DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Landscape heterogeneity reduces coyote predation on white-tailed deer fawns

Abstract

Coyote (Canis latrans) predation on white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) fawns in southeastern North America has led to deer population declines in some areas. Research or management efforts initiated in response to coyote predation on fawns have primarily focused on implementation of reduced antlerless deer harvest or coyote control to mitigate population declines. Vegetation characteristics may influence coyote hunting efficiency, but the potential influence of land cover at large scales in the southeastern United States is underexplored. We investigated whether mortality risk was affected by landscape characteristics within fawn home ranges for a sample of 165 fawns on the United States Department of Energy’s Savannah River Site (SRS), South Carolina, 2007–2012. We monitored fawns every 8 hours to ≥ 4 weeks of age and 1–3 times daily to 12 weeks of age. We included only surviving or coyote-predated fawns in the dataset. The most supported model describing hazard ratios included the length of edge (i.e., area where 2 land cover types joined) in fawn home ranges. Probability of coyote predation increased 1.26 times for each 968-m decrease in edge within a fawn’s simulated home range (29.1-ha circular buffer) under this model. Further, fawns with the least edge in their home rangesmore » were >2 times more likely to be depredated by a coyote than fawns with the greatest edge availability. Support for other models was relatively low, but informative variables (e.g., mean patch fractal dimension, Shannon’s diversity index, mean forest patch size) supported a general trend that as fawn home ranges became more homogeneous and contained larger patches with less edge and fewer cover types, predation risk increased. These findings are consistent with similar work in the midwestern United States, despite landscape differences between regions. The combined weight of evidence suggests maintenance of a heterogeneous landscape consisting of relatively small dispersed patches may reduce fawn losses to coyotes. In conclusion, this information may also be used to identify areas susceptible to greater fawn predation rates across large spatial scales. However, the relatively long forestry rotation lengths and large scale of consistent forest management on the SRS are uncommon in the southeastern United States and the mechanism for the pattern we observed is unclear. Therefore, our results may not be applicable to sites with different forest management practices.« less

Authors:
 [1];  [2];  [2];  [3]
  1. Auburn Univ., AL (United States). School of Forestry and Wildlife Sciences
  2. USDA Forest Service, New Ellenton, SC (United States). Southern Research Station
  3. Savannah River Site (SRS), Aiken, SC (United States). Savannah River National Lab. (SRNL). Warnell School of Forestry and Natural Resources; Univ. of Georgia, Athens, GA (United States)
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Savannah River Site (SRS), New Ellenton, SC (United States). USDA Forest Service
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE Office of Environmental Management (EM), Office of Science and Technology (EM-50); United States Department of Agriculture (USDA)
OSTI Identifier:
1352537
Report Number(s):
17-01-p
Journal ID: ISSN 0022-541X; 17-01-p
Grant/Contract Number:  
AI09-00SR22188
Resource Type:
Accepted Manuscript
Journal Name:
Journal of Wildlife Management
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Volume: 81; Journal Issue: 4; Journal ID: ISSN 0022-541X
Publisher:
Wiley
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
60 APPLIED LIFE SCIENCES; 54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES; Canis latrans; coyote; fawn; habitat; Odocoileus virginianus; predation; survival; white-tailed deer

Citation Formats

Gulsby, William D., Kilgo, John C., Vukovich, Mark, and Martin, James A. Landscape heterogeneity reduces coyote predation on white-tailed deer fawns. United States: N. p., 2017. Web. doi:10.1002/jwmg.21240.
Gulsby, William D., Kilgo, John C., Vukovich, Mark, & Martin, James A. Landscape heterogeneity reduces coyote predation on white-tailed deer fawns. United States. https://doi.org/10.1002/jwmg.21240
Gulsby, William D., Kilgo, John C., Vukovich, Mark, and Martin, James A. Tue . "Landscape heterogeneity reduces coyote predation on white-tailed deer fawns". United States. https://doi.org/10.1002/jwmg.21240. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1352537.
@article{osti_1352537,
title = {Landscape heterogeneity reduces coyote predation on white-tailed deer fawns},
author = {Gulsby, William D. and Kilgo, John C. and Vukovich, Mark and Martin, James A.},
abstractNote = {Coyote (Canis latrans) predation on white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) fawns in southeastern North America has led to deer population declines in some areas. Research or management efforts initiated in response to coyote predation on fawns have primarily focused on implementation of reduced antlerless deer harvest or coyote control to mitigate population declines. Vegetation characteristics may influence coyote hunting efficiency, but the potential influence of land cover at large scales in the southeastern United States is underexplored. We investigated whether mortality risk was affected by landscape characteristics within fawn home ranges for a sample of 165 fawns on the United States Department of Energy’s Savannah River Site (SRS), South Carolina, 2007–2012. We monitored fawns every 8 hours to ≥ 4 weeks of age and 1–3 times daily to 12 weeks of age. We included only surviving or coyote-predated fawns in the dataset. The most supported model describing hazard ratios included the length of edge (i.e., area where 2 land cover types joined) in fawn home ranges. Probability of coyote predation increased 1.26 times for each 968-m decrease in edge within a fawn’s simulated home range (29.1-ha circular buffer) under this model. Further, fawns with the least edge in their home ranges were >2 times more likely to be depredated by a coyote than fawns with the greatest edge availability. Support for other models was relatively low, but informative variables (e.g., mean patch fractal dimension, Shannon’s diversity index, mean forest patch size) supported a general trend that as fawn home ranges became more homogeneous and contained larger patches with less edge and fewer cover types, predation risk increased. These findings are consistent with similar work in the midwestern United States, despite landscape differences between regions. The combined weight of evidence suggests maintenance of a heterogeneous landscape consisting of relatively small dispersed patches may reduce fawn losses to coyotes. In conclusion, this information may also be used to identify areas susceptible to greater fawn predation rates across large spatial scales. However, the relatively long forestry rotation lengths and large scale of consistent forest management on the SRS are uncommon in the southeastern United States and the mechanism for the pattern we observed is unclear. Therefore, our results may not be applicable to sites with different forest management practices.},
doi = {10.1002/jwmg.21240},
journal = {Journal of Wildlife Management},
number = 4,
volume = 81,
place = {United States},
year = {Tue Mar 07 00:00:00 EST 2017},
month = {Tue Mar 07 00:00:00 EST 2017}
}

Journal Article:
Free Publicly Available Full Text
Publisher's Version of Record

Citation Metrics:
Cited by: 34 works
Citation information provided by
Web of Science

Save / Share:

Works referenced in this record:

Predation by coyotes on white-tailed deer neonates in South Carolina
journal, May 2012

  • Kilgo, John C.; Ray, H. Scott; Vukovich, Mark
  • The Journal of Wildlife Management, Vol. 76, Issue 7
  • DOI: 10.1002/jwmg.393

Can managers compensate for coyote predation of white-tailed deer?: Coyotes and Deer
journal, April 2014

  • Robinson, Kelly F.; Diefenbach, Duane R.; Fuller, Angela K.
  • The Journal of Wildlife Management, Vol. 78, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1002/jwmg.693

Patch use as an indicator of habitat preference, predation risk, and competition
journal, January 1988

  • Brown, Joel S.
  • Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, Vol. 22, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1007/BF00395696

Habitat features associated with predation of New England cottontails: What scale is appropriate?
journal, June 1995

  • Brown, Anne L.; Litvaitis, John A.
  • Canadian Journal of Zoology, Vol. 73, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.1139/z95-120

simPH : An R Package for Illustrating Estimates from Cox Proportional Hazard Models Including for Interactive and Nonlinear Effects
journal, January 2015


Intrinsic and extrinsic factors influencing coyote predation of small mammals in Yellowstone National Park
journal, May 1996

  • Gese, Eric M.; Ruff, Robert L.; Crabtree, Robert L.
  • Canadian Journal of Zoology, Vol. 74, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.1139/z96-090

Space Use and Habitat Selection by Resident and Transient Coyotes (Canis latrans)
journal, July 2015


White-tailed deer fawn recruitment before and after experimental coyote removals in central Georgia: Fawn Recruitment Before and After Coyote Removal
journal, March 2015

  • Gulsby, William D.; Killmaster, Charlie H.; Bowers, John W.
  • Wildlife Society Bulletin, Vol. 39, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1002/wsb.534

Seasonal Food Habits of the Coyote in the South Carolina Coastal Plain
journal, March 2008


Coyote removal, understory cover, and survival of white-tailed deer neonates: Coyote Control and Fawn Survival
journal, August 2014

  • Kilgo, John C.; Vukovich, Mark; Scott Ray, H.
  • The Journal of Wildlife Management, Vol. 78, Issue 7
  • DOI: 10.1002/jwmg.764

Effect size, confidence interval and statistical significance: a practical guide for biologists
journal, November 2007


Home Range, Movements, and Habitat Use of Coyotes in Southcentral Georgia
journal, January 1992

  • Holzman, Stephen; Conroy, Michael J.; Pickering, John
  • The Journal of Wildlife Management, Vol. 56, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.2307/3808801

Survival Estimates of White-tailed Deer Fawns at Fort Rucker, Alabama
journal, July 2013


Survival of Neonatal White-Tailed Deer in an Exurban Population
journal, May 2007

  • Saalfeld, Sarah T.; Ditchkoff, Stephen S.
  • Journal of Wildlife Management, Vol. 71, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.2193/2006-116

Can Coyotes Affect Deer Populations in Southeastern North America?
journal, July 2010

  • Kilgo, John C.; Ray, H. Scott; Ruth, Charles
  • Journal of Wildlife Management, Vol. 74, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.2193/2009-263

Uninformative Parameters and Model Selection Using Akaike's Information Criterion
journal, August 2010


Cause-Specific Mortality and Survival of White-Tailed Deer Fawns in Southwestern Lower Michigan
journal, June 2006


Spatial-use patterns, movements, and interactions among adult coyotes in central Mississippi
journal, December 2000

  • Chamberlain, Michael J.; Lovell, Charles D.; Leopold, Bruce D.
  • Canadian Journal of Zoology, Vol. 78, Issue 12
  • DOI: 10.1139/z00-154

The low performance of forest versus rural coyotes in northeastern North America: Inequality between presence and availability of prey
journal, January 2002


Interspecific variation in antipredator behaviour leads to differential vulnerability of mule deer and white-tailed deer fawns early in life
journal, November 2005


Avian Nest Dispersion and Fledging Success in Field-Forest Ecotones
journal, August 1978

  • Gates, J. Edward; Gysel, Leslie W.
  • Ecology, Vol. 59, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.2307/1938540

Maternal Defense in Columbian White-Tailed Deer: When is it Worth it?
journal, August 1987

  • Smith, Winston Paul
  • The American Naturalist, Vol. 130, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1086/284712

Do Biological and Bedsite Characteristics Influence Survival of Neonatal White-Tailed Deer?
journal, March 2015


Observations of Interspecific Behavior between Predators and White-Tailed Deer in Southwestern Oklahoma
journal, February 1980

  • Garner, G. W.; Morrison, J. A.
  • Journal of Mammalogy, Vol. 61, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.2307/1379968

Guidelines of the American Society of Mammalogists for the use of wild mammals in research
journal, February 2011


Survival of white-tailed deer fawns in the grasslands of the northern Great Plains
journal, January 2012

  • Grovenburg, Troy W.; Klaver, Robert W.; Jenks, Jonathan A.
  • The Journal of Wildlife Management, Vol. 76, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.1002/jwmg.339

Factors affecting survival of adult female white-tailed deer after coyote establishment in south Carolina: Adult Female Deer Survival
journal, November 2016

  • Kilgo, John C.; Vukovich, Mark; Conroy, Michael J.
  • Wildlife Society Bulletin, Vol. 40, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1002/wsb.708

Animal Activity in Uncontrolled Terrestrial Communities as Determined by a Sand Transect Technique
journal, February 1968

  • Bider, J. Roger
  • Ecological Monographs, Vol. 38, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.2307/1948530

White-tailed deer population dynamics and adult female survival in the presence of a novel predator: Deer Population Dynamics
journal, February 2015

  • Chitwood, Michael C.; Lashley, Marcus A.; Kilgo, John C.
  • The Journal of Wildlife Management, Vol. 79, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1002/jwmg.835

A comparison of forest resource inventory, provincial land cover maps and field surveys for wildlife habitat analysis in the Great Lakes – St. Lawrence forest
journal, February 2010

  • Maxie, Andrea J.; Hussey, Karen F.; Lowe, Stacey J.
  • The Forestry Chronicle, Vol. 86, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.5558/tfc86077-1

Variation in Coyote Diets Associated with Season and Successional Changes in Vegetation
journal, April 1987

  • Andelt, William F.; Kie, John G.; Knowlton, Frederick F.
  • The Journal of Wildlife Management, Vol. 51, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.2307/3801002

Survival of White-Tailed Deer Fawns in Southern Illinois
journal, May 2007

  • Rohm, John H.; Nielsen, Clayton K.; Woolf, Alan
  • Journal of Wildlife Management, Vol. 71, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.2193/2006-027

Modeling Survival Data: Extending the Cox Model
book, January 2000


Modeling Survival Data: Extending the Cox Model
journal, February 2002


Uninformative Parameters and Model Selection Using Akaike's Information Criterion
journal, August 2010

  • Arnold, Todd W.
  • Journal of Wildlife Management, Vol. 74, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.2193/2009-367

Guidelines of the American Society of Mammalogists for the Use of Wild Mammals in Research
journal, June 2007


Works referencing / citing this record:

Landscape-level patterns in fawn survival across North America: Landscape-Level Patterns in Fawn Survival
journal, April 2018

  • Gingery, Tess M.; Diefenbach, Duane R.; Wallingford, Bret D.
  • The Journal of Wildlife Management, Vol. 82, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.1002/jwmg.21456

Association of moose parturition and post-parturition habitat with calf survival: Moose Parturition Habitat and Calf Survival
journal, September 2018

  • Severud, William J.; DelGiudice, Glenn D.; Obermoller, Tyler R.
  • The Journal of Wildlife Management, Vol. 83, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1002/jwmg.21570

Home range size, vegetation density, and season influences prey use by coyotes (Canis latrans)
journal, October 2018