DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Mapping and simulating systematics due to spatially varying observing conditions in DES science verification data

Abstract

Spatially-varying depth and characteristics of observing conditions, such as seeing, airmass, or sky background, are major sources of systematic uncertainties in modern galaxy survey analyses, in particular in deep multi-epoch surveys. We present a framework to extract and project these sources of systematics onto the sky, and apply it to the Dark Energy Survey (DES) to map the observing conditions of the Science Verification (SV) data. The resulting distributions and maps of sources of systematics are used in several analyses of DES SV to perform detailed null tests with the data, and also to incorporate systematics in survey simulations. We illustrate the complementarity of these two approaches by comparing the SV data with the BCC-UFig, a synthetic sky catalogue generated by forward-modelling of the DES SV images. We then analyse the BCC-UFig simulation to construct galaxy samples mimicking those used in SV galaxy clustering studies. We show that the spatially-varying survey depth imprinted in the observed galaxy densities and the redshift distributions of the SV data are successfully reproduced by the simulation and well-captured by the maps of observing conditions. The combined use of the maps, the SV data and the BCC-UFig simulation allows us to quantify the impact ofmore » spatial systematics on N(z), the redshift distributions inferred using photometric redshifts. We conclude that spatial systematics in the SV data are mainly due to seeing fluctuations and are under control in current clustering and weak lensing analyses. However, they will need to be carefully characterised in upcoming phases of DES in order to avoid biasing the inferred cosmological results. The framework presented is relevant to all multi-epoch surveys, and will be essential for exploiting future surveys such as the Large Synoptic Survey Telescope, which will require detailed null-tests and realistic end-to-end image simulations to correctly interpret the deep, high-cadence observations of the sky.« less

Authors:
ORCiD logo; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ORCiD logo; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; more »; ; ; ORCiD logo; ORCiD logo; ; ; ; ; ; ORCiD logo; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ORCiD logo; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ORCiD logo; ; ORCiD logo; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ORCiD logo; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ORCiD logo; ORCiD logo; ; ; ; ; ; ; « less
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
SLAC National Accelerator Lab., Menlo Park, CA (United States); Argonne National Lab. (ANL), Argonne, IL (United States); Fermi National Accelerator Lab. (FNAL), Batavia, IL (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE Office of Science (SC), High Energy Physics (HEP)
Contributing Org.:
DES Collaboration; DES
OSTI Identifier:
1348239
Alternate Identifier(s):
OSTI ID: 1223239
Report Number(s):
FERMILAB-PUB-15-310-A-AE; arXiv:1507.05647
Journal ID: ISSN 1538-4365; TRN: US1701511
Grant/Contract Number:  
AC02-76SF00515; AC02-07CH11359
Resource Type:
Accepted Manuscript
Journal Name:
The Astrophysical Journal. Supplement Series (Online)
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Name: The Astrophysical Journal. Supplement Series (Online); Journal Volume: 226; Journal Issue: 2; Journal ID: ISSN 1538-4365
Publisher:
American Astronomical Society/IOP
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
79 ASTRONOMY AND ASTROPHYSICS; cosmology: observations; galaxies: distances and redshifts; galaxies: statistics; large-scale structure of universe; precision cosmology; galaxy surveys; spatial systematics; image simulations

Citation Formats

Leistedt, B., Peiris, H. V., Elsner, F., Benoit-Lévy, A., Amara, A., Bauer, A. H., Becker, M. R., Bonnett, C., Bruderer, C., Busha, M. T., Kind, M. Carrasco, Chang, C., Crocce, M., da Costa, L. N., Gaztanaga, E., Huff, E. M., Lahav, O., Palmese, A., Percival, W. J., Refregier, A., Ross, A. J., Rozo, E., Rykoff, E. S., Sánchez, C., Sadeh, I., Sevilla-Noarbe, I., Sobreira, F., Suchyta, E., Swanson, M. E. C., Wechsler, R. H., Abdalla, F. B., Allam, S., Banerji, M., Bernstein, G. M., Bernstein, R. A., Bertin, E., Bridle, S. L., Brooks, D., Buckley-Geer, E., Burke, D. L., Capozzi, D., Rosell, A. Carnero, Carretero, J., Cunha, C. E., D’Andrea, C. B., DePoy, D. L., Desai, S., Diehl, H. T., Doel, P., Eifler, T. F., Evrard, A. E., Neto, A. Fausti, Flaugher, B., Fosalba, P., Frieman, J., Gerdes, D. W., Gruen, D., Gruendl, R. A., Gutierrez, G., Honscheid, K., James, D. J., Jarvis, M., Kent, S., Kuehn, K., Kuropatkin, N., Li, T. S., Lima, M., Maia, M. A. G., March, M., Marshall, J. L., Martini, P., Melchior, P., Miller, C. J., Miquel, R., Nichol, R. C., Nord, B., Ogando, R., Plazas, A. A., Reil, K., Romer, A. K., Roodman, A., Sanchez, E., Santiago, B., Scarpine, V., Schubnell, M., Smith, R. C., Soares-Santos, M., Tarle, G., Thaler, J., Thomas, D., Vikram, V., Walker, A. R., Wester, W., Zhang, Y., and Zuntz, J. Mapping and simulating systematics due to spatially varying observing conditions in DES science verification data. United States: N. p., 2016. Web. doi:10.3847/0067-0049/226/2/24.
Leistedt, B., Peiris, H. V., Elsner, F., Benoit-Lévy, A., Amara, A., Bauer, A. H., Becker, M. R., Bonnett, C., Bruderer, C., Busha, M. T., Kind, M. Carrasco, Chang, C., Crocce, M., da Costa, L. N., Gaztanaga, E., Huff, E. M., Lahav, O., Palmese, A., Percival, W. J., Refregier, A., Ross, A. J., Rozo, E., Rykoff, E. S., Sánchez, C., Sadeh, I., Sevilla-Noarbe, I., Sobreira, F., Suchyta, E., Swanson, M. E. C., Wechsler, R. H., Abdalla, F. B., Allam, S., Banerji, M., Bernstein, G. M., Bernstein, R. A., Bertin, E., Bridle, S. L., Brooks, D., Buckley-Geer, E., Burke, D. L., Capozzi, D., Rosell, A. Carnero, Carretero, J., Cunha, C. E., D’Andrea, C. B., DePoy, D. L., Desai, S., Diehl, H. T., Doel, P., Eifler, T. F., Evrard, A. E., Neto, A. Fausti, Flaugher, B., Fosalba, P., Frieman, J., Gerdes, D. W., Gruen, D., Gruendl, R. A., Gutierrez, G., Honscheid, K., James, D. J., Jarvis, M., Kent, S., Kuehn, K., Kuropatkin, N., Li, T. S., Lima, M., Maia, M. A. G., March, M., Marshall, J. L., Martini, P., Melchior, P., Miller, C. J., Miquel, R., Nichol, R. C., Nord, B., Ogando, R., Plazas, A. A., Reil, K., Romer, A. K., Roodman, A., Sanchez, E., Santiago, B., Scarpine, V., Schubnell, M., Smith, R. C., Soares-Santos, M., Tarle, G., Thaler, J., Thomas, D., Vikram, V., Walker, A. R., Wester, W., Zhang, Y., & Zuntz, J. Mapping and simulating systematics due to spatially varying observing conditions in DES science verification data. United States. https://doi.org/10.3847/0067-0049/226/2/24
Leistedt, B., Peiris, H. V., Elsner, F., Benoit-Lévy, A., Amara, A., Bauer, A. H., Becker, M. R., Bonnett, C., Bruderer, C., Busha, M. T., Kind, M. Carrasco, Chang, C., Crocce, M., da Costa, L. N., Gaztanaga, E., Huff, E. M., Lahav, O., Palmese, A., Percival, W. J., Refregier, A., Ross, A. J., Rozo, E., Rykoff, E. S., Sánchez, C., Sadeh, I., Sevilla-Noarbe, I., Sobreira, F., Suchyta, E., Swanson, M. E. C., Wechsler, R. H., Abdalla, F. B., Allam, S., Banerji, M., Bernstein, G. M., Bernstein, R. A., Bertin, E., Bridle, S. L., Brooks, D., Buckley-Geer, E., Burke, D. L., Capozzi, D., Rosell, A. Carnero, Carretero, J., Cunha, C. E., D’Andrea, C. B., DePoy, D. L., Desai, S., Diehl, H. T., Doel, P., Eifler, T. F., Evrard, A. E., Neto, A. Fausti, Flaugher, B., Fosalba, P., Frieman, J., Gerdes, D. W., Gruen, D., Gruendl, R. A., Gutierrez, G., Honscheid, K., James, D. J., Jarvis, M., Kent, S., Kuehn, K., Kuropatkin, N., Li, T. S., Lima, M., Maia, M. A. G., March, M., Marshall, J. L., Martini, P., Melchior, P., Miller, C. J., Miquel, R., Nichol, R. C., Nord, B., Ogando, R., Plazas, A. A., Reil, K., Romer, A. K., Roodman, A., Sanchez, E., Santiago, B., Scarpine, V., Schubnell, M., Smith, R. C., Soares-Santos, M., Tarle, G., Thaler, J., Thomas, D., Vikram, V., Walker, A. R., Wester, W., Zhang, Y., and Zuntz, J. Mon . "Mapping and simulating systematics due to spatially varying observing conditions in DES science verification data". United States. https://doi.org/10.3847/0067-0049/226/2/24. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1348239.
@article{osti_1348239,
title = {Mapping and simulating systematics due to spatially varying observing conditions in DES science verification data},
author = {Leistedt, B. and Peiris, H. V. and Elsner, F. and Benoit-Lévy, A. and Amara, A. and Bauer, A. H. and Becker, M. R. and Bonnett, C. and Bruderer, C. and Busha, M. T. and Kind, M. Carrasco and Chang, C. and Crocce, M. and da Costa, L. N. and Gaztanaga, E. and Huff, E. M. and Lahav, O. and Palmese, A. and Percival, W. J. and Refregier, A. and Ross, A. J. and Rozo, E. and Rykoff, E. S. and Sánchez, C. and Sadeh, I. and Sevilla-Noarbe, I. and Sobreira, F. and Suchyta, E. and Swanson, M. E. C. and Wechsler, R. H. and Abdalla, F. B. and Allam, S. and Banerji, M. and Bernstein, G. M. and Bernstein, R. A. and Bertin, E. and Bridle, S. L. and Brooks, D. and Buckley-Geer, E. and Burke, D. L. and Capozzi, D. and Rosell, A. Carnero and Carretero, J. and Cunha, C. E. and D’Andrea, C. B. and DePoy, D. L. and Desai, S. and Diehl, H. T. and Doel, P. and Eifler, T. F. and Evrard, A. E. and Neto, A. Fausti and Flaugher, B. and Fosalba, P. and Frieman, J. and Gerdes, D. W. and Gruen, D. and Gruendl, R. A. and Gutierrez, G. and Honscheid, K. and James, D. J. and Jarvis, M. and Kent, S. and Kuehn, K. and Kuropatkin, N. and Li, T. S. and Lima, M. and Maia, M. A. G. and March, M. and Marshall, J. L. and Martini, P. and Melchior, P. and Miller, C. J. and Miquel, R. and Nichol, R. C. and Nord, B. and Ogando, R. and Plazas, A. A. and Reil, K. and Romer, A. K. and Roodman, A. and Sanchez, E. and Santiago, B. and Scarpine, V. and Schubnell, M. and Smith, R. C. and Soares-Santos, M. and Tarle, G. and Thaler, J. and Thomas, D. and Vikram, V. and Walker, A. R. and Wester, W. and Zhang, Y. and Zuntz, J.},
abstractNote = {Spatially-varying depth and characteristics of observing conditions, such as seeing, airmass, or sky background, are major sources of systematic uncertainties in modern galaxy survey analyses, in particular in deep multi-epoch surveys. We present a framework to extract and project these sources of systematics onto the sky, and apply it to the Dark Energy Survey (DES) to map the observing conditions of the Science Verification (SV) data. The resulting distributions and maps of sources of systematics are used in several analyses of DES SV to perform detailed null tests with the data, and also to incorporate systematics in survey simulations. We illustrate the complementarity of these two approaches by comparing the SV data with the BCC-UFig, a synthetic sky catalogue generated by forward-modelling of the DES SV images. We then analyse the BCC-UFig simulation to construct galaxy samples mimicking those used in SV galaxy clustering studies. We show that the spatially-varying survey depth imprinted in the observed galaxy densities and the redshift distributions of the SV data are successfully reproduced by the simulation and well-captured by the maps of observing conditions. The combined use of the maps, the SV data and the BCC-UFig simulation allows us to quantify the impact of spatial systematics on N(z), the redshift distributions inferred using photometric redshifts. We conclude that spatial systematics in the SV data are mainly due to seeing fluctuations and are under control in current clustering and weak lensing analyses. However, they will need to be carefully characterised in upcoming phases of DES in order to avoid biasing the inferred cosmological results. The framework presented is relevant to all multi-epoch surveys, and will be essential for exploiting future surveys such as the Large Synoptic Survey Telescope, which will require detailed null-tests and realistic end-to-end image simulations to correctly interpret the deep, high-cadence observations of the sky.},
doi = {10.3847/0067-0049/226/2/24},
journal = {The Astrophysical Journal. Supplement Series (Online)},
number = 2,
volume = 226,
place = {United States},
year = {Mon Oct 17 00:00:00 EDT 2016},
month = {Mon Oct 17 00:00:00 EDT 2016}
}

Journal Article:
Free Publicly Available Full Text
Publisher's Version of Record

Citation Metrics:
Cited by: 40 works
Citation information provided by
Web of Science

Save / Share:

Works referenced in this record:

Planck 2013 results. XII. Diffuse component separation
journal, October 2014


Characterizing unknown systematics in large scale structure surveys
journal, April 2014

  • Agarwal, Nishant; Ho, Shirley; Myers, Adam D.
  • Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, Vol. 2014, Issue 04
  • DOI: 10.1088/1475-7516/2014/04/007

Bayesian Photometric Redshift Estimation
journal, June 2000

  • Benitez, Narciso
  • The Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 536, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1086/308947

An Ultra Fast Image Generator (UFig) for wide-field astronomy
journal, February 2013


SExtractor: Software for source extraction
journal, June 1996

  • Bertin, E.; Arnouts, S.
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics Supplement Series, Vol. 117, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1051/aas:1996164

The WiggleZ Dark Energy Survey: the selection function and z= 0.6 galaxy power spectrum: WiggleZ survey: selection function
journal, May 2010


Representations of celestial coordinates in FITS
journal, November 2002


TPZ: photometric redshift PDFs and ancillary information by using prediction trees and random forests
journal, May 2013

  • Carrasco Kind, Matias; Brunner, Robert J.
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 432, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stt574

Exhausting the information: novel Bayesian combination of photometric redshift PDFs
journal, June 2014

  • Carrasco Kind, Matias; Brunner, Robert J.
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 442, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stu1098

Improving the LSST dithering pattern and cadence for dark energy studies
conference, August 2014

  • Carroll, Christopher M.; Gawiser, Eric; Kurczynski, Peter L.
  • SPIE Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation, SPIE Proceedings
  • DOI: 10.1117/12.2057267

Galaxies in the Hubble Ultra Deep Field. I. Detection, Multiband Photometry, Photometric Redshifts, and Morphology
journal, July 2006

  • Coe, Dan; Benítez, Narciso; Sánchez, Sebastián F.
  • The Astronomical Journal, Vol. 132, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1086/505530

Galaxy clustering, photometric redshifts and diagnosis of systematics in the DES Science Verification data
journal, December 2015

  • Crocce, M.; Carretero, J.; Bauer, A. H.
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 455, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stv2590

The Blanco Cosmology Survey: data Acquisition, Processing, Calibration, Quality Diagnostics, and data Release
journal, September 2012


CMB lensing tomography with the DES Science Verification galaxies
journal, January 2016

  • Giannantonio, T.; Fosalba, P.; Cawthon, R.
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 456, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stv2678

HEALPix: A Framework for High‐Resolution Discretization and Fast Analysis of Data Distributed on the Sphere
journal, April 2005

  • Gorski, K. M.; Hivon, E.; Banday, A. J.
  • The Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 622, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1086/427976

The 2.5 m Telescope of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey
journal, April 2006

  • Gunn, James E.; Siegmund, Walter A.; Mannery, Edward J.
  • The Astronomical Journal, Vol. 131, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1086/500975

A scheme to deal accurately and efficiently with complex angular masks in galaxy surveys
journal, March 2004


Clustering of Sloan Digital sky Survey iii Photometric Luminous Galaxies: the Measurement, Systematics, and Cosmological Implications
journal, November 2012


Toward Precision LSST Weak-Lensing Measurement. I. Impacts of Atmospheric Turbulence and Optical Aberration
journal, May 2011

  • Jee, M. James; Tyson, J. Anthony
  • Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, Vol. 123, Issue 903
  • DOI: 10.1086/660137

Exploiting the full potential of photometric quasar surveys: optimal power spectra through blind mitigation of systematics
journal, August 2014

  • Leistedt, Boris; Peiris, Hiranya V.
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 444, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stu1439

Estimating the large-scale angular power spectrum in the presence of systematics: a case study of Sloan Digital Sky Survey quasars
journal, September 2013

  • Leistedt, Boris; Peiris, Hiranya V.; Mortlock, Daniel J.
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 435, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stt1359

The APM Galaxy Survey -- III. An analysis of systematic errors in the angular correlation function and cosmological implications
journal, December 1996

  • Maddox, S. J.; Efstathiou, G.; Sutherland, W. J.
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 283, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/283.4.1227

Mass and galaxy distributions of four massive galaxy clusters from Dark Energy Survey Science Verification data
journal, March 2015

  • Melchior, P.; Suchyta, E.; Huff, E.
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 449, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stv398

The Dark Energy Survey data processing and calibration system
conference, September 2012

  • Mohr, Joseph J.; Armstrong, Robert; Bertin, Emmanuel
  • SPIE Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation, SPIE Proceedings
  • DOI: 10.1117/12.926785

Ameliorating systematic uncertainties in the angular clustering of galaxies: a study using the SDSS-III: Ameliorating systematic uncertainties in w(θ)
journal, September 2011


The clustering of galaxies in the SDSS-III Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: analysis of potential systematics: Systematic analysis of BOSS 3D clustering
journal, June 2012

  • Ross, Ashley J.; Percival, Will J.; Sánchez, Ariel G.
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 424, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21235.x

Photometric redshift analysis in the Dark Energy Survey Science Verification data
journal, October 2014

  • Sánchez, C.; Carrasco Kind, M.; Lin, H.
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 445, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stu1836

Analysis of Systematic Effects and Statistical Uncertainties in Angular Clustering of Galaxies from Early Sloan Digital Sky Survey Data
journal, November 2002

  • Scranton, Ryan; Johnston, David; Dodelson, Scott
  • The Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 579, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1086/342786

Exact likelihood evaluations and foreground marginalization in low resolution WMAP data
journal, June 2004


No galaxy left behind: accurate measurements with the faintest objects in the Dark Energy Survey
journal, January 2016

  • Suchyta, E.; Huff, E. M.; Aleksić, J.
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 457, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stv2953

Methods for rapidly processing angular masks of next-generation galaxy surveys
journal, July 2008

  • Swanson, M. E. C.; Tegmark, Max; Hamilton, Andrew J. S.
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 387, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13296.x

How to measure CMB power spectra without losing information
journal, May 1997


Measuring the Galaxy Power Spectrum with Future Redshift Surveys
journal, June 1998

  • Tegmark, Max; Hamilton, Andrew J. S.; Strauss, Michael A.
  • The Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 499, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1086/305663

Works referencing / citing this record:

ICE-COLA: fast simulations for weak lensing observables
journal, October 2017

  • Izard, Albert; Fosalba, Pablo; Crocce, Martin
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 473, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stx2544

Large-scale retrospective relative spectrophotometric self-calibration in space
journal, February 2017

  • Markovič, Katarina; Percival, Will J.; Scodeggio, Marco
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 467, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stx283

A catalogue of structural and morphological measurements for DES Y1
journal, July 2018

  • Tarsitano, F.; Hartley, W. G.; Amara, A.
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 481, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/sty1970

Measuring linear and non-linear galaxy bias using counts-in-cells in the Dark Energy Survey Science Verification data
journal, October 2018

  • Salvador, A. I.; Sánchez, F. J.; Pagul, A.
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 482, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/sty2802

Weak lensing magnification in the Dark Energy Survey Science Verification data
journal, February 2018

  • Garcia-Fernandez, M.; Sanchez, E.; Sevilla-Noarbe, I.
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 476, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/sty282

A unified pseudo- C ℓ framework
journal, January 2019

  • Alonso, David; Sanchez, Javier; Slosar, Anže
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 484, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stz093

Galaxies in X-ray selected clusters and groups in Dark Energy Survey data – II. Hierarchical Bayesian modelling of the red-sequence galaxy luminosity function
journal, June 2019

  • Zhang, Y.; Miller, C. J.; Rooney, P.
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 488, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stz1612

Dark Energy Survey Year 1 results: constraints on intrinsic alignments and their colour dependence from galaxy clustering and weak lensing
journal, August 2019

  • Samuroff, S.; Blazek, J.; Troxel, M. A.
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 489, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stz2197

Producing a BOSS CMASS sample with DES imaging
journal, September 2019

  • Lee, S.; Huff, E. M.; Ross, A. J.
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 489, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stz2288

Constraints on Cosmology and Baryonic Feedback with the Deep Lens Survey Using Galaxy–Galaxy and Galaxy–Mass Power Spectra
journal, January 2019

  • Yoon, Mijin; James Jee, M.; Anthony Tyson, J.
  • The Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 870, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/aaf3a9

Hierarchical Modeling and Statistical Calibration for Photometric Redshifts
journal, August 2019

  • Leistedt, Boris; Hogg, David W.; Wechsler, Risa H.
  • The Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 881, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab2d29

Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: The Photometric Data Set for Cosmology
journal, April 2018

  • Drlica-Wagner, A.; Sevilla-Noarbe, I.; Rykoff, E. S.
  • The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, Vol. 235, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.3847/1538-4365/aab4f5

Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Photometric Data Set for Cosmology
text, January 2018

  • Drlica-Wagner, A.; Sevilla-Noarbe, I.; Rykoff, Es
  • Apollo - University of Cambridge Repository
  • DOI: 10.17863/cam.21145

Large-scale retrospective relative spectro-photometric self-calibration in space
text, January 2016


ICE-COLA: fast simulations for weak lensing observables
text, January 2017


Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Photometric Data Set for Cosmology
text, January 2017


Hierarchical modeling and statistical calibration for photometric redshifts
text, January 2018


A catalogue of structural and morphological measurements for DES Y1
text, January 2018


Producing a BOSS-CMASS sample with DES imaging
text, January 2019