DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Comparison of monoenergetic photon organ dose rate coefficients for stylized and voxel phantoms submerged in air

Abstract

As part of a broader effort to calculate effective dose rate coefficients for external exposure to photons and electrons emitted by radionuclides distributed in air, soil or water, age-specific stylized phantoms have been employed to determine dose coefficients relating dose rate to organs and tissues in the body. In this article, dose rate coefficients computed using the International Commission on Radiological Protection reference adult male voxel phantom are compared with values computed using the Oak Ridge National Laboratory adult male stylized phantom in an air submersion exposure geometry. Monte Carlo calculations for both phantoms were performed for monoenergetic source photons in the range of 30 keV to 5 MeV. Furthermore, these calculations largely result in differences under 10 % for photon energies above 50 keV, and it can be expected that both models show comparable results for the environmental sources of radionuclides.

Authors:
 [1];  [1];  [1];  [2];  [1];  [2];  [2];  [3]
  1. Oak Ridge National Lab. (ORNL), Oak Ridge, TN (United States)
  2. Easterly Scientific, Knoxville, TN (United States)
  3. Oak Ridge National Lab. (ORNL), Oak Ridge, TN (United States); Georgia Inst. of Technology, Atlanta, GA (United States)
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Oak Ridge National Lab. (ORNL), Oak Ridge, TN (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
Work for Others (WFO); USDOE
OSTI Identifier:
1338489
Grant/Contract Number:  
AC05-00OR22725
Resource Type:
Accepted Manuscript
Journal Name:
Radiation Protection Dosimetry
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Volume: 172; Journal Issue: 4; Journal ID: ISSN 0144-8420
Publisher:
Oxford University Press
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
38 RADIATION CHEMISTRY, RADIOCHEMISTRY, AND NUCLEAR CHEMISTRY

Citation Formats

Bellamy, Michael B., Hiller, Mauritius M., Dewji, Shaheen A., Veinot, Kenneth G., Leggett, Richard Wayne, Eckerman, Keith F., Easterly, Clay E., and Hertel, Nolan E. Comparison of monoenergetic photon organ dose rate coefficients for stylized and voxel phantoms submerged in air. United States: N. p., 2016. Web. doi:10.1093/rpd/ncv548.
Bellamy, Michael B., Hiller, Mauritius M., Dewji, Shaheen A., Veinot, Kenneth G., Leggett, Richard Wayne, Eckerman, Keith F., Easterly, Clay E., & Hertel, Nolan E. Comparison of monoenergetic photon organ dose rate coefficients for stylized and voxel phantoms submerged in air. United States. https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncv548
Bellamy, Michael B., Hiller, Mauritius M., Dewji, Shaheen A., Veinot, Kenneth G., Leggett, Richard Wayne, Eckerman, Keith F., Easterly, Clay E., and Hertel, Nolan E. Mon . "Comparison of monoenergetic photon organ dose rate coefficients for stylized and voxel phantoms submerged in air". United States. https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncv548. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1338489.
@article{osti_1338489,
title = {Comparison of monoenergetic photon organ dose rate coefficients for stylized and voxel phantoms submerged in air},
author = {Bellamy, Michael B. and Hiller, Mauritius M. and Dewji, Shaheen A. and Veinot, Kenneth G. and Leggett, Richard Wayne and Eckerman, Keith F. and Easterly, Clay E. and Hertel, Nolan E.},
abstractNote = {As part of a broader effort to calculate effective dose rate coefficients for external exposure to photons and electrons emitted by radionuclides distributed in air, soil or water, age-specific stylized phantoms have been employed to determine dose coefficients relating dose rate to organs and tissues in the body. In this article, dose rate coefficients computed using the International Commission on Radiological Protection reference adult male voxel phantom are compared with values computed using the Oak Ridge National Laboratory adult male stylized phantom in an air submersion exposure geometry. Monte Carlo calculations for both phantoms were performed for monoenergetic source photons in the range of 30 keV to 5 MeV. Furthermore, these calculations largely result in differences under 10 % for photon energies above 50 keV, and it can be expected that both models show comparable results for the environmental sources of radionuclides.},
doi = {10.1093/rpd/ncv548},
journal = {Radiation Protection Dosimetry},
number = 4,
volume = 172,
place = {United States},
year = {Mon Feb 01 00:00:00 EST 2016},
month = {Mon Feb 01 00:00:00 EST 2016}
}

Journal Article:
Free Publicly Available Full Text
Publisher's Version of Record

Citation Metrics:
Cited by: 13 works
Citation information provided by
Web of Science

Save / Share:

Works referenced in this record:

Revisions to the ornl Series of Adult and Pediatric Computational Phantoms for use with the mird Schema
journal, January 2006


Absorbed Gamma Dose Rate for Immersion in a Semi-infinite Radioactive Cloud
journal, January 1974


A Model for Exposure to a Semi-Infinite Cloud of a Photon Emitter
journal, January 1974


Dose-rate Conversion Factors for External Exposure to Photons and Electrons
journal, January 1983


Comparison between effective doses for voxel-based and stylized exposure models from photon and electron irradiation
journal, October 2005


Age-dependent organ and effective dose coefficients for external photons: a comparison of stylized and voxel-based paediatric phantoms
journal, September 2006


MAX meets ADAM: a dosimetric comparison between a voxel-based and a mathematical model for external exposure to photons
journal, February 2004


Works referencing / citing this record:

Comparison of neutron organ and effective dose coefficients for PIMAL stylized phantom in bent postures in standard irradiation geometries
journal, August 2018


Age-dependent comparison of monoenergetic photon organ and effective dose coefficients for pediatric stylized and voxel phantoms submerged in air
journal, September 2018

  • Dewji, Shaheen Azim; Bales, Kathryn; Griffin, Keith
  • Physics in Medicine & Biology, Vol. 63, Issue 17
  • DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/aad64e