Best Bang for the Buck: Part 2 – Choosing Between Different Sized Designs
Abstract
Last month, we considered four potential designs of varying sizes and a variety of their attributes for an engineering problem involving a screening design with seven factors. The engineer’s original request was to find a design with 14 runs that could estimate all of the main effects, as well as have some potential for finding important two-factor interactions and possibly curvature in the underlying surface. This assessment was that the proposed size of design was potentially a bit too ambitious for the experiment’s goals, so we explored three other competing designs that had slightly larger sizes but were able to improve several aspects of the design.
- Authors:
-
- Los Alamos National Lab. (LANL), Los Alamos, NM (United States)
- Publication Date:
- Research Org.:
- Los Alamos National Lab. (LANL), Los Alamos, NM (United States)
- Sponsoring Org.:
- USDOE
- OSTI Identifier:
- 1337113
- Report Number(s):
- LA-UR-16-26819
Journal ID: ISSN 0033-524X
- Grant/Contract Number:
- AC52-06NA25396
- Resource Type:
- Accepted Manuscript
- Journal Name:
- Quality Progress
- Additional Journal Information:
- Journal Volume: 49; Journal Issue: 11; Journal ID: ISSN 0033-524X
- Publisher:
- American Society for Quality Control
- Country of Publication:
- United States
- Language:
- English
- Subject:
- 99 GENERAL AND MISCELLANEOUS; 97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING; Mathematics
Citation Formats
Anderson-Cook, Christine Michaela, and Lu, Lu. Best Bang for the Buck: Part 2 – Choosing Between Different Sized Designs. United States: N. p., 2016.
Web.
Anderson-Cook, Christine Michaela, & Lu, Lu. Best Bang for the Buck: Part 2 – Choosing Between Different Sized Designs. United States.
Anderson-Cook, Christine Michaela, and Lu, Lu. Tue .
"Best Bang for the Buck: Part 2 – Choosing Between Different Sized Designs". United States. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1337113.
@article{osti_1337113,
title = {Best Bang for the Buck: Part 2 – Choosing Between Different Sized Designs},
author = {Anderson-Cook, Christine Michaela and Lu, Lu},
abstractNote = {Last month, we considered four potential designs of varying sizes and a variety of their attributes for an engineering problem involving a screening design with seven factors. The engineer’s original request was to find a design with 14 runs that could estimate all of the main effects, as well as have some potential for finding important two-factor interactions and possibly curvature in the underlying surface. This assessment was that the proposed size of design was potentially a bit too ambitious for the experiment’s goals, so we explored three other competing designs that had slightly larger sizes but were able to improve several aspects of the design.},
doi = {},
journal = {Quality Progress},
number = 11,
volume = 49,
place = {United States},
year = {Tue Nov 01 00:00:00 EDT 2016},
month = {Tue Nov 01 00:00:00 EDT 2016}
}
Free Publicly Available Full Text
Publisher's Version of Record
The DOI is not currently available
Other availability
Save to My Library
You must Sign In or Create an Account in order to save documents to your library.