DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Evaluation of the aerosol vertical distribution in global aerosol models through comparison against CALIOP measurements: AeroCom phase II results

Abstract

The ability of 11 models in simulating the aerosol vertical distribution from regional to global scales, as part of the second phase of the AeroCom model intercomparison initiative (AeroCom II), is assessed herein and compared to results of the first phase. The evaluation is performed using a global monthly gridded data set of aerosol extinction profiles built for this purpose from the CALIOP (Cloud-Aerosol Lidar with Orthogonal Polarization) Layer Product 3.01. Results over 12 subcontinental regions show that five models improved, whereas three degraded in reproducing the interregional variability in Zα0–6 km, the mean extinction height diagnostic, as computed from the CALIOP aerosol profiles over the 0–6 km altitude range for each studied region and season. While the models' performance remains highly variable, the simulation of the timing of the Zα0–6 km peak season has also improved for all but two models from AeroCom Phase I to Phase II. The biases in Zα0–6 km are smaller in all regions except Central Atlantic, East Asia, and North and South Africa. Most of the models now underestimate Zα0–6 km over land, notably in the dust and biomass burning regions in Asia and Africa. At global scale, the AeroCom II models better reproducemore » the Zα0–6 km latitudinal variability over ocean than over land. Hypotheses for the performance and evolution of the individual models and for the intermodel diversity are discussed. We also provide an analysis of the CALIOP limitations and uncertainties contributing to the differences between the simulations and observations.« less

Authors:
 [1];  [2];  [3];  [1];  [2];  [2];  [4];  [3];  [5];  [6];  [7];  [8];  [9];  [1];  [10]; ORCiD logo [10];  [3];  [11];  [2];  [12] more »;  [13];  [14];  [9];  [2];  [14];  [9];  [15];  [16];  [17]; ORCiD logo [5];  [18];  [19];  [20] « less
  1. European Commission, Ispra (Italy). Joint Research Centre, Inst. for Environment and Sustainability
  2. Norwegian Meteorological Inst., Oslo (Norway)
  3. Lab. des Sciences du Climat et de l'Environnement, Gif-sur-Yvette (France)
  4. NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, VA (United States)
  5. Columbia Univ., New York, NY (United States); NASA Goddard Inst. for Space Studies (GISS), New York, NY (United States)
  6. Univ. of Reading, Reading (United Kingdom)
  7. Univ. of Oslo (Norway); Center for International Climate and Environmental Research-Oslo (CICERO), Oslo (Norway)
  8. NASA Goddard Space Flight Center (GSFC), Greenbelt, MD (United States); Univ. of Maryland Baltimore County (UMBC), Baltimore, MD (United States)
  9. NASA Goddard Space Flight Center (GSFC), Greenbelt, MD (United States)
  10. Pacific Northwest National Lab. (PNNL), Richland, WA (United States)
  11. Norwegian Meteorological Inst., Oslo (Norway); Univ. of Oslo (Norway)
  12. Pacific Northwest National Lab. (PNNL), Richland, WA (United States); Univ. of Wyoming, Laramie, WY (United States)
  13. ETH-Zentrum, Zürich (Switzerland)
  14. Center for International Climate and Environmental Research-Oslo (CICERO), Oslo (Norway)
  15. Univ. of Oxford (United Kingdom). Dept. of Physics
  16. Science Systems and Applications, Inc., Hampton, VA (United States)
  17. Kyushu Univ., Fukuoka (Japan)
  18. Lab. des Sciences du Climat et de l'Environnement, Gif-sur-Yvette (France); National Inst. for Agronomic Research, Thiverval-Grignon (France)
  19. Pacific Northwest National Lab. (PNNL), Richland, WA (United States); Gwangju Inst. of Science and Technology (Korea)
  20. Pacific Northwest National Lab. (PNNL), Richland, WA (United States); Max Planck Inst. for Meteorology, Hamburg (Germany)
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL), Richland, WA (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE Office of Science (SC), Advanced Scientific Computing Research (ASCR). Scientific Discovery through Advanced Computing (SciDAC); National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA); Research Council of Norway; European Commission (EC); Norwegian Space Center
OSTI Identifier:
1324897
Report Number(s):
PNNL-SA-114059
Journal ID: ISSN 2169-897X; KP1703020
Grant/Contract Number:  
AC05-76RL01830; SLAC; AEROCOM-P3; ClimSense
Resource Type:
Accepted Manuscript
Journal Name:
Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Volume: 121; Journal Issue: 12; Journal ID: ISSN 2169-897X
Publisher:
American Geophysical Union
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES; aerosol vertical profile; global climate models; AeroCom; CALIOP global extinction product

Citation Formats

Koffi, Brigitte, Schulz, Michael, Bréon, François-Marie, Dentener, Frank, Steensen, Birthe Marie, Griesfeller, Jan, Winker, David, Balkanski, Yves, Bauer, Susanne E., Bellouin, Nicolas, Berntsen, Terje, Bian, Huisheng, Chin, Mian, Diehl, Thomas, Easter, Richard, Ghan, Steven, Hauglustaine, Didier A., Iversen, Trond, Kirkevåg, Alf, Liu, Xiaohong, Lohmann, Ulrike, Myhre, Gunnar, Rasch, Phil, Seland, Øyvind, Skeie, Ragnhild B., Steenrod, Stephen D., Stier, Philip, Tackett, Jason, Takemura, Toshihiko, Tsigaridis, Kostas, Vuolo, Maria Raffaella, Yoon, Jinho, and Zhang, Kai. Evaluation of the aerosol vertical distribution in global aerosol models through comparison against CALIOP measurements: AeroCom phase II results. United States: N. p., 2016. Web. doi:10.1002/2015JD024639.
Koffi, Brigitte, Schulz, Michael, Bréon, François-Marie, Dentener, Frank, Steensen, Birthe Marie, Griesfeller, Jan, Winker, David, Balkanski, Yves, Bauer, Susanne E., Bellouin, Nicolas, Berntsen, Terje, Bian, Huisheng, Chin, Mian, Diehl, Thomas, Easter, Richard, Ghan, Steven, Hauglustaine, Didier A., Iversen, Trond, Kirkevåg, Alf, Liu, Xiaohong, Lohmann, Ulrike, Myhre, Gunnar, Rasch, Phil, Seland, Øyvind, Skeie, Ragnhild B., Steenrod, Stephen D., Stier, Philip, Tackett, Jason, Takemura, Toshihiko, Tsigaridis, Kostas, Vuolo, Maria Raffaella, Yoon, Jinho, & Zhang, Kai. Evaluation of the aerosol vertical distribution in global aerosol models through comparison against CALIOP measurements: AeroCom phase II results. United States. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD024639
Koffi, Brigitte, Schulz, Michael, Bréon, François-Marie, Dentener, Frank, Steensen, Birthe Marie, Griesfeller, Jan, Winker, David, Balkanski, Yves, Bauer, Susanne E., Bellouin, Nicolas, Berntsen, Terje, Bian, Huisheng, Chin, Mian, Diehl, Thomas, Easter, Richard, Ghan, Steven, Hauglustaine, Didier A., Iversen, Trond, Kirkevåg, Alf, Liu, Xiaohong, Lohmann, Ulrike, Myhre, Gunnar, Rasch, Phil, Seland, Øyvind, Skeie, Ragnhild B., Steenrod, Stephen D., Stier, Philip, Tackett, Jason, Takemura, Toshihiko, Tsigaridis, Kostas, Vuolo, Maria Raffaella, Yoon, Jinho, and Zhang, Kai. Mon . "Evaluation of the aerosol vertical distribution in global aerosol models through comparison against CALIOP measurements: AeroCom phase II results". United States. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD024639. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1324897.
@article{osti_1324897,
title = {Evaluation of the aerosol vertical distribution in global aerosol models through comparison against CALIOP measurements: AeroCom phase II results},
author = {Koffi, Brigitte and Schulz, Michael and Bréon, François-Marie and Dentener, Frank and Steensen, Birthe Marie and Griesfeller, Jan and Winker, David and Balkanski, Yves and Bauer, Susanne E. and Bellouin, Nicolas and Berntsen, Terje and Bian, Huisheng and Chin, Mian and Diehl, Thomas and Easter, Richard and Ghan, Steven and Hauglustaine, Didier A. and Iversen, Trond and Kirkevåg, Alf and Liu, Xiaohong and Lohmann, Ulrike and Myhre, Gunnar and Rasch, Phil and Seland, Øyvind and Skeie, Ragnhild B. and Steenrod, Stephen D. and Stier, Philip and Tackett, Jason and Takemura, Toshihiko and Tsigaridis, Kostas and Vuolo, Maria Raffaella and Yoon, Jinho and Zhang, Kai},
abstractNote = {The ability of 11 models in simulating the aerosol vertical distribution from regional to global scales, as part of the second phase of the AeroCom model intercomparison initiative (AeroCom II), is assessed herein and compared to results of the first phase. The evaluation is performed using a global monthly gridded data set of aerosol extinction profiles built for this purpose from the CALIOP (Cloud-Aerosol Lidar with Orthogonal Polarization) Layer Product 3.01. Results over 12 subcontinental regions show that five models improved, whereas three degraded in reproducing the interregional variability in Zα0–6 km, the mean extinction height diagnostic, as computed from the CALIOP aerosol profiles over the 0–6 km altitude range for each studied region and season. While the models' performance remains highly variable, the simulation of the timing of the Zα0–6 km peak season has also improved for all but two models from AeroCom Phase I to Phase II. The biases in Zα0–6 km are smaller in all regions except Central Atlantic, East Asia, and North and South Africa. Most of the models now underestimate Zα0–6 km over land, notably in the dust and biomass burning regions in Asia and Africa. At global scale, the AeroCom II models better reproduce the Zα0–6 km latitudinal variability over ocean than over land. Hypotheses for the performance and evolution of the individual models and for the intermodel diversity are discussed. We also provide an analysis of the CALIOP limitations and uncertainties contributing to the differences between the simulations and observations.},
doi = {10.1002/2015JD024639},
journal = {Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres},
number = 12,
volume = 121,
place = {United States},
year = {Mon Jun 27 00:00:00 EDT 2016},
month = {Mon Jun 27 00:00:00 EDT 2016}
}

Journal Article:
Free Publicly Available Full Text
Publisher's Version of Record

Citation Metrics:
Cited by: 68 works
Citation information provided by
Web of Science

Save / Share:

Works referenced in this record:

A simulation of the global distribution and radiative forcing of soil dust aerosols at the Last Glacial Maximum
journal, January 2009

  • Takemura, T.; Egashira, M.; Matsuzawa, K.
  • Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Vol. 9, Issue 9
  • DOI: 10.5194/acp-9-3061-2009

The effect of harmonized emissions on aerosol properties in global models – an AeroCom experiment
journal, January 2007

  • Textor, C.; Schulz, M.; Guibert, S.
  • Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Vol. 7, Issue 17
  • DOI: 10.5194/acp-7-4489-2007

Uncertainties and importance of sea spray composition on aerosol direct and indirect effects: IMPORTANCE OF SEA-SPRAY COMPOSITION
journal, January 2013

  • Tsigaridis, Kostas; Koch, Dorothy; Menon, Surabi
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, Vol. 118, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1029/2012JD018165

Global dust model intercomparison in AeroCom phase I
journal, January 2011

  • Huneeus, N.; Schulz, M.; Balkanski, Y.
  • Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Vol. 11, Issue 15
  • DOI: 10.5194/acp-11-7781-2011

Cloud microphysics and aerosol indirect effects in the global climate model ECHAM5-HAM
journal, January 2007

  • Lohmann, U.; Stier, P.; Hoose, C.
  • Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Vol. 7, Issue 13
  • DOI: 10.5194/acp-7-3425-2007

CALIPSO/CALIOP Cloud Phase Discrimination Algorithm
journal, November 2009

  • Hu, Yongxiang; Winker, David; Vaughan, Mark
  • Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, Vol. 26, Issue 11
  • DOI: 10.1175/2009JTECHA1280.1

Aerosol-climate interactions in the CAM-Oslo atmospheric GCM and investigation of associated basic shortcomings
journal, May 2008


The Retrieval of Profiles of Particulate Extinction from Cloud-Aerosol Lidar Infrared Pathfinder Satellite Observations (CALIPSO) Data: Algorithm Description
journal, June 2009

  • Young, Stuart A.; Vaughan, Mark A.
  • Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, Vol. 26, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.1175/2008JTECHA1221.1

Toward a minimal representation of aerosols in climate models: description and evaluation in the Community Atmosphere Model CAM5
journal, January 2012

  • Liu, X.; Easter, R. C.; Ghan, S. J.
  • Geoscientific Model Development, Vol. 5, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.5194/gmd-5-709-2012

The global 3-D distribution of tropospheric aerosols as characterized by CALIOP
journal, January 2013

  • Winker, D. M.; Tackett, J. L.; Getzewich, B. J.
  • Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Vol. 13, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.5194/acp-13-3345-2013

Anthropogenic, biomass burning, and volcanic emissions of black carbon, organic carbon, and SO<sub>2</sub> from 1980 to 2010 for hindcast model experiments
journal, January 2012


Radiative forcing of the direct aerosol effect from AeroCom Phase II simulations
journal, January 2013

  • Myhre, G.; Samset, B. H.; Schulz, M.
  • Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Vol. 13, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.5194/acp-13-1853-2013

A new method for evaluating the impact of vertical distribution on aerosol radiative forcing in general circulation models
journal, January 2014

  • Vuolo, M. R.; Schulz, M.; Balkanski, Y.
  • Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Vol. 14, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.5194/acp-14-877-2014

Biomass burning emissions estimated with a global fire assimilation system based on observed fire radiative power
journal, January 2012


Interactive chemistry in the Laboratoire de Météorologie Dynamique general circulation model: Description and background tropospheric chemistry evaluation: INTERACTIVE CHEMISTRY IN LMDZ
journal, February 2004

  • Hauglustaine, D. A.; Hourdin, F.; Jourdain, L.
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, Vol. 109, Issue D4
  • DOI: 10.1029/2003JD003957

The AeroCom evaluation and intercomparison of organic aerosol in global models
journal, January 2014

  • Tsigaridis, K.; Daskalakis, N.; Kanakidou, M.
  • Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Vol. 14, Issue 19
  • DOI: 10.5194/acp-14-10845-2014

Impact of cloud-borne aerosol representation on aerosol direct and indirect effects
journal, January 2006


Carbon emissions from fires in tropical and subtropical ecosystems
journal, April 2003


Global view of aerosol vertical distributions from CALIPSO lidar measurements and GOCART simulations: Regional and seasonal variations
journal, January 2010

  • Yu, Hongbin; Chin, Mian; Winker, David M.
  • Journal of Geophysical Research, Vol. 115
  • DOI: 10.1029/2009JD013364

How shorter black carbon lifetime alters its climate effect
journal, September 2014

  • Hodnebrog, Øivind; Myhre, Gunnar; Samset, Bjørn H.
  • Nature Communications, Vol. 5, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1038/ncomms6065

The global aerosol-climate model ECHAM-HAM, version 2: sensitivity to improvements in process representations
journal, January 2012

  • Zhang, K.; O&apos;Donnell, D.; Kazil, J.
  • Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Vol. 12, Issue 19
  • DOI: 10.5194/acp-12-8911-2012

Assessment of the CALIPSO Lidar 532 nm attenuated backscatter calibration using the NASA LaRC airborne High Spectral Resolution Lidar
journal, January 2011

  • Rogers, R. R.; Hostetler, C. A.; Hair, J. W.
  • Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Vol. 11, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.5194/acp-11-1295-2011

Light absorption by pollution, dust, and biomass burning aerosols: a global model study and evaluation with AERONET measurements
journal, January 2009


Estimating the direct and indirect effects of secondary organic aerosols using ECHAM5-HAM
journal, January 2011

  • O&apos;Donnell, D.; Tsigaridis, K.; Feichter, J.
  • Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Vol. 11, Issue 16
  • DOI: 10.5194/acp-11-8635-2011

Airborne High Spectral Resolution Lidar for profiling aerosol optical properties
journal, January 2008

  • Hair, Johnathan W.; Hostetler, Chris A.; Cook, Anthony L.
  • Applied Optics, Vol. 47, Issue 36
  • DOI: 10.1364/AO.47.006734

The CALIPSO Automated Aerosol Classification and Lidar Ratio Selection Algorithm
journal, October 2009

  • Omar, Ali H.; Winker, David M.; Vaughan, Mark A.
  • Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, Vol. 26, Issue 10
  • DOI: 10.1175/2009JTECHA1231.1

Aerosol–climate interactions in the Norwegian Earth System Model – NorESM1-M
journal, January 2013

  • Kirkevåg, A.; Iversen, T.; Seland, Ø.
  • Geoscientific Model Development, Vol. 6, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.5194/gmd-6-207-2013

Radiative forcing by aerosols as derived from the AeroCom present-day and pre-industrial simulations
journal, January 2006

  • Schulz, M.; Textor, C.; Kinne, S.
  • Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Vol. 6, Issue 12
  • DOI: 10.5194/acp-6-5225-2006

Vertical profiles of aerosol optical properties over central Illinois and comparison with surface and satellite measurements
journal, January 2012

  • Sheridan, P. J.; Andrews, E.; Ogren, J. A.
  • Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Vol. 12, Issue 23
  • DOI: 10.5194/acp-12-11695-2012

Global fire emissions and the contribution of deforestation, savanna, forest, agricultural, and peat fires (1997–2009)
journal, January 2010

  • van der Werf, G. R.; Randerson, J. T.; Giglio, L.
  • Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Vol. 10, Issue 23
  • DOI: 10.5194/acp-10-11707-2010

Historical (1850–2000) gridded anthropogenic and biomass burning emissions of reactive gases and aerosols: methodology and application
journal, January 2010

  • Lamarque, J. -F.; Bond, T. C.; Eyring, V.
  • Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Vol. 10, Issue 15
  • DOI: 10.5194/acp-10-7017-2010

MATRIX (Multiconfiguration Aerosol TRacker of mIXing state): an aerosol microphysical module for global atmospheric models
journal, January 2008

  • Bauer, S. E.; Wright, D. L.; Koch, D.
  • Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Vol. 8, Issue 20
  • DOI: 10.5194/acp-8-6003-2008

The Retrieval of Profiles of Particulate Extinction from Cloud–Aerosol Lidar and Infrared Pathfinder Satellite Observations ( CALIPSO ) Data: Uncertainty and Error Sensitivity Analyses
journal, March 2013

  • Young, Stuart A.; Vaughan, Mark A.; Kuehn, Ralph E.
  • Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, Vol. 30, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1175/JTECH-D-12-00046.1

Analysis and quantification of the diversities of aerosol life cycles within AeroCom
journal, January 2006

  • Textor, C.; Schulz, M.; Guibert, S.
  • Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Vol. 6, Issue 7
  • DOI: 10.5194/acp-6-1777-2006

Satellite perspective of aerosol intercontinental transport: From qualitative tracking to quantitative characterization
journal, April 2013


Modelled black carbon radiative forcing and atmospheric lifetime in AeroCom Phase II constrained by aircraft observations
journal, January 2014


What controls the vertical distribution of aerosol? Relationships between process sensitivity in HadGEM3–UKCA and inter-model variation from AeroCom Phase II
journal, January 2015

  • Kipling, Z.; Stier, P.; Johnson, C. E.
  • Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Discussions, Vol. 15, Issue 18
  • DOI: 10.5194/acpd-15-25933-2015

Black carbon vertical profiles strongly affect its radiative forcing uncertainty
journal, January 2013

  • Samset, B. H.; Myhre, G.; Schulz, M.
  • Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Vol. 13, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.5194/acp-13-2423-2013

Sensitivity of aerosol optical thickness and aerosol direct radiative effect to relative humidity
journal, January 2009

  • Bian, H.; Chin, M.; Rodriguez, J. M.
  • Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Vol. 9, Issue 7
  • DOI: 10.5194/acp-9-2375-2009

Overview of the CALIPSO Mission and CALIOP Data Processing Algorithms
journal, November 2009

  • Winker, David M.; Vaughan, Mark A.; Omar, Ali
  • Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, Vol. 26, Issue 11
  • DOI: 10.1175/2009JTECHA1281.1

Global three-dimensional simulation of aerosol optical thickness distribution of various origins
journal, July 2000

  • Takemura, Toshihiko; Okamoto, Hajime; Maruyama, Yoshihiro
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, Vol. 105, Issue D14
  • DOI: 10.1029/2000JD900265

An AeroCom initial assessment – optical properties in aerosol component modules of global models
journal, January 2006

  • Kinne, S.; Schulz, M.; Textor, C.
  • Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Vol. 6, Issue 7
  • DOI: 10.5194/acp-6-1815-2006

Anthropogenic radiative forcing time series from pre-industrial times until 2010
journal, January 2011

  • Skeie, R. B.; Berntsen, T. K.; Myhre, G.
  • Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Vol. 11, Issue 22
  • DOI: 10.5194/acp-11-11827-2011

The CALIPSO Mission: A Global 3D View of Aerosols and Clouds
journal, September 2010

  • Winker, D. M.; Pelon, J.; Coakley, J. A.
  • Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, Vol. 91, Issue 9
  • DOI: 10.1175/2010BAMS3009.1

Intercomparison of column aerosol optical depths from CALIPSO and MODIS-Aqua
journal, January 2011

  • Kittaka, C.; Winker, D. M.; Vaughan, M. A.
  • Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, Vol. 4, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.5194/amt-4-131-2011

Transport analysis and source attribution of seasonal and interannual variability of CO in the tropical upper troposphere and lower stratosphere
journal, January 2013

  • Liu, J.; Logan, J. A.; Murray, L. T.
  • Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Vol. 13, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.5194/acp-13-129-2013

Emissions of primary aerosol and precursor gases in the years 2000 and 1750 prescribed data-sets for AeroCom
journal, January 2006

  • Dentener, F.; Kinne, S.; Bond, T.
  • Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Vol. 6, Issue 12
  • DOI: 10.5194/acp-6-4321-2006

Evaluation of black carbon estimations in global aerosol models
journal, January 2009


Constraints on aerosol processes in climate models from vertically-resolved aircraft observations of black carbon
journal, January 2013

  • Kipling, Z.; Stier, P.; Schwarz, J. P.
  • Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Vol. 13, Issue 12
  • DOI: 10.5194/acp-13-5969-2013

Black carbon in the atmosphere and snow, from pre-industrial times until present
journal, January 2011

  • Skeie, R. B.; Berntsen, T.; Myhre, G.
  • Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Vol. 11, Issue 14
  • DOI: 10.5194/acp-11-6809-2011

Global and regional trends of aerosol optical depth over land and ocean using SeaWiFS measurements from 1997 to 2010
journal, January 2012

  • Hsu, N. C.; Gautam, R.; Sayer, A. M.
  • Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Vol. 12, Issue 17
  • DOI: 10.5194/acp-12-8037-2012

Application of the CALIOP layer product to evaluate the vertical distribution of aerosols estimated by global models: AeroCom phase I results: AEROSOL PROFILES IN GLOBAL MODELS
journal, May 2012

  • Koffi, Brigitte; Schulz, Michael; Bréon, Francois-Marie
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, Vol. 117, Issue D10
  • DOI: 10.1029/2011JD016858

Intercomparison and evaluation of global aerosol microphysical properties among AeroCom models of a range of complexity
journal, January 2014

  • Mann, G. W.; Carslaw, K. S.; Reddington, C. L.
  • Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Vol. 14, Issue 9
  • DOI: 10.5194/acp-14-4679-2014

HTAP_v2.2: a mosaic of regional and global emission grid maps for 2008 and 2010 to study hemispheric transport of air pollution
journal, January 2015

  • Janssens-Maenhout, G.; Crippa, M.; Guizzardi, D.
  • Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Vol. 15, Issue 19
  • DOI: 10.5194/acp-15-11411-2015

Use of probability distribution functions for discriminating between cloud and aerosol in lidar backscatter data
journal, January 2004


Simulation of climate response to aerosol direct and indirect effects with aerosol transport-radiation model
journal, January 2005


Sources, sinks, and transatlantic transport of North African dust aerosol: A multimodel analysis and comparison with remote sensing data
journal, May 2014

  • Kim, Dongchul; Chin, Mian; Yu, Hongbin
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, Vol. 119, Issue 10
  • DOI: 10.1002/2013JD021099

Aerosol forcing in the Climate Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP5) simulations by HadGEM2-ES and the role of ammonium nitrate
journal, January 2011

  • Bellouin, Nicolas; Rae, Jamie; Jones, Andy
  • Journal of Geophysical Research, Vol. 116, Issue D20
  • DOI: 10.1029/2011JD016074

Spatial and seasonal distribution of Arctic aerosols observed by CALIOP (2006–2012)
journal, January 2013

  • Di Pierro, M.; Jaeglé, L.; Eloranta, E. W.
  • Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Discussions, Vol. 13, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.5194/acpd-13-4863-2013

Dust vertical profile impact on global radiative forcing estimation using a coupled chemical-transport–radiative-transfer model
journal, January 2013


The CALIPSO Lidar Cloud and Aerosol Discrimination: Version 2 Algorithm and Initial Assessment of Performance
journal, July 2009

  • Liu, Zhaoyan; Vaughan, Mark; Winker, David
  • Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, Vol. 26, Issue 7
  • DOI: 10.1175/2009JTECHA1229.1

The NCEP/NCAR 40-Year Reanalysis Project
journal, March 1996


Interannual variability in global biomass burning emissions from 1997 to 2004
journal, January 2006

  • van der Werf, G. R.; Randerson, J. T.; Giglio, L.
  • Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Vol. 6, Issue 11
  • DOI: 10.5194/acp-6-3423-2006

Meridional gradients in aerosol vertical distribution over Indian Mainland: Observations and model simulations
journal, January 2016


Works referencing / citing this record:

Optimal Band Analysis of a Space-Based Multispectral Sensor for Urban Air Pollutant Detection
journal, October 2019


Profiling of Saharan dust from the Caribbean to western Africa – Part 2: Shipborne lidar measurements versus forecasts
journal, January 2017

  • Ansmann, Albert; Rittmeister, Franziska; Engelmann, Ronny
  • Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Vol. 17, Issue 24
  • DOI: 10.5194/acp-17-14987-2017

Aerosol and physical atmosphere model parameters are both important sources of uncertainty in aerosol ERF
journal, January 2018

  • Regayre, Leighton A.; Johnson, Jill S.; Yoshioka, Masaru
  • Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Vol. 18, Issue 13
  • DOI: 10.5194/acp-18-9975-2018

In situ constraints on the vertical distribution of global aerosol
journal, January 2019

  • Watson-Parris, Duncan; Schutgens, Nick; Reddington, Carly
  • Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Vol. 19, Issue 18
  • DOI: 10.5194/acp-19-11765-2019

Interrelations between surface, boundary layer, and columnar aerosol properties derived in summer and early autumn over a continental urban site in Warsaw, Poland
journal, January 2019

  • Wang, Dongxiang; Szczepanik, Dominika; Stachlewska, Iwona S.
  • Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Vol. 19, Issue 20
  • DOI: 10.5194/acp-19-13097-2019

Interactions between the atmosphere, cryosphere, and ecosystems at northern high latitudes
journal, January 2019

  • Boy, Michael; Thomson, Erik S.; Acosta Navarro, Juan-C.
  • Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Vol. 19, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.5194/acp-19-2015-2019

Anthropogenic aerosol forcing – insights from multiple estimates from aerosol-climate models with reduced complexity
journal, January 2019

  • Fiedler, Stephanie; Kinne, Stefan; Huang, Wan Ting Katty
  • Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Vol. 19, Issue 10
  • DOI: 10.5194/acp-19-6821-2019

Aerosols at the Poles: An AeroCom Phase II multi-model evaluation
posted_content, February 2017

  • Sand, Maria; Samset, Bjørn H.; Balkanski, Yves
  • Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Discussions
  • DOI: 10.5194/acp-2016-1120

CALIPSO lidar level 3 aerosol profile product: version 3 algorithm design
journal, January 2018

  • Tackett, Jason L.; Winker, David M.; Getzewich, Brian J.
  • Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, Vol. 11, Issue 7
  • DOI: 10.5194/amt-11-4129-2018

The CALIPSO version 4 automated aerosol classification and lidar ratio selection algorithm
journal, January 2018

  • Kim, Man-Hae; Omar, Ali H.; Tackett, Jason L.
  • Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, Vol. 11, Issue 11
  • DOI: 10.5194/amt-11-6107-2018

The impact of improved aerosol priors on near-infrared measurements of carbon dioxide
journal, January 2019

  • Nelson, Robert R.; O&apos;Dell, Christopher W.
  • Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, Vol. 12, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.5194/amt-12-1495-2019

Novel aerosol extinction coefficients and lidar ratios over the ocean from CALIPSO–CloudSat: evaluation and global statistics
journal, January 2019

  • Painemal, David; Clayton, Marian; Ferrare, Richard
  • Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, Vol. 12, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.5194/amt-12-2201-2019

The impact of precipitation evaporation on the atmospheric aerosol distribution in EC-Earth v3.2.0
journal, January 2018

  • de Bruine, Marco; Krol, Maarten; van Noije, Twan
  • Geoscientific Model Development, Vol. 11, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.5194/gmd-11-1443-2018

A production-tagged aerosol module for Earth system models, OsloAero5.3 – extensions and updates for CAM5.3-Oslo
journal, January 2018

  • Kirkevåg, Alf; Grini, Alf; Olivié, Dirk
  • Geoscientific Model Development, Vol. 11, Issue 10
  • DOI: 10.5194/gmd-11-3945-2018

Aerosols at the poles: an AeroCom Phase II multi-model evaluation
journal, January 2017

  • Sand, Maria; Samset, Bjørn H.; Balkanski, Yves
  • Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Vol. 17, Issue 19
  • DOI: 10.5194/acp-17-12197-2017

Regional and seasonal radiative forcing by perturbations to aerosol and ozone precursor emissions
journal, January 2016

  • Bellouin, Nicolas; Baker, Laura; Hodnebrog, Øivind
  • Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Vol. 16, Issue 21
  • DOI: 10.5194/acp-16-13885-2016

CALIPSO lidar level 3 aerosol profile product: version 3 algorithm design
posted_content, April 2018

  • Tackett, Jason L.; Winker, David M.; Getzewich, Brian J.
  • Atmospheric Measurement Techniques Discussions
  • DOI: 10.5194/amt-2018-97