DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Mandating better buildings: a global review of building codes and prospects for improvement in the United States

Abstract

This paper provides a global overview of the design, implementation, and evolution of building energy codes. Reflecting alternative policy goals, building energy codes differ significantly across the United States, the European Union, and China. This review uncovers numerous innovative practices including greenhouse gas emissions caps per square meter of building space, energy performance certificates with retrofit recommendations, and inclusion of renewable energy to achieve ‘nearly zero‐energy buildings’. These innovations motivated an assessment of an aggressive commercial building code applied to all US states, requiring both new construction and buildings with major modifications to comply with the latest version of the ASHRAE 90.1 Standards. Using the National Energy Modeling System ( NEMS ), we estimate that by 2035, such building codes in the United States could reduce energy for space heating, cooling, water heating, and lighting in commercial buildings by 16%, 15%, 20%, and 5%, respectively. Impacts on different fuels and building types, energy rates and bills as well as pollution emission reductions are also examined. WIREs Energy Environ 2016, 5:188–215. doi: 10.1002/wene.168 This article is categorized under: Energy Efficiency > Economics and Policy Energy Systems Economics > Economics and Policy Energy Policy and Planning > Climate and Environment

Authors:
 [1];  [1];  [2];  [3]
  1. Georgia Inst. of Technology, Atlanta, GA (United States). School of Public Policy
  2. City of Atlanta Mayor's Office of Sustainability, Atlanta GA (United States)
  3. Oak Ridge National Lab. (ORNL), Oak Ridge, TN (United States). Energy and Transportation Science Division
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL), Oak Ridge, TN (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE
OSTI Identifier:
1295092
Alternate Identifier(s):
OSTI ID: 1400509
Grant/Contract Number:  
AC05-00OR22725; 4000105765
Resource Type:
Accepted Manuscript
Journal Name:
Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews. Energy and Environment
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Volume: 5; Journal Issue: 2; Journal ID: ISSN 2041-8396
Publisher:
Wiley
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
29 ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY, AND ECONOMY; 32 ENERGY CONSERVATION, CONSUMPTION, AND UTILIZATION; Commercial buildings; Building energy codes; Energy efficiency; Nearly zero-energy buildings; Energy modeling; Cost-benefit analysis

Citation Formats

Sun, Xiaojing, Brown, Marilyn A., Cox, Matt, and Jackson, Roderick. Mandating better buildings: a global review of building codes and prospects for improvement in the United States. United States: N. p., 2015. Web. doi:10.1002/wene.168.
Sun, Xiaojing, Brown, Marilyn A., Cox, Matt, & Jackson, Roderick. Mandating better buildings: a global review of building codes and prospects for improvement in the United States. United States. https://doi.org/10.1002/wene.168
Sun, Xiaojing, Brown, Marilyn A., Cox, Matt, and Jackson, Roderick. Wed . "Mandating better buildings: a global review of building codes and prospects for improvement in the United States". United States. https://doi.org/10.1002/wene.168. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1295092.
@article{osti_1295092,
title = {Mandating better buildings: a global review of building codes and prospects for improvement in the United States},
author = {Sun, Xiaojing and Brown, Marilyn A. and Cox, Matt and Jackson, Roderick},
abstractNote = {This paper provides a global overview of the design, implementation, and evolution of building energy codes. Reflecting alternative policy goals, building energy codes differ significantly across the United States, the European Union, and China. This review uncovers numerous innovative practices including greenhouse gas emissions caps per square meter of building space, energy performance certificates with retrofit recommendations, and inclusion of renewable energy to achieve ‘nearly zero‐energy buildings’. These innovations motivated an assessment of an aggressive commercial building code applied to all US states, requiring both new construction and buildings with major modifications to comply with the latest version of the ASHRAE 90.1 Standards. Using the National Energy Modeling System ( NEMS ), we estimate that by 2035, such building codes in the United States could reduce energy for space heating, cooling, water heating, and lighting in commercial buildings by 16%, 15%, 20%, and 5%, respectively. Impacts on different fuels and building types, energy rates and bills as well as pollution emission reductions are also examined. WIREs Energy Environ 2016, 5:188–215. doi: 10.1002/wene.168 This article is categorized under: Energy Efficiency > Economics and Policy Energy Systems Economics > Economics and Policy Energy Policy and Planning > Climate and Environment},
doi = {10.1002/wene.168},
journal = {Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews. Energy and Environment},
number = 2,
volume = 5,
place = {United States},
year = {Wed Mar 11 00:00:00 EDT 2015},
month = {Wed Mar 11 00:00:00 EDT 2015}
}

Journal Article:
Free Publicly Available Full Text
Publisher's Version of Record

Citation Metrics:
Cited by: 12 works
Citation information provided by
Web of Science

Save / Share:

Works referenced in this record:

End use technology choice in the National Energy Modeling System (NEMS): An analysis of the residential and commercial building sectors
journal, November 2013


Barriers and drivers to energy efficiency – A new taxonomical approach
journal, October 2013


Analysis Methods for Natural and Hybrid Ventilation - a Critical Literature Review and Recent Developments
journal, February 2003


Beyond the code: Energy, carbon, and cost savings using conventional technologies
journal, April 2011


Assessing the drivers of regional trends in solar photovoltaic manufacturing
journal, January 2013

  • Goodrich, Alan C.; Powell, Douglas M.; James, Ted L.
  • Energy & Environmental Science, Vol. 6, Issue 10
  • DOI: 10.1039/c3ee40701b

Building regulations in energy efficiency: Compliance in England and Wales
journal, June 2012


Market failures and barriers as a basis for clean energy policies
journal, November 2001


Managing carbon emissions in China through building energy efficiency
journal, June 2009


Smart-grid policies: an international review: Smart-grid policies
journal, October 2012

  • Brown, Marilyn A.; Zhou, Shan
  • Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment, Vol. 2, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1002/wene.53

Public Values: An Inventory
journal, May 2007


Innovative energy-efficiency policies: an international review
journal, June 2014

  • Brown, Marilyn
  • Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment, Vol. 4, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1002/wene.125

Analysis of interactions among the barriers to energy saving in China
journal, June 2008


The Market for "Lemons": Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism
journal, August 1970

  • Akerlof, George A.
  • The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 84, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.2307/1879431

A review of building energy regulation and policy for energy conservation in developing countries
journal, December 2010


Net zero energy buildings: A consistent definition framework
journal, May 2012


The Transition to Solid-State Lighting
journal, March 2009


Commercial building energy use in six cities in Southern China
journal, February 2013


Energy benchmarking of commercial buildings: a low-cost pathway toward urban sustainability
journal, July 2013


Germany's path towards nearly zero-energy buildings—Enabling the greenhouse gas mitigation potential in the building stock
journal, June 2011


Analysis of Energy Saving Impacts of New Commercial Energy Codes for the Gulf Coast
report, December 2006

  • Halverson, Mark A.; Gowri, Krishnan; Richman, Eric E.
  • DOI: 10.2172/896697

Obstacles to Energy Efficiency
book, January 2004


Works referencing / citing this record:

Policy Monitor—Green Buildings: Economics and Policies
journal, July 2016

  • Matisoff, Daniel C.; Noonan, Douglas S.; Flowers, Mallory E.
  • Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, Vol. 10, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1093/reep/rew009