DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Optimization of scat detection methods for a social ungulate, the wild pig, and experimental evaluation of factors affecting detection of scat

Abstract

Collection of scat samples is common in wildlife research, particularly for genetic capture-mark-recapture applications. Due to high degradation rates of genetic material in scat, large numbers of samples must be collected to generate robust estimates. Optimization of sampling approaches to account for taxa-specific patterns of scat deposition is, therefore, necessary to ensure sufficient sample collection. While scat collection methods have been widely studied in carnivores, research to maximize scat collection and noninvasive sampling efficiency for social ungulates is lacking. Further, environmental factors or scat morphology may influence detection of scat by observers. We contrasted performance of novel radial search protocols with existing adaptive cluster sampling protocols to quantify differences in observed amounts of wild pig (Sus scrofa) scat. We also evaluated the effects of environmental (percentage of vegetative ground cover and occurrence of rain immediately prior to sampling) and scat characteristics (fecal pellet size and number) on the detectability of scat by observers. We found that 15- and 20-m radial search protocols resulted in greater numbers of scats encountered than the previously used adaptive cluster sampling approach across habitat types, and that fecal pellet size, number of fecal pellets, percent vegetative ground cover, and recent rain events were significant predictorsmore » of scat detection. Our results suggest that use of a fixed-width radial search protocol may increase the number of scats detected for wild pigs, or other social ungulates, allowing more robust estimation of population metrics using noninvasive genetic sampling methods. Further, as fecal pellet size affected scat detection, juvenile or smaller-sized animals may be less detectable than adult or large animals, which could introduce bias into abundance estimates. In conclusion, knowledge of relationships between environmental variables and scat detection may allow researchers to optimize sampling protocols to maximize utility of noninvasive sampling for wild pigs and other social ungulates.« less

Authors:
 [1];  [2];  [3];  [4];  [5]
  1. Univ. of Georgia, Aiken, SC (United States). Savannah River Ecology Laboratory; Univ. of Georgia, Athens, GA, (United States). D. B. Warnell School of Forestry and Natural Resources
  2. United States Dept. of Agriculture Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Starkville, MS (United States). National Wildlife Research Center
  3. Univ. of Georgia, Aiken, SC (United States). Savannah River Ecology Laboratory; Univ. of Georgia, Athens, GA (United States). Odum School of Ecology
  4. U. S. Geological Survey, Georgia Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit; Univ. of Georgia, Athens, GA (United States). D. B. Warnell School of Forestry and Natural Resources
  5. Univ. of Georgia, Aiken, SC (United States). Savannah River Ecology Laboratory; Univ. of Georgia, Athens, GA (United States). D. B. Warnell School of Forestry and Natural Resources
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Univ. of Georgia, Athens, GA (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE
OSTI Identifier:
1282931
Grant/Contract Number:  
FC09-07SR22506
Resource Type:
Accepted Manuscript
Journal Name:
PLoS ONE
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Volume: 11; Journal Issue: 5; Journal ID: ISSN 1932-6203
Publisher:
Public Library of Science
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
59 BASIC BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES; boar sus scrofa; population size; South Carolina; fecal dna; deer; selection; genetics; impact; range; feces; swine; pines; pig models; forests; optimization; population genetics; genetics of disease; wildlife

Citation Formats

Keiter, David A., Cunningham, Fred L., Rhodes, Jr., Olin E., Irwin, Brian J., and Beasley, James C. Optimization of scat detection methods for a social ungulate, the wild pig, and experimental evaluation of factors affecting detection of scat. United States: N. p., 2016. Web. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0155615.
Keiter, David A., Cunningham, Fred L., Rhodes, Jr., Olin E., Irwin, Brian J., & Beasley, James C. Optimization of scat detection methods for a social ungulate, the wild pig, and experimental evaluation of factors affecting detection of scat. United States. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0155615
Keiter, David A., Cunningham, Fred L., Rhodes, Jr., Olin E., Irwin, Brian J., and Beasley, James C. Wed . "Optimization of scat detection methods for a social ungulate, the wild pig, and experimental evaluation of factors affecting detection of scat". United States. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0155615. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1282931.
@article{osti_1282931,
title = {Optimization of scat detection methods for a social ungulate, the wild pig, and experimental evaluation of factors affecting detection of scat},
author = {Keiter, David A. and Cunningham, Fred L. and Rhodes, Jr., Olin E. and Irwin, Brian J. and Beasley, James C.},
abstractNote = {Collection of scat samples is common in wildlife research, particularly for genetic capture-mark-recapture applications. Due to high degradation rates of genetic material in scat, large numbers of samples must be collected to generate robust estimates. Optimization of sampling approaches to account for taxa-specific patterns of scat deposition is, therefore, necessary to ensure sufficient sample collection. While scat collection methods have been widely studied in carnivores, research to maximize scat collection and noninvasive sampling efficiency for social ungulates is lacking. Further, environmental factors or scat morphology may influence detection of scat by observers. We contrasted performance of novel radial search protocols with existing adaptive cluster sampling protocols to quantify differences in observed amounts of wild pig (Sus scrofa) scat. We also evaluated the effects of environmental (percentage of vegetative ground cover and occurrence of rain immediately prior to sampling) and scat characteristics (fecal pellet size and number) on the detectability of scat by observers. We found that 15- and 20-m radial search protocols resulted in greater numbers of scats encountered than the previously used adaptive cluster sampling approach across habitat types, and that fecal pellet size, number of fecal pellets, percent vegetative ground cover, and recent rain events were significant predictors of scat detection. Our results suggest that use of a fixed-width radial search protocol may increase the number of scats detected for wild pigs, or other social ungulates, allowing more robust estimation of population metrics using noninvasive genetic sampling methods. Further, as fecal pellet size affected scat detection, juvenile or smaller-sized animals may be less detectable than adult or large animals, which could introduce bias into abundance estimates. In conclusion, knowledge of relationships between environmental variables and scat detection may allow researchers to optimize sampling protocols to maximize utility of noninvasive sampling for wild pigs and other social ungulates.},
doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0155615},
journal = {PLoS ONE},
number = 5,
volume = 11,
place = {United States},
year = {Wed May 25 00:00:00 EDT 2016},
month = {Wed May 25 00:00:00 EDT 2016}
}

Journal Article:
Free Publicly Available Full Text
Publisher's Version of Record

Citation Metrics:
Cited by: 4 works
Citation information provided by
Web of Science

Save / Share:

Works referenced in this record:

Balancing sample accumulation and DNA degradation rates to optimize noninvasive genetic sampling of sympatric carnivores
journal, December 2014

  • Lonsinger, Robert C.; Gese, Eric M.; Dempsey, Steven J.
  • Molecular Ecology Resources, Vol. 15, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1111/1755-0998.12356

A comparison of food habits and prey preference of Amur tiger ( Panthera tigris altaica ) at three sites in the Russian Far East
journal, July 2015

  • Kerley, Linda L.; Mukhacheva, Anna S.; Matyukhina, Dina S.
  • Integrative Zoology, Vol. 10, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1111/1749-4877.12135

Radiotelemetry Studies of Feral Hogs in South Carolina
journal, October 1972

  • Kurz, Joseph C.; Marchinton, R. Larry
  • The Journal of Wildlife Management, Vol. 36, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.2307/3799254

An evaluation of field and non-invasive genetic methods to estimate brown bear (Ursus arctos) population size
journal, March 2006


Home Ranges of Sympatric Black and Turkey Vultures in South Carolina
journal, August 2004

  • DeVault, Travis L.; Reinhart, Bradley D.; Brisbin, I. Lehr
  • The Condor, Vol. 106, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1093/condor/106.3.706

Noninvasive genetic sampling: look before you leap
journal, August 1999


Antelope mating strategies facilitate invasion of grasslands by a woody weed
journal, February 2013


The influence of road characteristics and species on detection probabilities of carnivore faeces
journal, January 2015

  • Kluever, Bryan M.; Gese, Eric M.; Dempsey, Steven J.
  • Wildlife Research, Vol. 42, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1071/wr14244

Parasitism in Captive and Reintroduced Red Wolves
journal, July 1991


Facts from feces revisited
journal, June 1997


The genetic mark–recapture likelihood function of capwire
journal, December 2007


Considering sampling approaches when determining carnivore diets: the importance of where, how, and when scats are collected
journal, March 2015

  • Steenweg, Robin; Gillingham, Michael P.; Parker, Katherine L.
  • Mammal Research, Vol. 60, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1007/s13364-015-0222-4

Parasitism in Captive and Reintroduced Red Wolves
journal, July 1991


Factors influencing degradation of DNA and hormones in maned wolf scat
journal, November 2011


Review of capture-recapture methods applicable to noninvasive genetic sampling: REVIEW OF DNA-BASED CAPTURE-RECAPTURE
journal, September 2005


A new method for estimating the size of small populations from genetic mark-recapture data: GENETIC MARK-RECAPTURE ESTIMATION
journal, May 2005


Empirical evaluation of non-invasive capture-mark-recapture estimation of population size based on a single sampling session
journal, May 2007


An evaluation of field and non-invasive genetic methods to estimate brown bear (Ursus arctos) population size
journal, March 2006


Temporal and spatial patterns of defecation in wild boar: Daily Defecation Rate in Wild Boar
journal, September 2014

  • Ferretti, Francesco; Storer, Kate; Coats, Julia
  • Wildlife Society Bulletin, Vol. 39, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1002/wsb.494

A comparison of food habits and prey preference of Amur tiger ( Panthera tigris altaica ) at three sites in the Russian Far East
journal, July 2015

  • Kerley, Linda L.; Mukhacheva, Anna S.; Matyukhina, Dina S.
  • Integrative Zoology, Vol. 10, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1111/1749-4877.12135

Experimental Tests of Latrine Use and Communication by River Otters
journal, December 2009

  • Oldham, Alana R.; Black, Jeffrey M.
  • Northwestern Naturalist, Vol. 90, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1898/NWN08-20.1

Comparison of Noninvasive Genetics and Camera Trapping for Estimating Population Density of Ocelots (Leopardus Pardalis) on Barro Colorado Island, Panama
journal, December 2014

  • Rodgers, Torrey W.; Giacalone, Jacalyn; Heske, Edward J.
  • Tropical Conservation Science, Vol. 7, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1177/194008291400700408

Faecal sampling along trails: a questionable standard for estimating red fox Vulpes vulpes abundance
journal, December 2012

  • Güthlin, Denise; Kröschel, Max; Küchenhoff, Helmut
  • Wildlife Biology, Vol. 18, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.2981/11-065

Balancing sample accumulation and DNA degradation rates to optimize noninvasive genetic sampling of sympatric carnivores
journal, December 2014

  • Lonsinger, Robert C.; Gese, Eric M.; Dempsey, Steven J.
  • Molecular Ecology Resources, Vol. 15, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1111/1755-0998.12356

Red deer habitat selection and movements in relation to roads
journal, October 2012

  • Meisingset, Erling L.; Loe, Leif E.; Brekkum, Øystein
  • The Journal of Wildlife Management, Vol. 77, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1002/jwmg.469

Estimating wild boar Sus scrofa population size using faecal DNA and capture-recapture modelling
journal, June 2012

  • Ebert, Cornelia; Knauer, Felix; Spielberger, Bettina
  • Wildlife Biology, Vol. 18, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.2981/11-002

Adaptive Cluster Sampling: Designs with Primary and Secondary Units
journal, September 1991


Demography, sociospatial behaviour and genetics of feral pigs (Sus scrofa) in a semi-arid environment
journal, March 1999


Impact of wild boar (Sus scrofa) in its introduced and native range: a review
journal, April 2012


Consequences Associated with the Recent Range Expansion of Nonnative Feral Swine
journal, February 2014

  • Bevins, Sarah N.; Pedersen, Kerri; Lutman, Mark W.
  • BioScience, Vol. 64, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1093/biosci/biu015

Home Ranges of Sympatric Black and Turkey Vultures in South Carolina
journal, January 2004

  • DeVault, Travis L.; Reinhart, Bradley D.; Brisbin, I. Lehr
  • The Condor, Vol. 106, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1650/7461

Radiotelemetry Studies of Feral Hogs in South Carolina
journal, October 1972

  • Kurz, Joseph C.; Marchinton, R. Larry
  • The Journal of Wildlife Management, Vol. 36, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.2307/3799254

A Spatially Explicit Model of the Wild Hog for Ecological Risk Assessment Activities at the Department of Energy's Savannah River Site
journal, June 2005

  • Gaines, Karen F.; Porter, Dwayne E.; Punshon, Tracy
  • Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: An International Journal, Vol. 11, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1080/10807030590949654

Estimating Spatial and Temporal Components of Variation for Fisheries Count Data Using Negative Binomial Mixed Models
journal, January 2013

  • Irwin, Brian J.; Wagner, Tyler; Bence, James R.
  • Transactions of the American Fisheries Society, Vol. 142, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1080/00028487.2012.728163

Uninformative Parameters and Model Selection Using Akaike's Information Criterion
journal, August 2010


Factors affecting detectability of river otters during sign surveys
journal, January 2011

  • Jeffress, Mackenzie R.; Paukert, Craig P.; Sandercock, Brett K.
  • The Journal of Wildlife Management, Vol. 75, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1002/jwmg.12

The impact of time and field conditions on brown bear (Ursus arctos) faecal DNA amplification
journal, January 2007

  • Murphy, Melanie A.; Kendall, Katherine C.; Robinson, Andrew
  • Conservation Genetics, Vol. 8, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.1007/s10592-006-9264-0

Effects of time and rainfall on PCR success using DNA extracted from deer fecal pellets
journal, April 2009

  • Brinkman, Todd J.; Schwartz, Michael K.; Person, David K.
  • Conservation Genetics, Vol. 11, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1007/s10592-009-9928-7

Sub-sampling Genetic Data to Estimate Black Bear Population Size: A Case Study
journal, November 2007


Individual heterogeneity as a pitfall in population estimates based on non‐invasive genetic sampling: a review and recommendations
journal, September 2010

  • Ebert, Cornelia; Knauer, Felix; Storch, Ilse
  • Wildlife Biology, Vol. 16, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.2981/09-108

Works referencing / citing this record:

A comparison of cost and quality of three methods for estimating density for wild pig (Sus scrofa)
journal, February 2020