High vacuum measurements and calibrations, molecular flow fluid transient effects
Abstract
High vacuum pressure measurements and calibrations below 1 × 10-8 Torr are problematic. Specifically, measurement accuracies change drastically for vacuum gauges when pressures are suddenly lowered in vacuum systems. How can gauges perform like this? A brief system description is first required to answer this question. Calibrations were performed using a vacuum calibration chamber with attached vacuum gauges. To control chamber pressures, vacuum pumps decreased the chamber pressure while nitrogen tanks increased the chamber pressure. By balancing these opposing pressures, equilibrium in the chamber was maintained at selected set point pressures to perform calibrations. When pressures were suddenly decreased during set point adjustments, a sudden rush of gas from the chamber also caused a surge of gas from the gauges to decrease the pressures in those gauges. Gauge pressures did not return to equilibrium as fast as chamber pressures due to the sparse distribution of gas molecules in the system. This disparity in the rate of pressure changes caused the pressures in different gauges to be different than expected. This discovery was experimentally proven to show that different gauge designs return to equilibrium at different rates, and that gauge accuracies vary for different gauge designs due to fluid transients inmore »
- Authors:
-
- Savannah River Site (SRS), Aiken, SC (United States). Savannah River Nuclear Solutions.
- Savannah River Site (SRS), Aiken, SC (United States). Savannah River National Lab. (SRNL).
- Publication Date:
- Research Org.:
- Savannah River Site (SRS), Aiken, SC (United States)
- Sponsoring Org.:
- USDOE
- OSTI Identifier:
- 1223188
- Alternate Identifier(s):
- OSTI ID: 1467497
- Report Number(s):
- VAC-D-15-00161
Journal ID: ISSN 0042-207X; PII: S0042207X15001827
- Grant/Contract Number:
- AC09-08SR22470
- Resource Type:
- Accepted Manuscript
- Journal Name:
- Vacuum
- Additional Journal Information:
- Journal Volume: 119; Journal Issue: C; Journal ID: ISSN 0042-207X
- Publisher:
- Elsevier
- Country of Publication:
- United States
- Language:
- English
- Subject:
- 46 INSTRUMENTATION RELATED TO NUCLEAR SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY; fluid transient; molecular flow; ion gauge; spinning rotor gauge; capacitance diaphragm gauge; cold cathode gauge; vacuum measurement; vacuum calibration; vacuum measurement errors
Citation Formats
Leishear, Robert A., and Gavalas, Nickolas A. High vacuum measurements and calibrations, molecular flow fluid transient effects. United States: N. p., 2015.
Web. doi:10.1016/J.VACUUM.2015.04.030.
Leishear, Robert A., & Gavalas, Nickolas A. High vacuum measurements and calibrations, molecular flow fluid transient effects. United States. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.VACUUM.2015.04.030
Leishear, Robert A., and Gavalas, Nickolas A. Wed .
"High vacuum measurements and calibrations, molecular flow fluid transient effects". United States. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.VACUUM.2015.04.030. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1223188.
@article{osti_1223188,
title = {High vacuum measurements and calibrations, molecular flow fluid transient effects},
author = {Leishear, Robert A. and Gavalas, Nickolas A.},
abstractNote = {High vacuum pressure measurements and calibrations below 1 × 10-8 Torr are problematic. Specifically, measurement accuracies change drastically for vacuum gauges when pressures are suddenly lowered in vacuum systems. How can gauges perform like this? A brief system description is first required to answer this question. Calibrations were performed using a vacuum calibration chamber with attached vacuum gauges. To control chamber pressures, vacuum pumps decreased the chamber pressure while nitrogen tanks increased the chamber pressure. By balancing these opposing pressures, equilibrium in the chamber was maintained at selected set point pressures to perform calibrations. When pressures were suddenly decreased during set point adjustments, a sudden rush of gas from the chamber also caused a surge of gas from the gauges to decrease the pressures in those gauges. Gauge pressures did not return to equilibrium as fast as chamber pressures due to the sparse distribution of gas molecules in the system. This disparity in the rate of pressure changes caused the pressures in different gauges to be different than expected. This discovery was experimentally proven to show that different gauge designs return to equilibrium at different rates, and that gauge accuracies vary for different gauge designs due to fluid transients in molecular flow.},
doi = {10.1016/J.VACUUM.2015.04.030},
journal = {Vacuum},
number = C,
volume = 119,
place = {United States},
year = {Wed Apr 29 00:00:00 EDT 2015},
month = {Wed Apr 29 00:00:00 EDT 2015}
}
Web of Science
Figures / Tables:
Figures / Tables found in this record: