Quantitative Comparisons of Image Quality for Flash X-Ray Detectors

Journal Article · 17 February 2025 · Experimental Techniques

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40799-025-00783-8 · OSTI ID:2530269

Wilson, F. ^[1]; Harke, K. ^[2]; Hardy, A. J. ^[2]; Kline, D. J. ^[2]; Sullivan, K. T. ^[2]; Tringe, J. ^[2]; Frick, C. P. ^[1]; Eliasson, V.  ^[1]

---

1. Colorado School of Mines, Golden, CO (United States)
2. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL), Livermore, CA (United States)

Due to X-rays’ ability to penetrate materials, flash X-ray radiography can be used for high-speed measurements where direct optical access is not possible. Choice of detector has a pronounced impact on resulting image quality. Four different detector systems were evaluated with a 450kVp flash source to quantitatively compare image quality metrics. The scintillating digital detector had less image noise than the three different storage phosphor computed radiography detectors across all transmission levels, but lacked the spatial resolution of the computed radiography detectors. For the screens tested here, the HPX-DR digital system had the highest signal to noise ratio of 68.24 and contrast to noise ratio of 35.53, but had the lowest spatial resolution, resolving 2.5 line pairs per millimeter at 1.78% contrast. At a value of 37.59, the Flex GP imaging plate had a signal to noise value above its storage phosphor counterparts under a 450kVp flash source. For radiographic setups typically used for dynamic experiments, the Flex XL Blue and Flex HR detectors had signal to noise ratios of 18.44 and 26.56 respectively. The highest resolved spatial frequencies of the Flex GP, Flex XL Blue, and Flex HR with the flash source are 3.85, 5.00, and 3.85 line pairs per millimeter, respectively. In conclusion, the Flex GP detector had the best combination of signal to noise ratio, contrast to noise ratio, and spatial resolution under a flash source.

• Research Organization: Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL), Livermore, CA (United States)
• Sponsoring Organization: USDOE Laboratory Directed Research and Development (LDRD) Program; USDOE National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)
• Grant/Contract Number: AC52-07NA27344
• OSTI ID: 2530269
• Report Number(s): LLNL--JRNL-869104; 1104563
• Journal Information: Experimental Techniques, Journal Name: Experimental Techniques; ISSN 0732-8818
• Publisher: WileyCopyright Statement
• Country of Publication: United States
• Language: English