Title: Comparative Economic Analysis Between Bioenergy and Forage Types of Switchgrass for Sustainable Biofuel Feedstock Production: A Data Envelopment Analysis and Cost–Benefit Analysis Approach

Journal Article · · Global Change Biology. Bioenergy
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.70020 · OSTI ID:2506874
ORCiD logo [1];  [2];  [1]; ORCiD logo [1];  [3];  [4];  [1]; ORCiD logo [5]; ORCiD logo [1]
  1. Department of Crop Sciences University of Illinois at Urbana‐Champaign Urbana Illinois USA
  2. Northern Great Plains Research Laboratory United States Department of Agriculture‐Agricultural Research Service Mandan North Dakota USA
  3. Plant Science Department South Dakota State University Brookings South Dakota USA
  4. Department of Agronomy and Horticulture, USDA Central‐East Regional Biomass Center Grain, Forage and Bioenergy Research Unit, USDA‐ARS Lincoln Nebraska USA
  5. Department of Agricultural and Consumer Economics University of Illinois at Urbana‐Champaign Urbana Illinois USA

ABSTRACT The capacity to produce switchgrass efficiently and cost‐effectively across diverse environments can be pivotal in achieving the short‐ and medium‐term Sustainable Aviation Fuel targets set by the U.S. Department of Energy. This study evaluated the economic performance of forage‐ and bioenergy‐type switchgrass cultivars and their response to N fertilization under diverse marginal environments across the US Midwest that included Illinois (IL), Iowa (IA), Nebraska (NE), and South Dakota (SD). Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) was used to evaluate the efficiency of 23 Decision‐Making Units (DMUs)—cultivar types and N fertilization rate combinations—while a cost–benefit analysis calculated their profitability over 5 years. Results showed that two energy‐type cultivars—“Independence” and “Liberty”—were superior economically to the forage cultivars. Independence performed best with the highest profit margin when fertilized at 56 kg N ha −1 , particularly in the US hardiness zone 6a (Urbana, IL). Liberty exhibited the highest profit margins in hardiness zone 5b (Madrid, IA, and Ithaca, NE) at 56 kg N ha −1 and showed exceptional profitability with 28 kg N ha −1 in hardiness zone 6b (Brighton, IL). Switchgrass cultivar “Carthage” showed better efficiency score and profitability results in hardiness zone 4b (South Shore, SD) at 56 kg N ha −1 . The profit trends observed in current study sites may indicate broader patterns across similar US hardiness zones. This study provides valuable insights for decision‐makers to optimize input strategies for biomass production of bioenergy switchgrass to meet renewable energy demands.

Sponsoring Organization:
USDOE
Grant/Contract Number:
EE0008521
OSTI ID:
2506874
Journal Information:
Global Change Biology. Bioenergy, Journal Name: Global Change Biology. Bioenergy Journal Issue: 2 Vol. 17; ISSN 1757-1693
Publisher:
Wiley-BlackwellCopyright Statement
Country of Publication:
United Kingdom
Language:
English

References (44)

Switchgrass book January 2014
How profitable is switchgrass in Illinois, USA? An economic definition of marginal land journal June 2022
Registration of ‘Independence’ switchgrass journal May 2024
Engineering and Science of Biomass Feedstock Production and Provision book January 2014
Efficiency measurement with multiple outputs and multiple inputs journal July 1996
Farm-Scale Production Cost of Switchgrass for Biomass journal March 2008
Biomass Production and Nutrient Removal by Perennial Energy Grasses Produced on a Wet Marginal Land journal July 2022
Biomass Quality Responses to Selection for Increased Biomass Yield in Perennial Energy Grasses journal September 2022
Breeding Switchgrass for Biomass Production Without Nitrogen Fertilizer journal October 2023
Harvest and storage costs for bales of switchgrass in the southeastern United States journal April 1996
Z-number DEA: A new possibilistic DEA in the context of Z-numbers journal August 2016
Exploring the performance and competitiveness of Vietnam port industry using DEA journal September 2020
Costs of producing miscanthus and switchgrass for bioenergy in Illinois journal June 2008
Spatial cost analysis for switchgrass cultivation: Case of Eskisehir journal July 2023
Efficiency assessment of switchgrass cultivation areas using sustainable indicators under epistemic uncertainty journal February 2019
A comparison of chance-constrained data envelopment analysis, stochastic nonparametric envelopment of data and bootstrap method: A case study of cultural regeneration performance of cities journal August 2024
Energy use pattern and benchmarking of selected greenhouses in Iran using data envelopment analysis journal January 2011
Diverse tillage practices with straw mulched management strategies to improve water use efficiency and maize productivity under a dryland farming system journal April 2024
A risk averse cross-efficiency data envelopment analysis model for sustainable switchgrass cultivation location optimization journal December 2017
Development of a non-radial model for resource reallocation using network data envelopment analysis journal June 2024
The carbon dioxide challenge facing U.S. aviation and paths to achieve net zero emissions by 2050 journal August 2023
Influences of nitrogen fertilization and climate regime on the above-ground biomass yields of miscanthus and switchgrass: A meta-analysis journal July 2019
The link between operational efficiency and environmental impacts journal February 2009
A meta-analysis of DEA and SFA studies of the technical efficiency of seaports: A comparison of fixed and random-effects regression models journal December 2012
An empirical investigation of the distribution of travellers’ willingness-to-pay: A comparison between a parametric and nonparametric approach journal February 2024
Producer Participation in Biomass Markets: farm Factors, Market Factors, and Correlated Choices journal April 2015
Efficiency ranking of decision making units in data envelopment analysis by using TOPSIS-DEA method journal August 2017
Cost evaluation of alternative switchgrass producing, harvesting, storing, and transporting systems and their logistics in the Southeastern USA journal August 2010
Biomass production of herbaceous energy crops in the United States: field trial results and yield potential maps from the multiyear regional feedstock partnership journal January 2018
Responsiveness of miscanthus and switchgrass yields to stand age and nitrogen fertilization: A meta‐regression analysis journal March 2022
Nitrogen fertilization effects on aged Miscanthus × giganteus stands: Exploring biomass yield, yield components, and biomass prediction using in‐season morphological traits journal April 2024
Measuring the economic inefficiency of Nepalese rice farms using data envelopment analysis journal June 2004
Switchgrass Biomass Production in the Midwest USA journal January 2002
Yield and Breakeven Price of ‘Alamo’ Switchgrass for Biofuels in Tennessee journal January 2009
Latitudinal Adaptation of Switchgrass Populations journal January 2004
Switchgrass Harvest Time Management Can Impact Biomass Yield and Nutrient Content journal January 2016
Registration of ‘Liberty’ Switchgrass journal January 2014
Field performance of switchgrass plants engineered for reduced recalcitrance journal May 2023
Optimal N Application Rates on Switchgrass for Producers and a Biorefinery journal November 2021
Predicting Biomass Yields of Advanced Switchgrass Cultivars for Bioenergy and Ecosystem Services Using Machine Learning journal May 2023
Perennial Forages as Second Generation Bioenergy Crops journal May 2008
Remote Sensing-Based Estimation of Advanced Perennial Grass Biomass Yields for Bioenergy journal November 2021
The feasibility of switchgrass for biofuel production journal January 2012
Economic Efficiency of Different Agricultural Practices of “Panicum virgatum L. (switchgrass)” for Fodder Production journal November 2013

Related Subjects