DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Simulating image coaddition with the Nancy Grace Roman Space Telescope – II. Analysis of the simulated images and implications for weak lensing

Journal Article · · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
ORCiD logo [1];  [2];  [2]; ORCiD logo [3];  [2]; ORCiD logo [1];  [2]; ORCiD logo [4];  [5];  [6];  [7];  [8];  [6];  [2]; ORCiD logo [3];  [3];  [9];  [1];  [10]
  1. Duke Univ., Durham, NC (United States)
  2. The Ohio State Univ., Columbus, OH (United States)
  3. Carnegie Mellon Univ., Pittsburgh, PA (United States)
  4. NASA Goddard Space Flight Center (GSFC), Greenbelt, MD (United States)
  5. Princeton Univ., NJ (United States); Flatiron Institute, New York, NY (United States)
  6. Argonne National Laboratory (ANL), Argonne, IL (United States)
  7. Univ. of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX (United States)
  8. Univ. of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA (United States)
  9. Univ. of Edinburgh, Scotland (United Kingdom)
  10. Univ. of Pittsburgh, PA (United States)

One challenge for applying current weak lensing analysis tools to the Nancy Grace Roman Space Telescope is that individual images will be undersampled. Our companion paper presented an initial application of Imcom – an algorithm that builds an optimal mapping from input to output pixels to reconstruct a fully sampled combined image – on the Roman image simulations. In this paper, we measure the output noise power spectra, identify the sources of the major features in the power spectra, and show that simple analytic models that ignore sampling effects underestimate the power spectra of the coadded noise images. We compute the moments of both idealized injected stars and fully simulated stars in the coadded images, and their one- and two-point statistics. We show that the idealized injected stars have root-mean-square ellipticity errors (1–6) × 10-4 per component depending on the band; the correlation functions are ≥2 orders of magnitude below requirements, indicating that the image combination step itself is using a small fraction of the overall Roman second moment error budget, although the fourth moments are larger and warrant further investigation. The stars in the simulated sky images, which include blending and chromaticity effects, have correlation functions near the requirement level (and below the requirement level in a wide-band image constructed by stacking all four filters). We evaluate the noise-induced biases in the ellipticities of injected stars, and explain the resulting trends with an analytical model. We conclude by enumerating the next steps in developing an image coaddition pipeline for Roman.

Research Organization:
Argonne National Laboratory (ANL), Argonne, IL (United States)
Sponsoring Organization:
USDOE Office of Science (SC); National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA); Simons Foundation; David & Lucile Packard Foundation
Grant/Contract Number:
AC02-06CH11357
OSTI ID:
2476165
Journal Information:
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Journal Name: Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society Journal Issue: 4 Vol. 528; ISSN 0035-8711
Publisher:
Oxford University PressCopyright Statement
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English

References (69)

Current status of weak gravitational lensing journal November 2002
Observational probes of cosmic acceleration journal September 2013
Array programming with NumPy journal September 2020
Numerical simulations of weak lensing measurements journal August 2001
Shapelets -- I. A method for image analysis journal January 2003
Shear calibration biases in weak-lensing surveys journal August 2003
Optimal point spread function modeling for weak lensing: complexity and sparsity journal April 2009
Astropy: A community Python package for astronomy journal September 2013
Shear nulling after PSF Gaussianisation: Moment-based weak lensing measurements with subpercent noise bias journal March 2017
Planck 2018 results: VI. Cosmological parameters journal September 2020
Euclid preparation: VI. Verifying the performance of cosmic shear experiments journal March 2020
How accurately can we measure weak gravitational shear? journal February 2001
Point spread function calibration requirements for dark energy from cosmic shear journal March 2008
Errors in Elliptical Gaussian FITS journal February 1997
Secondary standard stars for absolute spectrophotometry journal March 1983
A New Shear Estimator for Weak‐Lensing Observations journal July 2000
Shapes and Shears, Stars and Smears: Optimal Measurements for Weak Lensing journal February 2002
Drizzle: A Method for the Linear Reconstruction of Undersampled Images journal February 2002
HEALPix: A Framework for High‐Resolution Discretization and Fast Analysis of Data Distributed on the Sphere journal April 2005
The Milky Way Tomography with SDSS. I. Stellar Number Density Distribution journal February 2008
Teledyne H1RG, H2RG, and H4RG Noise Generator journal November 2015
Optimal Linear Image Combination journal October 2011
Brighter-fatter Effect in Near-infrared Detectors—III. Fourier-domain Treatment of Flat Field Correlations and Application to WFIRST journal June 2020
Quantum Yield and Charge Diffusion in the Nancy Grace Roman Space Telescope Infrared Detectors journal January 2022
A synthetic Roman Space Telescope High-Latitude Imaging Survey: simulation suite and the impact of wavefront errors on weak gravitational lensing journal November 2020
Assessing tension metrics with dark energy survey and Planck data journal June 2021
Mitigating the effects of undersampling in weak lensing shear estimation with metacalibration journal January 2021
Cosmology with the Roman Space Telescope : synergies with the Rubin Observatory Legacy Survey of Space and Time journal March 2021
Weak gravitational lensing shear estimation with metacalibration for the Roman High-Latitude Imaging Survey journal September 2022
Impact of point spread function higher moments error on weak gravitational lensing – II. A comprehensive study journal November 2022
Weak gravitational lensing shear measurement with FPFS: analytical mitigation of noise bias and selection bias journal February 2022
A general framework for removing point-spread function additive systematics in cosmological weak lensing analysis journal June 2023
Discovery of a red backsplash galaxy candidate near M81 journal February 2023
A joint Roman Space Telescope and Rubin Observatory synthetic wide-field imaging survey journal March 2023
Analytical weak-lensing shear responses of galaxy properties and galaxy detection journal March 2023
Origins of weak lensing systematics, and requirements on future instrumentation (or knowledge of instrumentation) journal December 2012
Defining a weak lensing experiment in space journal April 2013
GREAT3 results – I. Systematic errors in shear estimation and the impact of real galaxy morphology journal May 2015
The impact of correlated noise on galaxy shape estimation for weak lensing journal February 2016
The DES Science Verification weak lensing shear catalogues journal May 2016
Analytical noise bias correction for weak lensing shear analysis with ERA journal July 2018
Matplotlib: A 2D Graphics Environment journal January 2007
The skewness of the aperture mass statistic journal July 2004
Galaxy-galaxy weak lensing in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey: intrinsic alignments and shear calibration errors journal September 2004
Systematic errors in weak lensing: application to SDSS galaxy-galaxy weak lensing journal August 2005
The Shear Testing Programme – I. Weak lensing analysis of simulated ground-based observations journal April 2006
Means of confusion: how pixel noise affects shear estimates for weak gravitational lensing: How pixel noise affects shear estimates journal July 2012
Noise bias in weak lensing shape measurements: Noise bias in lensing shape measurement journal August 2012
A General Definition of Residuals journal July 1968
Properties and characteristics of the Nancy Grace Roman Space Telescope H4RG-10 detectors journal October 2020
Validating Synthetic Galaxy Catalogs for Dark Energy Science in the LSST Era journal January 2022
Deep-field Metacalibration journal May 2023
PSFs of coadded images journal February 2023
healpy: equal area pixelization and spherical harmonics transforms for data on the sphere in Python journal March 2019
The Astropy Project: Building an Open-science Project and Status of the v2.0 Core Package journal August 2018
Photometric Biases in Modern Surveys journal March 2020
Practical Weak-lensing Shear Measurement with Metacalibration journal May 2017
LSST: From Science Drivers to Reference Design and Anticipated Data Products journal March 2019
Mitigating Shear-dependent Object Detection Biases with Metacalibration journal October 2020
The Astropy Project: Sustaining and Growing a Community-oriented Open-source Project and the Latest Major Release (v5.0) of the Core Package* journal August 2022
Near-IR Weak-lensing (NIRWL) Measurements in the CANDELS Fields. I. Point-spread Function Modeling and Systematics journal November 2023
The Dark Energy Survey: Data Release 1 journal November 2018
CosmoDC2: A Synthetic Sky Catalog for Dark Energy Science with LSST journal December 2019
The LSST DESC DC2 Simulated Sky Survey journal March 2021
The Dark Energy Survey Data Release 2 journal July 2021
The LSST Dark Energy Science Collaboration (DESC) Science Requirements Document preprint January 2018
Dark Energy Survey Year 3 Results: Point-Spread Function Modeling text January 2020
DESC DC2 Data Release Note preprint January 2021
Report of the Dark Energy Task Force preprint January 2006