DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Uncertainty-informed selection of CMIP6 Earth system model subsets for use in multisectoral and impact models

Journal Article · · Earth System Dynamics (Online)

Abstract. Earth system models (ESMs) and general circulation models (GCMs) are heavily used to provide inputs to sectoral impact and multisector dynamic models, which include representations of energy, water, land, economics, and their interactions. Therefore, representing the full range of model uncertainty, scenario uncertainty, and interannual variability that ensembles of these models capture is critical to the exploration of the future co-evolution of the integrated human–Earth system. The pre-eminent source of these ensembles has been the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP). With more modeling centers participating in each new CMIP phase, the size of the model archive is rapidly increasing, which can be intractable for impact modelers to effectively utilize due to computational constraints and the challenges of analyzing large datasets. In this work, we present a method to select a subset of the latest phase, CMIP6, featuring models for use as inputs to a sectoral impact or multisector dynamics models, while prioritizing preservation of the range of model uncertainty, scenario uncertainty, and interannual variability in the full CMIP6 ensemble results. This method is intended to help impact modelers select climate information from the CMIP archive efficiently for use in downstream models that require global coverage of climate information. This is particularly critical for large-ensemble experiments of multisector dynamic models that may be varying additional features beyond climate inputs in a factorial design, thus putting constraints on the number of climate simulations that can be used. We focus on temperature and precipitation outputs of CMIP6 models, as these are two of the most used variables among impact models, and many other key input variables for impacts are at least correlated with one or both of temperature and precipitation (e.g., relative humidity). Besides preserving the multi-model ensemble variance characteristics, we prioritize selecting CMIP6 models in the subset that preserve the very likely distribution of equilibrium climate sensitivity values as assessed by the latest Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) report. This approach could be applied to other output variables of climate models and, possibly when combined with emulators, offers a flexible framework for designing more efficient experiments on human-relevant climate impacts. It can also provide greater insight into the properties of existing CMIP6 models.

Sponsoring Organization:
USDOE
OSTI ID:
2467571
Journal Information:
Earth System Dynamics (Online), Journal Name: Earth System Dynamics (Online) Journal Issue: 5 Vol. 15; ISSN 2190-4987
Publisher:
Copernicus GmbHCopyright Statement
Country of Publication:
Germany
Language:
English

References (42)

The Practitioner's Dilemma: How to Assess the Credibility of Downscaled Climate Projections journal November 2013
Observed changes in false springs over the contiguous United States: Abatzoglou and Peterson: Observed Changes in False Springs journal March 2014
The potential to narrow uncertainty in projections of regional precipitation change journal April 2010
How well do the spring indices predict phenological activity across plant species? journal February 2020
Climate change projections of the North American Regional Climate Change Assessment Program (NARCCAP) journal July 2013
River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I — A discussion of principles journal April 1970
The Agricultural Model Intercomparison and Improvement Project (AgMIP): Protocols and pilot studies journal March 2013
GCMeval – An interactive tool for evaluation and selection of climate model ensembles journal April 2020
Causes of Higher Climate Sensitivity in CMIP6 Models journal January 2020
Modeling the Economic and Environmental Impacts of Land Scarcity Under Deep Uncertainty journal February 2022
CMIP6 Simulations With the CMCC Earth System Model (CMCC‐ESM2) journal March 2022
Showcasing MESMER‐X: Spatially Resolved Emulation of Annual Maximum Temperatures of Earth System Models journal August 2022
The Impact of Crop Rotation and Spatially Varying Crop Parameters in the E3SM Land Model (ELMv2) journal March 2023
Modeling Perennial Bioenergy Crops in the E3SM Land Model (ELMv2) journal January 2023
Climate simulations: recognize the ‘hot model’ problem journal May 2022
Evaluating the economic impact of water scarcity in a changing world journal March 2021
Using large ensembles of climate change mitigation scenarios for robust insights journal May 2022
Implementation of FAIR principles in the IPCC: the WGI AR6 Atlas repository journal October 2022
Downscaling and bias-correction contribute considerable uncertainty to local climate projections in CMIP6 journal September 2023
Assessing agricultural risks of climate change in the 21st century in a global gridded crop model intercomparison journal December 2013
Hydrological droughts in the 21st century, hotspots and uncertainties from a global multimodel ensemble experiment journal December 2013
The Inter-Sectoral Impact Model Intercomparison Project (ISI–MIP): Project framework journal December 2013
Spring plant phenology and false springs in the conterminous US during the 21st century journal October 2015
Humans drive future water scarcity changes across all Shared Socioeconomic Pathways journal January 2020
Emulating climate extreme indices journal June 2020
Exploring uncertainties in global crop yield projections in a large ensemble of crop models and CMIP5 and CMIP6 climate scenarios journal February 2021
Context for interpreting equilibrium climate sensitivity and transient climate response from the CMIP6 Earth system models journal June 2020
The Potential to Narrow Uncertainty in Regional Climate Predictions journal August 2009
Using and Designing GCM–RCM Ensemble Regional Climate Projections journal December 2010
ESD Reviews: Model dependence in multi-model climate ensembles: weighting, sub-selection and out-of-sample testing journal January 2019
Emulating Earth system model temperatures with MESMER: from global mean temperature trajectories to grid-point-level realizations on land journal February 2020
Partitioning climate projection uncertainty with multiple large ensembles and CMIP5/6 journal January 2020
Extreme metrics from large ensembles: investigating the effects of ensemble size on their estimates journal January 2021
STITCHES: creating new scenarios of climate model output by stitching together pieces of existing simulations journal November 2022
MESMER-M: an Earth system model emulator for spatially resolved monthly temperature journal April 2022
Assessing the impacts of 1.5 °C global warming – simulation protocol of the Inter-Sectoral Impact Model Intercomparison Project (ISIMIP2b) journal January 2017
Trend-preserving bias adjustment and statistical downscaling with ISIMIP3BASD (v1.0) journal January 2019
A circulation-based performance atlas of the CMIP5 and 6 models for regional climate studies in the Northern Hemisphere mid-to-high latitudes journal February 2022
Climate model Selection by Independence, Performance, and Spread (ClimSIPS v1.0.1) for regional applications journal August 2023
Overview of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) experimental design and organization journal January 2016
The Scenario Model Intercomparison Project (ScenarioMIP) for CMIP6 journal January 2016
IPCC, 2023: Climate Change 2023: Synthesis Report, Summary for Policymakers. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Core Writing Team, H. Lee and J. Romero (eds.)]. IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland. report July 2023