DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: The Interplay of Binary and Quantitative Structure on the Stability of Mutualistic Networks

Journal Article · · Integrative and Comparative Biology

Synopsis Understanding how the structure of biological systems impacts their resilience (broadly defined) is a recurring question across multiple levels of biological organization. In ecology, considerable effort has been devoted to understanding how the structure of interactions between species in ecological networks is linked to different broad resilience outcomes, especially local stability. Still, nearly all of that work has focused on interaction structure in presence-absence terms and has not investigated quantitative structure, i.e., the arrangement of interaction strengths in ecological networks. We investigated how the interplay between binary and quantitative structure impacts stability in mutualistic interaction networks (those in which species interactions are mutually beneficial), using community matrix approaches. We additionally examined the effects of network complexity and within-guild competition for context. In terms of structure, we focused on understanding the stability impacts of nestedness, a structure in which more-specialized species interact with smaller subsets of the same species that more-generalized species interact with. Most mutualistic networks in nature display binary nestedness, which is puzzling because both binary and quantitative nestedness are known to be destabilizing on their own. We found that quantitative network structure has important consequences for local stability. In more-complex networks, binary-nested structures were the most stable configurations, depending on the quantitative structures, but which quantitative structure was stabilizing depended on network complexity and competitive context. As complexity increases and in the absence of within-guild competition, the most stable configurations have a nested binary structure with a complementary (i.e., anti-nested) quantitative structure. In the presence of within-guild competition, however, the most stable networks are those with a nested binary structure and a nested quantitative structure. In other words, the impact of interaction overlap on community persistence is dependent on the competitive context. These results help to explain the prevalence of binary-nested structures in nature and underscore the need for future empirical work on quantitative structure.

Sponsoring Organization:
USDOE
Grant/Contract Number:
SC0023112
OSTI ID:
2448116
Journal Information:
Integrative and Comparative Biology, Journal Name: Integrative and Comparative Biology Journal Issue: 3 Vol. 64; ISSN 1540-7063
Publisher:
Oxford University PressCopyright Statement
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English

References (29)

Nested species interactions promote feasibility over stability during the assembly of a pollinator community journal January 2016
Effective competition determines the global stability of model ecosystems journal November 2016
Selection on stability across ecological scales journal July 2015
The diversity–stability debate journal May 2000
The architecture of mutualistic networks minimizes competition and increases biodiversity journal April 2009
Stability criteria for complex ecosystems journal February 2012
Mutualism supports biodiversity when the direct competition is weak journal February 2017
The ghost of nestedness in ecological networks journal January 2013
Predicting the stability of large structured food webs journal July 2015
The nested assembly of plant-animal mutualistic networks journal July 2003
Temporal origin of nestedness in interaction networks journal November 2023
Tolerance of pollination networks to species extinctions journal December 2004
Coexistence, niches and biodiversity effects on ecosystem functioning journal December 2012
Niche partitioning due to adaptive foraging reverses effects of nestedness and connectance on pollination network stability journal September 2016
Plant interaction networks reveal the limits of our understanding of diversity maintenance journal February 2024
Network structural properties mediate the stability of mutualistic communities journal March 2008
Adaptive foraging allows the maintenance of biodiversity of pollination networks journal October 2012
Asymmetric Coevolutionary Networks Facilitate Biodiversity Maintenance journal April 2006
Stability and Diversity of Ecosystems journal July 2007
Stability of Ecological Communities and the Architecture of Mutualistic and Trophic Networks journal August 2010
The Robustness and Restoration of a Network of Ecological Networks journal February 2012
On the structural stability of mutualistic systems journal July 2014
Characterizing Species Interactions to Understand Press Perturbations: What Is the Community Matrix? journal November 2016
Biodiversity and Ecosystem Functioning journal November 2014
Plant-Animal Mutualistic Networks: The Architecture of Biodiversity journal December 2007
Measuring specialization in species interaction networks journal January 2006
Effects of Biodiversity on Ecosystem Functioning: a Consensus of Current Knowledge journal February 2005
Qualitative Stability in Model Ecosystems journal May 1973
Testing how antagonistic interactions impact the robustness of plant-pollinator networks journal July 2019

Related Subjects