DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Modeling direct air carbon capture and storage in a 1.5 °C climate future using historical analogs

Journal Article · · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

Limiting the rise in global temperature to 1.5 °C will rely, in part, on technologies to remove CO2 from the atmosphere. However, many carbon dioxide removal (CDR) technologies are in the early stages of development, and there is limited data to inform predictions of their future adoption. Here, we present an approach to model adoption of early-stage technologies such as CDR and apply it to direct air carbon capture and storage (DACCS). Our approach combines empirical data on historical technology analogs and early adoption indicators to model a range of feasible growth pathways. We use these pathways as inputs to an integrated assessment model (the Global Change Analysis Model, GCAM) and evaluate their effects under an emissions policy to limit end-of-century temperature change to 1.5 °C. Adoption varies widely across analogs, which share different strategic similarities with DACCS. If DACCS growth mirrors high-growth analogs (e.g., solar photovoltaics), it can reach up to 4.9 GtCO2 removal by midcentury, compared to as low as 0.2 GtCO2 for low-growth analogs (e.g., natural gas pipelines). For these slower growing analogs, unabated fossil fuel generation in 2050 is reduced by 44% compared to high-growth analogs, with implications for energy investments and stranded assets. Residual emissions at the end of the century are also substantially lower (by up to 43% and 34% in transportation and industry) under lower DACCS scenarios. The large variation in growth rates observed for different analogs can also point to policy takeaways for enabling DACCS.

Research Organization:
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL), Richland, WA (United States)
Sponsoring Organization:
Alfred P. Sloan Foundation; National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF); USDOE
Grant/Contract Number:
AC05-76RL01830
OSTI ID:
2446800
Report Number(s):
PNNL-SA--185117
Journal Information:
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, Journal Name: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America Journal Issue: 20 Vol. 121; ISSN 0027-8424
Publisher:
National Academy of SciencesCopyright Statement
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English

References (44)

Future capacity growth of energy technologies: are scenarios consistent with historical evidence? journal November 2012
Ecological limits to terrestrial biological carbon dioxide removal journal February 2013
Rapid scale-up of negative emissions technologies: social barriers and social implications journal August 2016
Evaluating process-based integrated assessment models of climate change mitigation journal May 2021
Forecasting with growth curves: An empirical comparison journal June 1995
Socio-technical transitions to sustainability: a review of criticisms and elaborations of the Multi-Level Perspective journal August 2019
Measuring the duration of formative phases for energy technologies journal December 2016
Energy transitions research: Insights and cautionary tales journal November 2012
Time to get ready: Conceptualizing the temporal and spatial dynamics of formative phases for energy technologies journal August 2018
Apples, oranges, and consistent comparisons of the temporal dynamics of energy transitions journal December 2016
Modelling and forecasting the diffusion of innovation – A 25-year review journal January 2006
A Process for Capturing CO2 from the Atmosphere journal August 2018
Accelerating Low-Carbon Innovation journal November 2020
A method to identify barriers to and enablers of implementing climate change mitigation options journal November 2022
How predictable is technological progress? journal April 2016
Diffusion of low-carbon technologies and the feasibility of long-term climate targets journal January 2015
Technology life-cycles in the energy sector — Technological characteristics and the role of deployment for innovation journal March 2016
Climate policy models need to get real about people — here’s how journal June 2021
Betting on negative emissions journal September 2014
The underestimated potential of solar energy to mitigate climate change journal August 2017
Integrating uncertainty into public energy research and development decisions journal May 2017
An inter-model assessment of the role of direct air capture in deep mitigation pathways journal July 2019
Emergency deployment of direct air capture as a response to the climate crisis journal January 2021
A policy roadmap for negative emissions using direct air capture journal April 2021
Biomass-based negative emissions difficult to reconcile with planetary boundaries journal January 2018
Alternative pathways to the 1.5 °C target reduce the need for negative emission technologies journal April 2018
The co-evolution of technological promises, modelling, policies and climate change targets journal April 2020
Food–energy–water implications of negative emissions technologies in a +1.5 °C future journal August 2020
Why residual emissions matter right now journal March 2023
Diverse carbon dioxide removal approaches could reduce impacts on the energy–water–land system journal March 2023
A low energy demand scenario for meeting the 1.5 °C target and sustainable development goals without negative emission technologies journal June 2018
National growth dynamics of wind and solar power compared to the growth required for global climate targets journal July 2021
Understanding environmental trade-offs and resource demand of direct air capture technologies through comparative life-cycle assessment journal October 2021
Probabilistic feasibility space of scaling up green hydrogen supply journal September 2022
The technological and economic prospects for CO2 utilization and removal journal November 2019
Evaluating the efficacy and equity of environmental stopgap measures journal March 2020
Use (and abuse) of expert elicitation in support of decision making for public policy journal May 2014
Negative emissions—Part 1: Research landscape and synthesis journal May 2018
A review of direct air capture (DAC): scaling up commercial technologies and innovating for the future journal April 2021
Verification, Validation, and Confirmation of Numerical Models in the Earth Sciences journal February 1994
The trouble with negative emissions journal October 2016
Granular technologies to accelerate decarbonization journal April 2020
Sustainability Science: Toward a Synthesis journal October 2020
From Zero to Hero?: Why Integrated Assessment Modeling of Negative Emissions Technologies Is Hard and How We Can Do Better journal December 2019