DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Dark energy survey year 3 results: miscentring calibration and X-ray-richness scaling relations in redMaPPer clusters

Journal Article · · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
ORCiD logo; ORCiD logo; ORCiD logo; ORCiD logo; ORCiD logo; ORCiD logo; ORCiD logo; ORCiD logo; ORCiD logo; ORCiD logo; ORCiD logo; ORCiD logo; ORCiD logo; ORCiD logo; ORCiD logo; ORCiD logo; ORCiD logo; ; ; more »; ORCiD logo; ORCiD logo; ; ORCiD logo; ; ; ; ; ORCiD logo; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; « less

ABSTRACT We use Dark Energy Survey Year 3 (DES Y3) clusters with archival XMM–Newton and Chandra X-ray data to assess the centring performance of the redMaPPer cluster finder and to measure key richness observable scaling relations. We find that 10–20 per cent of redMaPPer clusters are miscentred, both when comparing to the X-ray peak position and to the visually identified central cluster galaxy. We find no significant difference in miscentring in bins of low versus high richness or redshift. The dominant reasons for miscentring include masked or missing data and the presence of other bright galaxies in the cluster. For half of the miscentred clusters, the correct central was one of the possible centrals identified by redMaPPer, while for ∼40 per cent of miscentred clusters, the correct central is not a redMaPPer member mostly due to masking. Additionally, we fit scaling relations of X-ray temperature and luminosity with richness. We find a TX–λ scatter of $$0.21\pm 0.01$$. While the scatter in TX–λ is consistent in redshift bins, we find modestly different slopes, with high-redshift clusters displaying a somewhat shallower relation. Splitting based on richness, we find a marginally larger scatter for our lowest richness bin, 20 < λ < 40. We note that the robustness of the scaling relations at lower richnesses is limited by the unknown selection function, but at λ > 75, we detect nearly all of the clusters falling within existing X-ray pointings. The X-ray properties of detected, serendipitous clusters are generally consistent with those of targeted clusters.

Sponsoring Organization:
USDOE
OSTI ID:
2429044
Journal Information:
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Journal Name: Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society Journal Issue: 1 Vol. 533; ISSN 0035-8711
Publisher:
Oxford University PressCopyright Statement
Country of Publication:
United Kingdom
Language:
English

References (52)

Abundances of the elements: Meteoritic and solar journal January 1989
Observational probes of cosmic acceleration journal September 2013
Detection of anti-correlation of hot and cold baryons in galaxy clusters journal July 2019
XMM-Newton and Chandra cross-calibration using HIFLUGCS galaxy clusters : Systematic temperature differences and cosmological impact⋆ journal February 2015
HI4PI: a full-sky H i survey based on EBHIS and GASS journal October 2016
Offset between X-ray and optical centers in clusters of galaxies: Connecting eROSITA data with simulations journal March 2023
The Leiden/Argentine/Bonn (LAB) Survey of Galactic HI: Final data release of the combined LDS and IAR surveys with improved stray-radiation corrections journal September 2005
The structural and scaling properties of nearby galaxy clusters: II. The journal September 2005
Parameter estimation in astronomy through application of the likelihood ratio journal March 1979
A Serendipitous Galaxy Cluster Survey with XMM : Expected Catalog Properties and Scientific Applications journal February 2001
Collisional Plasma Models with APEC/APED: Emission-Line Diagnostics of Hydrogen-like and Helium-like Ions journal August 2001
A Wavelet‐Based Algorithm for the Spatial Analysis of Poisson Data journal January 2002
Some Aspects of Measurement Error in Linear Regression of Astronomical Data journal August 2007
The dark Energy Camera journal October 2015
IMPROVEMENT OF THE RICHNESS ESTIMATES OF maxBCG CLUSTERS journal August 2009
Galaxies in X-Ray Groups. ii. a weak Lensing Study of halo Centering journal August 2012
redMaPPer. I. ALGORITHM AND SDSS DR8 CATALOG journal April 2014
Dark energy two decades after: observables, probes, consistency tests journal December 2017
Brightest cluster galaxies: the centre can(not?) hold journal October 2020
Spectroscopic quantification of projection effects in the SDSS redMaPPer galaxy cluster catalogue journal May 2021
Exploring the contamination of the DES-Y1 cluster sample with SPT-SZ selected clusters journal March 2021
Velocity dispersions of clusters in the Dark Energy Survey Y3 redMaPPer catalogue journal June 2022
The XMM Cluster Survey analysis of the SDSS DR8 redMaPPer catalogue: implications for scatter, selection bias, and isotropy in cluster scaling relations journal August 2022
The XMM cluster survey: exploring scaling relations and completeness of the dark energy survey year 3 redMaPPer cluster catalogue journal April 2023
Luminous red galaxies in clusters: central occupation, spatial distributions and miscentring journal July 2015
Constraints on the richness–mass relation and the optical-SZE positional offset distribution for SZE-selected clusters journal October 2015
How does our choice of observable influence our estimation of the centre of a galaxy cluster? Insights from cosmological simulations journal December 2015
Galaxy cluster mass estimation from stacked spectroscopic analysis journal May 2016
Weighing the giants– V. Galaxy cluster scaling relations journal September 2016
Brightest galaxies as halo centre tracers in SDSS DR7 journal September 2017
Testing redMaPPer centring probabilities using galaxy clustering and galaxy–galaxy lensing journal July 2018
Modelling projection effects in optically selected cluster catalogues journal October 2018
Dark Energy Survey Year 1 results: weak lensing mass calibration of redMaPPer galaxy clusters journal October 2018
LoCuSS: scaling relations between galaxy cluster mass, gas, and stellar content journal January 2019
Dark Energy Surveyed Year 1 results: calibration of cluster mis-centring in the redMaPPer catalogues journal May 2019
Mass variance from archival X-ray properties of Dark Energy Survey Year-1 galaxy clusters journal September 2019
An optically-selected cluster catalog at redshift 0.1 < z < 1.1 from the Hyper Suprime-Cam Subaru Strategic Program S16A data journal June 2017
Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Cosmological constraints from cluster abundances and weak lensing journal July 2020
Cosmological constraints from DES Y1 cluster abundances and SPT multiwavelength data journal February 2021
Are brightest halo galaxies central galaxies?: Brightest halo galaxies journal September 2010
The XMM Cluster Survey: X-ray analysis methodology: XCS: x-ray analysis methodology journal October 2011
Miscentring in galaxy clusters: dark matter to brightest cluster galaxy offsets in 10 000 Sloan Digital Sky Survey clusters: Miscentring in galaxy clusters journal October 2012
Cosmological Parameters from Observations of Galaxy Clusters journal September 2011
Formation of Galaxy Clusters journal September 2012
H I in the Galaxy journal September 1990
The Redmapper Galaxy Cluster Catalog from des Science Verification data journal May 2016
Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: The Photometric Data Set for Cosmology journal April 2018
Chandra Follow-up of the SDSS DR8 Redmapper Catalog Using the MATCha Pipeline journal September 2019
The SPTpol Extended Cluster Survey journal March 2020
Dark Energy Survey Year 3 Results: Photometric Data Set for Cosmology journal May 2021
eROSITA Science Book: Mapping the Structure of the Energetic Universe preprint January 2012
Improved Cosmological Constraints from SDSS redMaPPer Clusters via X-ray Follow-up of a Complete Subsample of Systems preprint January 2019

Related Subjects