DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Choosing the Right Tool: A Comparative Study of Wetland Assessment Approaches

Journal Article · · Wetlands

There are over 700 aquatic ecological assessment approaches across the globe that meet specific institutional goals. However, in many cases, multiple assessment tools are designed to meet the same management need, resulting in a confusing array of overlapping options. Here, we look at six riverine wetland assessments currently in use in Montana, USA, and ask which tool (1) best captures the condition across a disturbance gradient and (2) has the most utility to meet the regulatory or management needs. We used descriptive statistics to compare wetland assessments (n = 18) across a disturbance gradient determined by a landscape development intensity. Factor analysis showed that many of the tools had internal metrics that did not correspond well with overall results, hindering the tool’s ability to act as designed. We surveyed regional wetland managers (n = 56) to determine the extent of their use of each of the six tools and how well they trusted the information the assessment tool provided. We found that the Montana Wetland Assessment Methodology best measured the range of disturbance and had the highest utility to meet Clean Water Act (CWA§ 404) needs. Montana Department of Environmental Quality was best for the CWA§ 303(d) & 305(b) needs. The US Natural Resources Conservation Service’s Riparian Assessment Tool was the third most used by managers but was the tool that had the least ability to distinguish across a disturbance, followed by the US Bureau of Land Management’s Proper Functioning Condition.

Research Organization:
Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL), Los Alamos, NM (United States)
Sponsoring Organization:
USDOE; National Science Foundation (NSF)
Grant/Contract Number:
89233218CNA000001
OSTI ID:
2406566
Report Number(s):
LA-UR--23-24599
Journal Information:
Wetlands, Journal Name: Wetlands Journal Issue: 5 Vol. 44; ISSN 0277-5212
Publisher:
SpringerCopyright Statement
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English

References (15)

Hydrogeomorphic (HGM) assessment—A test of user consistency journal September 1999
An Approach for Evaluating the Repeatability of Rapid Wetland Assessment Methods: The Effects of Training and Experience journal June 2009
The Cultural Dimensions of Freshwater Wetland Assessments: Lessons Learned from the Application of US Rapid Assessment Methods in France journal April 2015
Ecological Equivalence Assessment Methods: What Trade-Offs between Operationality, Scientific Basis and Comprehensiveness? journal May 2017
Landscape Development Intensity Index journal January 2005
Landscape as a predictor of wetland condition: an evaluation of the Landscape Development Index (LDI) with a large reference wetland dataset from Ohio journal June 2006
Three hundred ways to assess Europe's surface waters: An almost complete overview of biological methods to implement the Water Framework Directive journal July 2012
Comparing assembly processes for multimetric indices of biotic integrity journal June 2018
European aquatic ecological assessment methods: A critical review of their sensitivity to key pressures journal October 2020
Ecosystem Behavior Under Stress journal May 1985
Fire and flood expand the floodplain shifting habitat mosaic concept journal December 2015
An evaluation of rapid methods for assessing the ecological condition of wetlands journal September 2007
Welcome to the Tidyverse journal November 2019
The Role of Reference Wetlands in Functional Assessment and Mitigation journal February 1996
Understanding the use of decision support tools by conservation professionals and their education and training needs: An application of the Reasoned Action Approach journal January 2020