ROSE: A reduced-order scattering emulator for optical models

Odell, D.; Giuliani, Pablo; Beyer, Kyle; Catacora-Rios, M.; Chan, Moses Y.-H.; Bonilla, Edgard; Furnstahl, Richard J.; Godbey, K.; Nunes, F. M.

doi:10.1103/physrevc.109.044612

Title: ROSE: A reduced-order scattering emulator for optical models

Journal Article · 10 April 2024 · Physical Review. C

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevc.109.044612 · OSTI ID:2337919

Odell, D. ^[1];

^[2];

^[3]; Catacora-Rios, M. ^[2];

^[4];

^[5];

^[6]; Godbey, K. ^[2]; Nunes, F. M. ^[2]

Ohio Univ., Athens, OH (United States); michigan state university
Michigan State Univ., East Lansing, MI (United States)
Univ. of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI (United States)
Northwestern Univ., Evanston, IL (United States)
Stanford Univ., CA (United States)
The Ohio State Univ., Columbus, OH (United States)

A new generation of phenomenological optical potentials requires robust calibration and uncertainty quantification, motivating the use of Bayesian statistical methods. These Bayesian methods usually require calculating observables for thousands or even millions of parameter sets, making fast and accurate emulators highly desirable or even essential. Emulating scattering across different energies or with interactions such as optical potentials is challenging because of the nonaffine parameter dependence, meaning the parameters do not all factorize from individual operators. Here we introduce and demonstrate the reduced-order scattering emulator (ROSE) framework, a reduced basis emulator that can handle nonaffine problems. ROSE is fully extensible and works within the publicly available band framework software suite for calibration, model mixing, and experimental design. As a demonstration problem, we use ROSE to calibrate a realistic nucleon-target scattering model through the calculation of elastic cross sections. This problem shows the practical value of the ROSE framework for Bayesian uncertainty quantification with controlled trade-offs between emulator speed and accuracy as compared to high-fidelity solvers. Finally, planned extensions of ROSE are discussed.

View Accepted Manuscript (DOE)

Cite

Export

Save

Research Organization:: Michigan State Univ., East Lansing, MI (United States)

Sponsoring Organization:: USDOE National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA); National Science Foundation (NSF)

Grant/Contract Number:: SC0021422; NA0003920

OSTI ID:: 2337919

Alternate ID(s):: OSTI ID: 2474275

Journal Information:: Physical Review. C, Journal Name: Physical Review. C Journal Issue: 4 Vol. 109; ISSN 2469-9985

Publisher:: American Physical Society (APS)Copyright Statement

Country of Publication:: United States

Language:: English

References (76)

A family of embedded Runge-Kutta formulae Dormand, J. R.; Prince, P. J. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, Vol. 6, Issue 1 https://doi.org/10.1016/0771-050X(80)90013-3	journal	March 1980
Uncertainty Quantification for Nuclear Density Functional Theory and Information Content of New Measurements McDonnell, J. D.; Schunck, N.; Higdon, D. Physical Review Letters, Vol. 114, Issue 12 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.122501	journal	March 2015
Eigenvector Continuation with Subspace Learning Frame, Dillon; He, Rongzheng; Ipsen, Ilse Physical Review Letters, Vol. 121, Issue 3 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.032501	journal	July 2018
Global Sensitivity Analysis of Bulk Properties of an Atomic Nucleus Ekström, Andreas; Hagen, Gaute Physical Review Letters, Vol. 123, Issue 25 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.123.252501	journal	December 2019
The nuclear optical model Hodgson, P. E. Reports on Progress in Physics, Vol. 34, Issue 2 https://doi.org/10.1088/0034-4885/34/2/306	journal	May 1971
Quenching of Single-Particle Strength in A=15 Nuclei Kay, B. P.; Tang, T. L.; Tolstukhin, I. A. Physical Review Letters, Vol. 129, Issue 15 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.152501	journal	October 2022
Uncertainty-quantified phenomenological optical potentials for single-nucleon scattering Pruitt, C. D.; Escher, J. E.; Rahman, R. Physical Review C, Vol. 107, Issue 1 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.107.014602	journal	January 2023
An EIM-degradation free reduced basis method via over collocation and residual hyper reduction-based error estimation Chen, Yanlai; Gottlieb, Sigal; Ji, Lijie Journal of Computational Physics, Vol. 444 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2021.110545	journal	November 2021
The R -matrix theory Descouvemont, P.; Baye, D. Reports on Progress in Physics, Vol. 73, Issue 3 https://doi.org/10.1088/0034-4885/73/3/036301	journal	February 2010
EMPIRE: Nuclear Reaction Model Code System for Data Evaluation Herman, M.; Capote, R.; Carlson, B. V. Nuclear Data Sheets, Vol. 108, Issue 12 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nds.2007.11.003	journal	December 2007
Ab Initio Prediction of the He4(d,γ)Li6 Big Bang Radiative Capture Hebborn, C.; Hupin, G.; Kravvaris, K. Physical Review Letters, Vol. 129, Issue 4 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.042503	journal	July 2022
Optimal scaling for various Metropolis-Hastings algorithms Roberts, Gareth O.; Rosenthal, Jeffrey S. Statistical Science, Vol. 16, Issue 4 https://doi.org/10.1214/ss/1015346320	journal	November 2001
Exploring Bayesian parameter estimation for chiral effective field theory using nucleon–nucleon phase shifts Wesolowski, S.; Furnstahl, R. J.; Melendez, J. A. Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics, Vol. 46, Issue 4 https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6471/aaf5fc	journal	February 2019
Temporal stability of collocation, Petrov–Galerkin, and other non-symmetric methods in elastodynamics and an energy conserving time integration Wang, Jiarui; Hillman, Michael C. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, Vol. 393 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2022.114738	journal	April 2022
Bayesian Data Analysis Gelman, Andrew; Carlin, John B.; Stern, Hal S. https://doi.org/10.1201/b16018	book	November 2013
Training and projecting: A reduced basis method emulator for many-body physics Bonilla, Edgard; Giuliani, Pablo; Godbey, Kyle Physical Review C, Vol. 106, Issue 5 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.106.054322	journal	November 2022
Excited states from eigenvector continuation: The anharmonic oscillator Companys Franzke, M.; Tichai, A.; Hebeler, K. Physics Letters B, Vol. 830 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2022.137101	journal	July 2022
Fast emulation of quantum three-body scattering Zhang, Xilin; Furnstahl, R. J. Physical Review C, Vol. 105, Issue 6 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.105.064004	journal	June 2022
Toward a complete theory for predicting inclusive deuteron breakup away from stability Potel, G.; Perdikakis, G.; Carlson, B. V. The European Physical Journal A, Vol. 53, Issue 9 https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/i2017-12371-9	journal	September 2017
Data-Driven Science and Engineering Brunton, Steven L.; Kutz, J. Nathan https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108380690	book	February 2019
An ‘empirical interpolation’ method: application to efficient reduced-basis discretization of partial differential equations Barrault, Maxime; Maday, Yvon; Nguyen, Ngoc Cuong Comptes Rendus Mathematique, Vol. 339, Issue 9 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crma.2004.08.006	journal	November 2004
Eigenvector continuation as an efficient and accurate emulator for uncertainty quantification König, S.; Ekström, A.; Hebeler, K. Physics Letters B, Vol. 810 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2020.135814	journal	November 2020
C 15 : From halo effective field theory structure to the study of transfer, breakup, and radiative-capture reactions Moschini, Laura; Yang, Jiecheng; Capel, Pierre Physical Review C, Vol. 100, Issue 4 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.100.044615	journal	October 2019
White paper: from bound states to the continuum Johnson, Calvin W.; Launey, Kristina D.; Auerbach, Naftali Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics, Vol. 47, Issue 12 https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6471/abb129	journal	November 2020
Recent advances in the quantification of uncertainties in reaction theory Lovell, A. E.; Nunes, F. M.; Catacora-Rios, M. Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics, Vol. 48, Issue 1 https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6471/abba72	journal	December 2020
Applications of reduced-basis methods to the nuclear single-particle spectrum Anderson, Amy L.; O'Donnell, Graham L.; Piekarewicz, J. Physical Review C, Vol. 106, Issue 3 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.106.L031302	journal	September 2022
Quantifying correlated truncation errors in effective field theory Melendez, J. A.; Furnstahl, R. J.; Phillips, D. R. Physical Review C, Vol. 100, Issue 4 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.100.044001	journal	October 2019
Coupled reaction channels calculations in nuclear physics Thompson, Ian J. Computer Physics Reports, Vol. 7, Issue 4 https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-7977(88)90005-6	journal	April 1988
Efficient reduced-basis treatment of nonaffine and nonlinear partial differential equations Grepl, Martin A.; Maday, Yvon; Nguyen, Ngoc C. ESAIM: Mathematical Modelling and Numerical Analysis, Vol. 41, Issue 3 https://doi.org/10.1051/m2an:2007031	journal	May 2007
Volume extrapolation via eigenvector continuation Yapa, Nuwan; König, Sebastian Physical Review C, Vol. 106, Issue 1 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.106.014309	journal	July 2022
Binding-energy asymmetry in absorption explored through CDCC extended for complex potentials Gómez-Ramos, M.; Gómez-Camacho, J.; Moro, A. M. Physics Letters B, Vol. 832 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2022.137252	journal	September 2022
Local and global nucleon optical models from 1 keV to 200 MeV Koning, A. J.; Delaroche, J. P. Nuclear Physics A, Vol. 713, Issue 3-4 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0375-9474(02)01321-0	journal	January 2003
Optical potentials for the rare-isotope beam era Hebborn, C.; Nunes, F. M.; Potel, G. Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics, Vol. 50, Issue 6 https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6471/acc348	journal	April 2023
Improved many-body expansions from eigenvector continuation Demol, P.; Duguet, T.; Ekström, A. Physical Review C, Vol. 101, Issue 4 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.101.041302	journal	April 2020
SciPy 1.0: fundamental algorithms for scientific computing in Python Virtanen, Pauli; Gommers, Ralf; Oliphant, Travis E. Nature Methods https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2	journal	February 2020
A Comparison of Three Methods for Selecting Values of Input Variables in the Analysis of Output from a Computer Code McKay, M. D.; Beckman, R. J.; Conover, W. J. Technometrics, Vol. 21, Issue 2 https://doi.org/10.2307/1268522	journal	May 1979
An Algorithm for the Construction of "D-Optimal" Experimental Designs Mitchell, Toby J. Technometrics, Vol. 42, Issue 1 https://doi.org/10.2307/1271431	journal	February 2000
Convergence of Eigenvector Continuation Sarkar, Avik; Lee, Dean Physical Review Letters, Vol. 126, Issue 3 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.032501	journal	January 2021
Efficient emulators for scattering using eigenvector continuation Furnstahl, R. J.; Garcia, A. J.; Millican, P. J. Physics Letters B, Vol. 809 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2020.135719	journal	October 2020
Variational Methods in Nuclear Collision Problems Kohn, W. Physical Review, Vol. 74, Issue 12 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.74.1763	journal	December 1948
Algorithm AS 295: A Fedorov Exchange Algorithm for D-Optimal Design Miller, Alan J.; Nguyen, Nam-Ky Applied Statistics, Vol. 43, Issue 4 https://doi.org/10.2307/2986264	journal	January 1994
Direct Comparison between Bayesian and Frequentist Uncertainty Quantification for Nuclear Reactions King, G. B.; Lovell, A. E.; Neufcourt, L. Physical Review Letters, Vol. 122, Issue 23 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.232502	journal	June 2019
Model reduction methods for nuclear emulators Melendez, J. A.; Drischler, C.; Furnstahl, R. J. Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics, Vol. 49, Issue 10 https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6471/ac83dd	journal	September 2022
Algorithmic complexity: three NP - hard problems in computational statistics Welch, William J. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation, Vol. 15, Issue 1 https://doi.org/10.1080/00949658208810560	journal	June 1982
The Lagrange-mesh method Baye, Daniel Physics Reports, Vol. 565 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2014.11.006	journal	March 2015
Ueber die numerische Aufl�sung von Differentialgleichungen Runge, C. Mathematische Annalen, Vol. 46, Issue 2 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01446807	journal	June 1895
Uncertainty quantification in breakup reactions Sürer, Ö.; Nunes, F. M.; Plumlee, M. Physical Review C, Vol. 106, Issue 2 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.106.024607	journal	August 2022
Fast & accurate emulation of two-body scattering observables without wave functions Melendez, J. A.; Drischler, C.; Garcia, A. J. Physics Letters B, Vol. 821 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2021.136608	journal	October 2021
Nuclear Reactions for Astrophysics: Principles, Calculation and Applications of Low-Energy Reactions Thompson, Ian J.; Nunes, Filomena M. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139152150	book	January 2009
Get on the BAND Wagon: a Bayesian framework for quantifying model uncertainties in nuclear dynamics Phillips, D. R.; Furnstahl, R. J.; Heinz, U. Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics, Vol. 48, Issue 7 https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6471/abf1df	journal	May 2021
Bayesian calibration of computer models Kennedy, Marc C.; O'Hagan, Anthony Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology), Vol. 63, Issue 3 https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9868.00294	journal	August 2001
Exploring experimental conditions to reduce uncertainties in the optical potential Catacora-Rios, M.; King, G. B.; Lovell, A. E. Physical Review C, Vol. 100, Issue 6 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.100.064615	journal	December 2019
Constraining transfer cross sections using Bayes' theorem Lovell, A. E.; Nunes, F. M. Physical Review C, Vol. 97, Issue 6 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.97.064612	journal	June 2018
Three-body description of direct nuclear reactions: Comparison with the continuum discretized coupled channels method Deltuva, A.; Moro, A. M.; Cravo, E. Physical Review C, Vol. 76, Issue 6 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.76.064602	journal	December 2007
Constructing a Simulation Surrogate with Partially Observed Output Chan, Moses Y. -H.; Plumlee, Matthew; Wild, Stefan M. Technometrics https://doi.org/10.1080/00401706.2023.2210170	journal	June 2023
Elastic scattering and breakup reactions of the proton drip-line nucleus B8 on Pb208 at 238 MeV Wang, K.; Yang, Y. Y.; Moro, A. M. Physical Review C, Vol. 103, Issue 2 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.103.024606	journal	February 2021
A review of some exchange algorithms for constructing discrete D-optimal designs Nguyen, Nam-Ky; Miller, Alan J. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Vol. 14, Issue 4 https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-9473(92)90064-M	journal	November 1992
Uncertainty quantification for optical model parameters Lovell, A. E.; Nunes, F. M.; Sarich, J. Physical Review C, Vol. 95, Issue 2 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.95.024611	journal	February 2017
Anomalous singularities in the complex Kohn variational principle of quantum scattering theory Lucchese, Robert R. Physical Review A, Vol. 40, Issue 12 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.40.6879	journal	December 1989
Quenching of single-particle strength from direct reactions with stable and rare-isotope beams Aumann, T.; Barbieri, C.; Bazin, D. Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics, Vol. 118 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ppnp.2021.103847	journal	May 2021
Generalizing the calculable R -matrix theory and eigenvector continuation to the incoming-wave boundary condition Bai, Dong; Ren, Zhongzhou Physical Review C, Vol. 103, Issue 1 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.103.014612	journal	January 2021
Bayes goes fast: Uncertainty quantification for a covariant energy density functional emulated by the reduced basis method Giuliani, Pablo; Godbey, Kyle; Bonilla, Edgard Frontiers in Physics, Vol. 10 https://doi.org/10.3389/fphy.2022.1054524	journal	January 2023
BUQEYE guide to projection-based emulators in nuclear physics Drischler, C.; Melendez, J. A.; Furnstahl, R. J. Frontiers in Physics, Vol. 10 https://doi.org/10.3389/fphy.2022.1092931	journal	February 2023
Discovering governing equations from data by sparse identification of nonlinear dynamical systems Brunton, Steven L.; Proctor, Joshua L.; Kutz, J. Nathan Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 113, Issue 15 https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1517384113	journal	March 2016
An Introductory Guide to Computational Methods for the Solution of Physics Problems Rawitscher, George; dos Santos Filho, Victo; Peixoto, Thiago Carvalho https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42703-4	book	October 2018
Toward emulating nuclear reactions using eigenvector continuation Drischler, C.; Quinonez, M.; Giuliani, P. G. Physics Letters B, Vol. 823 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2021.136777	journal	December 2021
Bayesian predictions for A=6 nuclei using eigenvector continuation emulators Djärv, T.; Ekström, A.; Forssén, C. Physical Review C, Vol. 105, Issue 1 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.105.014005	journal	January 2022
Unraveling the Reaction Mechanisms Leading to Partial Fusion of Weakly Bound Nuclei Lei, Jin; Moro, Antonio M. Physical Review Letters, Vol. 123, Issue 23 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.123.232501	journal	December 2019
R-Matrix Theory of Nuclear Reactions Lane, A. M.; Thomas, R. G. Reviews of Modern Physics, Vol. 30, Issue 2 https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.30.257	journal	April 1958
corner.py: Scatterplot matrices in Python Foreman-Mackey, Daniel The Journal of Open Source Software, Vol. 1, Issue 2 https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.00024	journal	June 2016
A Method of Extrapolation of Perturbations Noumerov, B. V. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 84, Issue 8 https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/84.8.592	journal	June 1924
Wave-function-based emulation for nucleon-nucleon scattering in momentum space Garcia, A. J.; Drischler, C.; Furnstahl, R. J. Physical Review C, Vol. 107, Issue 5 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.107.054001	journal	May 2023
Self-learning emulators and eigenvector continuation Sarkar, Avik; Lee, Dean Physical Review Research, Vol. 4, Issue 2 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.4.023214	journal	June 2022
Statistical tools for a better optical model Catacora-Rios, M.; King, G. B.; Lovell, A. E. Physical Review C, Vol. 104, Issue 6 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.104.064611	journal	December 2021
Certified Reduced Basis Methods for Parametrized Partial Differential Equations Hesthaven, Jan S.; Rozza, Gianluigi; Stamm, Benjamin SpringerBriefs in Mathematics https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22470-1	book	January 2016
RIPL – Reference Input Parameter Library for Calculation of Nuclear Reactions and Nuclear Data Evaluations Capote, R.; Herman, M.; Obložinský, P. Nuclear Data Sheets, Vol. 110, Issue 12 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nds.2009.10.004	journal	December 2009

Similar Records

BUQEYE guide to projection-based emulators in nuclear physics

Journal Article · 2023 · Frontiers in Physics · OSTI ID:1957546

Drischler, C.; Melendez, J. A.; Furnstahl, R. J.; +2 more

Data-Consistent Solutions to Stochastic Inverse Problems Using a Probabilistic Multi-Fidelity Method Based on Conditional Densities

Journal Article · 2018 · International Journal for Uncertainty Quantification · OSTI ID:1769923

Bruder, L.; Gee, M. W.; Wildey, Timothy

Quantifying Uncertainties In Neutron-Alpha Scattering With Chiral Nucleon-Nucleon And Three-Nucleon Forces

Journal Article · 2020 · Physical Review. C · OSTI ID:1860672

Kravvaris, Konstantinos; Quinlan, Kevin R.; Quaglioni, Sofia; +2 more

Related Subjects

73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS
reduced order methods
elastic scattering
optical potentials

Title: ROSE: A reduced-order scattering emulator for optical models

Citation Formats

References (76)

Similar Records

Related Subjects