DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Sulphate resistance of low‐clinker engineered cementitious composites examined by MicroXRF imaging

Journal Article · · Journal of Microscopy
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jmi.13303 · OSTI ID:2335976

Abstract Engineered cementitious composites (ECC) are a class of high‐performing fibre‐reinforced cementitious materials recognised for their increased ductility and durability compared to conventional cement‐based materials, owing to their autogenously controlled tight crack widths, even when subjected to high strains. To reduce ECC's environmental impact, this research examines the use of a low‐clinker binder − limestone‐calcined clay cement (LC3) − as an alternative to portland cement (PC), along with fly ash to further reduce the clinker proportion and the embodied CO 2 of the formulations. In conventional concrete, LC3 hydrates to a denser microstructure resulting from the synergistic reaction between limestone and calcined clay. At the lower water contents typical of ECC and with the presence of fly ash, the influence of the binder composition on the microstructure is difficult to anticipate. To examine the influence of these compositional variables on microstructure, permeability and durability, the sulphate resistance of LC3‐based ECC is explored. Specifically, the ECC‐LC3 blends are designed with high clinker replacement rate of 75% by mass of binder and contain either conventional fly ash or reclaimed fly ash at 50% by mass of binder. Expansion of ECC‐LC3 samples subjected to standard sodium sulphate test conditions was measured up to 12 months and the depth of penetration of sulphates into the ECC‐LC3 of varying compositions was quantified using micro‐X‐Ray Fluorescence (microXRF) imaging and modelling. The expansion results show that the ECC‐LC3 formulations performed better than the PC samples and can provide adequate resistance to external sulphate attack, even when reclaimed fly ashes are used in place of the conventional ash. In addition, the shallow penetration of sulphate into these cementitious composites demonstrates the low diffusion coefficients values that were determined using the quantitative data from MicroXRF imaging.

Sponsoring Organization:
USDOE
Grant/Contract Number:
NONE; AR0001141
OSTI ID:
2335976
Alternate ID(s):
OSTI ID: 2335978
Journal Information:
Journal of Microscopy, Journal Name: Journal of Microscopy Journal Issue: 2 Vol. 294; ISSN 0022-2720
Publisher:
Wiley-BlackwellCopyright Statement
Country of Publication:
United Kingdom
Language:
English

References (21)

Evaluation of Beneficiated and Reclaimed Fly Ashes in Concrete journal July 2019
Rheological properties, strength characteristics and flexural performances of engineered cementitious composites incorporating synthetic wollastonite microfibers with two different high aspect ratios journal November 2021
Quantification of chloride in concrete samples using LA-ICP-MS journal August 2016
On Engineered Cementitious Composites (ECC): A Review of the Material and Its Applications journal January 2003
Sulfate attack monitored by microCT and EDXRD: Influence of cement type, water-to-cement ratio, and aggregate journal January 2006
Evaluation of Alternative Fly Ashes as Supplementary Cementitious Materials journal July 2019
On the use of limestone calcined clay cement (LC3) in high-strength strain-hardening cement-based composites (HS-SHCC) journal June 2021
Modelling of isothermal coupled moisture–ion transport in cementitious materials journal August 2011
Role of the morphology and the dehydroxylation of metakaolins on geopolymerization journal December 2010
Distribution of porosity surrounding a microfiber in cement paste journal September 2023
Detailed depth profiles of sulfate ingress into concrete measured with laser induced breakdown spectroscopy journal January 2009
Determination of chlorine, sulfur and carbon in reinforced concrete structures by double-pulse laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy journal September 2014
The greening of engineered cementitious composites (ECC): A review journal April 2022
Durability of Engineered Cementitious Composites Incorporating High-Volume Fly Ash and Limestone Powder journal August 2022
Engineered Cementitious Composites (ECC) with limestone calcined clay cement (LC3) journal November 2020
Estimation of non-traditional supplementary cementitious materials potential to prevent alkali-silica reaction using pozzolanic reactivity and bulk resistivity journal October 2022
The corrosion resistance of engineered cementitious composite (ECC) containing high-volume fly ash and low-volume bentonite against the combined action of sulfate attack and dry-wet cycles journal October 2021
Material processing, microstructure, and composite properties of low carbon Engineered Cementitious Composites (ECC) journal November 2022
Limestone calcined clay cement and concrete: A state-of-the-art review journal November 2021
Durability study on engineered cementitious composites (ECC) under sulfate and chloride environment journal February 2017
Evaluating the Use of Alkali-Silica Reaction Mitigation as a Metric for Assessing Pozzolanicity journal November 2022