DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Linguistic variation in functional types of statutory law

Journal Article · · Applied Corpus Linguistics

When the meaning of an ambiguous word, phrase or grammatical structure in a statutory provision is disputed, courts are tasked with identifying the best meaning of the contested language. A common method of resolving linguistic ambiguities is to investigate the meaning of the contested word or structure in statutory provisions with similar subject matter. While the subject matter of a text has a demonstrated effect on language use, register variation research shows that the function of a text is also highly influential in predicting linguistic variation. Thus far, the function of a statutory provision (e.g., obligation to act, authorization to act) has not been considered in legal interpretative research. In the present study, I investigate the extent to which function influences the lexico-grammatical characteristics of statutory texts. 2,573 statutory provisions from the Arizona State Code are individually assigned to one of seven categories representing their function: Duties, Permissions, Impersonal Rules, Operational Definitions, Prohibitions, Procedural Guidelines, and Criminal Offenses. Key feature analysis is used to identify and describe patterns of lexico-grammatical variation between the seven functional types. Results reveal a great deal of lexico-grammatical variation associated with function in the register of statutory law. Furthermore, some functional types of statutory provisions are more linguistically distinct than others. In conclusion, these findings suggest that it may be beneficial to consider communicative function when investigating legal interpretative questions.

Research Organization:
Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL), Los Alamos, NM (United States)
Sponsoring Organization:
USDOE National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)
Grant/Contract Number:
89233218CNA000001
OSTI ID:
2281533
Report Number(s):
LA-UR--23-34096
Journal Information:
Applied Corpus Linguistics, Journal Name: Applied Corpus Linguistics Journal Issue: 1 Vol. 4; ISSN 2666-7991
Publisher:
ElsevierCopyright Statement
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English

References (10)

Key feature analysis: a simple, yet powerful method for comparing text varieties journal April 2023
A matrix of legislative speech acts for Chinese and British statutes journal January 2011
The textual fit of translated EU law: a corpus-based study of deontic modality journal June 2014
What is a register? Accounting for linguistic and situational variation within – and outside of – textual varieties journal March 2023
Register variation across text lengths: Evidence from social media journal August 2022
A lexico-grammatical comparison of statutory law and popular written language journal January 2022
Linguistic variation and legal representation in legislative discourse: A corpus-based multi-dimensional study journal December 2017
Legislative Language in the EU: The Crucible journal December 2002
The corpus of United States state statutes—design, construction and use journal August 2023
A Multi-Dimensional Analysis of English tweets journal June 2022