DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Comparison of methods to estimate aerosol effective radiative forcings in climate models

Journal Article · · Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (Online)

Abstract. Uncertainty in the effective radiative forcing (ERF) of climate primarily arises from the unknown contribution of aerosols, which impact radiative fluxes directly and through modifying cloud properties. Climate model simulations with fixed sea surface temperatures but perturbed atmospheric aerosol loadings allow for an estimate of how strongly the planet's radiative energy budget has been perturbed by the increase in aerosols since pre-industrial times. The approximate partial radiative perturbation (APRP) technique further decomposes the contributions to the direct forcing due to aerosol scattering and absorption and to the indirect forcing due to aerosol-induced changes in cloud scattering, amount, and absorption, as well as the effects of aerosols on surface albedo. Here we evaluate previously published APRP-derived estimates of aerosol effective radiative forcings from these simulations conducted in the sixth phase of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP6) and find that they are biased as a result of two large coding errors that – in most cases – fortuitously compensate. The most notable exception is the direct radiative forcing from absorbing aerosols, which is more than 40 % larger averaged across CMIP6 models in the present study. Correcting these biases eliminates the residuals and leads to better agreement with benchmark estimates derived from double calls to the radiation code. The APRP method – when properly implemented – remains a highly accurate and efficient technique for diagnosing aerosol ERF in cases where double radiation calls are not available, and in all cases it provides quantification of the individual contributors to the ERF that are highly useful but not otherwise available.

Sponsoring Organization:
USDOE
OSTI ID:
1994425
Journal Information:
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (Online), Journal Name: Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (Online) Journal Issue: 15 Vol. 23; ISSN 1680-7324
Publisher:
Copernicus GmbHCopyright Statement
Country of Publication:
Germany
Language:
English

References (16)

Quantifying components of aerosol-cloud-radiation interactions in climate models journal June 2014
On the pattern of CO 2 radiative forcing and poleward energy transport : CO journal October 2017
The Earth’s Energy Budget, Climate Feedbacks and Climate Sensitivity book July 2023
Climate commitment in an uncertain world: CLIMATE COMMITMENT journal January 2011
CMIP6 Historical Simulations (1850–2014) With GISS‐E2.1 journal January 2021
An Assessment of Earth's Climate Sensitivity Using Multiple Lines of Evidence journal September 2020
Aerosols must be included in climate risk assessments journal November 2022
Estimating the timing of geophysical commitment to 1.5 and 2.0 °C of global warming journal June 2022
Large uncertainty in future warming due to aerosol forcing journal November 2022
The influence of anthropogenic aerosol on multi-decadal variations of historical global climate journal June 2013
Estimating Shortwave Radiative Forcing and Response in Climate Models journal June 2007
Projected effects of declining aerosols in RCP4.5: unmasking global warming? journal January 2013
Technical Note: Estimating aerosol effects on cloud radiative forcing journal January 2013
Surprising similarities in model and observational aerosol radiative forcing estimates journal January 2020
Effective radiative forcing and adjustments in CMIP6 models journal January 2020
The Radiative Forcing Model Intercomparison Project (RFMIP): experimental protocol for CMIP6 journal January 2016

Related Subjects