DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Contraceptive Sabotage and Contraceptive Use at the Time of Pregnancy: An Analysis of People with a Recent Live Birth in the United States

Journal Article · · Journal of Interpersonal Violence
ORCiD logo [1];  [2];  [1]; ORCiD logo [3];  [4];  [5];  [5]
  1. Division of Violence Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
  2. The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
  3. Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
  4. Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
  5. Division of Violence Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA, Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education, Oak Ridge, TN, USA

Contraceptive sabotage and other forms of intimate partner violence (IPV) can interfere with contraceptive use. We used 2012 to 2015 Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System data from 8,981 people residing in five states who reported that when they became pregnant, they were not trying to get pregnant. We assessed the relationships between ever experiencing contraceptive sabotage and physical IPV 12 months before pregnancy (both by the current partner) and contraceptive use at the time of pregnancy using multivariable logistic regression. We also assessed the joint associations between physical IPV 12 months before pregnancy and ever experienced contraceptive sabotage with contraceptive use at the time of pregnancy. Few people ever experienced contraceptive sabotage (1.8%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.4, 2.3) or physical IPV 12 months before pregnancy (2.8%; 95% CI: 2.3, 3.3). In models adjusted for age, race/ethnicity, marital status, education, and state of residence, ever experiencing contraceptive sabotage was associated with contraceptive use at the time of pregnancy (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 1.73; 95% CI: 1.06, 2.82), but not with physical IPV 12 months before pregnancy (aOR: 0.69; 95% CI: 0.46, 1.02). When examining the joint association, compared to not ever experiencing contraceptive sabotage or physical IPV 12 months before pregnancy, ever experiencing contraceptive sabotage was significantly related to contraceptive use at the time of pregnancy (aOR: 1.72; 95% CI: 1.00, 2.95). However, it was not associated with experiencing physical IPV 12 months before pregnancy (aOR: 0.68; 95% CI: 0.45, 1.04) or with experiencing both contraceptive sabotage and physical IPV 12 months before pregnancy (aOR: 1.21; 95% CI: 0.42, 3.50), compared to not ever experiencing contraceptive sabotage or physical IPV 12 months before pregnancy. Our study highlights that current partner contraceptive sabotage may motivate those not trying to get pregnant to use contraception; however, all people in our sample still experienced a pregnancy.

Sponsoring Organization:
USDOE
OSTI ID:
1992984
Journal Information:
Journal of Interpersonal Violence, Journal Name: Journal of Interpersonal Violence Journal Issue: 23-24 Vol. 38; ISSN 0886-2605
Publisher:
SAGE PublicationsCopyright Statement
Country of Publication:
Country unknown/Code not available
Language:
English

References (37)

Screening for Intimate Partner Violence, Elder Abuse, and Abuse of Vulnerable Adults journal October 2018
Accelerate progress—sexual and reproductive health and rights for all: report of the Guttmacher– Lancet Commission journal June 2018
Reproductive coercion and co-occurring intimate partner violence in obstetrics and gynecology patients journal January 2014
Male partner reproductive coercion among women veterans journal February 2018
Male Partner Pregnancy-Promoting Behaviors and Adolescent Partner Violence: Findings from a Qualitative Study with Adolescent Females journal September 2007
Pregnancy coercion, intimate partner violence and unintended pregnancy journal April 2010
Reproductive coercion: connecting the dots between partner violence and unintended pregnancy journal June 2010
A family planning clinic partner violence intervention to reduce risk associated with reproductive coercion journal March 2011
Recent reproductive coercion and unintended pregnancy among female family planning clients journal February 2014
“It just happens”: a qualitative study exploring low-income women’s perspectives on pregnancy intention and planning journal February 2015
Psychometric properties and refinement of the Reproductive Coercion Scale journal March 2017
Integrating anti-violence efforts into sexual and reproductive health: Reproductive coercion as a case example journal November 2022
Differences by Sexual Minority Status in Relationship Abuse and Sexual and Reproductive Health Among Adolescent Females journal November 2014
Relationships of Reproductive Coercion and Intimate Partner Violence to Unintended Pregnancy journal January 2019
Male reproductive control of women who have experienced intimate partner violence in the United States journal June 2010
Race and Reproductive Coercion: A Qualitative Assessment journal May 2015
Understanding Contraceptive Failure: An Analysis of Qualitative Narratives journal July 2022
Racial/Ethnic Differences in Women's Experiences of Reproductive Coercion, Intimate Partner Violence, and Unintended Pregnancy journal August 2017
Physical Intimate Partner Violence and Contraceptive Behaviors Among Young Women journal August 2018
Types of Lifetime Reproductive Coercion and Current Contraceptive Use journal August 2021
Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence, Reproductive Coercion, and Reproductive Health Among American Indian and Alaska Native Women: A Narrative Interview Study journal January 2022
Reproductive Coercion and Relationship Abuse Among Adolescents and Young Women Seeking Care at School Health Centers journal August 2019
How do health practitioners in a large Australian public hospital identify and respond to reproductive abuse? A qualitative study journal October 2019
Disparities in Rates of Unintended Pregnancy In the United States, 1994 and 2001 journal June 2006
Experiences of Reproductive Coercion Among Latina Women and Strategies for Minimizing Harm: “The Path Makes Us Strong” journal January 2020
Reproductive control by others: means, perpetrators and effects journal January 2019
Reproductive Coercion by Male Sexual Partners: Associations With Partner Violence and College Women’s Sexual Health journal August 2015
Reproductive Coercion, Intimate Partner Violence, and Unintended Pregnancy Among Latina Women journal June 2020
Reproductive Coercion and Intimate Partner Violence Victimization Among a Racially and Ethnically Diverse Young Adult Sample journal April 2022
“A Huge, Hidden Problem”: Australian Health Practitioners’ Views and Understandings of Reproductive Coercion journal December 2018
Influence of the Relational Context on Reproductive Coercion and the Associated Consequences journal May 2020
The Chi-Square Test journal November 2011
Reproductive Coercion: A Systematic Review journal August 2016
A conceptual re-evaluation of reproductive coercion: centring intent, fear and control journal April 2021
Abusive Experiences and Young Women's Sexual Health Outcomes: Is Condom Negotiation Self-Efficacy a Mediator?
  • Jones, Kelley A.; Cornelius, Marie D.; Silverman, Jay G.
  • Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, Vol. 48, Issue 2 https://doi.org/10.1363/48e8616
journal April 2016
Estimating the Effect of Intimate Partner Violence on Women’s Use of Contraception: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis journal February 2015
The Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS): Overview of Design and Methodology journal October 2018