DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Explosive Yield Estimation Using Regional Seismic Moment Tensors

Journal Article · · Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1785/0120220234 · OSTI ID:1975176

Here, we use the Pasyanos and Chiang (2022) data set to calculate the seismic moment M0 for each explosion and use the measured explosive yield W to validate the W~M0 relationship in Denny and Johnson (1991; hereafter, DJ91). The M0 is corrected by transforming to a potency tensor and applying more appropriate near-source geophysical parameter values in the moment estimate. The mean residual between observed and predicted yield is near zero; however, the standard deviation of the residuals results in an F-value (a 95% confidence factor) of about 5. We re-estimate the coefficients in the DJ91 model and find similar values and only a slight improvement in the F-value. Next, we embark on a similar model selection process as DJ91, allowing for non-cube-root yield scaling and other plausible near-source elastic moduli. As was found by DJ91, the yield dependence is not significantly different from unity, and a cube root assumption is valid. Therefore, we yield scale the seismic moment and test the significance of all plausible explanatory variables. Isotropic moment performs better in the response variable than total moment. The preference for isotropic moment could be due to its relationship to volume change, which would be more directly affected by explosive yield. Surprisingly, we find that the overburden pressure, which is a function of depth, is not a significant parameter in the model. We hypothesize that this is due to the competing depth effects on source asymmetry and the incorporation of depth in the Green’s functions used to calculate the seismic moment tensors. Importantly, this emphasizes that only seismic moment tensor-derived moments should be used in these models. After removing insignificant model parameters, we are left with a simple model to predict explosive yield $$\widehat{W}$$ in kt from isotropic moment MI in N·m, $$\widehat{W}$$=κ–1.4132 100.035626GPMI, in which κ and GP are the near-source bulk modulus and gas porosity in Pa and %, respectively. The F-value for this model is approximately 3.

Research Organization:
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL), Livermore, CA (United States)
Sponsoring Organization:
USDOE National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)
Grant/Contract Number:
AC52-07NA27344
OSTI ID:
1975176
Report Number(s):
LLNL-JRNL-841853; 1063869
Journal Information:
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, Vol. 113, Issue 5; ISSN 0037-1106
Publisher:
Seismological Society of AmericaCopyright Statement
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English

References (35)

An Explosion Model Comparison with Insights from the Source Physics Experiments journal September 2013
Modeling Ms-Yield Scaling of Nevada Test Site Nuclear Explosions for Constraints on Volumetric Moment due to Source-Medium Damage journal August 2012
Parametrization of general seismic potency and moment tensors for source inversion of seismic waveform data journal April 2013
Cavity Radius Scaling for Underground Explosions in Hard Rock journal September 2016
Overview of Open Seismic Data from the North Korean Event of 9 October 2006 journal March 2008
Seismic Results from DOE’s Non-Proliferation Experiment: A Comparison of Chemical and Nuclear Explosions book January 1996
Optimal estimation of scalar seismic moment journal September 1982
Apparent Explosion Moments from Rg Waves Recorded on SPE journal November 2016
Chemical Explosion Experiments to Improve Nuclear Test Monitoring journal July 2013
Estimating Explosion Yields Using Moment Tensor Solutions and Seismic Moment journal May 2022
Yield estimation using regional mb(Pn) journal June 1990
Tectonic release from the Soviet Joint Verification Experiment journal September 1990
The Effects of Assumed Source Depth and Shear-Wave Velocity on Moment Tensors Estimated for Small, Contained Chemical Explosions in Granite journal September 2020
The Production of Elastic Waves by Explosion Pressures. i. Theory and Empirical Field Observations journal April 1942
Equivalent Volume Sources for Explosions at Depth: Theory and Observations journal April 2005
Comparison of seismic and hydrodynamic yield determinations for the Soviet joint verification experiment of 1988 journal May 1989
Vertical force scaling in seismic source models of underground nuclear explosions journal January 2020
Energy-density effects on seismic decoupling journal February 1993
Path Calibration of the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea 3 September 2017 Nuclear Test journal August 2021
Relative Seismic Source Scaling Based on Pn Observations from the North Korean Underground Nuclear Explosions journal May 2022
Source Characterization of Underground Explosions from Combined Regional Moment Tensor and First-Motion Analysis journal July 2014
Empirical Measurements of Tectonic Moment Release In Nuclear Explosions From Teleseismic Surface Waves and Body Waves journal April 1994
The explosion seismic source function: Models and scaling laws reviewed book January 1991
Seismic characteristics of underground nuclear detonations journal December 1971
Appendix 2 Key formulas in earthquake seismology book January 2003
Seismic moment and long-period radiation of underground nuclear explosions journal June 1973
Seismic Source Summary for All U.S. Below-Surface Nuclear Explosions journal June 2002
The Rock Physics Handbook book January 2009
A static theory of the seismic coupling of a contained underground explosion journal September 1961
Defining the scalar moment of a seismic source with a general moment tensor journal October 1999
Computer Programs in Seismology: An Evolving Tool for Instruction and Research journal October 2013
Spectral yield estimation of NTS explosions journal August 1991
On Quantification of the Earthquake Source journal March 2001
Moment Tensor Analysis of Very Shallow Sources journal October 2016
Full Moment Tensor Solutions of U.S. Underground Nuclear Tests for Event Screening and Yield Estimation journal September 2021