DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Vehicle-cycle and life-cycle analysis of medium-duty and heavy-duty trucks in the United States

Journal Article · · Science of the Total Environment
 [1];  [1];  [1]
  1. Argonne National Laboratory (ANL), Argonne, IL (United States)

Medium- and heavy-duty vehicles account for a substantial portion (25 %) of transport-related greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in the United States. Efforts to reduce these emissions focus primarily on diesel hybrids, hydrogen fuel cells, and battery electric vehicles. However, these efforts ignore the high energy intensity of producing lithium (Li)-ion batteries and the carbon fiber used in fuel-cell vehicles. Here, we conduct a life-cycle analysis to compare the impacts of the vehicle manufacturing cycle for Class 6 (pickup-and-delivery, PnD) and Class 8 (day- and sleeper-cab) trucks with diesel, electric, fuel-cell, and hybrid powertrains. We assume that all trucks were manufactured in the US in 2020 and operated over 2021–2035, and we developed a comprehensive materials inventory for all trucks. Our analysis reveals that common systems (trailer/van/box, truck body, chassis, and lift-gates) dominate the vehicle-cycle GHG emissions (64–83 % share) of diesel, hybrid, and fuel-cell powertrains. Conversely, propulsion systems (lithium-ion batteries and fuel-cell systems) contribute substantially to these emissions for electric (43–77 %) and fuel-cell powertrains (16–27 %). These vehicle-cycle contributions arise from the extensive use of steel and aluminum, the high energy/GHG intensity of producing lithium-ion batteries and carbon fiber, and the assumed battery replacement schedule for Class 8 electric trucks. A switch from the conventional diesel powertrain to alternative electric and fuel-cell powertrains causes an increase in vehicle-cycle GHG emissions (by 60–287 % and 13–29 %, respectively) but leads to substantial GHG reductions when considering the combined vehicle- and fuel-cycles (Class 6: 33–61 %, Class 8: 2–32 %), highlighting the benefits of this shift in powertrains and energy supply chain. Finally, payload variation significantly influences the relative life-cycle performance of different powertrains, while LIB cathode chemistry has a negligible effect on BET life-cycle GHGs.

Research Organization:
Argonne National Laboratory (ANL), Argonne, IL (United States)
Sponsoring Organization:
USDOE Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE), Office of Sustainable Transportation. Vehicle Technologies Office (VTO); USDOE Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE), Office of Sustainable Transportation. Hydrogen Fuel Cell Technologies Office (HFTO); USDOE Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)
Grant/Contract Number:
AC02-06CH11357
OSTI ID:
1975138
Alternate ID(s):
OSTI ID: 1991242
Journal Information:
Science of the Total Environment, Vol. 891; ISSN 0048-9697
Publisher:
ElsevierCopyright Statement
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English

References (24)

Environmental profile of thermoelectrics for applications with continuous waste heat generation via life cycle assessment journal January 2021
Impacts of Vehicle Weight Reduction via Material Substitution on Life-Cycle Greenhouse Gas Emissions journal October 2015
Parametric modeling approach for economic and environmental life cycle assessment of medium-duty truck electrification journal January 2017
Green Principles for Vehicle Lightweighting journal March 2019
Deterministic and stochastic carbon footprint of intermodal ferry and truck freight transport across Scandinavian routes journal July 2019
Life Cycle Analysis of Lithium-Ion Batteries for Automotive Applications journal June 2019
Life-Cycle Greenhouse Gas Emission Benefits of Natural Gas Vehicles journal June 2021
The significance of Li-ion batteries in electric vehicle life-cycle energy and emissions and recycling's role in its reduction journal January 2015
Li-ion battery materials: present and future journal June 2015
Market diffusion of alternative fuels and powertrains in heavy-duty vehicles: A literature review journal November 2019
Life Cycle Assessment of Ocean Energy Technologies: A Systematic Review journal September 2019
Scalable Life-Cycle Inventory for Heavy-Duty Vehicle Production journal July 2020
Recent progress in hydrogen fuelled internal combustion engine (H2ICE) – A comprehensive outlook journal January 2022
The role of life cycle assessment in the sustainable transition to a decarbonised gas network through green gas production journal January 2019
Carbon and energy footprints of electric delivery trucks: A hybrid multi-regional input-output life cycle assessment journal August 2016
Emerging approaches, challenges and opportunities in life cycle assessment journal June 2014
Well-to-Wheels Analysis of Zero-Emission Plug-In Battery Electric Vehicle Technology for Medium- and Heavy-Duty Trucks journal December 2020
Carbon and energy footprints of refuse collection trucks: A hybrid life cycle evaluation journal October 2017
Life-cycle implications of hydrogen fuel cell electric vehicle technology for medium- and heavy-duty trucks journal July 2018
Does a battery-electric truck make a difference? – Life cycle emissions, costs, and externality analysis of alternative fuel-powered Class 8 heavy-duty trucks in the United States journal January 2017
Life Cycle Assessment of an emerging overhead line hybrid truck in short-haul pilot operation journal March 2022
Life cycle sustainability assessment of autonomous heavy‐duty trucks journal December 2019
Robust Pareto optimal approach to sustainable heavy-duty truck fleet composition journal July 2019
Life cycle assessment of hydrogen and diesel dual-fuel class 8 heavy duty trucks journal March 2019