DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Integration of software tools for integrative modeling of biomolecular systems

Journal Article · · Journal of Structural Biology
 [1];  [1];  [1];  [2];  [1];  [3];  [1]
  1. University of California, San Francisco, CA (United States)
  2. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL), Berkeley, CA (United States)
  3. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL), Berkeley, CA (United States); University of California, Berkeley, CA (United States)

Integrative modeling computes a model based on varied types of input information, be it from experiments or prior models. Often, a type of input information will be best handled by a specific modeling software package. In such a case, we desire to integrate our integrative modeling software package, Integrative Modeling Platform (IMP), with software specialized to the computational demands of the modeling problem at hand. After several attempts, however, we have concluded that even in collaboration with the software's developers, integration is either impractical or impossible. The reasons for the intractability of integration include software incompatibilities, differing modeling logic, the costs of collaboration, and academic incentives. In the integrative modeling software ecosystem, several large modeling packages exist with often redundant tools. So we reason, therefore, that the other development groups have similarly concluded that the benefit of integration does not justify the cost. As a result, modelers are often restricted to the set of tools within a single software package. The inability to integrate tools from distinct software negatively impacts the quality of the models and the efficiency of the modeling. As the complexity of modeling problems grows, we seek to galvanize developers and modelers to consider the long-term benefit that software interoperability yields. In this article, we formulate a demonstrative set of software standards for implementing a model search using tools from independent software packages and discuss our efforts to integrate IMP and the crystallography suite Phenix within the Bayesian modeling framework.

Research Organization:
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL), Berkeley, CA (United States)
Sponsoring Organization:
USDOE; National Institutes of Health (NIH); National Science Foundation (NSF)
Grant/Contract Number:
AC02-05CH11231
OSTI ID:
1969643
Journal Information:
Journal of Structural Biology, Journal Name: Journal of Structural Biology Journal Issue: 1 Vol. 214; ISSN 1047-8477
Publisher:
ElsevierCopyright Statement
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English

References (30)

Xplor-NIH for molecular structure determination from NMR and other data sources: Xplor-NIH for Molecular Structure Determination journal September 2017
MolProbity: More and better reference data for improved all-atom structure validation: PROTEIN SCIENCE.ORG journal November 2017
Rosetta3: An Object-Oriented Software Suite for the Simulation and Design of Macromolecules book January 2011
Principles for Integrative Structural Biology Studies journal May 2019
From integrative structural biology to cell biology journal January 2021
The HADDOCK2.2 Web Server: User-Friendly Integrative Modeling of Biomolecular Complexes journal February 2016
Quantitative FRET studies and integrative modeling unravel the structure and dynamics of biomolecular systems journal October 2016
HADDOCK:  A Protein−Protein Docking Approach Based on Biochemical or Biophysical Information journal February 2003
Molecular Structure of Nucleic Acids: A Structure for Deoxyribose Nucleic Acid journal April 1953
Determining the architectures of macromolecular assemblies journal November 2007
Improved low-resolution crystallographic refinement with Phenix and Rosetta journal September 2013
Producing genome structure populations with the dynamic and automated PGS software journal April 2018
Announcing the worldwide Protein Data Bank journal December 2003
Bayesian ensemble refinement by replica simulations and reweighting journal December 2015
Accessing protein conformational ensembles using room-temperature X-ray crystallography journal September 2011
Integrative Structure–Function Mapping of the Nucleoporin Nup133 Suggests a Conserved Mechanism for Membrane Anchoring of the Nuclear Pore Complex journal August 2014
Structural Characterization by Cross-linking Reveals the Detailed Architecture of a Coatomer-related Heptameric Module from the Nuclear Pore Complex journal August 2014
PatchDock and SymmDock: servers for rigid and symmetric docking journal July 2005
Assessing the limits of restraint-based 3D modeling of genomes and genomic domains journal March 2015
Phaser crystallographic software journal July 2007
Crystallographic refinement by simulated annealing: application to crambin journal January 1989
Iterative model building, structure refinement and density modification with the PHENIX AutoBuild wizard journal December 2007
PHENIX: a comprehensive Python-based system for macromolecular structure solution journal January 2010
Towards automated crystallographic structure refinement with phenix.refine journal March 2012
Macromolecular Modeling with Rosetta journal June 2008
Putting the Pieces Together: Integrative Modeling Platform Software for Structure Determination of Macromolecular Assemblies journal January 2012
Automatic analysis and 3D-modelling of Hi-C data using TADbit reveals structural features of the fly chromatin colors journal July 2017
RosettaScripts: A Scripting Language Interface to the Rosetta Macromolecular Modeling Suite journal June 2011
BCL::Fold - De Novo Prediction of Complex and Large Protein Topologies by Assembly of Secondary Structure Elements journal November 2012
Mapping the conformational landscape of a dynamic enzyme by multitemperature and XFEL crystallography journal September 2015