DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Nth-plant scenario for forest resources and short rotation woody crops: Biorefineries and depots in the contiguous US

Abstract

Estimating the US potential of woody material is of vital importance to ensure cost-effective supply logistics and develop a sustainable bioenergy and bioproducts industry. We analyzed a mature conversion technology for woody resources for the contiguous US that takes advantage of economies of scale: the nth-plant. Here, we developed a database to quantify the total accessible woody biomass within a distributed network of preprocessing depots and biorefineries considering both quality specifications for conversion and a target cost to compete with fossil fuels. We considered two categories of woody biomass: 1) forest residues from trees, tops and limbs produced from conventional thinning and timber harvesting operations as well as non-timber tree removal; and 2) short rotation woody crops such as poplar, willow, pine, and eucalyptus. A mixed integer linear programming model was developed to analyze scenarios with woody feedstock blends at variable biomass ash contents and cost targets at the biorefinery. When considering a target cost of 85.51 dollars/dry ton (2016$) at the biorefinery, the maximum accessible biomass from forest residues in 2040 remained constant at 106 million dry tons regardless of ash targets. Including short rotation woody crops as part of the blend increased the total accessible biomass to 153more » and 195 million dry tons at ash targets of 1% and 1.75%, respectively. We concluded from our analysis that woody resources could address about 55% of EPA’s (Environmental Protection Agency) target of 16 billion gallons of cellulosic biofuel.« less

Authors:
 [1];  [2]; ORCiD logo [3]; ORCiD logo [3];  [4];  [4]
  1. North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, NC (United States)
  2. North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, NC (United States); Idaho National Lab. (INL), Idaho Falls, ID (United States)
  3. Idaho National Lab. (INL), Idaho Falls, ID (United States)
  4. Oak Ridge National Lab. (ORNL), Oak Ridge, TN (United States)
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Idaho National Laboratory (INL), Idaho Falls, ID (United States); Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL), Oak Ridge, TN (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)
OSTI Identifier:
1962012
Alternate Identifier(s):
OSTI ID: 1974331
Report Number(s):
INL/JOU-23-70982-Rev000
Journal ID: ISSN 0306-2619; TRN: US2313055
Grant/Contract Number:  
AC07-05ID14517; AC05-00OR22725
Resource Type:
Accepted Manuscript
Journal Name:
Applied Energy
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Volume: 325; Journal ID: ISSN 0306-2619
Publisher:
Elsevier
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
09 BIOMASS FUELS; forest residues; optimization; short rotation woody crops; biofuel; biorefineries

Citation Formats

Hossain, Tasmin, Jones, Daniela S., Hartley, Damon S., Thompson, David N., Langholtz, Matthew, and Davis, Maggie. Nth-plant scenario for forest resources and short rotation woody crops: Biorefineries and depots in the contiguous US. United States: N. p., 2022. Web. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.119881.
Hossain, Tasmin, Jones, Daniela S., Hartley, Damon S., Thompson, David N., Langholtz, Matthew, & Davis, Maggie. Nth-plant scenario for forest resources and short rotation woody crops: Biorefineries and depots in the contiguous US. United States. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.119881
Hossain, Tasmin, Jones, Daniela S., Hartley, Damon S., Thompson, David N., Langholtz, Matthew, and Davis, Maggie. Thu . "Nth-plant scenario for forest resources and short rotation woody crops: Biorefineries and depots in the contiguous US". United States. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.119881. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1962012.
@article{osti_1962012,
title = {Nth-plant scenario for forest resources and short rotation woody crops: Biorefineries and depots in the contiguous US},
author = {Hossain, Tasmin and Jones, Daniela S. and Hartley, Damon S. and Thompson, David N. and Langholtz, Matthew and Davis, Maggie},
abstractNote = {Estimating the US potential of woody material is of vital importance to ensure cost-effective supply logistics and develop a sustainable bioenergy and bioproducts industry. We analyzed a mature conversion technology for woody resources for the contiguous US that takes advantage of economies of scale: the nth-plant. Here, we developed a database to quantify the total accessible woody biomass within a distributed network of preprocessing depots and biorefineries considering both quality specifications for conversion and a target cost to compete with fossil fuels. We considered two categories of woody biomass: 1) forest residues from trees, tops and limbs produced from conventional thinning and timber harvesting operations as well as non-timber tree removal; and 2) short rotation woody crops such as poplar, willow, pine, and eucalyptus. A mixed integer linear programming model was developed to analyze scenarios with woody feedstock blends at variable biomass ash contents and cost targets at the biorefinery. When considering a target cost of 85.51 dollars/dry ton (2016$) at the biorefinery, the maximum accessible biomass from forest residues in 2040 remained constant at 106 million dry tons regardless of ash targets. Including short rotation woody crops as part of the blend increased the total accessible biomass to 153 and 195 million dry tons at ash targets of 1% and 1.75%, respectively. We concluded from our analysis that woody resources could address about 55% of EPA’s (Environmental Protection Agency) target of 16 billion gallons of cellulosic biofuel.},
doi = {10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.119881},
journal = {Applied Energy},
number = ,
volume = 325,
place = {United States},
year = {Thu Sep 08 00:00:00 EDT 2022},
month = {Thu Sep 08 00:00:00 EDT 2022}
}

Works referenced in this record:

The nth-plant scenario for blended feedstock conversion and preprocessing nationwide: Biorefineries and depots
journal, July 2021


Integrating multimodal transport into forest-delivered biofuel supply chain design
journal, August 2016


Development of decision support systems for bioenergy applications
journal, April 2000


2013 feedstock supply and price projections and sensitivity analysis
journal, May 2014

  • Langholtz, Matthew; Eaton, Laurence; Turhollow, Anthony
  • Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining, Vol. 8, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1002/bbb.1489

Analyzing the design and management of biomass-to-biorefinery supply chain
journal, November 2009

  • Ekşioğlu, Sandra D.; Acharya, Ambarish; Leightley, Liam E.
  • Computers & Industrial Engineering, Vol. 57, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.cie.2009.07.003

Blended Feedstocks for Thermochemical Conversion: Biomass Characterization and Bio-Oil Production From Switchgrass-Pine Residues Blends
journal, August 2018

  • Edmunds, Charles W.; Reyes Molina, Eliezer A.; André, Nicolas
  • Frontiers in Energy Research, Vol. 6
  • DOI: 10.3389/fenrg.2018.00079

The impact of alternative land and yield assumptions in herbaceous biomass supply modeling: one-size-fits-all resource assessment?: One-size-fits-all resource assessment?
journal, November 2018

  • Eaton, Laurence; Langholtz, Matthew; Davis, Maggie
  • Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining, Vol. 13, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1002/bbb.1946

Solutions for a cultivated planet
journal, October 2011

  • Foley, Jonathan A.; Ramankutty, Navin; Brauman, Kate A.
  • Nature, Vol. 478, Issue 7369
  • DOI: 10.1038/nature10452

A discrete-event simulation model to test multimodal strategies for a greener and more resilient wood supply
journal, October 2019

  • Kogler, Christoph; Rauch, Peter
  • Canadian Journal of Forest Research, Vol. 49, Issue 10
  • DOI: 10.1139/cjfr-2018-0542

Benchmarking Procurement Cost Saving Strategies for Wood Supply Chains
journal, August 2021

  • Kogler, Christoph; Schimpfhuber, Sophie; Eichberger, Clemens
  • Forests, Vol. 12, Issue 8
  • DOI: 10.3390/f12081086

Energy feedstock characteristics of willow and hybrid poplar clones at harvest age
journal, December 2003


Planning woody biomass logistics for energy production: A strategic decision model
journal, March 2009


An optimisation framework for a hybrid first/second generation bioethanol supply chain
journal, July 2012


Discrete event simulation of multimodal and unimodal transportation in the wood supply chain: a literature review
journal, January 2018

  • Kogler, Christoph; Rauch, Peter
  • Silva Fennica, Vol. 52, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.14214/sf.9984

Optimal design and global sensitivity analysis of biomass supply chain networks for biofuels under uncertainty
journal, September 2011


Global food security under climate change
journal, December 2007

  • Schmidhuber, J.; Tubiello, F. N.
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 104, Issue 50
  • DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0701976104

Supply analysis of preferential market incentive for energy crops
journal, February 2021

  • Oyedeji, Oluwafemi; Langholtz, Matthew; Hellwinckel, Chad
  • Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining, Vol. 15, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1002/bbb.2184

A safe operating space for humanity
journal, September 2009

  • Rockström, Johan; Steffen, Will; Noone, Kevin
  • Nature, Vol. 461, Issue 7263
  • DOI: 10.1038/461472a

Agricultural sustainability and intensive production practices
journal, August 2002

  • Tilman, David; Cassman, Kenneth G.; Matson, Pamela A.
  • Nature, Vol. 418, Issue 6898
  • DOI: 10.1038/nature01014

Optimal locations for second generation Fischer Tropsch biodiesel production in Finland
journal, February 2014


Strategies for Reducing Moisture Content in Forest Residues at the Harvest Site
journal, January 2018

  • Kizha, Anil Raj; Han, Han-Sup; Paulson, Jeffrey
  • Applied Engineering in Agriculture, Vol. 34, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.13031/aea.12427

A Global and Spatially Explicit Assessment of Climate Change Impacts on Crop Production and Consumptive Water Use
journal, February 2013


The development of a cost model for two supply chain network scenarios for decentralized pyrolysis system scenarios to produce bio-oil
journal, September 2019


Effect of Biomass Properties and System Configuration on the Operating Effectiveness of Biomass to Biofuel Systems
journal, April 2020

  • Hartley, Damon S.; Thompson, David N.; Griffel, L. Michael
  • ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering, Vol. 8, Issue 19
  • DOI: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.9b06551

Woody biofuel production from short rotation coppice in Italy: Environmental-impact assessment of different species and crop management
journal, November 2016


Economic Optimization of a Lignocellulosic Biomass-to-Ethanol Supply Chain
journal, January 2012

  • Alex Marvin, W.; Schmidt, Lanny D.; Benjaafar, Saif
  • Chemical Engineering Science, Vol. 67, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2011.05.055

Biofuel refinery location and supply chain planning under traffic congestion
journal, January 2011

  • Bai, Yun; Hwang, Taesung; Kang, Seungmo
  • Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Vol. 45, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.trb.2010.04.006

Distributed biomass supply chain cost optimization to evaluate multiple feedstocks for a biorefinery
journal, November 2019


An Excel-Based Decision Support System for Supply Chain Design and Management of Biofuels
journal, October 2014

  • Acharya, Ambarish M.; Gonzales, Daniela S.; Eksioglu, Sandra D.
  • International Journal of Operations Research and Information Systems, Vol. 5, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.4018/ijoris.2014100102

Economic evaluation of decentralized pyrolysis for the production of bio-oil as an energy carrier for improved logistics towards a large centralized gasification plant
journal, July 2014

  • Braimakis, Konstantinos; Atsonios, Konstantinos; Panopoulos, Kyriakos D.
  • Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Vol. 35
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2014.03.052

GIS-based allocation of herbaceous biomass in biorefineries and depots
journal, February 2017


Understanding biomass feedstock variability
journal, January 2013

  • Kenney, Kevin L.; Smith, William A.; Gresham, Garold L.
  • Biofuels, Vol. 4, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.4155/bfs.12.83