DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Core collapse supernova gravitational wave emission for progenitors of 9.6, 15, and 25 M

Abstract

Here, we present gravitational wave emission predictions based on three core collapse supernova simulations corresponding to three different progenitor masses. The masses span a large range, between 9.6 and 25M, are all initially nonrotating, and are of two metallicities: zero and solar. We compute both the temporal evolution of the gravitational wave strains for both the plus and the cross polarizations, as well as their spectral decomposition and characteristic strains. The temporal evolution of our zero metallicity 9.6M progenitor model is distinct from the temporal evolution of our solar metallicity 15M progenitor model and our zero metallicity 25M progenitor model. In the former case, the high-frequency gravitational wave emission is largely confined to a brief time period ~75 ms after bounce, whereas in the latter two cases high-frequency emission does not commence until ~125 ms after bounce or later. The excitation mechanisms of the high-frequency emission in all three cases correspond to proto-neutron star convection and accretion onto the proto-neutron star from the convective gain layer above it, with the former playing the dominant role for most of the evolution. The low-frequency emission in all three models exhibits very similar behavior. At frequencies below ~250 Hz, gravitational waves are emittedmore » by neutrino-driven convection and the standing accretion shock instability (SASI). This emission extends throughout the simulations when a gain region is present. In all three models, explosion is observed at ~125, ~500, and ~250 ms after bounce in the 9.6, 15, and 25M progenitor models, respectively. At these times, the low-frequency gravitational wave emission is joined by very low-frequency emission, below ~10 Hz. These very low-frequency episodes are the result of explosion and begin at the above designated explosion times in each of our models. Our characteristic strains tell us that, in principle, all three gravitational wave signals would be detectable by current-generation detectors for a supernova at a distance of 10 kpc. However, our 9.6M progenitor model is a significantly weaker source of gravitational waves, with strain amplitudes approximately 5–10 times less than in our other two models. The characteristic strain for this model tells us that such a supernova would be detectable only within a much more narrow frequency range around the maximum sensitivity of today’s detectors. Finally, in our 9.6M progenitor model, we see very high-frequency gravitational radiation, extending up to ~2000 Hz. This feature results from the interaction of shock- and deleptonization-induced convection with perturbations introduced in the progenitor by nuclear burning during core collapse. While unique to the 9.6M progenitor model analyzed here, this very high-frequency emission may, in fact, be a generic feature of the predictions for the gravitational wave emission from all core collapse supernova models when simulations are performed with three-dimensional progenitors.« less

Authors:
ORCiD logo [1]; ORCiD logo [2]; ORCiD logo [3]; ORCiD logo [4];  [1]; ORCiD logo [5]; ORCiD logo [3]; ORCiD logo [6]; ORCiD logo [7]; ORCiD logo [8]; ORCiD logo [9]; ORCiD logo [10]
  1. Univ. of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN (United States)
  2. National Science Foundation (NSF), Alexandria, VA (United States)
  3. Oak Ridge National Lab. (ORNL), Oak Ridge, TN (United States). National Center for Computational Sciences (NCCS)
  4. Univ. of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN (United States); Oak Ridge National Lab. (ORNL), Oak Ridge, TN (United States). Physics Division; Oak Ridge National Lab. (ORNL), Oak Ridge, TN (United States). Joint Institute for Nuclear Physics and its Applications
  5. Univ. of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN (United States); Oak Ridge National Lab. (ORNL), Oak Ridge, TN (United States). Physics Division
  6. Florida Atlantic Univ., Boca Raton, FL (United States)
  7. North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, NC (United States)
  8. Oak Ridge National Lab. (ORNL), Oak Ridge, TN (United States). National Center for Computational Sciences (NCCS); Oak Ridge National Lab. (ORNL), Oak Ridge, TN (United States). Physics Division
  9. Community College of Denver, CO (United States)
  10. Oak Ridge National Lab. (ORNL), Oak Ridge, TN (United States). Physics Division; Univ. of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL (United States)
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL), Oak Ridge, TN (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE Office of Science (SC), Nuclear Physics (NP); National Science Foundation (NSF)
OSTI Identifier:
1928942
Grant/Contract Number:  
AC05-00OR22725; AC02-06CH11357; 1806692; 2110177
Resource Type:
Accepted Manuscript
Journal Name:
Physical Review. D.
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Volume: 107; Journal Issue: 4; Journal ID: ISSN 2470-0010
Publisher:
American Physical Society (APS)
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
79 ASTRONOMY AND ASTROPHYSICS; gravitation; gravitational waves; novae & supernovae; transient & explosive astronomical phenomena

Citation Formats

Mezzacappa, Anthony, Marronetti, Pedro, Landfield, Ryan E., Lentz, Eric J., Murphy, R. Daniel, Raphael Hix, W., Harris, J. Austin, Bruenn, Stephen W., Blondin, John M., Messer, II, O. E.  Bronson, Casanova, Jordi, and Kronzer, Luke L. Core collapse supernova gravitational wave emission for progenitors of 9.6, 15, and 25M⊙. United States: N. p., 2023. Web. doi:10.1103/physrevd.107.043008.
Mezzacappa, Anthony, Marronetti, Pedro, Landfield, Ryan E., Lentz, Eric J., Murphy, R. Daniel, Raphael Hix, W., Harris, J. Austin, Bruenn, Stephen W., Blondin, John M., Messer, II, O. E.  Bronson, Casanova, Jordi, & Kronzer, Luke L. Core collapse supernova gravitational wave emission for progenitors of 9.6, 15, and 25M⊙. United States. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.107.043008
Mezzacappa, Anthony, Marronetti, Pedro, Landfield, Ryan E., Lentz, Eric J., Murphy, R. Daniel, Raphael Hix, W., Harris, J. Austin, Bruenn, Stephen W., Blondin, John M., Messer, II, O. E.  Bronson, Casanova, Jordi, and Kronzer, Luke L. Thu . "Core collapse supernova gravitational wave emission for progenitors of 9.6, 15, and 25M⊙". United States. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.107.043008. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1928942.
@article{osti_1928942,
title = {Core collapse supernova gravitational wave emission for progenitors of 9.6, 15, and 25M⊙},
author = {Mezzacappa, Anthony and Marronetti, Pedro and Landfield, Ryan E. and Lentz, Eric J. and Murphy, R. Daniel and Raphael Hix, W. and Harris, J. Austin and Bruenn, Stephen W. and Blondin, John M. and Messer, II, O. E.  Bronson and Casanova, Jordi and Kronzer, Luke L.},
abstractNote = {Here, we present gravitational wave emission predictions based on three core collapse supernova simulations corresponding to three different progenitor masses. The masses span a large range, between 9.6 and 25M⊙, are all initially nonrotating, and are of two metallicities: zero and solar. We compute both the temporal evolution of the gravitational wave strains for both the plus and the cross polarizations, as well as their spectral decomposition and characteristic strains. The temporal evolution of our zero metallicity 9.6M⊙ progenitor model is distinct from the temporal evolution of our solar metallicity 15M⊙ progenitor model and our zero metallicity 25M⊙ progenitor model. In the former case, the high-frequency gravitational wave emission is largely confined to a brief time period ~75 ms after bounce, whereas in the latter two cases high-frequency emission does not commence until ~125 ms after bounce or later. The excitation mechanisms of the high-frequency emission in all three cases correspond to proto-neutron star convection and accretion onto the proto-neutron star from the convective gain layer above it, with the former playing the dominant role for most of the evolution. The low-frequency emission in all three models exhibits very similar behavior. At frequencies below ~250 Hz, gravitational waves are emitted by neutrino-driven convection and the standing accretion shock instability (SASI). This emission extends throughout the simulations when a gain region is present. In all three models, explosion is observed at ~125, ~500, and ~250 ms after bounce in the 9.6, 15, and 25M⊙ progenitor models, respectively. At these times, the low-frequency gravitational wave emission is joined by very low-frequency emission, below ~10 Hz. These very low-frequency episodes are the result of explosion and begin at the above designated explosion times in each of our models. Our characteristic strains tell us that, in principle, all three gravitational wave signals would be detectable by current-generation detectors for a supernova at a distance of 10 kpc. However, our 9.6M⊙ progenitor model is a significantly weaker source of gravitational waves, with strain amplitudes approximately 5–10 times less than in our other two models. The characteristic strain for this model tells us that such a supernova would be detectable only within a much more narrow frequency range around the maximum sensitivity of today’s detectors. Finally, in our 9.6M⊙ progenitor model, we see very high-frequency gravitational radiation, extending up to ~2000 Hz. This feature results from the interaction of shock- and deleptonization-induced convection with perturbations introduced in the progenitor by nuclear burning during core collapse. While unique to the 9.6M⊙ progenitor model analyzed here, this very high-frequency emission may, in fact, be a generic feature of the predictions for the gravitational wave emission from all core collapse supernova models when simulations are performed with three-dimensional progenitors.},
doi = {10.1103/physrevd.107.043008},
journal = {Physical Review. D.},
number = 4,
volume = 107,
place = {United States},
year = {Thu Feb 09 00:00:00 EST 2023},
month = {Thu Feb 09 00:00:00 EST 2023}
}

Works referenced in this record:

Three-dimensional simulations of neutrino-driven core-collapse supernovae from low-mass single and binary star progenitors
journal, January 2019

  • Müller, Bernhard; Tauris, Thomas M.; Heger, Alexander
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 484, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stz216

A new gravitational-wave signature of low-T/|W| instability in rapidly rotating stellar core collapse
journal, February 2020

  • Shibagaki, Shota; Kuroda, Takami; Kotake, Kei
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters, Vol. 493, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnrasl/slaa021

Equation of state effects on gravitational waves from rotating core collapse
journal, March 2017


Nucleosynthesis and remnants in massive stars of solar metallicity
journal, April 2007


The Character of Three-Dimensional Core-Collapse Simulation Results
journal, January 2022


Three-dimensional Core-collapse Supernova Simulations with Multidimensional Neutrino Transport Compared to the Ray-by-ray-plus Approximation
journal, March 2019

  • Glas, Robert; Just, Oliver; Janka, H. -Thomas
  • The Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 873, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab0423

The overarching framework of core-collapse supernova explosions as revealed by 3D fornax simulations
journal, November 2019

  • Burrows, Adam; Radice, David; Vartanyan, David
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 491, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stz3223

Three-dimensional models of core-collapse supernovae from low-mass progenitors with implications for Crab
journal, June 2020

  • Stockinger, G.; Janka, H-T; Kresse, D.
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 496, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/staa1691

A new Multi-Energy Neutrino Radiation-Hydrodynamics code in full General Relativity and its Application to the Gravitational Collapse of Massive Stars
journal, February 2016

  • Kuroda, Takami; Takiwaki, Tomoya; Kotake, Kei
  • The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, Vol. 222, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.3847/0067-0049/222/2/20

Rotation-supported Neutrino-driven Supernova Explosions in Three Dimensions and the Critical Luminosity Condition
journal, January 2018

  • Summa, Alexander; Janka, Hans-Thomas; Melson, Tobias
  • The Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 852, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa9ce8

3D simulations of strongly magnetized non-rotating supernovae: explosion dynamics and remnant properties
journal, November 2022

  • Varma, Vishnu; Müller, Bernhard; Schneider, Fabian R. N.
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 518, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stac3247

Three-dimensional simulation of a core-collapse supernova for a binary star progenitor of SN 1987A
journal, June 2022

  • Nakamura, Ko; Takiwaki, Tomoya; Kotake, Kei
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 514, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stac1586

Measuring gravitational waves from binary black hole coalescences. I. Signal to noise for inspiral, merger, and ringdown
journal, April 1998


Multidimensional simulations of ultrastripped supernovae to shock breakout
journal, June 2018

  • Müller, Bernhard; Gay, Daniel W.; Heger, Alexander
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 479, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/sty1683

Nucleosynthesis and Evolution of Massive Metal-Free Stars
journal, November 2010


Three-dimensional supernova explosion simulations of 9-, 10-, 11-, 12-, and 13-M⊙ stars
journal, February 2019

  • Burrows, Adam; Radice, David; Vartanyan, David
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 485, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stz543

Circular Polarizations of Gravitational Waves from Core-Collapse Supernovae: A Clear Indication of Rapid Rotation
journal, April 2016


Neutrino-Driven Supernova of a Low-Mass Iron-Core Progenitor Boosted by Three-Dimensional Turbulent Convection
journal, March 2015


Equation-of-state Dependence of Gravitational Waves in Core-collapse Supernovae
journal, December 2021

  • Eggenberger Andersen, Oliver; Zha, Shuai; da Silva Schneider, André
  • The Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 923, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac294c

Detection prospects of core-collapse supernovae with supernova-optimized third-generation gravitational-wave detectors
journal, August 2019


Gravitational-wave signal of a core-collapse supernova explosion of a 15 M star
journal, July 2020


Muon Creation in Supernova Matter Facilitates Neutrino-Driven Explosions
journal, December 2017


THREE-DIMENSIONAL CORE-COLLAPSE SUPERNOVA SIMULATED USING A 15 M PROGENITOR
journal, July 2015


Gravitational waves from 3D core-collapse supernova models: The impact of moderate progenitor rotation
journal, April 2019

  • Andresen, H.; Müller, E.; Janka, H-Th
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 486, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stz990

Stellar Mass Black Hole Formation and Multimessenger Signals from Three-dimensional Rotating Core-collapse Supernova Simulations
journal, June 2021

  • Pan, Kuo-Chuan; Liebendörfer, Matthias; Couch, Sean M.
  • The Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 914, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/abfb05

Exploring Fundamentally Three-dimensional Phenomena in High-fidelity Simulations of Core-collapse Supernovae
journal, September 2018


Characterizing the Gravitational Wave Signal from Core-collapse Supernovae
journal, April 2019

  • Radice, David; Morozova, Viktoriya; Burrows, Adam
  • The Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 876, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.3847/2041-8213/ab191a

Characteristic time variability of gravitational-wave and neutrino signals from three-dimensional simulations of non-rotating and rapidly rotating stellar core collapse
journal, January 2021

  • Shibagaki, Shota; Kuroda, Takami; Kotake, Kei
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 502, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stab228

A successful 3D core-collapse supernova explosion model
journal, September 2018

  • Vartanyan, David; Burrows, Adam; Radice, David
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 482, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/sty2585

Computational methods for nucleosynthesis and nuclear energy generation
journal, September 1999

  • Hix, W. Raphael; Thielemann, Friedrich-Karl
  • Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, Vol. 109, Issue 1-2
  • DOI: 10.1016/S0377-0427(99)00163-6

General-Relativistic Three-Dimensional Multi-Group Neutrino Radiation-Hydrodynamics Simulations of Core-Collapse Supernovae
journal, October 2016


Explosion mechanism, neutrino burst and gravitational wave in core-collapse supernovae
journal, March 2006

  • Kotake, Kei; Sato, Katsuhiko; Takahashi, Keitaro
  • Reports on Progress in Physics, Vol. 69, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1088/0034-4885/69/4/R03

Gravitational wave emission from 3D explosion models of core-collapse supernovae with low and normal explosion energies
journal, May 2019

  • Powell, Jade; Müller, Bernhard
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 487, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stz1304

The collapse and three-dimensional explosion of three-dimensional massive-star supernova progenitor models
journal, December 2021

  • Vartanyan, David; Coleman, Matthew S. B.; Burrows, Adam
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 510, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stab3702

A new Multi-Dimensional General Relativistic Neutrino Hydrodynamics code of Core-Collapse Supernovae. iii. Gravitational wave Signals from Supernova Explosion Models
journal, March 2013

  • Müller, Bernhard; Janka, Hans-Thomas; Marek, Andreas
  • The Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 766, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/766/1/43

Multipole expansions of gravitational radiation
journal, April 1980


Gravitational wave signals from 3D neutrino hydrodynamics simulations of core-collapse supernovae
journal, March 2017

  • Andresen, H.; Müller, B.; Müller, E.
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 468, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stx618

Modeling core-collapse supernovae gravitational-wave memory in laser interferometric data
journal, May 2022


A Model for Gravitational wave Emission from Neutrino-Driven Core-Collapse Supernovae
journal, December 2009


The equation of state in supernovae
journal, May 1985


A new Gravitational-Wave Signature from Standing Accretion Shock Instability in Supernovae
journal, September 2016


Gravitational-wave signals from 3D supernova simulations with different neutrino-transport methods
journal, March 2021

  • Andresen, H.; Glas, R.; Janka, H-Th
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 503, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stab675

Neutrino emission characteristics of black hole formation in three-dimensional simulations of stellar collapse
journal, June 2020


Sasi Activity in Three-Dimensional Neutrino-Hydrodynamics Simulations of Supernova Cores
journal, May 2013

  • Hanke, Florian; Müller, Bernhard; Wongwathanarat, Annop
  • The Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 770, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/770/1/66

Magnetorotational Explosion of a Massive Star Supported by Neutrino Heating in General Relativistic Three-dimensional Simulations
journal, June 2020

  • Kuroda, Takami; Arcones, Almudena; Takiwaki, Tomoya
  • The Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 896, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab9308

Equation of State Dependent Dynamics and Multi-messenger Signals from Stellar-mass Black Hole Formation
journal, April 2018

  • Pan, Kuo-Chuan; Liebendörfer, Matthias; Couch, Sean M.
  • The Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 857, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/aab71d

Supernova simulations from a 3D progenitor model – Impact of perturbations and evolution of explosion properties
journal, August 2017

  • Müller, Bernhard; Melson, Tobias; Heger, Alexander
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 472, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stx1962

Correlated Signatures of Gravitational-wave and Neutrino Emission in Three-dimensional General-relativistic Core-collapse Supernova Simulations
journal, December 2017

  • Kuroda, Takami; Kotake, Kei; Hayama, Kazuhiro
  • The Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 851, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa988d

Inferring astrophysical parameters of core-collapse supernovae from their gravitational-wave emission
journal, March 2022


Determining gravitational radiation from Newtonian self-gravitating systems
journal, March 1990

  • Finn, Lee Samuel; Evans, Charles R.
  • The Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 351
  • DOI: 10.1086/168497

A generalized equation of state for hot, dense matter
journal, December 1991


Gravitational Waves from Neutrino Emission Asymmetries in Core-collapse Supernovae
journal, September 2020


A 3D simulation of a neutrino-driven supernova explosion aided by convection and magnetic fields
journal, August 2020

  • Müller, Bernhard; Varma, Vishnu
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters, Vol. 498, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnrasl/slaa137

Binary-stripped Stars as Core-collapse Supernovae Progenitors
journal, July 2021

  • Vartanyan, David; Laplace, Eva; Renzo, Mathieu
  • The Astrophysical Journal Letters, Vol. 916, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.3847/2041-8213/ac0b42

Chimera: A Massively Parallel Code for Core-collapse Supernova Simulations
journal, April 2020

  • Bruenn, Stephen W.; Blondin, John M.; Hix, W. Raphael
  • The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, Vol. 248, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.3847/1538-4365/ab7aff

Determining the Structure of Rotating Massive Stellar Cores with Gravitational Waves
journal, June 2021

  • Pajkos, Michael A.; Warren, MacKenzie L.; Couch, Sean M.
  • The Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 914, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/abfb65

Neutrino-Driven Explosion of a 20 Solar-Mass star in Three Dimensions Enabled by Strange-Quark Contributions to Neutrino–Nucleon Scattering
journal, July 2015


Three-dimensional core-collapse supernova simulations of massive and rotating progenitors
journal, April 2020

  • Powell, Jade; Müller, Bernhard
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 494, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/staa1048