DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Cradle-to-Grave Lifecycle Analysis of Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Light-Duty Passenger Vehicles in China: Towards a Carbon-Neutral Future

Abstract

Vehicle electrification is considered a pathway for on-road transportation decarbonization in China. Different from the conventional gasoline vehicles whose emissions are mainly released from vehicle tailpipes, emissions of battery electric vehicles (BEVs) are from the upstream processes of electricity generation and vehicle manufacturing, thus a comprehensive lifecycle analysis and comparison of BEVs with gasoline vehicles is required to quantify the emission mitigation benefit of vehicle electrification and determine the path to a carbon-neutral future. In the study, we compare the cradle-to-grave (C2G) lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions of gasoline and electric vehicles in China and analyze the greenhouse gas emission reduction of vehicle electrification in different provinces. Results show that under the current technologies, the national average C2G GHG emissions for battery electric vehicles (BEVs) of 100 miles (i.e., 160 km) and 300 miles (i.e., 480 km) all-electric range (AER) are 231 and 279 g CO2eq/km, respectively, 22% and 5% lower than those for gasoline internal combustion engine vehicles (ICEVs). Improving vehicle fuel efficiency by hybridizing gasoline ICEVs can effectively reduce C2G emissions to 212 g CO2eq/km. At the provincial level, C2G GHG emissions of BEVs vary according to the provincial electricity mix. In eight provinces, C2G GHG emissions of BEVsmore » with 300 miles AER (BEV300s) are higher than those of gasoline ICEVs due to the GHG-intensive coal-based electricity mix. In the future scenario, with low carbon fuels (such as high-level bioethanol blending gasoline) and electricity decarbonization, the national average C2G emissions of hybrid electric vehicles (HEVs) and BEV300s can be reduced to 55 and 73 g CO2eq/km, respectively. Further decrease of C2G GHG emissions relies on reducing vehicle-cycle emissions from material processing and vehicle component manufacturing.« less

Authors:
ORCiD logo; ORCiD logo; ; ;
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Argonne National Laboratory (ANL), Argonne, IL (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE; Aramco Services Company; U.S.–China Clean Energy Research Center (CERC-CVC)
OSTI Identifier:
1922962
Alternate Identifier(s):
OSTI ID: 1969726
Grant/Contract Number:  
DEAC02-06CH11357; AC02-06CH11357
Resource Type:
Published Article
Journal Name:
Sustainability (Basel)
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Name: Sustainability (Basel) Journal Volume: 15 Journal Issue: 3; Journal ID: ISSN 2071-1050
Publisher:
MDPI AG
Country of Publication:
Switzerland
Language:
English
Subject:
33 ADVANCED PROPULSION SYSTEMS; lifecycle analysis; cradle-to-grave; decarbonization; electric vehicle; life cycle analysis

Citation Formats

Gan, Yu, Lu, Zifeng, He, Xin, Wang, Michael, and Amer, Amer Ahmad. Cradle-to-Grave Lifecycle Analysis of Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Light-Duty Passenger Vehicles in China: Towards a Carbon-Neutral Future. Switzerland: N. p., 2023. Web. doi:10.3390/su15032627.
Gan, Yu, Lu, Zifeng, He, Xin, Wang, Michael, & Amer, Amer Ahmad. Cradle-to-Grave Lifecycle Analysis of Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Light-Duty Passenger Vehicles in China: Towards a Carbon-Neutral Future. Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15032627
Gan, Yu, Lu, Zifeng, He, Xin, Wang, Michael, and Amer, Amer Ahmad. Wed . "Cradle-to-Grave Lifecycle Analysis of Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Light-Duty Passenger Vehicles in China: Towards a Carbon-Neutral Future". Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15032627.
@article{osti_1922962,
title = {Cradle-to-Grave Lifecycle Analysis of Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Light-Duty Passenger Vehicles in China: Towards a Carbon-Neutral Future},
author = {Gan, Yu and Lu, Zifeng and He, Xin and Wang, Michael and Amer, Amer Ahmad},
abstractNote = {Vehicle electrification is considered a pathway for on-road transportation decarbonization in China. Different from the conventional gasoline vehicles whose emissions are mainly released from vehicle tailpipes, emissions of battery electric vehicles (BEVs) are from the upstream processes of electricity generation and vehicle manufacturing, thus a comprehensive lifecycle analysis and comparison of BEVs with gasoline vehicles is required to quantify the emission mitigation benefit of vehicle electrification and determine the path to a carbon-neutral future. In the study, we compare the cradle-to-grave (C2G) lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions of gasoline and electric vehicles in China and analyze the greenhouse gas emission reduction of vehicle electrification in different provinces. Results show that under the current technologies, the national average C2G GHG emissions for battery electric vehicles (BEVs) of 100 miles (i.e., 160 km) and 300 miles (i.e., 480 km) all-electric range (AER) are 231 and 279 g CO2eq/km, respectively, 22% and 5% lower than those for gasoline internal combustion engine vehicles (ICEVs). Improving vehicle fuel efficiency by hybridizing gasoline ICEVs can effectively reduce C2G emissions to 212 g CO2eq/km. At the provincial level, C2G GHG emissions of BEVs vary according to the provincial electricity mix. In eight provinces, C2G GHG emissions of BEVs with 300 miles AER (BEV300s) are higher than those of gasoline ICEVs due to the GHG-intensive coal-based electricity mix. In the future scenario, with low carbon fuels (such as high-level bioethanol blending gasoline) and electricity decarbonization, the national average C2G emissions of hybrid electric vehicles (HEVs) and BEV300s can be reduced to 55 and 73 g CO2eq/km, respectively. Further decrease of C2G GHG emissions relies on reducing vehicle-cycle emissions from material processing and vehicle component manufacturing.},
doi = {10.3390/su15032627},
journal = {Sustainability (Basel)},
number = 3,
volume = 15,
place = {Switzerland},
year = {Wed Feb 01 00:00:00 EST 2023},
month = {Wed Feb 01 00:00:00 EST 2023}
}

Journal Article:
Free Publicly Available Full Text
Publisher's Version of Record
https://doi.org/10.3390/su15032627

Save / Share:

Works referenced in this record:

Life cycle assessment of future electric and hybrid vehicles: A cradle-to-grave systems engineering approach
journal, August 2016

  • Tagliaferri, Carla; Evangelisti, Sara; Acconcia, Federica
  • Chemical Engineering Research and Design, Vol. 112
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.cherd.2016.07.003

Life cycle environmental impacts and carbon emissions: A case study of electric and gasoline vehicles in China
journal, December 2018

  • Yu, Ang; Wei, Yiqun; Chen, Wenwen
  • Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, Vol. 65
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.trd.2018.09.009

Challenges toward carbon neutrality in China: Strategies and countermeasures
journal, January 2022


How China could be carbon neutral by mid-century
journal, October 2020


The role of new energy in carbon neutral
journal, April 2021


Comparative Life Cycle Energy and GHG Emission Analysis for BEVs and PhEVs: A Case Study in China
journal, March 2019

  • Xiong, Siqin; Ji, Junping; Ma, Xiaoming
  • Energies, Vol. 12, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.3390/en12050834

Review of electric vehicle policies in China: Content summary and effect analysis
journal, April 2017


Energy and environmental impact of battery electric vehicle range in China
journal, November 2015


Cradle-to-gate greenhouse gas (GHG) burdens for aluminum and steel production and cradle-to-grave GHG benefits of vehicle lightweighting in China
journal, January 2020


A life-cycle assessment of battery electric and internal combustion engine vehicles: A case in Hebei Province, China
journal, August 2019


Impact of recycling on energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions from electric vehicle production: The China 2025 case
journal, July 2017


Updated atmospheric speciated mercury emissions from iron and steel production in China during 2000–2015
journal, January 2017


Vehicle lightweighting vs. electrification: Life cycle energy and GHG emissions results for diverse powertrain vehicles
journal, August 2014


Well-to-wheels greenhouse gas and air pollutant emissions from battery electric vehicles in China
journal, November 2019

  • Zheng, Yali; He, Xiaoyi; Wang, Hewu
  • Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Vol. 25, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1007/s11027-019-09890-5

Carbon footprint of global natural gas supplies to China
journal, February 2020


Well-to-refinery emissions and net-energy analysis of China’s crude-oil supply
journal, February 2018

  • Masnadi, Mohammad S.; El-Houjeiri, Hassan M.; Schunack, Dominik
  • Nature Energy, Vol. 3, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1038/s41560-018-0090-7

Taking into account greenhouse gas emissions of electric vehicles for transportation de-carbonization
journal, August 2021


Lightweighting in light commercial vehicles: cradle-to-grave life cycle assessment of a safety-relevant component
journal, January 2018

  • Cecchel, Silvia; Chindamo, Daniel; Collotta, Massimo
  • The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, Vol. 23, Issue 10
  • DOI: 10.1007/s11367-017-1433-5

Comparative life cycle assessment of conventional, electric and hybrid passenger vehicles in Spain
journal, April 2021


Effects of Regional Temperature on Electric Vehicle Efficiency, Range, and Emissions in the United States
journal, February 2015

  • Yuksel, Tugce; Michalek, Jeremy J.
  • Environmental Science & Technology, Vol. 49, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.1021/es505621s

Comparative economic and environmental analysis of conventional, hybrid and electric vehicles – the case study of Greece
journal, August 2013


Life cycle environmental assessment of electric and internal combustion engine vehicles in China
journal, February 2021


Policies and Institutions to Support Carbon Neutrality in China by 2060
journal, April 2021

  • Davidson, Michael; Karplus, Valerie J.; Zhang, Da
  • Economics of Energy & Environmental Policy, Vol. 10, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.5547/2160-5890.10.2.mdav

Regional Heterogeneity in the Emissions Benefits of Electrified and Lightweighted Light-Duty Vehicles
journal, July 2019

  • Wu, Di; Guo, Fengdi; Field, Frank R.
  • Environmental Science & Technology, Vol. 53, Issue 18
  • DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.9b00648

Comprehensive report on China's Long-Term Low-Carbon Development Strategies and Pathways
journal, December 2020

  • He, Jiankun; Li, Zheng; Zhang, Xiliang
  • Chinese Journal of Population, Resources and Environment, Vol. 18, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.cjpre.2021.04.004

Cradle-to-grave mercury emissions of light-duty gasoline and electric vehicles in China
journal, March 2023


Energy consumption and CO2 emission impacts of vehicle electrification in three developed regions of China
journal, September 2012


Policy and Management of Carbon Peaking and Carbon Neutrality: A Literature Review
journal, July 2022


Effect of regional grid mix, driving patterns and climate on the comparative carbon footprint of gasoline and plug-in electric vehicles in the United States
journal, April 2016


Decarbonization scenarios and carbon reduction potential for China’s road transportation by 2060
journal, December 2022


Comparative Environmental Life Cycle Assessment of Conventional and Electric Vehicles
journal, August 2012


Greenhouse gas consequences of the China dual credit policy
journal, October 2020


Critical review of life cycle assessment of lithium-ion batteries for electric vehicles: A lifespan perspective
journal, May 2022


Using life cycle assessment to evaluate some environmental impacts of gold production
journal, July 2012


China Electricity Generation Greenhouse Gas Emission Intensity in 2030: Implications for Electric Vehicles
journal, April 2019

  • Shen, Wei; Han, Weijian; Wallington, Timothy J.
  • Environmental Science & Technology, Vol. 53, Issue 10
  • DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.8b05264

Current and Future Greenhouse Gas Emissions Associated with Electricity Generation in China: Implications for Electric Vehicles
journal, May 2014

  • Shen, Wei; Han, Weijian; Wallington, Timothy J.
  • Environmental Science & Technology, Vol. 48, Issue 12
  • DOI: 10.1021/es500524e

Assessing electric vehicle policy with region-specific carbon footprints
journal, December 2019