Title: Body surface area equations for physically active men and women

Journal Article · · American Journal of Human Biology
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ajhb.23823 · OSTI ID:1894731
ORCiD logo [1]; ORCiD logo [2];  [3];  [1]; ORCiD logo [4]
  1. Military Performance Division United States Army Research Institute of Environmental Medicine (USARIEM) Natick Massachusetts USA
  2. Thermal and Mountain Medicine Division USARIEM Natick Massachusetts USA
  3. Military Performance Division United States Army Research Institute of Environmental Medicine (USARIEM) Natick Massachusetts USA, Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education (ORISE) Oak Ridge Tennessee USA
  4. Office of the Senior Scientist USARIEM Natick Massachusetts USA

Abstract Objectives To improve predictive formulae for estimating body surface area (BSA) in healthy men and women using a modern three‐dimensional scanner technology. Methods Body surface areas were obtained from a convenience sample of 1267 US Marines (464 women and 803 men) using a whole body surface scanner (Size Stream SS20). The reliability of SS20 measures of total and regional BSA within participants was compared across triplicate scans. We then derived a series of formulae to estimate SS20‐measured BSA using various combinations of sex, height, and mass. We also assessed relationships between percent body fat measured by dual‐energy x‐ray absorptiometry and sex‐specific formulae errors in Marines. Results Body surface areas recorded by the SS20 were highly reliable whether measured for the total body or by region (ICC ≥ .962). Formulae estimates of BSA from sex, height, and mass were precise (root‐mean‐square deviation, 0.031 m 2 ). Errors from the Marine Corps formulae were positively associated with percent body fat for men ( p  = .001) but not women ( p  = .843). Conclusions Clinicians, military leaders, and researchers can use the newly developed BSA formulae for precise estimates in healthy physically active men and women. Users should be aware that height‐ and mass‐based BSA estimates are less accurate for individuals with extremely low or high percent body fat.

Sponsoring Organization:
USDOE
OSTI ID:
1894731
Journal Information:
American Journal of Human Biology, Journal Name: American Journal of Human Biology Journal Issue: 2 Vol. 35; ISSN 1042-0533
Publisher:
Wiley Blackwell (John Wiley & Sons)Copyright Statement
Country of Publication:
Country unknown/Code not available
Language:
English

References (40)

Clinical Calorimetry: Tenth Paper a Formula to Estimate the Approximate Surface area if Height and Weight be Known journal June 1916
Climatic influences on human body size and proportions: Ecological adaptations and secular trends journal August 1998
Prediction of body fat content in an inuit community journal January 1994
Body weight, race and climate journal December 1953
Interpretation of low body mass indices: Australian aborigines journal June 1994
Glomerular number and size in relation to age, kidney weight, and body surface in normal man journal February 1992
Relationships between body roundness with body fat and visceral adipose tissue emerging from a new geometrical model journal June 2013
The Akaike information criterion: Background, derivation, properties, application, interpretation, and refinements journal March 2019
Convective and radiative heat transfer coefficients for individual human body segments journal May 1997
Drinking Strategies: Planned Drinking Versus Drinking to Thirst journal January 2018
Summary of the Basal Metabolism data on 8,614 Subjects with Especial Reference to the Normal Standards for the Estimation of the Basal Metabolic rate journal December 1922
Lack of precision of burn surface area calculation by UK Armed Forces medical personnel journal March 2014
3-Dimensional optical scanning for body composition assessment: A 4-component model comparison of four commercially available scanners journal October 2020
The effects of body proportions on thermoregulation: an experimental assessment of Allen's rule journal September 2007
Comparison of Combat and Non-Combat Burns From Ongoing U.S. Military Operations journal May 2006
Body Surface Area Prediction in Normal, Hypermuscular, and Obese Mice journal May 2009
Formulae for calculating body surface area in modern U.S. Army Soldiers journal August 2020
Surface Area to Volume Ratio: A Natural Variable for Bacterial Morphogenesis journal October 2018
Dealing With Burn Patients in War Zones journal January 2020
The Impact of Recent Technological Advances on the Trueness and Precision of DXA to Assess Body Composition journal January 2012
Body mass index and percent body fat: a meta analysis among different ethnic groups journal December 1998
The paradox of low body mass index and high body fat percentage among Chinese, Malays and Indians in Singapore journal August 2000
Body surface area formulae: an alarming ambiguity journal June 2016
Kernel density estimation and its application journal January 2018
Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry for total-body and regional bone-mineral and soft-tissue composition journal June 1990
Soft Tissue Composition and Bone Mineral Status: Evaluation by Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry journal February 1993
Indexing glomerular filtration rate for body surface area in obese patients is misleading: concept and example journal July 2005
The coefficient of determination R 2 and intra-class correlation coefficient from generalized linear mixed-effects models revisited and expanded journal September 2017
Densitometric Analysis of body Composition: Revision of some Quantitative Assumptions* journal December 2006
Body composition of extreme performers in the US Marine Corps journal November 2022
Body surface area prediction in normal-weight and obese patients journal September 2001
Understanding Bland Altman analysis journal January 2015
Reporting standards for Bland–Altman agreement analysis in laboratory research: a cross-sectional survey of current practice journal September 2014
Application of Mixed Effects Limits of Agreement in the Presence of Multiple Sources of Variability: Exemplar from the Comparison of Several Devices to Measure Respiratory Rate in COPD Patients journal December 2016
3D Body Scanning has Suitable Reliability: An Anthropometric Investigation for Garment Construction
  • Parker, Christopher J.; Gill, Simeon; Hayes, Steven G.
  • Proceedings of 3DBODY.TECH 2017 - 8th International Conference and Exhibition on 3D Body Scanning and Processing Technologies, Montreal QC, Canada, 11-12 Oct. 2017 https://doi.org/10.15221/17.298
conference October 2017
Determination of Body Surface Area and Formulas to Estimate Body Surface Area Using the Alginate Method journal January 2008
Circumference-Based Predictions of Body Fat Revisited: Preliminary Results From a US Marine Corps Body Composition Survey journal March 2022
Reporting Standards for a Bland–Altman Agreement Analysis: A Review of Methodological Reviews journal May 2020
Frostbite: Pathophysiology, Epidemiology, Diagnosis, Treatment, and Prevention journal January 2020
Predictors of Hospitalization in Male Marine Corps Recruits with Exertional Heat Illness journal March 2004

Related Subjects