Title: Large balancing areas and dispersed renewable investment enhance grid flexibility in a renewable-dominant power system in China

Journal Article · · iScience
ORCiD logo [1];  [2]; ORCiD logo [3];  [4];  [2]
  1. Lawrence Berkeley National Lab. (LBNL), Berkeley, CA (United States); Univ. of California, Berkeley, CA (United States)
  2. Lawrence Berkeley National Lab. (LBNL), Berkeley, CA (United States)
  3. Stony Brook Univ., NY (United States)
  4. Peking Univ., Beijing (China)

Renewable energy is poised to play a major role in achieving China's carbon neutrality goal by 2060; however, reliability and flexibility is a big concern of a renewable-dominant power system. Various strategies of enhancing flexibility are under discussion to ensure the reliability of such a system, but no detailed quantitative analysis has been reported yet in China. We combine the advantages of a capacity expansion model, SWITCH-China, with a production simulation model, PLEXOS, and analyze flexibility options under different scenarios of a renewable-dominant power system in China. We find that a larger balancing area offers direct flexibility benefits. Regional balancing could reduce the renewable curtailment rate by 5-7%, compared with a provincial balancing strategy. National balancing could further reduce the power cost by about 16%. However, retrofitting coal power plants for flexible operation would only improve the system flexibility marginally.

Research Organization:
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL), Berkeley, CA (United States)
Sponsoring Organization:
Energy Foundation China; Growald Family Foundation; Hewlett Foundation; USDOE Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)
Grant/Contract Number:
AC02-05CH11231
OSTI ID:
1891295
Journal Information:
iScience, Journal Name: iScience Journal Issue: 2 Vol. 25; ISSN 2589-0042
Publisher:
ElsevierCopyright Statement
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English

References (18)

Is a 100% renewable European power system feasible by 2050? journal January 2019
Economic and carbon emission impacts of electricity market transition in China: A case study of Guangdong Province journal March 2019
Envisioning a renewable electricity future for the United States journal February 2014
An integrated source-grid-load planning model at the macro level: Case study for China's power sector journal May 2017
Demand response for variable renewable energy integration: A proposed approach and its impacts journal April 2020
Transmission grid extensions for the integration of variable renewable energies in Europe: Who benefits where? journal April 2012
The political economy of electricity dispatch reform in China journal February 2013
The role of national carbon pricing in phasing out China's coal power journal June 2021
Electricity Storage and the Renewable Energy Transition journal October 2020
Electricity market design under increasing renewable energy penetration: Misalignments observed in the European Union journal December 2019
Economic and environmental benefits of market-based power-system reform in China: A case study of the Southern grid system journal February 2020
Electricity generation from renewables in the United States: Resource potential, current usage, technical status, challenges, strategies, policies, and future directions journal August 2013
Wholesale electricity market design with increasing levels of renewable generation: Revenue sufficiency and long-term reliability journal March 2016
SWITCH-China: A Systems Approach to Decarbonizing China’s Power System journal May 2016
Rapid cost decrease of renewables and storage accelerates the decarbonization of China’s power system journal May 2020
Least-cost targets and avoided fossil fuel capacity in India’s pursuit of renewable energy journal March 2021
The persistence of flexible coal in a deeply decarbonizing energy system journal May 2021
Grid Integration of Renewable Energy: Flexibility, Innovation, and Experience journal November 2016