DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Effects of knock intensity measurement technique and fuel chemical composition on the research octane number (RON) of FACE gasolines: Part 1 – Lambda and knock characterization

Abstract

The Research and Motor Octane Number (RON and MON) rate the knock propensity of gasoline in the Cooperative Fuel Research (CFR) engine by comparing the knock intensity of sample fuels relative to that of primary reference fuels (PRF), a binary blend of iso-octane and n-heptane. Important differences exist between standard octane testing and automotive spark ignition (SI) engine knock testing including speed, load, air-to-fuel equivalence ratio (lambda), and knock characterization, which lead to a discrepancy between a fuel’s RON rating and its knock resistance characterized on an automotive SI engine based on knock-limited spark advance. This publication is the first of a set of three publications which modify operating parameters of the RON test method (ASTM D2699) to investigate the effects of these differences with automotive SI engine knock-limited spark advance testing. A fuel’s standard RON is evaluated at the lambda of the highest knock intensity, whereas automotive SI engines typically operate at stoichiometry. Here, we analyze the effects of a stoichiometric RON rating methodology. Additionally, the knock intensity response from the standard CFR knockmeter system is compared to a cylinder pressure oscillation-based knock intensity at several lambda settings. All experiments were performed with a set of seven Coordinating Researchmore » Council (CRC) Fuels for Advanced Combustion Engines (FACE) gasolines with approximately 95 RON. The fuel chemical composition impacted the lambda of the highest knock intensity, which resulted in fuel-specific offsets between the standard and stoichiometric RON ratings. The knock system comparison showed significant offsets between cylinder pressure-based and knockmeter-based knock intensity levels.« less

Authors:
ORCiD logo [1];  [1]
  1. Argonne National Lab. (ANL), Lemont, IL (United States)
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Argonne National Lab. (ANL), Argonne, IL (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
Coordinating Research Council (CRC); USDOE
OSTI Identifier:
1880351
Alternate Identifier(s):
OSTI ID: 1868584
Grant/Contract Number:  
AC02-06CH11357
Resource Type:
Accepted Manuscript
Journal Name:
Fuel
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Volume: 304; Journal ID: ISSN 0016-2361
Publisher:
Elsevier
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
37 INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL, AND ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY; CFR Engine; CRC FACE Fuels; Knock Intensity; Lambda; Octane Index; RON

Citation Formats

Hoth, Alexander, and Kolodziej, Christopher P. Effects of knock intensity measurement technique and fuel chemical composition on the research octane number (RON) of FACE gasolines: Part 1 – Lambda and knock characterization. United States: N. p., 2021. Web. doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2021.120722.
Hoth, Alexander, & Kolodziej, Christopher P. Effects of knock intensity measurement technique and fuel chemical composition on the research octane number (RON) of FACE gasolines: Part 1 – Lambda and knock characterization. United States. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2021.120722
Hoth, Alexander, and Kolodziej, Christopher P. Tue . "Effects of knock intensity measurement technique and fuel chemical composition on the research octane number (RON) of FACE gasolines: Part 1 – Lambda and knock characterization". United States. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2021.120722. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1880351.
@article{osti_1880351,
title = {Effects of knock intensity measurement technique and fuel chemical composition on the research octane number (RON) of FACE gasolines: Part 1 – Lambda and knock characterization},
author = {Hoth, Alexander and Kolodziej, Christopher P.},
abstractNote = {The Research and Motor Octane Number (RON and MON) rate the knock propensity of gasoline in the Cooperative Fuel Research (CFR) engine by comparing the knock intensity of sample fuels relative to that of primary reference fuels (PRF), a binary blend of iso-octane and n-heptane. Important differences exist between standard octane testing and automotive spark ignition (SI) engine knock testing including speed, load, air-to-fuel equivalence ratio (lambda), and knock characterization, which lead to a discrepancy between a fuel’s RON rating and its knock resistance characterized on an automotive SI engine based on knock-limited spark advance. This publication is the first of a set of three publications which modify operating parameters of the RON test method (ASTM D2699) to investigate the effects of these differences with automotive SI engine knock-limited spark advance testing. A fuel’s standard RON is evaluated at the lambda of the highest knock intensity, whereas automotive SI engines typically operate at stoichiometry. Here, we analyze the effects of a stoichiometric RON rating methodology. Additionally, the knock intensity response from the standard CFR knockmeter system is compared to a cylinder pressure oscillation-based knock intensity at several lambda settings. All experiments were performed with a set of seven Coordinating Research Council (CRC) Fuels for Advanced Combustion Engines (FACE) gasolines with approximately 95 RON. The fuel chemical composition impacted the lambda of the highest knock intensity, which resulted in fuel-specific offsets between the standard and stoichiometric RON ratings. The knock system comparison showed significant offsets between cylinder pressure-based and knockmeter-based knock intensity levels.},
doi = {10.1016/j.fuel.2021.120722},
journal = {Fuel},
number = ,
volume = 304,
place = {United States},
year = {Tue Apr 13 00:00:00 EDT 2021},
month = {Tue Apr 13 00:00:00 EDT 2021}
}

Works referenced in this record:

The Relevance of Fuel RON and MON to Knock Onset in Modern SI Engines
conference, October 2008

  • Mittal, Vikram; Heywood, John B.
  • Powertrains, Fuels and Lubricants Meeting, SAE Technical Paper Series
  • DOI: 10.4271/2008-01-2414

Correlating Auto-Ignition Delays And Knock-Limited Spark-Advance Data For Different Types Of Fuel
conference, May 2005

  • Yates, Andy D. B.; Swarts, André; Viljoen, Carl L.
  • 2005 SAE Brasil Fuels & Lubricants Meeting, SAE Technical Paper Series
  • DOI: 10.4271/2005-01-2083

Development of an Experimental Database and Chemical Kinetic Models for Surrogate Gasoline Fuels
conference, April 2007

  • Pitz, W. J.; Cernansky, N. P.; Dryer, F. L.
  • SAE World Congress & Exhibition, SAE Technical Paper Series
  • DOI: 10.4271/2007-01-0175

A Further Study of Inconsistencies between Autoignition and Knock Intensity in the CFR Octane Rating Engine
conference, May 2005

  • Swarts, Andre; Yates, Andy; Viljoen, Carl
  • 2005 SAE Brasil Fuels & Lubricants Meeting, SAE Technical Paper Series
  • DOI: 10.4271/2005-01-2081

Modification of CFR Test Engine Unit to Determine Octane Numbers of Pure Alcohols and Gasoline-Alcohol Blends
conference, February 1982

  • Hunwartzen, I.
  • SAE International Congress and Exposition, SAE Technical Paper Series
  • DOI: 10.4271/820002

New GKI - Gasoline Knock Index for Rating of Fuel’s Knock Resistance on an Upgraded CFR Test Engine
conference, September 2018

  • Hauber, Johann; Huber, Karl; Nell, Robert
  • International Powertrains, Fuels & Lubricants Meeting, SAE Technical Paper Series
  • DOI: 10.4271/2018-01-1743

The Shift in Relevance of Fuel RON and MON to Knock Onset in Modern SI Engines Over the Last 70 Years
journal, October 2009

  • Mittal, Vikram; Heywood, John B.
  • SAE International Journal of Engines, Vol. 2, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.4271/2009-01-2622

Insights into Engine Knock: Comparison of Knock Metrics across Ranges of Intake Temperature and Pressure in the CFR Engine
journal, February 2018

  • Rockstroh, Toby; Kolodziej, Christopher P.; Jespersen, Mads C.
  • SAE International Journal of Fuels and Lubricants, Vol. 11, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.4271/2018-01-0210

Modeling End-Gas Autoignition of Ethanol/Gasoline Surrogate Blends in the Cooperative Fuel Research Engine
journal, January 2017


Pressure-Based Knock Measurement Issues
conference, April 2017

  • Shahlari, Arsham J.; Ghandhi, Jaal
  • WCX™ 17: SAE World Congress Experience, SAE Technical Paper Series
  • DOI: 10.4271/2017-01-0668

Fuel Anti-Knock Quality - Part I. Engine Studies
conference, September 2001

  • Kalghatgi, G. T.
  • SAE International Fall Fuels & Lubricants Meeting & Exhibition, SAE Technical Paper Series
  • DOI: 10.4271/2001-01-3584

Combustion Characteristics of PRF and TSF Ethanol Blends with RON 98 in an Instrumented CFR Engine
conference, September 2018

  • Hoth, Alexander; Kolodziej, Christopher P.; Rockstroh, Toby
  • International Powertrains, Fuels & Lubricants Meeting, SAE Technical Paper Series
  • DOI: 10.4271/2018-01-1672

Comparing Knock between the CFR Engine and a Single Cylinder Research Engine
conference, December 2019

  • Swarts, Andre; Anderson, Garrett L.; Wallace, Julian M.
  • 2019 JSAE/SAE Powertrains, Fuels and Lubricants, SAE Technical Paper Series
  • DOI: 10.4271/2019-01-2156

Recent progress in gasoline surrogate fuels
journal, March 2018

  • Sarathy, S. Mani; Farooq, Aamir; Kalghatgi, Gautam T.
  • Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, Vol. 65
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.pecs.2017.09.004

The Effect of Charge Cooling on the RON of Ethanol/Gasoline Blends
journal, April 2013

  • Foong, Tien Mun; Morganti, Kai J.; Brear, Michael J.
  • SAE International Journal of Fuels and Lubricants, Vol. 6, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.4271/2013-01-0886

Insights into the Role of Autoignition during Octane Rating
conference, January 2007

  • Swarts, André; Yates, Andy
  • 2007 Fuels and Emissions Conference, SAE Technical Paper Series
  • DOI: 10.4271/2007-01-0008

Understanding chemistry-specific fuel differences at a constant RON in a boosted SI engine
journal, April 2018


Bridging the Knock Severity Gap to CFR Octane Rating Engines
journal, September 2020

  • Swarts, Andre; Kalaskar, Vickey
  • SAE International Journal of Advances and Current Practices in Mobility, Vol. 3, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.4271/2020-01-2050