Title: Why are we still using 3D masses for cluster cosmology?

Journal Article · · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society

ABSTRACT The abundance of clusters of galaxies is highly sensitive to the late-time evolution of the matter distribution, since clusters form at the highest density peaks. However, the 3D cluster mass cannot be inferred without deprojecting the observations, introducing model-dependent biases and uncertainties due to the mismatch between the assumed and the true cluster density profile and the neglected matter along the sightline. Since projected aperture masses can be measured directly in simulations and observationally through weak lensing, we argue that they are better suited for cluster cosmology. Using the Mira–Titan suite of gravity-only simulations, we show that aperture masses correlate strongly with 3D halo masses, albeit with large intrinsic scatter due to the varying matter distribution along the sightline. Nonetheless, aperture masses can be measured ≈2–3 times more precisely from observations, since they do not require assumptions about the density profile and are only affected by the shape noise in the weak lensing measurements. We emulate the cosmology dependence of the aperture mass function directly with a Gaussian process. Comparing the cosmology sensitivity of the aperture mass function and the 3D halo mass function for a fixed survey solid angle and redshift interval, we find the aperture mass sensitivity is higher for Ωm and $$w_a$$, similar for σ8, ns, and $$w_0$$, and slightly lower for h. With a carefully calibrated aperture mass function emulator, cluster cosmology analyses can use cluster aperture masses directly, reducing the sensitivity to model-dependent mass calibration biases and uncertainties.

Research Organization:
Argonne National Laboratory (ANL), Argonne, IL (United States). Argonne Leadership Computing Facility (ALCF); Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL), Oak Ridge, TN (United States). Oak Ridge Leadership Computing Facility (OLCF)
Sponsoring Organization:
Dutch Research Council (NWO); USDOE; USDOE Office of Science (SC), Basic Energy Sciences (BES). Scientific User Facilities Division; USDOE Office of Science (SC), High Energy Physics (HEP)
Grant/Contract Number:
AC02-06CH11357; AC05-00OR22725
OSTI ID:
1880138
Journal Information:
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Journal Name: Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society Journal Issue: 3 Vol. 515; ISSN 0035-8711
Publisher:
Oxford University PressCopyright Statement
Country of Publication:
United Kingdom
Language:
English

References (74)

Masses of Galaxy Clusters from Gravitational Lensing journal April 2013
The Galaxy Cluster Mass Scale and Its Impact on Cosmological Constraints from the Cluster Population journal February 2019
Weak gravitational lensing journal January 2001
HACC: Simulating sky surveys on state-of-the-art supercomputing architectures journal January 2016
A new measure for cosmic shear journal June 1998
How well can we determine cluster mass profiles from weak lensing? journal March 2003
The insignificant evolution of the richness-mass relation of galaxy clusters journal August 2014
Disturbed galaxy clusters are more abundant in an X-ray volume-limited sample journal October 2017
Planck 2018 results: VI. Cosmological parameters journal September 2020
The effect of distant large scale structure on weak lensing mass estimates journal May 2001
Formation of Galaxies and Clusters of Galaxies by Self-Similar Gravitational Condensation journal February 1974
Excursion set mass functions for hierarchical Gaussian fluctuations journal September 1991
Weak Lensing by Two [CLC][ITAL]z[/ITAL][/CLC] ∼ 0.8 Clusters of Galaxies journal April 1998
Confusion of Diffuse Objects in the X-Ray Sky journal February 2001
Constraints on Cosmological Parameters from Future Galaxy Cluster Surveys journal June 2001
Shear‐selected Cluster Cosmology: Tomography and Optimal Filtering journal May 2005
The Santa Fe Light Cone Simulation Project. I. Confusion and the Warm‐Hot Intergalactic Medium in Upcoming Sunyaev‐Zel’dovich Effect Surveys journal December 2007
Toward a Halo Mass Function for Precision Cosmology: The Limits of Universality journal December 2008
Constraining Cosmology with High-Convergence Regions in weak Lensing Surveys journal January 2009
The Cosmology Dependence of weak Lensing Cluster Counts journal May 2009
The Impact of Correlated Projections on weak Lensing Cluster Counts journal December 2009
Mass Function Predictions Beyond Λcdm journal April 2011
On the Accuracy of Weak-Lensing Cluster mass Reconstructions journal September 2011
Detection of (dark) matter concentrations via weak gravitational lensing journal December 1996
Projection effects in cluster catalogues journal June 1997
How baryons can significantly bias cluster count cosmology journal May 2021
Calibration of bias and scatter involved in cluster mass measurements using optical weak gravitational lensing journal September 2021
Weighing the Giants – I. Weak-lensing masses for 51 massive galaxy clusters: project overview, data analysis methods and cluster images journal February 2014
The similarity of the stellar mass fractions of galaxy groups and clusters journal November 2013
Weighing the Giants – III. Methods and measurements of accurate galaxy cluster weak-lensing masses journal February 2014
The impact of galaxy formation on the total mass, mass profile and abundance of haloes journal June 2014
Tracing mass and light in the Universe: where is the dark matter? journal February 2014
Testing Sunyaev–Zel'dovich measurements of the hot gas content of dark matter haloes using synthetic skies journal June 2015
Statistical uncertainties and systematic errors in weak lensing mass estimates of galaxy clusters journal September 2015
Mapping stellar content to dark matter haloes using galaxy clustering and galaxy–galaxy lensing in the SDSS DR7 journal October 2015
Constraints on the richness–mass relation and the optical-SZE positional offset distribution for SZE-selected clusters journal October 2015
The Canadian Cluster Comparison Project: detailed study of systematics and updated weak lensing masses★ journal March 2015
The universality of the virial halo mass function and models for non-universality of other halo definitions journal December 2015
Covariance in the thermal SZ–weak lensing mass scaling relation of galaxy clusters journal May 2016
The impact of baryons on massive galaxy clusters: halo structure and cluster mass estimates journal November 2016
Next generation cosmology: constraints from the Euclid galaxy cluster survey journal March 2016
KiDS-450: cosmological constraints from weak-lensing peak statistics – II: Inference from shear peaks using N-body simulations journal October 2017
KiDS-450: cosmological constraints from weak lensing peak statistics – I. Inference from analytical prediction of high signal-to-noise ratio convergence peaks journal November 2017
Do satellite galaxies trace matter in galaxy clusters? journal January 2018
Sunyaev–Zel’dovich effect and X-ray scaling relations from weak lensing mass calibration of 32 South Pole Telescope selected galaxy clusters journal December 2018
Coping with selection effects: a Primer on regression with truncated data journal January 2019
The effect of selection – a tale of cluster mass measurement bias induced by correlation and projection journal January 2022
Cosmological constraints from Subaru weak lensing cluster counts journal June 2015
Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Cosmological constraints from cluster abundances and weak lensing journal July 2020
Probing cosmology with weak lensing peak counts journal February 2010
Cosmological information in weak lensing peaks journal August 2011
Influence of projection in cluster cosmology studies journal November 2011
Large-scale structure formation with massive neutrinos and dynamical dark energy journal May 2014
Effects of completeness and purity on cluster dark energy constraints journal December 2018
Cosmology with the shear-peak statistics journal February 2010
Simulating the Universe with MICE: the abundance of massive clusters journal April 2010
Precision cluster mass determination from weak lensing: Lensing cluster masses journal May 2010
The observed growth of massive galaxy clusters - I. Statistical methods and cosmological constraints: Cluster growth: methods and cosmology journal July 2010
The observed growth of massive galaxy clusters - II. X-ray scaling relations: Cluster growth: X-ray scaling relations journal July 2010
Detailed cluster lensing profiles at large radii and the impact on cluster weak lensing studies: Detailed cluster lensing profiles journal June 2011
What do cluster counts really tell us about the Universe?: What do cluster counts tell us? journal September 2011
Mock weak lensing analysis of simulated galaxy clusters: bias and scatter in mass and concentration journal January 2012
Scaling relations for galaxy clusters in the Millennium-XXL simulation: Scaling relations for clusters in the MXXL journal October 2012
The Canadian Cluster Comparison Project: weak lensing masses and SZ scaling relations: Weak lensing masses of CCCP clusters journal November 2012
Cosmological Parameters from Observations of Galaxy Clusters journal September 2011
Scalable Gaussian process inference using variational methods text January 2017
The Mira–Titan Universe: Precision Predictions for dark Energy Surveys journal March 2016
The Mira-Titan Universe. II. Matter Power Spectrum Emulation journal September 2017
The Aemulus Project. II. Emulating the Halo Mass Function journal February 2019
Dark Quest. I. Fast and Accurate Emulation of Halo Clustering Statistics and Its Application to Galaxy Clustering journal October 2019
The Mira-Titan Universe. III. Emulation of the Halo Mass Function journal September 2020
Universal at Last? The Splashback Mass Function of Dark Matter Halos journal November 2020
HACC Cosmological Simulations: First Data Release journal September 2019
The SPTpol Extended Cluster Survey journal March 2020