Title: A global comparison of building decarbonization scenarios by 2050 towards 1.5–2 °C targets

Journal Article · · Nature Communications
 [1];  [2]; ORCiD logo [3]; ORCiD logo [4]; ORCiD logo [5]; ORCiD logo [5]; ORCiD logo [6];  [3];  [7];  [4]; ORCiD logo [8];  [2]; ORCiD logo [7]; ORCiD logo [6]; ORCiD logo [9]; ORCiD logo [7]; ORCiD logo [10];  [11];  [1];  [2] more »;  [2] « less
  1. UNEP-DTU Partnership, MCopenhagen (Denmark)
  2. IVL Swedish Environmental Research Institute, Gothenburg (Sweden)
  3. European Commission, Petten (Netherlands). Joint Research Centre (JRC)
  4. National Renewable Energy Lab. (NREL), Golden, CO (United States)
  5. Federal Univ. of Rio de Janeiro (Brazil)
  6. Lawrence Berkeley National Lab. (LBNL), Berkeley, CA (United States)
  7. Technische Univ. Wien (Austria)
  8. SINTEF Community, Trondheim (Norway)
  9. National Renewable Energy Lab. (NREL), Golden, CO (United States); Peking Univ., Beijing (China)
  10. Universidad San Francisco de Quito (Ecuador)
  11. Escuela Politécnica Nacional (EPN), Quito (Eduador)

Buildings play a key role in the transition to a low-carbon-energy system and in achieving Paris Agreement climate targets. Analyzing potential scenarios for building decarbonization in different socioeconomic contexts is a crucial step to develop national and transnational roadmaps to achieve global emission reduction targets. This study integrates building stock energy models for 32 countries across four continents to create carbon emission mitigation reference scenarios and decarbonization scenarios by 2050, covering 60% of today’s global building emissions. These decarbonization pathways are compared to those from global models. Results demonstrate that reference scenarios are in all countries insufficient to achieve substantial decarbonization and lead, in some regions, to significant increases, i.e., China and South America. Decarbonization scenarios lead to substantial carbon reductions within the range projected in the 2 °C scenario but are still insufficient to achieve the decarbonization goals under the 1.5 °C scenario.

Research Organization:
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL), Berkeley, CA (United States); National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), Golden, CO (United States)
Sponsoring Organization:
Copenhagen Center on Energy Efficiency (C2E2); European Union’s Horizon 2020; Inter-American Development Bank (IADB); Ministry of Climate and Environment (Enova SF); Research Council of Norway; Swedish Research Council (FORMAS); USDOE Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE); USDOE Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE), Energy Efficiency Office. Building Technologies Office
Grant/Contract Number:
AC02-05CH11231; AC36-08GO28308
OSTI ID:
1872404
Report Number(s):
NREL/JA-5500-76936; MainId:24899; UUID:e74ece1c-f67d-47af-86ab-656bffa60d38; MainAdminID:64667
Journal Information:
Nature Communications, Journal Name: Nature Communications Journal Issue: 1 Vol. 13; ISSN 2041-1723
Publisher:
Nature Publishing GroupCopyright Statement
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English

References (26)

Brazil’s emission trajectories in a well-below 2 °C world: the role of disruptive technologies versus land-based mitigation in an already low-emission energy system journal October 2020
Are scenarios of energy demand in the building stock in line with Paris targets? journal July 2018
Low carbon transition of global building sector under 2- and 1.5-degree targets journal July 2018
Economic feasibility of building retrofitting mitigation potentials: Climate change uncertainties for Swedish cities journal May 2019
A novel improved model for building energy consumption prediction based on model integration journal March 2020
A review of bottom-up building stock models for energy consumption in the residential sector journal July 2010
Global comparison of building energy use data within the context of climate change journal November 2020
How much energy will buildings consume in 2100? A global perspective within a scenario framework journal April 2018
Renewable heating: Perspectives and the impact of policy instruments journal August 2013
Increased house size can cancel out the effect of improved insulation on overall heating energy requirements journal August 2017
Large potentials for energy saving and greenhouse gas emission reductions from large-scale deployment of zero emission building technologies in a national building stock journal May 2021
Long-term deep decarbonisation pathways for Ecuador: Insights from an integrated assessment model journal May 2021
The Shared Socioeconomic Pathways and their energy, land use, and greenhouse gas emissions implications: An overview journal January 2017
Providing decent living with minimum energy: A global scenario journal November 2020
Assessing the Potential to Reduce U.S. Building CO2 Emissions 80% by 2050 journal October 2019
Heating and cooling energy trends and drivers in buildings journal January 2015
Contributions of building retrofitting in five member states to EU targets for energy savings journal October 2018
Developing a common approach for classifying building stock energy models journal November 2020
Halving energy demand from buildings: The impact of low consumption practices journal September 2019
Energy efficiency to reduce residential electricity and natural gas use under climate change journal May 2017
Residual fossil CO2 emissions in 1.5–2 °C pathways journal June 2018
The threat of political bargaining to climate mitigation in Brazil journal July 2018
A low energy demand scenario for meeting the 1.5 °C target and sustainable development goals without negative emission technologies journal June 2018
A map of roadmaps for zero and low energy and carbon buildings worldwide journal November 2020
Deep decarbonisation of buildings energy services through demand and supply transformations in a 1.5°C scenario journal May 2021
Systematic map of determinants of buildings’ energy demand and CO 2 emissions shows need for decoupling journal April 2021