DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: A Case Study of the Weather Research and Forecasting Model Applied to the Joint Urban 2003 Tracer Field Experiment. Part III: Boundary-Layer Parametrizations

Abstract

Numerical weather prediction is often used to supply the mean wind and turbulence fields for atmospheric transport and dispersion plume models as they provide dense geographic coverage in comparison to typically sparse monitoring networks. Here, the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model 4.0 was run over the month-long period of the Joint Urban 2003 field campaign conducted in Oklahoma City. We compare three different simulations in their ability to reproduce the observations, each using a different boundary-layer parametrization. Specifically, we examine the Mellor–Yamada–Janjic (MYJ), Yonsei University (YSU), and Mellor–Yamada–Nakanishi–Niino (MYNN) boundary-layer parametrizations. All three predict the wind speed well during the day but overpredict it at night. The MYNN parametrization is better than MYJ at predicting the daytime turbulence in the surface layer, but both underpredict the nocturnal turbulence. Additionally, the MYJ parametrization is best at predicting the reciprocal Obukhov length, while MYNN and YSU both significantly overpredict thermal stability. Reconstructing the reciprocal Obukhov length from other simulated parameters produces more accurate values for both parametrizations. All three models overpredict the boundary-layer height, particularly under convective conditions. The MYJ parametrization overestimates boundary-layer height the most, while YSU and MYNN have comparable performance with MYNN having an advantage in predicting themore » stable boundary-layer height. Several days were found where the WRF simulations predict significant deviations from the prevailing diurnal pattern in wind direction, which are not found in the observations.« less

Authors:
ORCiD logo [1]; ORCiD logo [1]; ORCiD logo [1]; ORCiD logo [1];  [2];  [3];  [4];  [4];  [4]
  1. Los Alamos National Lab. (LANL), Los Alamos, NM (United States)
  2. National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR), Boulder, CO (United States)
  3. US Dept. of Homeland Security (DHS), Dugway Proving Ground, Dugway, UT (United States)
  4. Aeris, LLC, Louisville, CO (United States)
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL), Los Alamos, NM (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE
OSTI Identifier:
1862806
Report Number(s):
LA-UR-20-27802
Journal ID: ISSN 0006-8314
Grant/Contract Number:  
89233218CNA000001
Resource Type:
Accepted Manuscript
Journal Name:
Boundary-Layer Meteorology
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Volume: 183; Journal Issue: 3; Journal ID: ISSN 0006-8314
Publisher:
Springer
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES; Atmospheric surface layer; boundary layer; turbulence; weather research and forecasting

Citation Formats

Nelson, Matthew Aaron, Conry, Patrick Tomas, Brown, Michael John, Costigan, Keeley Rochelle, Meech, Scott, Zajic, Dragan, Bieringer, Paul E., Annunzio, Andrew, and Bieberbach, George. A Case Study of the Weather Research and Forecasting Model Applied to the Joint Urban 2003 Tracer Field Experiment. Part III: Boundary-Layer Parametrizations. United States: N. p., 2022. Web. doi:10.1007/s10546-022-00696-8.
Nelson, Matthew Aaron, Conry, Patrick Tomas, Brown, Michael John, Costigan, Keeley Rochelle, Meech, Scott, Zajic, Dragan, Bieringer, Paul E., Annunzio, Andrew, & Bieberbach, George. A Case Study of the Weather Research and Forecasting Model Applied to the Joint Urban 2003 Tracer Field Experiment. Part III: Boundary-Layer Parametrizations. United States. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-022-00696-8
Nelson, Matthew Aaron, Conry, Patrick Tomas, Brown, Michael John, Costigan, Keeley Rochelle, Meech, Scott, Zajic, Dragan, Bieringer, Paul E., Annunzio, Andrew, and Bieberbach, George. Thu . "A Case Study of the Weather Research and Forecasting Model Applied to the Joint Urban 2003 Tracer Field Experiment. Part III: Boundary-Layer Parametrizations". United States. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-022-00696-8. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1862806.
@article{osti_1862806,
title = {A Case Study of the Weather Research and Forecasting Model Applied to the Joint Urban 2003 Tracer Field Experiment. Part III: Boundary-Layer Parametrizations},
author = {Nelson, Matthew Aaron and Conry, Patrick Tomas and Brown, Michael John and Costigan, Keeley Rochelle and Meech, Scott and Zajic, Dragan and Bieringer, Paul E. and Annunzio, Andrew and Bieberbach, George},
abstractNote = {Numerical weather prediction is often used to supply the mean wind and turbulence fields for atmospheric transport and dispersion plume models as they provide dense geographic coverage in comparison to typically sparse monitoring networks. Here, the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model 4.0 was run over the month-long period of the Joint Urban 2003 field campaign conducted in Oklahoma City. We compare three different simulations in their ability to reproduce the observations, each using a different boundary-layer parametrization. Specifically, we examine the Mellor–Yamada–Janjic (MYJ), Yonsei University (YSU), and Mellor–Yamada–Nakanishi–Niino (MYNN) boundary-layer parametrizations. All three predict the wind speed well during the day but overpredict it at night. The MYNN parametrization is better than MYJ at predicting the daytime turbulence in the surface layer, but both underpredict the nocturnal turbulence. Additionally, the MYJ parametrization is best at predicting the reciprocal Obukhov length, while MYNN and YSU both significantly overpredict thermal stability. Reconstructing the reciprocal Obukhov length from other simulated parameters produces more accurate values for both parametrizations. All three models overpredict the boundary-layer height, particularly under convective conditions. The MYJ parametrization overestimates boundary-layer height the most, while YSU and MYNN have comparable performance with MYNN having an advantage in predicting the stable boundary-layer height. Several days were found where the WRF simulations predict significant deviations from the prevailing diurnal pattern in wind direction, which are not found in the observations.},
doi = {10.1007/s10546-022-00696-8},
journal = {Boundary-Layer Meteorology},
number = 3,
volume = 183,
place = {United States},
year = {Thu Mar 24 00:00:00 EDT 2022},
month = {Thu Mar 24 00:00:00 EDT 2022}
}

Works referenced in this record:

The Kain–Fritsch Convective Parameterization: An Update
journal, January 2004


A New Vertical Diffusion Package with an Explicit Treatment of Entrainment Processes
journal, September 2006

  • Hong, Song-You; Noh, Yign; Dudhia, Jimy
  • Monthly Weather Review, Vol. 134, Issue 9
  • DOI: 10.1175/MWR3199.1

Chicago’s Heat Island and Climate Change: Bridging the Scales via Dynamical Downscaling
journal, July 2015

  • Conry, Patrick; Sharma, Ashish; Potosnak, Mark J.
  • Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology, Vol. 54, Issue 7
  • DOI: 10.1175/JAMC-D-14-0241.1

Sensitivity of WRF model estimates to various PBL parameterizations in different climatic zones over India
journal, September 2017


The integrated WRF/urban modelling system: development, evaluation, and applications to urban environmental problems
journal, January 2011

  • Chen, Fei; Kusaka, Hiroyuki; Bornstein, Robert
  • International Journal of Climatology, Vol. 31, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1002/joc.2158

A simple model of the atmospheric boundary layer; sensitivity to surface evaporation
journal, October 1986

  • Troen, I. B.; Mahrt, L.
  • Boundary-Layer Meteorology, Vol. 37, Issue 1-2
  • DOI: 10.1007/BF00122760

Observations of the Effects of Atmospheric Stability on Turbulence Statistics Deep within an Urban Street Canyon
journal, December 2007

  • Ramamurthy, P.; Pardyjak, E. R.; Klewicki, J. C.
  • Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology, Vol. 46, Issue 12
  • DOI: 10.1175/2007JAMC1296.1

Comparison of Heat Fluxes from Summertime Observations in the Suburbs of Four North American Cities
journal, April 1995


Evaluation of the coupling between mesoscale-WRF and LES‐EULAG models for simulating fine-scale urban dispersion
journal, November 2012


Estimating climatological planetary boundary layer heights from radiosonde observations: Comparison of methods and uncertainty analysis
journal, January 2010

  • Seidel, Dian J.; Ao, Chi O.; Li, Kun
  • Journal of Geophysical Research, Vol. 115, Issue D16
  • DOI: 10.1029/2009JD013680

MODIS Collection 5 global land cover: Algorithm refinements and characterization of new datasets
journal, January 2010

  • Friedl, Mark A.; Sulla-Menashe, Damien; Tan, Bin
  • Remote Sensing of Environment, Vol. 114, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2009.08.016

Nonlocal Boundary Layer Vertical Diffusion in a Medium-Range Forecast Model
journal, October 1996


A Case Study of the Weather Research and Forecasting Model Applied to the Joint Urban 2003 Tracer Field Experiment. Part 1: Wind and Turbulence
journal, September 2015

  • Nelson, Matthew A.; Brown, Michael J.; Halverson, Scot A.
  • Boundary-Layer Meteorology, Vol. 158, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1007/s10546-015-0091-z

An Introduction to Boundary Layer Meteorology
book, January 1988


Evaluation of Different WRF Parametrizations over the Region of Iași with Remote Sensing Techniques
journal, September 2019

  • Roșu, Iulian-Alin; Ferrarese, Silvia; Radinschi, Irina
  • Atmosphere, Vol. 10, Issue 9
  • DOI: 10.3390/atmos10090559

Evaluation of nonlocal and local planetary boundary layer schemes in the WRF model: EVALUATION OF PBL SCHEMES IN WRF
journal, June 2012

  • Xie, Bo; Fung, Jimmy C. H.; Chan, Allen
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, Vol. 117, Issue D12
  • DOI: 10.1029/2011JD017080

Radiative transfer for inhomogeneous atmospheres: RRTM, a validated correlated-k model for the longwave
journal, July 1997

  • Mlawer, Eli J.; Taubman, Steven J.; Brown, Patrick D.
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, Vol. 102, Issue D14
  • DOI: 10.1029/97JD00237

Explicit Forecasts of Winter Precipitation Using an Improved Bulk Microphysics Scheme. Part II: Implementation of a New Snow Parameterization
journal, December 2008

  • Thompson, Gregory; Field, Paul R.; Rasmussen, Roy M.
  • Monthly Weather Review, Vol. 136, Issue 12
  • DOI: 10.1175/2008MWR2387.1

A Review of Planetary Boundary Layer Parameterization Schemes and Their Sensitivity in Simulating Southeastern U.S. Cold Season Severe Weather Environments
journal, June 2015

  • Cohen, Ariel E.; Cavallo, Steven M.; Coniglio, Michael C.
  • Weather and Forecasting, Vol. 30, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1175/WAF-D-14-00105.1

One-Way Coupling of the WRF–QUIC Urban Dispersion Modeling System
journal, October 2015

  • Kochanski, A. K.; Pardyjak, E. R.; Stoll, R.
  • Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology, Vol. 54, Issue 10
  • DOI: 10.1175/JAMC-D-15-0020.1

Observed Diurnal Cycle Climatology of Planetary Boundary Layer Height
journal, November 2010


Development of a turbulence closure model for geophysical fluid problems
journal, January 1982


Urban heat island effect and its impact on boundary layer development and land–sea circulation over northern Taiwan
journal, July 2008


The NCEP/NCAR 40-Year Reanalysis Project
journal, March 1996


Development of an Improved Turbulence Closure Model for the Atmospheric Boundary Layer
journal, January 2009

  • Nakanishi, Mikio; Niino, Hiroshi
  • Journal of the Meteorological Society of Japan, Vol. 87, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.2151/jmsj.87.895

Properties of the Wind Field within the Oklahoma City Park Avenue Street Canyon. Part II: Spectra, Cospectra, and Quadrant Analyses
journal, December 2007

  • Nelson, M. A.; Pardyjak, E. R.; Brown, M. J.
  • Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology, Vol. 46, Issue 12
  • DOI: 10.1175/2006JAMC1290.1

Intercomparison of Planetary Boundary-Layer Parametrizations in the WRF Model for a Single Day from CASES-99
journal, January 2011