DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Better calibration of cloud parameterizations and subgrid effects increases the fidelity of the E3SM Atmosphere Model version 1

Abstract

Realistic simulation of the Earth's mean-state climate remains a major challenge, and yet it is crucial for predicting the climate system in transition. Deficiencies in models' process representations, propagation of errors from one process to another, and associated compensating errors can often confound the interpretation and improvement of model simulations. These errors and biases can also lead to unrealistic climate projections and incorrect attribution of the physical mechanisms governing past and future climate change. Here we show that a significantly improved global atmospheric simulation can be achieved by focusing on the realism of process assumptions in cloud calibration and subgrid effects using the Energy Exascale Earth System Model (E3SM) Atmosphere Model version 1 (EAMv1). The calibration of clouds and subgrid effects informed by our understanding of physical mechanisms leads to significant improvements in clouds and precipitation climatology, reducing common and long-standing biases across cloud regimes in the model. The improved cloud fidelity in turn reduces biases in other aspects of the system. Furthermore, even though the recalibration does not change the global mean aerosol and total anthropogenic effective radiative forcings (ERFs), the sensitivity of clouds, precipitation, and surface temperature to aerosol perturbations is significantly reduced. This suggests that it ismore » possible to achieve improvements to the historical evolution of surface temperature over EAMv1 and that precise knowledge of global mean ERFs is not enough to constrain historical or future climate change. Cloud feedbacks are also significantly reduced in the recalibrated model, suggesting that there would be a lower climate sensitivity when it is run as part of the fully coupled E3SM. This study also compares results from incremental changes to cloud microphysics, turbulent mixing, deep convection, and subgrid effects to understand how assumptions in the representation of these processes affect different aspects of the simulated atmosphere as well as its response to forcings. We conclude that the spectral composition and geographical distribution of the ERFs and cloud feedback, as well as the fidelity of the simulated base climate state, are important for constraining the climate in the past and future.« less

Authors:
ORCiD logo; ; ; ; ORCiD logo; ; ORCiD logo; ORCiD logo; ; ORCiD logo; ; ; ORCiD logo; ; ORCiD logo; ; ; ; ORCiD logo; more »; ORCiD logo; ; ; ; ORCiD logo; ; ORCiD logo; ORCiD logo; ; ; ORCiD logo; ; ORCiD logo; ; ORCiD logo; ORCiD logo; ; ORCiD logo; ORCiD logo; ; ; ORCiD logo « less
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL), Upton, NY (United States); Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL), Livermore, CA (United States); Oak Ridge National Lab. (ORNL), Oak Ridge, TN (United States). Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) Data Center; Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL), Richland, WA (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA); USDOE Office of Science (SC), Biological and Environmental Research (BER)
Contributing Org.:
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL); Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL); Argonne National Laboratory (ANL); Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL)
OSTI Identifier:
1861923
Alternate Identifier(s):
OSTI ID: 1846019; OSTI ID: 1861964; OSTI ID: 1864504; OSTI ID: 1864730
Report Number(s):
BNL-222782-2022-JAAM; LLNL-JRNL-826259; PNNL-SA-166161
Journal ID: ISSN 1991-9603
Grant/Contract Number:  
65814; 74358; 66187; SCW1453; 57131; AC52-07NA27344.; NA0003525; AC52-07NA27344; AC05-76RL01830; SC0012704; AC02-05CH11231
Resource Type:
Published Article
Journal Name:
Geoscientific Model Development (Online)
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Name: Geoscientific Model Development (Online) Journal Volume: 15 Journal Issue: 7; Journal ID: ISSN 1991-9603
Publisher:
Copernicus GmbH
Country of Publication:
Germany
Language:
English
Subject:
58 GEOSCIENCES; 54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES

Citation Formats

Ma, Po-Lun, Harrop, Bryce E., Larson, Vincent E., Neale, Richard B., Gettelman, Andrew, Morrison, Hugh, Wang, Hailong, Zhang, Kai, Klein, Stephen A., Zelinka, Mark D., Zhang, Yuying, Qian, Yun, Yoon, Jin-Ho, Jones, Christopher R., Huang, Meng, Tai, Sheng-Lun, Singh, Balwinder, Bogenschutz, Peter A., Zheng, Xue, Lin, Wuyin, Quaas, Johannes, Chepfer, Hélène, Brunke, Michael A., Zeng, Xubin, Mülmenstädt, Johannes, Hagos, Samson, Zhang, Zhibo, Song, Hua, Liu, Xiaohong, Pritchard, Michael S., Wan, Hui, Wang, Jingyu, Tang, Qi, Caldwell, Peter M., Fan, Jiwen, Berg, Larry K., Fast, Jerome D., Taylor, Mark A., Golaz, Jean-Christophe, Xie, Shaocheng, Rasch, Philip J., and Leung, L. Ruby. Better calibration of cloud parameterizations and subgrid effects increases the fidelity of the E3SM Atmosphere Model version 1. Germany: N. p., 2022. Web. doi:10.5194/gmd-15-2881-2022.
Ma, Po-Lun, Harrop, Bryce E., Larson, Vincent E., Neale, Richard B., Gettelman, Andrew, Morrison, Hugh, Wang, Hailong, Zhang, Kai, Klein, Stephen A., Zelinka, Mark D., Zhang, Yuying, Qian, Yun, Yoon, Jin-Ho, Jones, Christopher R., Huang, Meng, Tai, Sheng-Lun, Singh, Balwinder, Bogenschutz, Peter A., Zheng, Xue, Lin, Wuyin, Quaas, Johannes, Chepfer, Hélène, Brunke, Michael A., Zeng, Xubin, Mülmenstädt, Johannes, Hagos, Samson, Zhang, Zhibo, Song, Hua, Liu, Xiaohong, Pritchard, Michael S., Wan, Hui, Wang, Jingyu, Tang, Qi, Caldwell, Peter M., Fan, Jiwen, Berg, Larry K., Fast, Jerome D., Taylor, Mark A., Golaz, Jean-Christophe, Xie, Shaocheng, Rasch, Philip J., & Leung, L. Ruby. Better calibration of cloud parameterizations and subgrid effects increases the fidelity of the E3SM Atmosphere Model version 1. Germany. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-2881-2022
Ma, Po-Lun, Harrop, Bryce E., Larson, Vincent E., Neale, Richard B., Gettelman, Andrew, Morrison, Hugh, Wang, Hailong, Zhang, Kai, Klein, Stephen A., Zelinka, Mark D., Zhang, Yuying, Qian, Yun, Yoon, Jin-Ho, Jones, Christopher R., Huang, Meng, Tai, Sheng-Lun, Singh, Balwinder, Bogenschutz, Peter A., Zheng, Xue, Lin, Wuyin, Quaas, Johannes, Chepfer, Hélène, Brunke, Michael A., Zeng, Xubin, Mülmenstädt, Johannes, Hagos, Samson, Zhang, Zhibo, Song, Hua, Liu, Xiaohong, Pritchard, Michael S., Wan, Hui, Wang, Jingyu, Tang, Qi, Caldwell, Peter M., Fan, Jiwen, Berg, Larry K., Fast, Jerome D., Taylor, Mark A., Golaz, Jean-Christophe, Xie, Shaocheng, Rasch, Philip J., and Leung, L. Ruby. Thu . "Better calibration of cloud parameterizations and subgrid effects increases the fidelity of the E3SM Atmosphere Model version 1". Germany. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-2881-2022.
@article{osti_1861923,
title = {Better calibration of cloud parameterizations and subgrid effects increases the fidelity of the E3SM Atmosphere Model version 1},
author = {Ma, Po-Lun and Harrop, Bryce E. and Larson, Vincent E. and Neale, Richard B. and Gettelman, Andrew and Morrison, Hugh and Wang, Hailong and Zhang, Kai and Klein, Stephen A. and Zelinka, Mark D. and Zhang, Yuying and Qian, Yun and Yoon, Jin-Ho and Jones, Christopher R. and Huang, Meng and Tai, Sheng-Lun and Singh, Balwinder and Bogenschutz, Peter A. and Zheng, Xue and Lin, Wuyin and Quaas, Johannes and Chepfer, Hélène and Brunke, Michael A. and Zeng, Xubin and Mülmenstädt, Johannes and Hagos, Samson and Zhang, Zhibo and Song, Hua and Liu, Xiaohong and Pritchard, Michael S. and Wan, Hui and Wang, Jingyu and Tang, Qi and Caldwell, Peter M. and Fan, Jiwen and Berg, Larry K. and Fast, Jerome D. and Taylor, Mark A. and Golaz, Jean-Christophe and Xie, Shaocheng and Rasch, Philip J. and Leung, L. Ruby},
abstractNote = {Realistic simulation of the Earth's mean-state climate remains a major challenge, and yet it is crucial for predicting the climate system in transition. Deficiencies in models' process representations, propagation of errors from one process to another, and associated compensating errors can often confound the interpretation and improvement of model simulations. These errors and biases can also lead to unrealistic climate projections and incorrect attribution of the physical mechanisms governing past and future climate change. Here we show that a significantly improved global atmospheric simulation can be achieved by focusing on the realism of process assumptions in cloud calibration and subgrid effects using the Energy Exascale Earth System Model (E3SM) Atmosphere Model version 1 (EAMv1). The calibration of clouds and subgrid effects informed by our understanding of physical mechanisms leads to significant improvements in clouds and precipitation climatology, reducing common and long-standing biases across cloud regimes in the model. The improved cloud fidelity in turn reduces biases in other aspects of the system. Furthermore, even though the recalibration does not change the global mean aerosol and total anthropogenic effective radiative forcings (ERFs), the sensitivity of clouds, precipitation, and surface temperature to aerosol perturbations is significantly reduced. This suggests that it is possible to achieve improvements to the historical evolution of surface temperature over EAMv1 and that precise knowledge of global mean ERFs is not enough to constrain historical or future climate change. Cloud feedbacks are also significantly reduced in the recalibrated model, suggesting that there would be a lower climate sensitivity when it is run as part of the fully coupled E3SM. This study also compares results from incremental changes to cloud microphysics, turbulent mixing, deep convection, and subgrid effects to understand how assumptions in the representation of these processes affect different aspects of the simulated atmosphere as well as its response to forcings. We conclude that the spectral composition and geographical distribution of the ERFs and cloud feedback, as well as the fidelity of the simulated base climate state, are important for constraining the climate in the past and future.},
doi = {10.5194/gmd-15-2881-2022},
journal = {Geoscientific Model Development (Online)},
number = 7,
volume = 15,
place = {Germany},
year = {Thu Apr 07 00:00:00 EDT 2022},
month = {Thu Apr 07 00:00:00 EDT 2022}
}

Journal Article:
Free Publicly Available Full Text
Publisher's Version of Record
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-2881-2022

Save / Share:

Works referenced in this record:

Observational constraint on cloud feedbacks suggests moderate climate sensitivity
journal, February 2021


Observational evidence for a negative shortwave cloud feedback in middle to high latitudes: OBSERVED SHORTWAVE CLOUD FEEDBACK
journal, February 2016

  • Ceppi, Paulo; McCoy, Daniel T.; Hartmann, Dennis L.
  • Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 43, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1002/2015GL067499

Bounding global aerosol radiative forcing of climate change
journal, November 2019


Coupled vs. decoupled boundary layers in VOCALS-REx
journal, January 2011

  • Jones, C. R.; Bretherton, C. S.; Leon, D.
  • Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Vol. 11, Issue 14
  • DOI: 10.5194/acp-11-7143-2011

Aerosols in the E3SM Version 1: New Developments and Their Impacts on Radiative Forcing
journal, January 2020

  • Wang, Hailong; Easter, Richard C.; Zhang, Rudong
  • Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, Vol. 12, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1029/2019MS001851

An Overview of CMIP5 and the Experiment Design
journal, April 2012

  • Taylor, Karl E.; Stouffer, Ronald J.; Meehl, Gerald A.
  • Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, Vol. 93, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1175/BAMS-D-11-00094.1

Cloud droplet sedimentation, entrainment efficiency, and subtropical stratocumulus albedo
journal, January 2007

  • Bretherton, C. S.; Blossey, P. N.; Uchida, J.
  • Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 34, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1029/2006GL027648

Efficacy of climate forcings
journal, January 2005


A Classical-Theory-Based Parameterization of Heterogeneous Ice Nucleation by Mineral Dust, Soot, and Biological Particles in a Global Climate Model
journal, August 2010

  • Hoose, Corinna; Kristjánsson, Jón Egill; Chen, Jen-Ping
  • Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, Vol. 67, Issue 8
  • DOI: 10.1175/2010JAS3425.1

Computing and Partitioning Cloud Feedbacks Using Cloud Property Histograms. Part II: Attribution to Changes in Cloud Amount, Altitude, and Optical Depth
journal, June 2012

  • Zelinka, Mark D.; Klein, Stephen A.; Hartmann, Dennis L.
  • Journal of Climate, Vol. 25, Issue 11
  • DOI: 10.1175/JCLI-D-11-00249.1

Characterizing the Relative Importance Assigned to Physical Variables by Climate Scientists when Assessing Atmospheric Climate Model Fidelity
journal, July 2018

  • Burrows, Susannah M.; Dasgupta, Aritra; Reehl, Sarah
  • Advances in Atmospheric Sciences, Vol. 35, Issue 9
  • DOI: 10.1007/s00376-018-7300-x

Evaluation of the cloud thermodynamic phase in a climate model using CALIPSO-GOCCP: CALIPSO-GOCCP CLOUD THERMODYNAMIC PHASE
journal, July 2013

  • Cesana, Grégory; Chepfer, Hélène
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, Vol. 118, Issue 14
  • DOI: 10.1002/jgrd.50376

Summarizing multiple aspects of model performance in a single diagram
journal, April 2001

  • Taylor, Karl E.
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, Vol. 106, Issue D7
  • DOI: 10.1029/2000JD900719

Advanced Two-Moment Bulk Microphysics for Global Models. Part II: Global Model Solutions and Aerosol–Cloud Interactions
journal, February 2015


Short ensembles: an efficient method for discerning climate-relevant sensitivities in atmospheric general circulation models
journal, January 2014


An underestimated negative cloud feedback from cloud lifetime changes
journal, June 2021

  • Mülmenstädt, Johannes; Salzmann, Marc; Kay, Jennifer E.
  • Nature Climate Change, Vol. 11, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.1038/s41558-021-01038-1

Sensitivity of remote aerosol distributions to representation of cloud–aerosol interactions in a global climate model
journal, January 2013

  • Wang, H.; Easter, R. C.; Rasch, P. J.
  • Geoscientific Model Development, Vol. 6, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.5194/gmd-6-765-2013

Small-Scale and Mesoscale Variability in Cloudy Boundary Layers: Joint Probability Density Functions
journal, December 2002


Effects of Convective Momentum Transport on the Atmospheric Circulation in the Community Atmosphere Model, Version 3
journal, April 2008


Using Probability Density Functions to Derive Consistent Closure Relationships among Higher-Order Moments
journal, April 2005

  • Larson, Vincent E.; Golaz, Jean-Christophe
  • Monthly Weather Review, Vol. 133, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1175/MWR2902.1

The Impact of Convection on ENSO: From a Delayed Oscillator to a Series of Events
journal, November 2008

  • Neale, Richard B.; Richter, Jadwiga H.; Jochum, Markus
  • Journal of Climate, Vol. 21, Issue 22
  • DOI: 10.1175/2008JCLI2244.1

On the relationships among cloud cover, mixed-phase partitioning, and planetary albedo in GCMs: CLOUD COVER, MIXED-PHASE, AND ALBEDO
journal, May 2016

  • McCoy, Daniel T.; Tan, Ivy; Hartmann, Dennis L.
  • Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, Vol. 8, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1002/2015MS000589

Performance metrics for climate models
journal, January 2008

  • Gleckler, P. J.; Taylor, K. E.; Doutriaux, C.
  • Journal of Geophysical Research, Vol. 113, Issue D6
  • DOI: 10.1029/2007JD008972

A New Cloud Physics Parameterization in a Large-Eddy Simulation Model of Marine Stratocumulus
journal, January 2000


Effects of coupling a stochastic convective parameterization with the Zhang–McFarlane scheme on precipitation simulation in the DOE E3SMv1.0 atmosphere model
journal, January 2021

  • Wang, Yong; Zhang, Guang J.; Xie, Shaocheng
  • Geoscientific Model Development, Vol. 14, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.5194/gmd-14-1575-2021

A unified parameterization of clouds and turbulence using CLUBB and subcolumns in the Community Atmosphere Model
journal, January 2015

  • Thayer-Calder, K.; Gettelman, A.; Craig, C.
  • Geoscientific Model Development, Vol. 8, Issue 12
  • DOI: 10.5194/gmd-8-3801-2015

Constraining cloud lifetime effects of aerosols using A-Train satellite observations: CONSTRAINING CLOUD LIFETIME EFFECTS
journal, August 2012

  • Wang, Minghuai; Ghan, Steven; Liu, Xiaohong
  • Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 39, Issue 15
  • DOI: 10.1029/2012GL052204

Drizzle in Stratiform Boundary Layer Clouds. Part II: Microphysical Aspects
journal, September 2005

  • Wood, R.
  • Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, Vol. 62, Issue 9
  • DOI: 10.1175/JAS3530.1

Evaluation of Clouds in Version 1 of the E3SM Atmosphere Model With Satellite Simulators
journal, May 2019

  • Zhang, Yuying; Xie, Shaocheng; Lin, Wuyin
  • Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, Vol. 11, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.1029/2018MS001562

Constraining Uncertainty in Aerosol Direct Forcing
journal, April 2020

  • Watson‐Parris, D.; Bellouin, N.; Deaconu, L. T.
  • Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 47, Issue 9
  • DOI: 10.1029/2020GL087141

The Collection 6 MODIS aerosol products over land and ocean
journal, January 2013

  • Levy, R. C.; Mattoo, S.; Munchak, L. A.
  • Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, Vol. 6, Issue 11
  • DOI: 10.5194/amt-6-2989-2013

On the Correspondence between Short- and Long-Time-Scale Systematic Errors in CAM4/CAM5 for the Year of Tropical Convection
journal, November 2012


Interpretation of Cloud-Climate Feedback as Produced by 14 Atmospheric General Circulation Models
journal, August 1989


Higher-Order Turbulence Closure and Its Impact on Climate Simulations in the Community Atmosphere Model
journal, December 2013

  • Bogenschutz, Peter A.; Gettelman, Andrew; Morrison, Hugh
  • Journal of Climate, Vol. 26, Issue 23
  • DOI: 10.1175/JCLI-D-13-00075.1

The DOE E3SM Coupled Model Version 1: Overview and Evaluation at Standard Resolution
journal, July 2019

  • Golaz, Jean‐Christophe; Caldwell, Peter M.; Van Roekel, Luke P.
  • Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, Vol. 11, Issue 7
  • DOI: 10.1029/2018MS001603

Twentieth century climate model response and climate sensitivity
journal, January 2007


Description and evaluation of a new four-mode version of the Modal Aerosol Module (MAM4) within version 5.3 of the Community Atmosphere Model
journal, January 2016


Improved Diurnal Cycle of Precipitation in E3SM With a Revised Convective Triggering Function
journal, July 2019

  • Xie, Shaocheng; Wang, Yi‐Chi; Lin, Wuyin
  • Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, Vol. 11, Issue 7
  • DOI: 10.1029/2019MS001702

The Roles of Convection Parameterization in the Formation of Double ITCZ Syndrome in the NCAR CESM: I. Atmospheric Processes
journal, March 2018

  • Song, Xiaoliang; Zhang, Guang J.
  • Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, Vol. 10, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1002/2017MS001191

Impacts of cloud superparameterization on projected daily rainfall intensity climate changes in multiple versions of the Community Earth System Model
journal, October 2016

  • Kooperman, Gabriel J.; Pritchard, Michael S.; Burt, Melissa A.
  • Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, Vol. 8, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1002/2016MS000715

Stratocumulus Clouds
journal, August 2012


Causes of Higher Climate Sensitivity in CMIP6 Models
journal, January 2020

  • Zelinka, Mark D.; Myers, Timothy A.; McCoy, Daniel T.
  • Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 47, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1029/2019GL085782

Testing cloud microphysics parameterizations in NCAR CAM5 with ISDAC and M-PACE observations
journal, January 2011

  • Liu, Xiaohong; Xie, Shaocheng; Boyle, James
  • Journal of Geophysical Research, Vol. 116
  • DOI: 10.1029/2011JD015889

Different contact angle distributions for heterogeneous ice nucleation in the Community Atmospheric Model version 5
journal, January 2014


Precipitation Characteristics in Eighteen Coupled Climate Models
journal, September 2006


Computing and Partitioning Cloud Feedbacks Using Cloud Property Histograms. Part I: Cloud Radiative Kernels
journal, June 2012

  • Zelinka, Mark D.; Klein, Stephen A.; Hartmann, Dennis L.
  • Journal of Climate, Vol. 25, Issue 11
  • DOI: 10.1175/JCLI-D-11-00248.1

Advanced Two-Moment Bulk Microphysics for Global Models. Part I: Off-Line Tests and Comparison with Other Schemes
journal, February 2015


Observational constraints on low cloud feedback reduce uncertainty of climate sensitivity
journal, May 2021


Clouds and Aerosols
book, June 2014


A Cumulus Cloud Microphysics Parameterization for Cloud-Resolving Models
journal, May 2013


The Modern-Era Retrospective Analysis for Research and Applications, Version 2 (MERRA-2)
journal, July 2017


Regional assessment of the parameter-dependent performance of CAM4 in simulating tropical clouds: REGIONAL TROPICAL CLOUDS IN CAM4
journal, July 2012

  • Zhang, Yuying; Xie, Shaocheng; Covey, Curt
  • Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 39, Issue 14
  • DOI: 10.1029/2012GL052184

Aerosol and physical atmosphere model parameters are both important sources of uncertainty in aerosol ERF
journal, January 2018

  • Regayre, Leighton A.; Johnson, Jill S.; Yoshioka, Masaru
  • Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Vol. 18, Issue 13
  • DOI: 10.5194/acp-18-9975-2018

Clouds and the Earth's Radiant Energy System (CERES): An Earth Observing System Experiment
journal, May 1996


COSP: Satellite simulation software for model assessment
journal, August 2011

  • Bodas-Salcedo, A.; Webb, M. J.; Bony, S.
  • Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, Vol. 92, Issue 8
  • DOI: 10.1175/2011BAMS2856.1

Clouds and the Earth’s Radiant Energy System (CERES) Energy Balanced and Filled (EBAF) Top-of-Atmosphere (TOA) Edition-4.0 Data Product
journal, January 2018


New Primary Ice-Nucleation Parameterizations in an Explicit Cloud Model
journal, July 1992


Constraining the low-cloud optical depth feedback at middle and high latitudes using satellite observations: CONSTRAINING LOW-CLOUD OPTICAL DEPTH FEEDBACK
journal, August 2016

  • Terai, C. R.; Klein, S. A.; Zelinka, M. D.
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, Vol. 121, Issue 16
  • DOI: 10.1002/2016JD025233

Effective radiative forcing and adjustments in CMIP6 models
journal, January 2020

  • Smith, Christopher J.; Kramer, Ryan J.; Myhre, Gunnar
  • Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Vol. 20, Issue 16
  • DOI: 10.5194/acp-20-9591-2020

How does increasing horizontal resolution in a global climate model improve the simulation of aerosol-cloud interactions?: RESOLUTION DEPENDENCE OF AIF
journal, June 2015

  • Ma, Po-Lun; Rasch, Philip J.; Wang, Minghuai
  • Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 42, Issue 12
  • DOI: 10.1002/2015GL064183

Revealing differences in GCM representations of low clouds
journal, November 2009


Large contribution of natural aerosols to uncertainty in indirect forcing
journal, November 2013

  • Carslaw, K. S.; Lee, L. A.; Reddington, C. L.
  • Nature, Vol. 503, Issue 7474
  • DOI: 10.1038/nature12674

Contributions of Different Cloud Types to Feedbacks and Rapid Adjustments in CMIP5
journal, July 2013


Sensible and Latent Heat Flux Measurements over the Ocean
journal, May 1982


Toward a minimal representation of aerosols in climate models: description and evaluation in the Community Atmosphere Model CAM5
journal, January 2012

  • Liu, X.; Easter, R. C.; Ghan, S. J.
  • Geoscientific Model Development, Vol. 5, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.5194/gmd-5-709-2012

A PDF-Based Model for Boundary Layer Clouds. Part I: Method and Model Description
journal, December 2002


Historical (1750–2014) anthropogenic emissions of reactive gases and aerosols from the Community Emissions Data System (CEDS)
journal, January 2018

  • Hoesly, Rachel M.; Smith, Steven J.; Feng, Leyang
  • Geoscientific Model Development, Vol. 11, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.5194/gmd-11-369-2018

The Seasonal Cycle over the Tropical Pacific in Coupled Ocean–Atmosphere General Circulation Models
journal, September 1995


Understanding Cloud and Convective Characteristics in Version 1 of the E3SM Atmosphere Model
journal, October 2018

  • Xie, Shaocheng; Lin, Wuyin; Rasch, Philip J.
  • Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, Vol. 10, Issue 10
  • DOI: 10.1029/2018MS001350

Evaluating adjusted forcing and model spread for historical and future scenarios in the CMIP5 generation of climate models: FORCING IN CMIP5 CLIMATE MODELS
journal, February 2013

  • Forster, Piers M.; Andrews, Timothy; Good, Peter
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, Vol. 118, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1002/jgrd.50174

Use of CALIPSO lidar observations to evaluate the cloudiness simulated by a climate model
journal, January 2008

  • Chepfer, H.; Bony, S.; Winker, D.
  • Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 35, Issue 15
  • DOI: 10.1029/2008GL034207

Occurrence, liquid water content, and fraction of supercooled water clouds from combined CALIOP/IIR/MODIS measurements
journal, January 2010

  • Hu, Yongxiang; Rodier, Sharon; Xu, Kuan-man
  • Journal of Geophysical Research, Vol. 115
  • DOI: 10.1029/2009JD012384

Historic global biomass burning emissions for CMIP6 (BB4CMIP) based on merging satellite observations with proxies and fire models (1750–2015)
journal, January 2017

  • van Marle, Margreet J. E.; Kloster, Silvia; Magi, Brian I.
  • Geoscientific Model Development, Vol. 10, Issue 9
  • DOI: 10.5194/gmd-10-3329-2017

Global Precipitation at One-Degree Daily Resolution from Multisatellite Observations
journal, February 2001


A Parameterization of Mesoscale Enhancement of Surface Fluxes for Large-Scale Models
journal, January 2000


Global-mean radiative feedbacks and forcing in atmosphere-only and coupled atmosphere-ocean climate change experiments
journal, June 2014

  • Ringer, Mark A.; Andrews, Timothy; Webb, Mark J.
  • Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 41, Issue 11
  • DOI: 10.1002/2014GL060347

Observational constraints on mixed-phase clouds imply higher climate sensitivity
journal, April 2016


Surface and top-of-atmosphere radiative feedback kernels for CESM-CAM5
journal, January 2018

  • Pendergrass, Angeline G.; Conley, Andrew; Vitt, Francis M.
  • Earth System Science Data, Vol. 10, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.5194/essd-10-317-2018

Sensitivity of the total anthropogenic aerosol effect to the treatment of rain in a global climate model: RAIN TREATMENT AND AEROSOL EFFECTS
journal, January 2009

  • Posselt, Rebekka; Lohmann, Ulrike
  • Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 36, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1029/2008GL035796

A multi-year short-range hindcast experiment with CESM1 for evaluating climate model moist processes from diurnal to interannual timescales
journal, January 2021

  • Ma, Hsi-Yen; Zhou, Chen; Zhang, Yunyan
  • Geoscientific Model Development, Vol. 14, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.5194/gmd-14-73-2021

Intercomparison of Bulk Aerodynamic Algorithms for the Computation of Sea Surface Fluxes Using TOGA COARE and TAO Data
journal, October 1998


Toward Understanding the Simulated Phase Partitioning of Arctic Single‐Layer Mixed‐Phase Clouds in E3SM
journal, July 2020

  • Zhang, Meng; Xie, Shaocheng; Liu, Xiaohong
  • Earth and Space Science, Vol. 7, Issue 7
  • DOI: 10.1029/2020EA001125

Quantification of modelling uncertainties in a large ensemble of climate change simulations
journal, August 2004

  • Murphy, James M.; Sexton, David M. H.; Barnett, David N.
  • Nature, Vol. 430, Issue 7001
  • DOI: 10.1038/nature02771

The GCM-Oriented CALIPSO Cloud Product (CALIPSO-GOCCP)
journal, January 2010

  • Chepfer, H.; Bony, S.; Winker, D.
  • Journal of Geophysical Research, Vol. 115
  • DOI: 10.1029/2009JD012251

Calibrate, emulate, sample
journal, January 2021

  • Cleary, Emmet; Garbuno-Inigo, Alfredo; Lan, Shiwei
  • Journal of Computational Physics, Vol. 424
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2020.109716

The Role of Convective Gustiness in Reducing Seasonal Precipitation Biases in the Tropical West Pacific
journal, April 2018

  • Harrop, Bryce E.; Ma, Po‐Lun; Rasch, Philip J.
  • Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, Vol. 10, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1002/2017MS001157

Microphysical process rates and global aerosol–cloud interactions
journal, January 2013

  • Gettelman, A.; Morrison, H.; Terai, C. R.
  • Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Vol. 13, Issue 19
  • DOI: 10.5194/acp-13-9855-2013

CLUBB as a unified cloud parameterization: Opportunities and challenges
journal, June 2015

  • Guo, H.; Golaz, J. ‐C.; Donner, L. J.
  • Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 42, Issue 11
  • DOI: 10.1002/2015GL063672

Emergent constraints on equilibrium climate sensitivity in CMIP5: do they hold for CMIP6?
journal, January 2020


Predicting global atmospheric ice nuclei distributions and their impacts on climate
journal, June 2010

  • DeMott, P. J.; Prenni, A. J.; Liu, X.
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 107, Issue 25
  • DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0910818107

On the Relationship between Stratiform Low Cloud Cover and Lower-Tropospheric Stability
journal, December 2006

  • Wood, Robert; Bretherton, Christopher S.
  • Journal of Climate, Vol. 19, Issue 24
  • DOI: 10.1175/JCLI3988.1

An AeroCom initial assessment – optical properties in aerosol component modules of global models
journal, January 2006

  • Kinne, S.; Schulz, M.; Textor, C.
  • Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Vol. 6, Issue 7
  • DOI: 10.5194/acp-6-1815-2006

Initial performance assessment of CALIOP
journal, January 2007

  • Winker, David M.; Hunt, William H.; McGill, Matthew J.
  • Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 34, Issue 19
  • DOI: 10.1029/2007GL030135

An Overview of the Atmospheric Component of the Energy Exascale Earth System Model
journal, August 2019

  • Rasch, P. J.; Xie, S.; Ma, P. ‐L.
  • Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, Vol. 11, Issue 8
  • DOI: 10.1029/2019MS001629

The Global Precipitation Climatology Project (GPCP) Monthly Analysis (New Version 2.3) and a Review of 2017 Global Precipitation
journal, April 2018

  • Adler, Robert; Sapiano, Mathew; Huffman, George
  • Atmosphere, Vol. 9, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.3390/atmos9040138

Ensembles of Global Climate Model Variants Designed for the Quantification and Constraint of Uncertainty in Aerosols and Their Radiative Forcing
journal, November 2019

  • Yoshioka, M.; Regayre, L. A.; Pringle, K. J.
  • Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems
  • DOI: 10.1029/2019MS001628

The DOE E3SM Coupled Model Version 1: Description and Results at High Resolution
journal, December 2019

  • Caldwell, Peter M.; Mametjanov, Azamat; Tang, Qi
  • Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, Vol. 11, Issue 12
  • DOI: 10.1029/2019MS001870

On the Correspondence between Mean Forecast Errors and Climate Errors in CMIP5 Models
journal, February 2014


Dreary state of precipitation in global models: MODEL AND OBSERVED PRECIPITATION
journal, December 2010

  • Stephens, Graeme L.; L'Ecuyer, Tristan; Forbes, Richard
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, Vol. 115, Issue D24
  • DOI: 10.1029/2010JD014532

Buoyancy reversal, decoupling and the transition from stratocumulus to shallow cumulus topped marine boundary layers
journal, July 2010


Mixed‐phase cloud physics and Southern Ocean cloud feedback in climate models
journal, September 2015

  • McCoy, Daniel T.; Hartmann, Dennis L.; Zelinka, Mark D.
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, Vol. 120, Issue 18
  • DOI: 10.1002/2015JD023603

Multimodel evaluation of cloud phase transition using satellite and reanalysis data
journal, August 2015

  • Cesana, G.; Waliser, D. E.; Jiang, X.
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, Vol. 120, Issue 15
  • DOI: 10.1002/2014JD022932

Recommendations for diagnosing effective radiative forcing from climate models for CMIP6: RECOMMENDED EFFECTIVE RADIATIVE FORCING
journal, October 2016

  • Forster, Piers M.; Richardson, Thomas; Maycock, Amanda C.
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, Vol. 121, Issue 20
  • DOI: 10.1002/2016JD025320

Tuning the climate of a global model: TUNING THE CLIMATE OF A GLOBAL MODEL
journal, March 2012

  • Mauritsen, Thorsten; Stevens, Bjorn; Roeckner, Erich
  • Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, Vol. 4, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1029/2012MS000154

Process‐Based Climate Model Development Harnessing Machine Learning: II. Model Calibration From Single Column to Global
journal, June 2021

  • Hourdin, Frédéric; Williamson, Daniel; Rio, Catherine
  • Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, Vol. 13, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.1029/2020MS002225

Spread in model climate sensitivity traced to atmospheric convective mixing
journal, January 2014

  • Sherwood, Steven C.; Bony, Sandrine; Dufresne, Jean-Louis
  • Nature, Vol. 505, Issue 7481
  • DOI: 10.1038/nature12829

Practice and philosophy of climate model tuning across six US modeling centers
journal, January 2017

  • Schmidt, Gavin A.; Bader, David; Donner, Leo J.
  • Geoscientific Model Development, Vol. 10, Issue 9
  • DOI: 10.5194/gmd-10-3207-2017

The global aerosol–climate model ECHAM6.3–HAM2.3 – Part 2: Cloud evaluation, aerosol radiative forcing, and climate sensitivity
journal, January 2019

  • Neubauer, David; Ferrachat, Sylvaine; Siegenthaler-Le Drian, Colombe
  • Geoscientific Model Development, Vol. 12, Issue 8
  • DOI: 10.5194/gmd-12-3609-2019

An Assessment of Earth's Climate Sensitivity Using Multiple Lines of Evidence
journal, September 2020

  • Sherwood, S. C.; Webb, M. J.; Annan, J. D.
  • Reviews of Geophysics, Vol. 58, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1029/2019RG000678

Technical Note: Estimating aerosol effects on cloud radiative forcing
journal, January 2013


Parametric Sensitivity and Uncertainty Quantification in the Version 1 of E3SM Atmosphere Model Based on Short Perturbed Parameter Ensemble Simulations
journal, December 2018

  • Qian, Yun; Wan, Hui; Yang, Ben
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, Vol. 123, Issue 23
  • DOI: 10.1029/2018JD028927

Evaluating models' response of tropical low clouds to SST forcings using CALIPSO observations
journal, January 2019

  • Cesana, Grégory; Del Genio, Anthony D.; Ackerman, Andrew S.
  • Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Vol. 19, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.5194/acp-19-2813-2019

The Art and Science of Climate Model Tuning
journal, March 2017

  • Hourdin, Frédéric; Mauritsen, Thorsten; Gettelman, Andrew
  • Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, Vol. 98, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1175/BAMS-D-15-00135.1

Interaction of a Cumulus Cloud Ensemble with the Large-Scale Environment. Part IV: The Discrete Model
journal, January 1982


Process‐Based Climate Model Development Harnessing Machine Learning: I. A Calibration Tool for Parameterization Improvement
journal, February 2021

  • Couvreux, Fleur; Hourdin, Frédéric; Williamson, Daniel
  • Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, Vol. 13, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1029/2020MS002217

Observed Sensitivity of Low-Cloud Radiative Effects to Meteorological Perturbations over the Global Oceans
journal, September 2020

  • Scott, Ryan C.; Myers, Timothy A.; Norris, Joel R.
  • Journal of Climate, Vol. 33, Issue 18
  • DOI: 10.1175/JCLI-D-19-1028.1

Low-Cloud Feedbacks from Cloud-Controlling Factors: A Review
journal, October 2017


Assessment of Global Cloud Datasets from Satellites: Project and Database Initiated by the GEWEX Radiation Panel
journal, July 2013

  • Stubenrauch, C. J.; Rossow, W. B.; Kinne, S.
  • Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, Vol. 94, Issue 7
  • DOI: 10.1175/BAMS-D-12-00117.1

Calibration and Uncertainty Quantification of Convective Parameters in an Idealized GCM
journal, September 2021

  • Dunbar, Oliver R. A.; Garbuno‐Inigo, Alfredo; Schneider, Tapio
  • Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, Vol. 13, Issue 9
  • DOI: 10.1029/2020MS002454