DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Quantifying the regional stranded asset risks from new coal plants under 1.5 °C

Abstract

Momentum to phase out unabated coal use is growing globally. This transition is critical to meeting the Paris climate goals but can potentially lead to large amounts of stranded assets, especially in regions with newer and growing coal fleets. Here we combine plant-level data with a global integrated assessment model to quantify changes in global stranded asset risks from coal-fired power plants across regions and over time. With new plant proposals, cancellations, and retirements over the past five years, global net committed emissions in 2030 from existing and planned coal plants declined by 3.3 GtCO2 (25%). While these emissions are now roughly in line with initial Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) to the Paris Agreement, they remain far off track from longer-term climate goals. Progress made in 2021 towards no new coal can potentially avoid a 24% (503 GW) increase in capacity and a 55% ($520 billion) increase in stranded assets under 1.5 °C. Stranded asset risks fall disproportionately on emerging Asian economies with newer and growing coal fleets. Recent no new coal commitments from major coal financers can potentially reduce stranding of international investments by over 50%.

Authors:
ORCiD logo [1]; ORCiD logo [2]; ORCiD logo [3];  [2];  [4];  [5];  [5];  [2];  [2]
  1. Univ. of Wisconsin, Madison, WI (United States); Univ. of Wisconsin, Madison, WI (United States). Nelson Inst. Center for Sustainability and the Global Environment
  2. Univ. of Maryland, College Park, MD (United States). Center for Global Sustainability
  3. Univ. of Wisconsin, Madison, WI (United States). Nelson Inst. Center for Sustainability and the Global Environment
  4. Univ. of Wisconsin, Madison, WI (United States)
  5. Univ. of Maryland, College Park, MD (United States). Center for Global Sustainability; Pacific Northwest National Lab. (PNNL), College Park, MD (United States). Joint Global Change Research Inst.
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Pacific Northwest National Lab. (PNNL), Richland, WA (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE
OSTI Identifier:
1861780
Report Number(s):
PNNL-ACT-SA-10559
Journal ID: ISSN 1748-9326
Grant/Contract Number:  
AC05-76RL01830
Resource Type:
Accepted Manuscript
Journal Name:
Environmental Research Letters
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Volume: 17; Journal Issue: 2; Journal ID: ISSN 1748-9326
Publisher:
IOP Publishing
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES; coal phaseout; stranded assets; climate mitigation; global climate goals; integrated assessment modeling; no new coal

Citation Formats

Edwards, Morgan R., Cui, Ryna, Bindl, Matilyn, Hultman, Nathan, Mathur, Krinjal, McJeon, Haewon, Iyer, Gokul, Song, Jiawei, and Zhao, Alicia. Quantifying the regional stranded asset risks from new coal plants under 1.5 °C. United States: N. p., 2022. Web. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ac4ec2.
Edwards, Morgan R., Cui, Ryna, Bindl, Matilyn, Hultman, Nathan, Mathur, Krinjal, McJeon, Haewon, Iyer, Gokul, Song, Jiawei, & Zhao, Alicia. Quantifying the regional stranded asset risks from new coal plants under 1.5 °C. United States. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac4ec2
Edwards, Morgan R., Cui, Ryna, Bindl, Matilyn, Hultman, Nathan, Mathur, Krinjal, McJeon, Haewon, Iyer, Gokul, Song, Jiawei, and Zhao, Alicia. Fri . "Quantifying the regional stranded asset risks from new coal plants under 1.5 °C". United States. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac4ec2. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1861780.
@article{osti_1861780,
title = {Quantifying the regional stranded asset risks from new coal plants under 1.5 °C},
author = {Edwards, Morgan R. and Cui, Ryna and Bindl, Matilyn and Hultman, Nathan and Mathur, Krinjal and McJeon, Haewon and Iyer, Gokul and Song, Jiawei and Zhao, Alicia},
abstractNote = {Momentum to phase out unabated coal use is growing globally. This transition is critical to meeting the Paris climate goals but can potentially lead to large amounts of stranded assets, especially in regions with newer and growing coal fleets. Here we combine plant-level data with a global integrated assessment model to quantify changes in global stranded asset risks from coal-fired power plants across regions and over time. With new plant proposals, cancellations, and retirements over the past five years, global net committed emissions in 2030 from existing and planned coal plants declined by 3.3 GtCO2 (25%). While these emissions are now roughly in line with initial Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) to the Paris Agreement, they remain far off track from longer-term climate goals. Progress made in 2021 towards no new coal can potentially avoid a 24% (503 GW) increase in capacity and a 55% ($520 billion) increase in stranded assets under 1.5 °C. Stranded asset risks fall disproportionately on emerging Asian economies with newer and growing coal fleets. Recent no new coal commitments from major coal financers can potentially reduce stranding of international investments by over 50%.},
doi = {10.1088/1748-9326/ac4ec2},
journal = {Environmental Research Letters},
number = 2,
volume = 17,
place = {United States},
year = {Fri Feb 11 00:00:00 EST 2022},
month = {Fri Feb 11 00:00:00 EST 2022}
}

Works referenced in this record:

The justice and equity implications of the clean energy transition
journal, June 2020


A climate stress-test of the financial system
journal, March 2017

  • Battiston, Stefano; Mandel, Antoine; Monasterolo, Irene
  • Nature Climate Change, Vol. 7, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1038/nclimate3255

Stranded on a low-carbon planet: Implications of climate policy for the phase-out of coal-based power plants
journal, January 2015


Measuring progress from nationally determined contributions to mid-century strategies
journal, November 2017


The SSP4: A world of deepening inequality
journal, January 2017


Committed emissions from existing energy infrastructure jeopardize 1.5 °C climate target
journal, July 2019


The early retirement challenge for fossil fuel power plants in deep decarbonisation scenarios
journal, August 2018


Near-real-time monitoring of global CO2 emissions reveals the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic
journal, October 2020


A plant-by-plant strategy for high-ambition coal power phaseout in China
journal, March 2021


Fusing subnational with national climate action is central to decarbonization: the case of the United States
journal, October 2020


The future of coal investment, trade, and stranded assets
journal, June 2021


Fossil electricity retirement deadlines for a just transition
journal, December 2020


Climate Transition Risk and Development Finance: A Carbon Risk Assessment of China's Overseas Energy Portfolios
journal, November 2018

  • Monasterolo, Irene; Zheng, Jiani I.; Battiston, Stefano
  • China & World Economy, Vol. 26, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.1111/cwe.12264

Accelerating the coal transition
journal, March 2021

  • Chattopadhyay, Deb; Bazilian, Morgan D.; Handler, Brad
  • The Electricity Journal, Vol. 34, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.tej.2020.106906

Quantifying stranding risk for fossil fuel assets and implications for renewable energy investment: A review of the literature
journal, December 2019

  • Curtin, J.; McInerney, C.; Ó Gallachóir, B.
  • Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Vol. 116
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2019.109402

Disparities in rooftop photovoltaics deployment in the United States by race and ethnicity
journal, January 2019

  • Sunter, Deborah A.; Castellanos, Sergio; Kammen, Daniel M.
  • Nature Sustainability, Vol. 2, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1038/s41893-018-0204-z

RCP4.5: a pathway for stabilization of radiative forcing by 2100
journal, July 2011

  • Thomson, Allison M.; Calvin, Katherine V.; Smith, Steven J.
  • Climatic Change, Vol. 109, Issue 1-2
  • DOI: 10.1007/s10584-011-0151-4

Transportation infrastructures in a low carbon world: An evaluation of investment needs and their determinants
journal, July 2019

  • Fisch-Romito, Vivien; Guivarch, Céline
  • Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, Vol. 72
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.trd.2019.04.014

Early transformation of the Chinese power sector to avoid additional coal lock-in
journal, January 2020

  • Wang, Huan; Chen, Wenying; Bertram, Christoph
  • Environmental Research Letters, Vol. 15, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/ab5d99

Early retirement of power plants in climate mitigation scenarios
journal, August 2020

  • Fofrich, Robert; Tong, Dan; Calvin, Katherine
  • Environmental Research Letters, Vol. 15, Issue 9
  • DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/ab96d3

Quantifying operational lifetimes for coal power plants under the Paris goals
journal, October 2019


Committed emissions from existing and planned power plants and asset stranding required to meet the Paris Agreement
journal, May 2018

  • Pfeiffer, Alexander; Hepburn, Cameron; Vogt-Schilb, Adrien
  • Environmental Research Letters, Vol. 13, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/aabc5f

Stranded asset implications of the Paris Agreement in Latin America and the Caribbean
journal, April 2020

  • Binsted, Matthew; Iyer, Gokul; Edmonds, James
  • Environmental Research Letters, Vol. 15, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/ab506d

Accounting for finance is key for climate mitigation pathways
journal, May 2021


The contribution of Paris to limit global warming to 2 °C
journal, November 2015


Framework to analyze the spatial distribution of the labor impacts of clean energy transitions
journal, March 2021


Coal and carbonization in sub-Saharan Africa
journal, December 2019

  • Steckel, Jan Christoph; Hilaire, Jérôme; Jakob, Michael
  • Nature Climate Change, Vol. 10, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1038/s41558-019-0649-8

‘Climate value at risk’ of global financial assets
journal, April 2016

  • Dietz, Simon; Bowen, Alex; Dixon, Charlie
  • Nature Climate Change, Vol. 6, Issue 7
  • DOI: 10.1038/nclimate2972

Stranded investment associated with rapid energy system changes under the mid-century strategy in Japan
journal, September 2020


Reducing stranded assets through early action in the Indian power sector
journal, September 2020

  • Malik, Aman; Bertram, Christoph; Despres, Jacques
  • Environmental Research Letters, Vol. 15, Issue 9
  • DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/ab8033

Macroeconomic impact of stranded fossil fuel assets
journal, June 2018


Coal communities and the U.S. energy transition: A policy corridors assessment
journal, April 2021


Systematic map of the literature on carbon lock-in induced by long-lived capital
journal, April 2021

  • Fisch-Romito, Vivien; Guivarch, Céline; Creutzig, Felix
  • Environmental Research Letters, Vol. 16, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/aba660

Capital stranding cascades: The impact of decarbonisation on productive asset utilisation
journal, November 2021


Finance-based accounting of coal emissions
journal, March 2021

  • Manych, Niccolò; Steckel, Jan Christoph; Jakob, Michael
  • Environmental Research Letters, Vol. 16, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/abd972

Sacrifice Along the Energy Continuum: A Call for Energy Justice
journal, August 2015


Modeling of power sector decarbonization in China: comparisons of early and delayed mitigation towards 2-degree target
journal, August 2019


Power sector asset stranding effects of climate policies
journal, April 2019

  • Saygin, Deger; Rigter, Jasper; Caldecott, Ben
  • Energy Sources, Part B: Economics, Planning, and Policy, Vol. 14, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1080/15567249.2019.1618421

Energy investment needs for fulfilling the Paris Agreement and achieving the Sustainable Development Goals
journal, June 2018