DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Turbine scale and siting considerations in wind plant layout optimization and implications for capacity density

Journal Article · · Energy Reports

Improvements in wind energy technology, reduced costs, and ambitious clean energy goals have led to projections of high wind contribution in coming years. Developing methodologies to design wind plants with a variety of siting constraints and turbine sizes helps enable high wind penetration, and gain a better understanding of how wind plants are sensitive to setback constraints and turbine design. In this paper, we present a two-step optimization method to simultaneously determine the optimal number of turbines and their locations in a wind plant domain divided into many small, discrete parcels. We present the optimized performance metrics of a wind plant optimized with different turbine sizes and ratings, and with different siting restrictions within the wind plant. Our results indicate that taller and larger turbines are more sensitive to increasing siting constraints. We also compare the optimal wind plant layouts and performance for wind plants optimized for minimum COE and maximum profit. Wind plants optimized for profit had 130%-190% of the capacity of plants optimized for COE, which demonstrates that the optimal results are greatly affected by the objective function, which should be carefully considered. Finally, in this paper we demonstrate the effect of increasing siting constraints on wind plant capacity density, and how the results change when different land areas are used to calculate capacity density. When using the entire wind plant boundary area to determine capacity density, increasing siting constraints decreases the capacity density. However, when we only use the available area (the area left after removing the siting constraints) to calculate the capacity density, increasing the siting constraints increases capacity density. This is a critical insight because of how capacity density is typically defined and used in research, and has important implications for assessment of technical potential and capacity expansion modeling, as well as future wind deployment potential.

Research Organization:
National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), Golden, CO (United States)
Sponsoring Organization:
USDOE Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE), Wind Energy Technologies Office (EE-4W)
Grant/Contract Number:
AC36-08GO28308
OSTI ID:
1856208
Report Number(s):
NREL/JA-5000-79928; MainId:39146; UUID:4b23c749-044d-4ae2-a180-41b199beb120; MainAdminID:64001
Journal Information:
Energy Reports, Journal Name: Energy Reports Vol. 8; ISSN 2352-4847
Publisher:
ElsevierCopyright Statement
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English

References (17)

A review of offshore wind farm layout optimization and electrical system design methods journal July 2019
Optimization of wind turbine positioning in large windfarms by means of a genetic algorithm journal January 1994
The Wind Integration National Dataset (WIND) Toolkit journal August 2015
A system-level cost-of-energy wind farm layout optimization with landowner modeling journal January 2014
An improved global wind resource estimate for integrated assessment models journal May 2017
Interactions of wind energy project siting, wind resource potential, and the evolution of the U.S. power system journal May 2021
Land use and turbine technology influences on wind potential in the United States journal May 2021
Data investigation of installed and output power densities of onshore and offshore wind turbines worldwide journal February 2021
Optimization of wind farm layout with complex land divisions journal May 2017
Carbon‐Neutral Pathways for the United States journal January 2021
Effects of turbine technology and land use on wind power resource potential journal May 2018
Observation-based solar and wind power capacity factors and power densities journal October 2018
A New Model for Wind Farm Layout Optimization With Landowner Decisions
  • Chen, Le; MacDonald, Erin
  • ASME 2011 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, Volume 5: 37th Design Automation Conference, Parts A and B https://doi.org/10.1115/DETC2011-47772
conference June 2012
Best Practices for Wake Model and Optimization Algorithm Selection in Wind Farm Layout Optimization conference January 2019
Massive simplification of the wind farm layout optimization problem journal January 2019
Coupled wind turbine design and layout optimization with nonhomogeneous wind turbines journal January 2019
Geographic context affects the landscape change and fragmentation caused by wind energy facilities journal January 2019