DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Seasonal Cycle of Idealized Polar Clouds: Large Eddy Simulations Driven by a GCM

Abstract

The uncertainty in polar cloud feedbacks calls for process understanding of the cloud response to climate warming. As an initial step toward improved process understanding, we investigate the seasonal cycle of polar clouds in the current climate by adopting a novel modeling framework using large eddy simulations (LES), which explicitly resolve cloud dynamics. Resolved horizontal and vertical advection of heat and moisture from an idealized GCM are prescribed as forcing in the LES. The LES are also forced with prescribed sea ice thickness, but surface temperature, atmospheric temperature, and moisture evolve freely without nudging. A semigray radiative transfer scheme without water vapor and cloud feedbacks allows the GCM and LES to achieve closed energy budgets more easily than would be possible with more complex schemes. This enables the mean states in the two models to be consistently compared, without the added complications from interaction with more comprehensive radiation. Furthermore, we show that the LES closely follow the GCM seasonal cycle, and the seasonal cycle of low-level clouds in the LES resembles observations: maximum cloud liquid occurs in late summer and early autumn, and winter clouds are dominated by ice in the upper troposphere. Large-scale advection of moisture provides the mainmore » source of water vapor for the liquid-containing clouds in summer, while a temperature advection peak in winter makes the atmosphere relatively dry and reduces cloud condensate. The framework we develop and employ can be used broadly for studying cloud processes and the response of polar clouds to climate warming.« less

Authors:
ORCiD logo [1]; ORCiD logo [2]; ORCiD logo [3]; ORCiD logo [4]; ORCiD logo [5]
  1. Johns Hopkins Univ., Baltimore, MD (United States)
  2. California Institute of Technology (CalTech), Pasadena, CA (United States); California Institute of Technology (CalTech), Pasadena, CA (United States). Jet Propulsion Lab. (JPL)
  3. California Institute of Technology (CalTech), Pasadena, CA (United States)
  4. Pacific Northwest National Lab. (PNNL), Richland, WA (United States)
  5. Univ. of California, San Diego, CA (United States). Scripps Inst. of Oceanography
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Pacific Northwest National Lab. (PNNL), Richland, WA (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE; National Science Foundation (NSF)
OSTI Identifier:
1847560
Report Number(s):
PNNL-SA-167085
Journal ID: ISSN 1942-2466
Grant/Contract Number:  
AC05-76RL01830; 1852977; AGS-1835860
Resource Type:
Accepted Manuscript
Journal Name:
Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Volume: 14; Journal Issue: 1; Journal ID: ISSN 1942-2466
Publisher:
American Geophysical Union (AGU)
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES; cloud; LES; Arctic; seasonal cycle; mixed-phase cloud; GCM

Citation Formats

Zhang, Xiyue, Schneider, Tapio, Shen, Zhaoyi, Pressel, Kyle G., and Eisenman, Ian. Seasonal Cycle of Idealized Polar Clouds: Large Eddy Simulations Driven by a GCM. United States: N. p., 2021. Web. doi:10.1029/2021ms002671.
Zhang, Xiyue, Schneider, Tapio, Shen, Zhaoyi, Pressel, Kyle G., & Eisenman, Ian. Seasonal Cycle of Idealized Polar Clouds: Large Eddy Simulations Driven by a GCM. United States. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021ms002671
Zhang, Xiyue, Schneider, Tapio, Shen, Zhaoyi, Pressel, Kyle G., and Eisenman, Ian. Thu . "Seasonal Cycle of Idealized Polar Clouds: Large Eddy Simulations Driven by a GCM". United States. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021ms002671. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1847560.
@article{osti_1847560,
title = {Seasonal Cycle of Idealized Polar Clouds: Large Eddy Simulations Driven by a GCM},
author = {Zhang, Xiyue and Schneider, Tapio and Shen, Zhaoyi and Pressel, Kyle G. and Eisenman, Ian},
abstractNote = {The uncertainty in polar cloud feedbacks calls for process understanding of the cloud response to climate warming. As an initial step toward improved process understanding, we investigate the seasonal cycle of polar clouds in the current climate by adopting a novel modeling framework using large eddy simulations (LES), which explicitly resolve cloud dynamics. Resolved horizontal and vertical advection of heat and moisture from an idealized GCM are prescribed as forcing in the LES. The LES are also forced with prescribed sea ice thickness, but surface temperature, atmospheric temperature, and moisture evolve freely without nudging. A semigray radiative transfer scheme without water vapor and cloud feedbacks allows the GCM and LES to achieve closed energy budgets more easily than would be possible with more complex schemes. This enables the mean states in the two models to be consistently compared, without the added complications from interaction with more comprehensive radiation. Furthermore, we show that the LES closely follow the GCM seasonal cycle, and the seasonal cycle of low-level clouds in the LES resembles observations: maximum cloud liquid occurs in late summer and early autumn, and winter clouds are dominated by ice in the upper troposphere. Large-scale advection of moisture provides the main source of water vapor for the liquid-containing clouds in summer, while a temperature advection peak in winter makes the atmosphere relatively dry and reduces cloud condensate. The framework we develop and employ can be used broadly for studying cloud processes and the response of polar clouds to climate warming.},
doi = {10.1029/2021ms002671},
journal = {Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems},
number = 1,
volume = 14,
place = {United States},
year = {Thu Dec 23 00:00:00 EST 2021},
month = {Thu Dec 23 00:00:00 EST 2021}
}

Works referenced in this record:

Numerical Simulation of Tropical Cumulus Clouds and Their Interaction with the Subcloud Layer
journal, August 1988


Sensitivity of idealized mixed‐phase stratocumulus to climate perturbations
journal, July 2020

  • Zhang, Xiyue; Schneider, Tapio; Kaul, Colleen M.
  • Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, Vol. 146, Issue 732
  • DOI: 10.1002/qj.3846

Ubiquitous low‐level liquid‐containing Arctic clouds: New observations and climate model constraints from CALIPSO‐GOCCP
journal, October 2012

  • Cesana, G.; Kay, J. E.; Chepfer, H.
  • Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 39, Issue 20
  • DOI: 10.1029/2012GL053385

Snow Size Spectra and Radar Reflectivity
journal, March 1970


The Role of Springtime Arctic Clouds in Determining Autumn Sea Ice Extent
journal, September 2016

  • Cox, Christopher J.; Uttal, Taneil; Long, Charles N.
  • Journal of Climate, Vol. 29, Issue 18
  • DOI: 10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0136.1

Numerics and subgrid‐scale modeling in large eddy simulations of stratocumulus clouds
journal, May 2017

  • Pressel, Kyle G.; Mishra, Siddhartha; Schneider, Tapio
  • Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, Vol. 9, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1002/2016MS000778

Use of CALIPSO lidar observations to evaluate the cloudiness simulated by a climate model
journal, January 2008

  • Chepfer, H.; Bony, S.; Winker, D.
  • Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 35, Issue 15
  • DOI: 10.1029/2008GL034207

Large-eddy simulation of subtropical cloud-topped boundary layers: 1. A forcing framework with closed surface energy balance: LES OF CLOUD-TOPPED BOUNDARY LAYERS
journal, October 2016

  • Tan, Zhihong; Schneider, Tapio; Teixeira, João
  • Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, Vol. 8, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1002/2016MS000655

Toward Cloud Resolving Modeling of Large-Scale Tropical Circulations: A Simple Cloud Microphysics Parameterization
journal, November 1998


A Gray-Radiation Aquaplanet Moist GCM. Part I: Static Stability and Eddy Scale
journal, October 2006

  • Frierson, Dargan M. W.; Held, Isaac M.; Zurita-Gotor, Pablo
  • Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, Vol. 63, Issue 10
  • DOI: 10.1175/JAS3753.1

Intercomparison of large-eddy simulations of Arctic mixed-phase clouds: Importance of ice size distribution assumptions
journal, March 2014

  • Ovchinnikov, Mikhail; Ackerman, Andrew S.; Avramov, Alexander
  • Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, Vol. 6, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1002/2013MS000282

Autumnal Mixed-Phase Cloudy Boundary Layers in the Arctic
journal, June 1998


Occurrence, liquid water content, and fraction of supercooled water clouds from combined CALIOP/IIR/MODIS measurements
journal, January 2010

  • Hu, Yongxiang; Rodier, Sharon; Xu, Kuan-man
  • Journal of Geophysical Research, Vol. 115
  • DOI: 10.1029/2009JD012384

Possible climate transitions from breakup of stratocumulus decks under greenhouse warming
journal, February 2019


Surface Irradiances of Edition 4.0 Clouds and the Earth’s Radiant Energy System (CERES) Energy Balanced and Filled (EBAF) Data Product
journal, June 2018


Large-eddy simulation of subtropical cloud-topped boundary layers: 2. Cloud response to climate change: LES OF LOW CLOUDS UNDER CLIMATE CHANGE
journal, January 2017

  • Tan, Zhihong; Schneider, Tapio; Teixeira, João
  • Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, Vol. 9, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1002/2016MS000804

Nonlinear threshold behavior during the loss of Arctic sea ice
journal, December 2008

  • Eisenman, I.; Wettlaufer, J. S.
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 106, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0806887106

Relationships between Large-Scale Heat and Moisture Budgets and the Occurrence of Arctic Stratus Clouds
journal, September 1985


Mixed-phase clouds cause climate model biases in Arctic wintertime temperature inversions
journal, October 2013


Large-eddy simulations of an Arctic mixed-phase stratiform cloud observed during ISDAC: sensitivity to moisture aloft, surface fluxes and large-scale forcing: LESs of Arctic Mixed-Phase Clouds during ISDAC
journal, September 2014

  • Savre, J.; Ekman, A. M. L.; Svensson, G.
  • Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, Vol. 141, Issue 689
  • DOI: 10.1002/qj.2425

The large-scale energy budget of the Arctic
journal, January 2007

  • Serreze, Mark C.; Barrett, Andrew P.; Slater, Andrew G.
  • Journal of Geophysical Research, Vol. 112, Issue D11
  • DOI: 10.1029/2006JD008230

Intercomparison of cloud model simulations of Arctic mixed-phase boundary layer clouds observed during SHEBA/FIRE-ACE: INTERCOMPARISON OF CLOUD MODEL SIMULATIONS OF ARCTIC MIXED-PHASE
journal, February 2011

  • Morrison, Hugh; Zuidema, Paquita; Ackerman, Andrew S.
  • Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, Vol. 3, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1029/2011MS000066

Polar clouds and radiation in satellite observations, reanalyses, and climate models: POLAR CLOUDS AND RADIATION
journal, April 2017

  • Lenaerts, Jan T. M.; Van Tricht, Kristof; Lhermitte, Stef
  • Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 44, Issue 7
  • DOI: 10.1002/2016GL072242

An intercomparison of radiatively driven entrainment and turbulence in a smoke cloud, as simulated by different numerical models
journal, January 1999

  • Bretherton, C. S.; Macvean, M. K.; Bechtold, P.
  • Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, Vol. 125, Issue 554
  • DOI: 10.1002/qj.49712555402

Cloud influence on and response to seasonal Arctic sea ice loss
journal, January 2009

  • Kay, Jennifer E.; Gettelman, Andrew
  • Journal of Geophysical Research, Vol. 114, Issue D18
  • DOI: 10.1029/2009JD011773

Sensitivities in Large-Eddy Simulations of Mixed-Phase Arctic Stratocumulus Clouds Using a Simple Microphysics Approach
journal, November 2015

  • Kaul, Colleen M.; Teixeira, João; Suzuki, Kentaroh
  • Monthly Weather Review, Vol. 143, Issue 11
  • DOI: 10.1175/MWR-D-14-00319.1

Arctic clouds in ECHAM6 and their sensitivity to cloud microphysics and surface fluxes
journal, January 2019

  • Kretzschmar, Jan; Salzmann, Marc; Mülmenstädt, Johannes
  • Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Vol. 19, Issue 16
  • DOI: 10.5194/acp-19-10571-2019

Continuous Single-Column Model Evaluation at a Permanent Meteorological Supersite
journal, September 2012

  • Neggers, R. A. J.; Siebesma, A. P.; Heus, T.
  • Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, Vol. 93, Issue 9
  • DOI: 10.1175/BAMS-D-11-00162.1

Measurements near the Atmospheric Surface Flux Group tower at SHEBA: Near-surface conditions and surface energy budget
journal, January 2002


Water vapor, cloud liquid water paths, and rain rates over northern high latitude open seas: NORTHERN HIGH LATITUDE ATMOSPHERIC MOISTURE
journal, March 2008

  • Zuidema, Paquita; Joyce, Robert
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, Vol. 113, Issue D5
  • DOI: 10.1029/2007JD009040

Can We Use Single‐Column Models for Understanding the Boundary Layer Cloud‐Climate Feedback?
journal, February 2018

  • Dal Gesso, S.; Neggers, R. A. J.
  • Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, Vol. 10, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1002/2017MS001113

Alternative methods for specification of observed forcing in single-column models and cloud system models
journal, October 1999

  • Randall, David A.; Cripe, Douglas G.
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, Vol. 104, Issue D20
  • DOI: 10.1029/1999JD900765

Isolating the Liquid Cloud Response to Recent Arctic Sea Ice Variability Using Spaceborne Lidar Observations
journal, January 2018

  • Morrison, A. L.; Kay, J. E.; Chepfer, H.
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, Vol. 123, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1002/2017JD027248

Overview of Arctic Cloud and Radiation Characteristics
journal, August 1996


Radiative forcing by long-lived greenhouse gases: Calculations with the AER radiative transfer models
journal, January 2008

  • Iacono, Michael J.; Delamere, Jennifer S.; Mlawer, Eli J.
  • Journal of Geophysical Research, Vol. 113, Issue D13
  • DOI: 10.1029/2008JD009944

Synoptically Driven Arctic Winter States
journal, March 2011

  • Stramler, Kirstie; Del Genio, Anthony D.; Rossow, William B.
  • Journal of Climate, Vol. 24, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.1175/2010JCLI3817.1

Arctic cloud macrophysical characteristics from CloudSat and CALIPSO
journal, September 2012


The Sensitivity of the Jet Stream Response to Climate Change to Radiative Assumptions
journal, April 2019

  • Tan, Zhihong; Lachmy, Orli; Shaw, Tiffany A.
  • Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, Vol. 11, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1029/2018MS001492

Intercomparison of model simulations of mixed-phase clouds observed during the ARM Mixed-Phase Arctic Cloud Experiment. I: single-layer cloud
journal, April 2009

  • Klein, Stephen A.; McCoy, Renata B.; Morrison, Hugh
  • Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, Vol. 135, Issue 641
  • DOI: 10.1002/qj.416

Recent Advances in Arctic Cloud and Climate Research
journal, October 2016

  • Kay, Jennifer E.; L’Ecuyer, Tristan; Chepfer, Helene
  • Current Climate Change Reports, Vol. 2, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1007/s40641-016-0051-9

A Model for the Thermodynamic Growth of Sea Ice in Numerical Investigations of Climate
journal, May 1976


Arctic cloud annual cycle biases in climate models
journal, January 2019

  • Taylor, Patrick C.; Boeke, Robyn C.; Li, Ying
  • Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Vol. 19, Issue 13
  • DOI: 10.5194/acp-19-8759-2019

Relative Contributions of Synoptic and Low-Frequency Eddies to Time-Mean Atmospheric Moisture Transport, Including the Role of Atmospheric Rivers
journal, November 2012

  • Newman, Matthew; Kiladis, George N.; Weickmann, Klaus M.
  • Journal of Climate, Vol. 25, Issue 21
  • DOI: 10.1175/JCLI-D-11-00665.1

Select strengths and biases of models in representing the Arctic winter boundary layer over sea ice: the Larcform 1 single column model intercomparison: FIRST ARCTIC AIR MASS INTERCOMPARISON
journal, August 2016

  • Pithan, Felix; Ackerman, Andrew; Angevine, Wayne M.
  • Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, Vol. 8, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1002/2016MS000630

Large-eddy simulation in an anelastic framework with closed water and entropy balances: LARGE-EDDY SIMULATION FRAMEWORK
journal, September 2015

  • Pressel, Kyle G.; Kaul, Colleen M.; Schneider, Tapio
  • Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, Vol. 7, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1002/2015MS000496

A new convective adjustment scheme. Part II: Single column tests using GATE wave, BOMEX, ATEX and arctic air-mass data sets
journal, July 1986

  • Betts, A. K.; Miller, M. J.
  • Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, Vol. 112, Issue 473
  • DOI: 10.1002/qj.49711247308

Assessing the Radiative Effects of Global Ice Clouds Based on CloudSat and CALIPSO Measurements
journal, November 2016


Ice properties of single-layer stratocumulus during the Mixed-Phase Arctic Cloud Experiment: 1. Observations
journal, January 2007

  • McFarquhar, Greg M.; Zhang, Gong; Poellot, Michael R.
  • Journal of Geophysical Research, Vol. 112, Issue D24
  • DOI: 10.1029/2007JD008633

A Gray-Radiation Aquaplanet Moist GCM. Part II: Energy Transports in Altered Climates
journal, May 2007

  • Frierson, Dargan M. W.; Held, Isaac M.; Zurita-Gotor, Pablo
  • Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, Vol. 64, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.1175/JAS3913.1

The Hydrological Cycle over a Wide Range of Climates Simulated with an Idealized GCM
journal, August 2008


Clouds and the Earth’s Radiant Energy System (CERES) Energy Balanced and Filled (EBAF) Top-of-Atmosphere (TOA) Edition-4.0 Data Product
journal, January 2018


Observational constraints on Arctic Ocean clouds and radiative fluxes during the early 21st century: ARCTIC OCEAN CLOUD AND RADIATION CLIMATOLOGY
journal, July 2013

  • Kay, Jennifer E.; L'Ecuyer, Tristan
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, Vol. 118, Issue 13
  • DOI: 10.1002/jgrd.50489

Toward an Explanation of the Annual Cycle of Cloudiness over the Arctic Ocean
journal, February 1999