DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: The Hubble Constant from Strongly Lensed Supernovae with Standardizable Magnifications

Abstract

The dominant uncertainty in the current measurement of the Hubble constant (H0) with strong gravitational lensing time delays is attributed to uncertainties in the mass profiles of the main deflector galaxies. Strongly lensed supernovae (glSNe) can provide, in addition to measurable time delays, lensing magnification constraints when knowledge about the unlensed apparent brightness of the explosion is imposed. We present a hierarchical Bayesian framework to combine a data set of SNe that are not strongly lensed and a data set of strongly lensed SNe with measured time delays. We jointly constrain (i) H0 using the time delays as an absolute distance indicator, (ii) the lens model profiles using the magnification ratio of lensed and unlensed fluxes on the population level, and (iii) the unlensed apparent magnitude distribution of the SN population and the redshift–luminosity relation of the relative expansion history of the universe. We apply our joint inference framework on a future expected data set of glSNe and forecast that a sample of 144 glSNe of Type Ia with well-measured time series and imaging data will measure H0 to 1.5%. We discuss strategies to mitigate systematics associated with using absolute flux measurements of glSNe to constrain the mass density profiles.more » Using the magnification of SN images is a promising and complementary alternative to using stellar kinematics. Future surveys, such as the Rubin and Roman observatories, will be able to discover the necessary number of glSNe, and with additional follow-up observations, this methodology will provide precise constraints on mass profiles and H0.« less

Authors:
ORCiD logo [1]; ORCiD logo [2]; ORCiD logo [3]
  1. Stanford Univ., CA (United States); SLAC National Accelerator Lab., Menlo Park, CA (United States)
  2. Univ. of Cambridge (United Kingdom)
  3. Univ. of Chicago, IL (United States)
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
SLAC National Accelerator Lab., Menlo Park, CA (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE Office of Science (SC), Basic Energy Sciences (BES)
Contributing Org.:
KIPAC
OSTI Identifier:
1838661
Alternate Identifier(s):
OSTI ID: 1854150; OSTI ID: 1864265
Grant/Contract Number:  
AC02-76SF00515
Resource Type:
Accepted Manuscript
Journal Name:
The Astrophysical Journal
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Volume: 924; Journal Issue: 1; Journal ID: ISSN 0004-637X
Publisher:
IOP Publishing
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
79 ASTRONOMY AND ASTROPHYSICS; Dark Energy; Hubble constant; supernovae; dark energy

Citation Formats

Birrer, Simon, Dhawan, Suhail, and Shajib, Anowar J. The Hubble Constant from Strongly Lensed Supernovae with Standardizable Magnifications. United States: N. p., 2022. Web. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac323a.
Birrer, Simon, Dhawan, Suhail, & Shajib, Anowar J. The Hubble Constant from Strongly Lensed Supernovae with Standardizable Magnifications. United States. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ac323a
Birrer, Simon, Dhawan, Suhail, and Shajib, Anowar J. Tue . "The Hubble Constant from Strongly Lensed Supernovae with Standardizable Magnifications". United States. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ac323a. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1838661.
@article{osti_1838661,
title = {The Hubble Constant from Strongly Lensed Supernovae with Standardizable Magnifications},
author = {Birrer, Simon and Dhawan, Suhail and Shajib, Anowar J.},
abstractNote = {The dominant uncertainty in the current measurement of the Hubble constant (H0) with strong gravitational lensing time delays is attributed to uncertainties in the mass profiles of the main deflector galaxies. Strongly lensed supernovae (glSNe) can provide, in addition to measurable time delays, lensing magnification constraints when knowledge about the unlensed apparent brightness of the explosion is imposed. We present a hierarchical Bayesian framework to combine a data set of SNe that are not strongly lensed and a data set of strongly lensed SNe with measured time delays. We jointly constrain (i) H0 using the time delays as an absolute distance indicator, (ii) the lens model profiles using the magnification ratio of lensed and unlensed fluxes on the population level, and (iii) the unlensed apparent magnitude distribution of the SN population and the redshift–luminosity relation of the relative expansion history of the universe. We apply our joint inference framework on a future expected data set of glSNe and forecast that a sample of 144 glSNe of Type Ia with well-measured time series and imaging data will measure H0 to 1.5%. We discuss strategies to mitigate systematics associated with using absolute flux measurements of glSNe to constrain the mass density profiles. Using the magnification of SN images is a promising and complementary alternative to using stellar kinematics. Future surveys, such as the Rubin and Roman observatories, will be able to discover the necessary number of glSNe, and with additional follow-up observations, this methodology will provide precise constraints on mass profiles and H0.},
doi = {10.3847/1538-4357/ac323a},
journal = {The Astrophysical Journal},
number = 1,
volume = 924,
place = {United States},
year = {Tue Jan 04 00:00:00 EST 2022},
month = {Tue Jan 04 00:00:00 EST 2022}
}

Works referenced in this record:

Astrometric requirements for strong lensing time-delay cosmography
journal, August 2019

  • Birrer, Simon; Treu, Tommaso
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 489, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stz2254

Direct Detection of Cold Dark Matter Substructure
journal, June 2002

  • Dalal, N.; Kochanek, C. S.
  • The Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 572, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1086/340303

Two Accurate Time-Delay Distances from Strong Lensing: Implications for Cosmology
journal, March 2013


The elliptical power law profile lens
journal, August 2015


TDCOSMO: III. Dark matter substructure meets dark energy. The effects of (sub)halos on strong-lensing measurements of H 0
journal, October 2020


lenstronomy: Multi-purpose gravitational lens modelling software package
journal, December 2018


Quantitative Interpretation of Quasar Microlensing Light Curves
journal, April 2004

  • Kochanek, C. S.
  • The Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 605, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1086/382180

H0LiCOW – III. Quantifying the effect of mass along the line of sight to the gravitational lens HE 0435−1223 through weighted galaxy counts★
journal, February 2017

  • Rusu, Cristian E.; Fassnacht, Christopher D.; Sluse, Dominique
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 467, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stx285

The mass-sheet degeneracy and time-delay cosmography: analysis of the strong lens RXJ1131-1231
journal, August 2016

  • Birrer, Simon; Amara, Adam; Refregier, Alexandre
  • Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, Vol. 2016, Issue 08
  • DOI: 10.1088/1475-7516/2016/08/020

Measuring type ia Supernova Populations of Stretch and Color and Predicting Distance Biases
journal, May 2016


ZTF Early Observations of Type Ia Supernovae. II. First Light, the Initial Rise, and Time to Reach Maximum Brightness
journal, October 2020


Gravitational lens time delays for distant supernovae: breaking the degeneracy between radial mass profiles and the Hubble constant
journal, February 2003


On the Possibility of Determining Hubble's Parameter and the Masses of Galaxies from the Gravitational Lens Effect
journal, September 1964


A new Channel for Detecting dark Matter Substructure in Galaxies: Gravitational lens time Delays
journal, June 2009


Measuring the inclination and mass-to-light ratio of axisymmetric galaxies via anisotropic Jeans models of stellar kinematics
journal, October 2008


A SHARP view of H0LiCOW: H0 from three time-delay gravitational lens systems with adaptive optics imaging
journal, September 2019

  • Chen, Geoff C-F; Fassnacht, Christopher D.; Suyu, Sherry H.
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 490, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stz2547

Gravitational lenses in arbitrary space-times
journal, March 2021

  • Fleury, Pierre; Larena, Julien; Uzan, Jean-Philippe
  • Classical and Quantum Gravity, Vol. 38, Issue 8
  • DOI: 10.1088/1361-6382/abea2d

CONFIRMATION OF A STAR FORMATION BIAS IN TYPE Ia SUPERNOVA DISTANCES AND ITS EFFECT ON THE MEASUREMENT OF THE HUBBLE CONSTANT
journal, March 2015


The Stellar Halos of Massive Elliptical Galaxies. ii. Detailed Abundance Ratios at Large Radius
journal, September 2013

  • Greene, Jenny E.; Murphy, Jeremy D.; Graves, Genevieve J.
  • The Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 776, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/776/2/64

Time-delay cosmographic forecasts with strong lensing and JWST stellar kinematics
journal, February 2020

  • Yıldırım, Akın; Suyu, Sherry H.; Halkola, Aleksi
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 493, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/staa498

SHARP – II. Mass structure in strong lenses is not necessarily dark matter substructure: a flux ratio anomaly from an edge-on disc in B1555+375
journal, July 2016

  • Hsueh, J. -W.; Fassnacht, C. D.; Vegetti, S.
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters, Vol. 463, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnrasl/slw146

Warm dark matter chills out: constraints on the halo mass function and the free-streaming length of dark matter with eight quadruple-image strong gravitational lenses
journal, December 2019

  • Gilman, Daniel; Birrer, Simon; Nierenberg, Anna
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 491, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stz3480

Fast Calculation of a Family of Elliptical Gravitational Lens Models
journal, August 1998

  • Barkana, Rennan
  • The Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 502, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1086/305950

Quantifying Environmental and Line-of-sight Effects in Models of Strong Gravitational Lens Systems
journal, February 2017


The Internal Structure and Formation of Early‐Type Galaxies: The Gravitational Lens System MG 2016+112 at z = 1.004
journal, August 2002

  • Treu, Tommaso; Koopmans, Leon V. E.
  • The Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 575, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1086/341216

Type ii-p Supernovae as Standard Candles: the Sdss-Ii Sample Revisited
journal, September 2010

  • Poznanski, Dovi; Nugent, Peter E.; Filippenko, Alexei V.
  • The Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 721, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/721/2/956

The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: DR4 maps and cosmological parameters
journal, December 2020

  • Aiola, Simone; Calabrese, Erminia; Maurin, Loïc
  • Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, Vol. 2020, Issue 12
  • DOI: 10.1088/1475-7516/2020/12/047

HOW TO FIND GRAVITATIONALLY LENSED TYPE Ia SUPERNOVAE
journal, December 2016


Overconstrained gravitational lens models and the Hubble constant
journal, February 2020

  • Kochanek, C. S.
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 493, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/staa344

H0LiCOW – IV. Lens mass model of HE 0435−1223 and blind measurement of its time-delay distance for cosmology
journal, November 2016

  • Wong, Kenneth C.; Suyu, Sherry H.; Auger, Matthew W.
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 465, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stw3077

Planck 2018 results: VI. Cosmological parameters
journal, September 2020


It’s Dust: Solving the Mysteries of the Intrinsic Scatter and Host-galaxy Dependence of Standardized Type Ia Supernova Brightnesses
journal, March 2021


The Quadruple Gravitational Lens PG 1115+080: Time Delays and Models
journal, February 1997

  • Schechter, Paul L.; Bailyn, Charles D.; Barr, Robert
  • The Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 475, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1086/310478

Gravitational lensing of type Ia supernovae by galaxy clusters
journal, May 1998


Probing dark matter structure down to 107 solar masses: flux ratio statistics in gravitational lenses with line-of-sight haloes
journal, June 2019

  • Gilman, Daniel; Birrer, Simon; Treu, Tommaso
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 487, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stz1593

Spectroscopy of the first resolved strongly lensed Type Ia supernova iPTF16geu
journal, December 2020

  • Johansson, J.; Goobar, A.; Price, S. H.
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 502, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/staa3829

TDCOSMO: I. An exploration of systematic uncertainties in the inference of H 0 from time-delay cosmography
journal, July 2020


H0LiCOW – XIII. A 2.4 per cent measurement of H0 from lensed quasars: 5.3σ tension between early- and late-Universe probes
journal, September 2019

  • Wong, Kenneth C.; Suyu, Sherry H.; Chen, Geoff C-F
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 498, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stz3094

Toward a Cosmological Hubble Diagram for Type II‐P Supernovae
journal, July 2006

  • Nugent, Peter; Sullivan, Mark; Ellis, Richard
  • The Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 645, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1086/504413

Interpreting the Strongly Lensed Supernova iPTF16geu: Time Delay Predictions, Microlensing, and Lensing Rates
journal, January 2017


Effects of Gravitational Microlensing on P Cygni Profiles of Type Ia Supernovae
journal, February 2006

  • Bagherpour, Hamed; Branch, David; Kantowski, Ronald
  • The Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 638, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1086/498889

First Cosmology Results using Type Ia Supernovae from the Dark Energy Survey: Constraints on Cosmological Parameters
journal, February 2019


Cluster Lensing Profiles Derived from a Redshift Enhancement of Magnified Boss-Survey Galaxies
journal, July 2013


COSMOGRAIL: XIX. Time delays in 18 strongly lensed quasars from 15 years of optical monitoring
journal, August 2020


Two-dimensional kinematics of SLACS lenses - III. Mass structure and dynamics of early-type lens galaxies beyond z ≃ 0.1: 2D kinematics of SLACS lenses - III
journal, May 2011

  • Barnabè, Matteo; Czoske, Oliver; Koopmans, Léon V. E.
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 415, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.18842.x

Correcting Type Ia Supernova Distances for Selection Biases and Contamination in Photometrically Identified Samples
journal, February 2017


“Worst-case” Microlensing in the Identification and Modeling of Lensed Quasars
journal, November 2021

  • Weisenbach, Luke; Schechter, Paul L.; Pontula, Sahil
  • The Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 922, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac2228

Gravitational lens Modeling with Basis sets
journal, November 2015


Binary Companions of Evolved Stars in APOGEE DR14: Search Method and Catalog of ∼5000 Companions
journal, June 2018

  • Price-Whelan, Adrian M.; Hogg, David W.; Rix, Hans-Walter
  • The Astronomical Journal, Vol. 156, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.3847/1538-3881/aac387

Rates and Properties of Supernovae Strongly Gravitationally Lensed by Elliptical Galaxies in Time-domain Imaging Surveys
journal, July 2019

  • Goldstein, Daniel A.; Nugent, Peter E.; Goobar, Ariel
  • The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, Vol. 243, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.3847/1538-4365/ab1fe0

Calibration of the Tip of the Red Giant Branch
journal, March 2020

  • Freedman, Wendy L.; Madore, Barry F.; Hoyt, Taylor
  • The Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 891, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab7339

Quasar Microlensing at High Magnification and the Role of Dark Matter: Enhanced Fluctuations and Suppressed Saddle Points
journal, December 2002

  • Schechter, Paul L.; Wambsganss, Joachim
  • The Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 580, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1086/343856

A HUBBLE DIAGRAM FROM TYPE II SUPERNOVAE BASED SOLELY ON PHOTOMETRY: THE PHOTOMETRIC COLOR METHOD
journal, December 2015


Gravitationally lensed quasars and supernovae in future wide-field optical imaging surveys: Lensed quasars and supernovae
journal, April 2010


H0LiCOW VIII. A weak-lensing measurement of the external convergence in the field of the lensed quasar HE 0435−1223
journal, April 2018

  • Tihhonova, O.; Courbin, F.; Harvey, D.
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 477, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/sty1040

iPTF16geu: A multiply imaged, gravitationally lensed type Ia supernova
journal, April 2017


M/L and velocity anisotropy from observations of spherical galaxies, or must M87 have a massive black hole?
journal, September 1982

  • Binney, J.; Mamon, G. A.
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 200, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/200.2.361

Magnified or multiply imaged? – Search strategies for gravitationally lensed supernovae in wide-field surveys
journal, June 2019

  • Wojtak, Radosław; Hjorth, Jens; Gall, Christa
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 487, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stz1516

TDCOSMO: IV. Hierarchical time-delay cosmography – joint inference of the Hubble constant and galaxy density profiles
journal, November 2020


The absolute magnitudes of Type IA supernovae
journal, August 1993

  • Phillips, M. M.
  • The Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 413
  • DOI: 10.1086/186970

Dark matter haloes of massive elliptical galaxies at z ∼ 0.2 are well described by the Navarro–Frenk–White profile
journal, February 2021

  • Shajib, Anowar J.; Treu, Tommaso; Birrer, Simon
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 503, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stab536

emcee : The MCMC Hammer
journal, March 2013

  • Foreman-Mackey, Daniel; Hogg, David W.; Lang, Dustin
  • Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, Vol. 125, Issue 925
  • DOI: 10.1086/670067

Fermat's principle, caustics, and the classification of gravitational lens images
journal, November 1986

  • Blandford, Roger; Narayan, Ramesh
  • The Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 310
  • DOI: 10.1086/164709

Line-of-sight effects in strong lensing: putting theory into practice
journal, April 2017

  • Birrer, Simon; Welschen, Cyril; Amara, Adam
  • Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, Vol. 2017, Issue 04
  • DOI: 10.1088/1475-7516/2017/04/049

Large-scale Gravitational Lens Modeling with Bayesian Neural Networks for Accurate and Precise Inference of the Hubble Constant
journal, March 2021

  • Park, Ji Won; Wagner-Carena, Sebastian; Birrer, Simon
  • The Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 910, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/abdfc4

Dissecting the Gravitational lens B1608+656. i. lens Potential Reconstruction
journal, January 2009


The Carnegie-Chicago Hubble Program. VIII. An Independent Determination of the Hubble Constant Based on the Tip of the Red Giant Branch
journal, August 2019

  • Freedman, Wendy L.; Madore, Barry F.; Hatt, Dylan
  • The Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 882, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab2f73

A new hybrid framework to efficiently model lines of sight to gravitational lenses
journal, August 2014

  • McCully, Curtis; Keeton, Charles R.; Wong, Kenneth C.
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 443, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stu1316

Precise Time Delays from Strongly Gravitationally Lensed Type Ia Supernovae with Chromatically Microlensed Images
journal, March 2018

  • Goldstein, Daniel A.; Nugent, Peter E.; Kasen, Daniel N.
  • The Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 855, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/aaa975

Dissecting the Gravitational lens B1608+656. ii. Precision Measurements of the Hubble Constant, Spatial Curvature, and the dark Energy Equation of State
journal, February 2010


Cosmological parameters from lensed supernovae
journal, September 2002


On model-dependent bounds on H(0) from gravitational images Application of Q0957 + 561A,B
journal, February 1985

  • Falco, E. E.; Gorenstein, M. V.; Shapiro, I. I.
  • The Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 289
  • DOI: 10.1086/184422

Astropy: A community Python package for astronomy
journal, September 2013


ZTF Early Observations of Type Ia Supernovae. I. Properties of the 2018 Sample
journal, December 2019

  • Yao, Yuhan; Miller, Adam A.; Kulkarni, S. R.
  • The Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 886, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab4cf5

Improved time-delay lens modelling and H 0 inference with transient sources
journal, May 2021

  • Ding, Xuheng; Liao, Kai; Birrer, Simon
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 504, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stab1240

HOLISMOKES: V. Microlensing of type II supernovae and time-delay inference through spectroscopic phase retrieval
journal, September 2021


A Robust Determination of the Time Delay in 0957+561A, B and a Measurement of the Global Value of Hubble's Constant
journal, June 1997

  • Kundić, Tomislav; Turner, Edwin L.; Colley, Wesley N.
  • The Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 482, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1086/304147

A Determination of H 0 with the CLASS Gravitational Lens B1608+656. III. A Significant Improvement in the Precision of the Time Delay Measurements
journal, December 2002

  • Fassnacht, C. D.; Xanthopoulos, E.; Koopmans, L. V. E.
  • The Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 581, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1086/344368

Measurements of the Hubble Constant: Tensions in Perspective*
journal, September 2021


The Sloan Lens ACS Survey. V. The Full ACS Strong‐Lens Sample
journal, August 2008

  • Bolton, Adam S.; Burles, Scott; Koopmans, Léon V. E.
  • The Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 682, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1086/589327

The Sloan lens acs Survey. x. Stellar, Dynamical, and Total mass Correlations of Massive Early-Type Galaxies
journal, November 2010


Multiple images of a highly magnified supernova formed by an early-type cluster galaxy lens
journal, March 2015


Hierarchical Inference with Bayesian Neural Networks: An Application to Strong Gravitational Lensing
journal, March 2021

  • Wagner-Carena, Sebastian; Park, Ji Won; Birrer, Simon
  • The Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 909, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/abdf59

Inferring the mass of spherical stellar systems from velocity moments
journal, June 1992

  • Dejonghe, Herwig; Merritt, David
  • The Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 391
  • DOI: 10.1086/171368

The Supernova Legacy Survey 3-year sample: Type Ia supernovae photometric distances and cosmological constraints
journal, November 2010


Projected Cosmological Constraints from Strongly Lensed Supernovae with the Roman Space Telescope
journal, February 2021

  • Pierel, J. D. R.; Rodney, S.; Vernardos, G.
  • The Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 908, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/abd8d3

Microlensing of Lensed Supernovae
journal, December 2006

  • Dobler, Gregory; Keeton, Charles R.
  • The Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 653, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1086/508769

Line-of-sight effects in strong gravitational lensing
journal, August 2021

  • Fleury, Pierre; Larena, Julien; Uzan, Jean-Philippe
  • Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, Vol. 2021, Issue 08
  • DOI: 10.1088/1475-7516/2021/08/024

STRIDES: a 3.9 per cent measurement of the Hubble constant from the strong lens system DES J0408−5354
journal, March 2020

  • Shajib, A. J.; Birrer, S.; Treu, T.
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 494, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/staa828

TDCOSMO: V. Strategies for precise and accurate measurements of the Hubble constant with strong lensing
journal, May 2021


Could Quasar Lensing Time Delays Hint to a Core Component in Halos, Instead of H 0 Tension?
journal, April 2020

  • Blum, Kfir; Castorina, Emanuele; Simonović, Marko
  • The Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 892, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.3847/2041-8213/ab8012

H0LiCOW – IX. Cosmographic analysis of the doubly imaged quasar SDSS 1206+4332 and a new measurement of the Hubble constant
journal, January 2019

  • Birrer, S.; Treu, T.; Rusu, C. E.
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 484, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stz200

The impact of microlensing on the standardization of strongly lensed Type Ia supernovae
journal, May 2018

  • Foxley-Marrable, Max; Collett, Thomas E.; Vernardos, Georgios
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 478, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/sty1346

Strongly lensed SNe Ia in the era of LSST: observing cadence for lens discoveries and time-delay measurements
journal, November 2019


HOLISMOKES: III. Achromatic phase of strongly lensed Type Ia supernovae
journal, February 2021


ILLUMINATING A DARK LENS: A TYPE Ia SUPERNOVA MAGNIFIED BY THE FRONTIER FIELDS GALAXY CLUSTER ABELL 2744
journal, September 2015


H0LiCOW XII. Lens mass model of WFI2033 − 4723 and blind measurement of its time-delay distance and H0
journal, September 2019

  • Rusu, Cristian E.; Wong, Kenneth C.; Bonvin, Vivien
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 498, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stz3451

On the choice of lens density profile in time delay cosmography
journal, December 2017

  • Sonnenfeld, Alessandro
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 474, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stx3105

SHARP – VII. New constraints on the dark matter free-streaming properties and substructure abundance from gravitationally lensed quasars
journal, November 2019

  • Hsueh, J-W; Enzi, W.; Vegetti, S.
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stz3177

Cosmic Distances Calibrated to 1% Precision with Gaia EDR3 Parallaxes and Hubble Space Telescope Photometry of 75 Milky Way Cepheids Confirm Tension with ΛCDM
journal, February 2021

  • Riess, Adam G.; Casertano, Stefano; Yuan, Wenlong
  • The Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 908, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.3847/2041-8213/abdbaf

Anomalies in Time Delays of Lensed Gravitational Waves and Dark Matter Substructures
journal, October 2018


SALT2: using distant supernovae to improve the use of type Ia supernovae as distance indicators
journal, February 2007


What Do Gravitational Lens Time Delays Measure?
journal, October 2002

  • Kochanek, C. S.
  • The Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 578, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1086/342476

Testing for redshift evolution of Type Ia supernovae using the strongly lensed PS1-10afx at z = 1.4
journal, July 2017


Large Magellanic Cloud Cepheid Standards Provide a 1% Foundation for the Determination of the Hubble Constant and Stronger Evidence for Physics beyond ΛCDM
journal, May 2019

  • Riess, Adam G.; Casertano, Stefano; Yuan, Wenlong
  • The Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 876, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab1422

Strong gravitational lensing of explosive transients
journal, November 2019


Simulations of the WFIRST Supernova Survey and Forecasts of Cosmological Constraints
journal, October 2018


Overconstrained models of time delay lenses redux: how the angular tail wags the radial dog
journal, January 2021

  • Kochanek, C. S.
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 501, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/staa4033

Testing the consistency of dust laws in SN Ia host galaxies: a BayeSN examination of Foundation DR1
journal, October 2021

  • Thorp, Stephen; Mandel, Kaisey S.; Jones, David O.
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 508, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stab2849

Improved cosmological constraints from a joint analysis of the SDSS-II and SNLS supernova samples
journal, August 2014


lenstronomy II: A gravitational lensing software ecosystem
journal, June 2021

  • Birrer, Simon; Shajib, Anowar; Gilman, Daniel
  • Journal of Open Source Software, Vol. 6, Issue 62
  • DOI: 10.21105/joss.03283