Dark Energy Survey Year 3 results: Cosmology from cosmic shear and robustness to modeling uncertainty
- Chicago U., KICP; Pennsylvania U.
- Carnegie Mellon U.
- Arizona U., Astron. Dept. - Steward Observ.
- Pennsylvania U.
- Northeastern U.; EPFL-ISIC, Lausanne
- KIPAC, Menlo Park
- Michigan U.
- Ohio State U., CCAPP; Ohio State U.
- KIPAC, Menlo Park; Stanford U., Phys. Dept.; SLAC
- Chicago U., KICP
- UC, Berkeley
- Caltech, JPL
- University Coll. London
- Duke U.
- Cambridge U., DAMTP
- IAA, Granada; Edinburgh U., Inst. Astron.; Perimeter Inst. Theor. Phys.
- Zurich, ETH
- Northern Illinois U.
- Zurich U., Inst. Math.
- Argonne (main)
- Sao Paulo, IFT
- Sao Paulo, IFT; LIneA, Rio de Janeiro
- Inst. Astron., Honolulu
- Wisconsin U., Madison
- Campinas State U.; LIneA, Rio de Janeiro
- Madrid, CIEMAT; IAC, La Laguna; Laguna U., Tenerife
- Illinois U., Urbana, Astron. Dept.; NCSA, Urbana
- Jodrell Bank
- Barcelona, IEEC; ICE, Bellaterra
- Chicago U., Astron. Astrophys. Ctr.; Fermilab; Chicago U., KICP
- Arizona U., Astron. Dept. - Steward Observ.; Caltech, JPL
- Garching, Max Planck Inst., MPE
- UC, Santa Cruz, Inst. Part. Phys.
- Cambridge U., Inst. of Astron.
- Barcelona, IFAE
- Oxford U.; Jodrell Bank
- Geneva U., Dept. Theor. Phys.
- Fermilab
- University Coll. London; LPENS, Paris
- Clermont-Ferrand U.; Stanford U., Phys. Dept.; Paris U., VI-VII
- Chicago U., Astron. Astrophys. Ctr.; Chicago U., KICP; KIPAC, Menlo Park
- Tokyo U., IPMU
- KIPAC, Menlo Park; SLAC
- ICTP-SAIFR, Sao Paulo; LIneA, Rio de Janeiro
- Ohio State U., CCAPP
- Madrid, CIEMAT
- Brookhaven
- CSIC, Catalunya
- Garching, Max Planck Inst., MPE; Munich U.
- Stanford U., Phys. Dept.; KIPAC, Menlo Park; SLAC
- Edinburgh U., Inst. Astron.
- Cerro-Tololo InterAmerican Obs.
- LIneA, Rio de Janeiro
- Portsmouth U., ICG
- Paris, Inst. Astrophys.
- Sussex U.
- Chicago U., Astron. Astrophys. Ctr.; Fermilab
- Trieste U.; Trieste Observ.
- LIneA, Rio de Janeiro; Rio de Janeiro Observ.
- Munich U.
- Inst. Theor. Astrophys., Oslo
- Fermilab; Chicago U., KICP
- Madrid, IFT
- Cambridge U., Inst. of Astron.; Cambridge U., KICC
- Queensland U.
- Munich U.; Garching, Max Planck Inst., MPE
- Harvard-Smithsonian Ctr. Astrophys.
- Macquarie U.; Lowell Observ.
- Sao Paulo U.; LIneA, Rio de Janeiro
- Texas A-M
- Ohio State U., CCAPP; Ohio State U., Dept. Astron.; Radcliffe Coll.
- Princeton U., Astrophys. Sci. Dept.
- NCSA, Urbana; Illinois U., Urbana, Astron. Dept.
- ICREA, Barcelona; Barcelona, IFAE
- NCSA, Urbana; Cambridge U., Inst. of Astron.
- NCSA, Urbana
- Southampton U.
- Oak Ridge
Here, this work and its companion paper, Amon et al. [Phys. Rev. D 105, 023514 (2022)], present cosmic shear measurements and cosmological constraints from over 100 million source galaxies in the Dark Energy Survey (DES) Year 3 data. We constrain the lensing amplitude parameter 𝑆8 ≡𝜎8$$\sqrt{Ω_{m}/0.3}$$ at the 3% level in Λ CDM: 𝑆8 =0.759$$^{+0.025}_{−0.023}$$ (68% CL). Our constraint is at the 2% level when using angular scale cuts that are optimized for the Λ CDM analysis: 𝑆8 =0.772$$^{+0.018}_{−0.017}$$ (68% CL). With cosmic shear alone, we find no statistically significant constraint on the dark energy equation-of-state parameter at our present statistical power. We carry out our analysis blind, and compare our measurement with constraints from two other contemporary weak lensing experiments: the Kilo-Degree Survey (KiDS) and Hyper-Suprime Camera Subaru Strategic Program (HSC). We additionally quantify the agreement between our data and external constraints from the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB). Our DES Y3 result under the assumption of Λ CDM is found to be in statistical agreement with Planck 2018, although favors a lower 𝑆8 than the CMB-inferred value by 2.3𝜎 (a 𝑝-value of 0.02). This paper explores the robustness of these cosmic shear results to modeling of intrinsic alignments, the matter power spectrum and baryonic physics. We additionally explore the statistical preference of our data for intrinsic alignment models of different complexity. The fiducial cosmic shear model is tested using synthetic data, and we report no biases greater than 0.3𝜎 in the plane of 𝑆8 ×Ωm caused by uncertainties in the theoretical models.
- Research Organization:
- Argonne National Laboratory (ANL), Argonne, IL (United States); Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL), Upton, NY (United States); Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA (United States); Duke Univ., Durham, NC (United States); Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory (FNAL), Batavia, IL (United States); Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL), Oak Ridge, TN (United States); SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory (SLAC), Menlo Park, CA (United States); University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI (United States)
- Sponsoring Organization:
- National Science Foundation (NSF); USDOE; USDOE Office of Science (SC), Basic Energy Sciences (BES); USDOE Office of Science (SC), High Energy Physics (HEP); United Kingdom Science and Technology Facilities Council
- Contributing Organization:
- DES Collaboration
- Grant/Contract Number:
- 89243024CSC000002; AC02-06CH11357; AC02-07CH11359; AC02-76SF00515; AC05-00OR22725; SC0007901; SC0010118; SC0019193; SC0021098
- OSTI ID:
- 1824145
- Report Number(s):
- DES--2019-0480; DES-2019-0480; FERMILAB-PUB--21-253-AE; oai:inspirehep.net:1866008; arXiv:2105.13544
- Journal Information:
- Physical Review. D., Journal Name: Physical Review. D. Journal Issue: 2 Vol. 105; ISSN 2470-0029; ISSN 2470-0010
- Publisher:
- American Physical Society (APS)Copyright Statement
- Country of Publication:
- United States
- Language:
- English
Similar Records
Dark Energy Survey Year 6 Results: Cosmological Constraints from Galaxy Clustering and Weak Lensing
Dark Energy Survey year 1 results: Joint analysis of galaxy clustering, galaxy lensing, and CMB lensing two-point functions