DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Dark Energy Survey Year 3 results: Cosmology from cosmic shear and robustness to modeling uncertainty

Journal Article · · Physical Review. D.
 [1];  [2]; ORCiD logo [3];  [4];  [5];  [4]; ORCiD logo [2];  [6];  [7];  [4];  [8];  [9];  [4];  [10];  [11];  [9];  [12]; ORCiD logo [13];  [7];  [10] more »;  [14];  [15];  [16];  [17]; ORCiD logo [3];  [4]; ORCiD logo [4]; ORCiD logo [2]; ORCiD logo [18];  [19];  [20]; ORCiD logo [21];  [22];  [23];  [24];  [20];  [25];  [22];  [26];  [27];  [24]; ORCiD logo [28];  [29];  [6]; ORCiD logo [28]; ORCiD logo [30];  [4];  [31];  [7];  [32];  [8];  [33];  [29];  [34];  [4]; ORCiD logo [35];  [27];  [36];  [37];  [38];  [3];  [12];  [4];  [39];  [38];  [40]; ORCiD logo [6]; ORCiD logo [9]; ORCiD logo [25];  [41];  [42]; ORCiD logo [8];  [28];  [43]; ORCiD logo [44]; ORCiD logo [45];  [43]; ORCiD logo [38];  [46];  [47];  [4];  [48];  [49];  [7];  [50]; ORCiD logo [38];  [2];  [38];  [51]; ORCiD logo [52];  [53]; ORCiD logo [38];  [38];  [54];  [55];  [56];  [28];  [13]; ORCiD logo [57];  [43];  [35];  [58];  [59];  [46]; ORCiD logo [38];  [60];  [13];  [61]; ORCiD logo [38]; ORCiD logo [62];  [63]; ORCiD logo [29];  [7];  [64];  [59]; ORCiD logo [38];  [65];  [33];  [8];  [66];  [67];  [33];  [68];  [13];  [69];  [38];  [59];  [70];  [71];  [72];  [73];  [74];  [66]; ORCiD logo [24];  [59];  [62];  [75];  [76];  [59];  [72];  [46];  [56]; ORCiD logo [46];  [38];  [7];  [14];  [29];  [77];  [7];  [78];  [76];  [7];  [54];  [50] « less
  1. Chicago U., KICP; Pennsylvania U.
  2. Carnegie Mellon U.
  3. Arizona U., Astron. Dept. - Steward Observ.
  4. Pennsylvania U.
  5. Northeastern U.; EPFL-ISIC, Lausanne
  6. KIPAC, Menlo Park
  7. Michigan U.
  8. Ohio State U., CCAPP; Ohio State U.
  9. KIPAC, Menlo Park; Stanford U., Phys. Dept.; SLAC
  10. Chicago U., KICP
  11. UC, Berkeley
  12. Caltech, JPL
  13. University Coll. London
  14. Duke U.
  15. Cambridge U., DAMTP
  16. IAA, Granada; Edinburgh U., Inst. Astron.; Perimeter Inst. Theor. Phys.
  17. Zurich, ETH
  18. Northern Illinois U.
  19. Zurich U., Inst. Math.
  20. Argonne (main)
  21. Sao Paulo, IFT
  22. Sao Paulo, IFT; LIneA, Rio de Janeiro
  23. Inst. Astron., Honolulu
  24. Wisconsin U., Madison
  25. Campinas State U.; LIneA, Rio de Janeiro
  26. Madrid, CIEMAT; IAC, La Laguna; Laguna U., Tenerife
  27. Illinois U., Urbana, Astron. Dept.; NCSA, Urbana
  28. Jodrell Bank
  29. Barcelona, IEEC; ICE, Bellaterra
  30. Chicago U., Astron. Astrophys. Ctr.; Fermilab; Chicago U., KICP
  31. Arizona U., Astron. Dept. - Steward Observ.; Caltech, JPL
  32. Garching, Max Planck Inst., MPE
  33. UC, Santa Cruz, Inst. Part. Phys.
  34. Cambridge U., Inst. of Astron.
  35. Barcelona, IFAE
  36. Oxford U.; Jodrell Bank
  37. Geneva U., Dept. Theor. Phys.
  38. Fermilab
  39. University Coll. London; LPENS, Paris
  40. Clermont-Ferrand U.; Stanford U., Phys. Dept.; Paris U., VI-VII
  41. Chicago U., Astron. Astrophys. Ctr.; Chicago U., KICP; KIPAC, Menlo Park
  42. Tokyo U., IPMU
  43. KIPAC, Menlo Park; SLAC
  44. ICTP-SAIFR, Sao Paulo; LIneA, Rio de Janeiro
  45. Ohio State U., CCAPP
  46. Madrid, CIEMAT
  47. Brookhaven
  48. CSIC, Catalunya
  49. Garching, Max Planck Inst., MPE; Munich U.
  50. Stanford U., Phys. Dept.; KIPAC, Menlo Park; SLAC
  51. Edinburgh U., Inst. Astron.
  52. Cerro-Tololo InterAmerican Obs.
  53. LIneA, Rio de Janeiro
  54. Portsmouth U., ICG
  55. Paris, Inst. Astrophys.
  56. Sussex U.
  57. Chicago U., Astron. Astrophys. Ctr.; Fermilab
  58. Trieste U.; Trieste Observ.
  59. LIneA, Rio de Janeiro; Rio de Janeiro Observ.
  60. Munich U.
  61. Inst. Theor. Astrophys., Oslo
  62. Fermilab; Chicago U., KICP
  63. Madrid, IFT
  64. Cambridge U., Inst. of Astron.; Cambridge U., KICC
  65. Queensland U.
  66. Munich U.; Garching, Max Planck Inst., MPE
  67. Harvard-Smithsonian Ctr. Astrophys.
  68. Macquarie U.; Lowell Observ.
  69. Sao Paulo U.; LIneA, Rio de Janeiro
  70. Texas A-M
  71. Ohio State U., CCAPP; Ohio State U., Dept. Astron.; Radcliffe Coll.
  72. Princeton U., Astrophys. Sci. Dept.
  73. NCSA, Urbana; Illinois U., Urbana, Astron. Dept.
  74. ICREA, Barcelona; Barcelona, IFAE
  75. NCSA, Urbana; Cambridge U., Inst. of Astron.
  76. NCSA, Urbana
  77. Southampton U.
  78. Oak Ridge

Here, this work and its companion paper, Amon et al. [Phys. Rev. D 105, 023514 (2022)], present cosmic shear measurements and cosmological constraints from over 100 million source galaxies in the Dark Energy Survey (DES) Year 3 data. We constrain the lensing amplitude parameter 𝑆8 ≡𝜎8⁢$$\sqrt{Ω_{m}/0.3}$$ at the 3% level in Λ⁢ CDM: 𝑆8 =0.75⁢9$$^{+0.025}_{−0.023}$$ (68% CL). Our constraint is at the 2% level when using angular scale cuts that are optimized for the Λ⁢ CDM analysis: 𝑆8 =0.77⁢2$$^{+0.018}_{−0.017}$$ (68% CL). With cosmic shear alone, we find no statistically significant constraint on the dark energy equation-of-state parameter at our present statistical power. We carry out our analysis blind, and compare our measurement with constraints from two other contemporary weak lensing experiments: the Kilo-Degree Survey (KiDS) and Hyper-Suprime Camera Subaru Strategic Program (HSC). We additionally quantify the agreement between our data and external constraints from the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB). Our DES Y3 result under the assumption of Λ⁢ CDM is found to be in statistical agreement with Planck 2018, although favors a lower 𝑆8 than the CMB-inferred value by 2.3⁢𝜎 (a 𝑝-value of 0.02). This paper explores the robustness of these cosmic shear results to modeling of intrinsic alignments, the matter power spectrum and baryonic physics. We additionally explore the statistical preference of our data for intrinsic alignment models of different complexity. The fiducial cosmic shear model is tested using synthetic data, and we report no biases greater than 0.3⁢𝜎 in the plane of 𝑆8 ×Ωm caused by uncertainties in the theoretical models.

Research Organization:
Argonne National Laboratory (ANL), Argonne, IL (United States); Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL), Upton, NY (United States); Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA (United States); Duke Univ., Durham, NC (United States); Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory (FNAL), Batavia, IL (United States); Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL), Oak Ridge, TN (United States); SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory (SLAC), Menlo Park, CA (United States); University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI (United States)
Sponsoring Organization:
National Science Foundation (NSF); USDOE; USDOE Office of Science (SC), Basic Energy Sciences (BES); USDOE Office of Science (SC), High Energy Physics (HEP); United Kingdom Science and Technology Facilities Council
Contributing Organization:
DES Collaboration
Grant/Contract Number:
89243024CSC000002; AC02-06CH11357; AC02-07CH11359; AC02-76SF00515; AC05-00OR22725; SC0007901; SC0010118; SC0019193; SC0021098
OSTI ID:
1824145
Report Number(s):
DES--2019-0480; DES-2019-0480; FERMILAB-PUB--21-253-AE; oai:inspirehep.net:1866008; arXiv:2105.13544
Journal Information:
Physical Review. D., Journal Name: Physical Review. D. Journal Issue: 2 Vol. 105; ISSN 2470-0029; ISSN 2470-0010
Publisher:
American Physical Society (APS)Copyright Statement
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English