DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Adapting a drinking water treatment technology for arsenic removal to the context of a small, low-income California community

Abstract

Small, low-income, and rural communities across the United States are disproportionately exposed to arsenic contaminated drinking water because existing treatment solutions are too expensive and difficult to operate. This paper describes efforts to overcome some barriers and limitations of conventional iron electrocoagulation (Fe-EC) to enable its use in the rural Californian (U.S.) context. Barriers and limitations of Fe-EC's application in rural California considered in this work include: 1) Frequent labor intensive electrode cleaning is required to overcome rust accumulation, 2) Electrolysis durations are long, reducing throughput for a given system size, and 3) Waste needs compliance with California standards. We report results from an investigation for overcoming these limitations via a field trial on a farm in Allensworth, a small, low-income, rural community in California. Our strategies to overcome each of the above barriers and limitations are respectively, 1) operating the Fe-EC reactor at high current density to result in sustained Fe production, 2) operating at high charge dosage rate with external H2O2, and 3) characterization of the arsenic-laden waste, and are discussed further in the paper. Main findings are: (1) Fe-EC removed arsenic consistently below the federal (and state) standard of 10 µg/L, (2) high current density failed tomore » sustain Fe production whereas low current density did not, (3) electrolysis time decreased from >1 hour to <2 min with H2O2 dosing of 5 mg/L at higher charge dosage rates, and (4) dilution of As-sludge is required to comply with State's non-hazardous waste status, (5) discrepancies were observed between lab and field results in using current density to overcome labor-intensive electrode cleanings. Finally, implications of overcoming limitations to scale-up of Fe-EC in relevant California communities are discussed.« less

Authors:
; ; ORCiD logo; ; ORCiD logo
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Lawrence Berkeley National Lab. (LBNL), Berkeley, CA (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE Office of Science (SC)
OSTI Identifier:
1822499
Alternate Identifier(s):
OSTI ID: 1819443
Grant/Contract Number:  
AC02-05CH11231
Resource Type:
Published Article
Journal Name:
Water Research
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Name: Water Research Journal Volume: 204 Journal Issue: C; Journal ID: ISSN 0043-1354
Publisher:
Elsevier
Country of Publication:
United Kingdom
Language:
English
Subject:
54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES; drinking water treatment; low-income communities; iron electrocoagulation; arsenic; California

Citation Formats

Glade, Sara, Bandaru, Siva RS, Nahata, Mohit, Majmudar, Jay, and Gadgil, Ashok. Adapting a drinking water treatment technology for arsenic removal to the context of a small, low-income California community. United Kingdom: N. p., 2021. Web. doi:10.1016/j.watres.2021.117595.
Glade, Sara, Bandaru, Siva RS, Nahata, Mohit, Majmudar, Jay, & Gadgil, Ashok. Adapting a drinking water treatment technology for arsenic removal to the context of a small, low-income California community. United Kingdom. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2021.117595
Glade, Sara, Bandaru, Siva RS, Nahata, Mohit, Majmudar, Jay, and Gadgil, Ashok. Fri . "Adapting a drinking water treatment technology for arsenic removal to the context of a small, low-income California community". United Kingdom. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2021.117595.
@article{osti_1822499,
title = {Adapting a drinking water treatment technology for arsenic removal to the context of a small, low-income California community},
author = {Glade, Sara and Bandaru, Siva RS and Nahata, Mohit and Majmudar, Jay and Gadgil, Ashok},
abstractNote = {Small, low-income, and rural communities across the United States are disproportionately exposed to arsenic contaminated drinking water because existing treatment solutions are too expensive and difficult to operate. This paper describes efforts to overcome some barriers and limitations of conventional iron electrocoagulation (Fe-EC) to enable its use in the rural Californian (U.S.) context. Barriers and limitations of Fe-EC's application in rural California considered in this work include: 1) Frequent labor intensive electrode cleaning is required to overcome rust accumulation, 2) Electrolysis durations are long, reducing throughput for a given system size, and 3) Waste needs compliance with California standards. We report results from an investigation for overcoming these limitations via a field trial on a farm in Allensworth, a small, low-income, rural community in California. Our strategies to overcome each of the above barriers and limitations are respectively, 1) operating the Fe-EC reactor at high current density to result in sustained Fe production, 2) operating at high charge dosage rate with external H2O2, and 3) characterization of the arsenic-laden waste, and are discussed further in the paper. Main findings are: (1) Fe-EC removed arsenic consistently below the federal (and state) standard of 10 µg/L, (2) high current density failed to sustain Fe production whereas low current density did not, (3) electrolysis time decreased from >1 hour to <2 min with H2O2 dosing of 5 mg/L at higher charge dosage rates, and (4) dilution of As-sludge is required to comply with State's non-hazardous waste status, (5) discrepancies were observed between lab and field results in using current density to overcome labor-intensive electrode cleanings. Finally, implications of overcoming limitations to scale-up of Fe-EC in relevant California communities are discussed.},
doi = {10.1016/j.watres.2021.117595},
journal = {Water Research},
number = C,
volume = 204,
place = {United Kingdom},
year = {Fri Oct 01 00:00:00 EDT 2021},
month = {Fri Oct 01 00:00:00 EDT 2021}
}

Works referenced in this record:

Iron-Catalyzed Oxidation of Arsenic(III) by Oxygen and by Hydrogen Peroxide:  pH-Dependent Formation of Oxidants in the Fenton Reaction
journal, June 2003

  • Hug, Stephan J.; Leupin, Olivier
  • Environmental Science & Technology, Vol. 37, Issue 12
  • DOI: 10.1021/es026208x

Trace Element Removal in Distributed Drinking Water Treatment Systems by Cathodic H 2 O 2 Production and UV Photolysis
journal, December 2017

  • Barazesh, James M.; Prasse, Carsten; Wenk, Jannis
  • Environmental Science & Technology, Vol. 52, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.7b04396

Effects of water chemistry on arsenic removal from drinking water by electrocoagulation
journal, January 2011


Arsenic in Ground Water of the United States: Occurrence and Geochemistry
journal, July 2000


Rapid and Efficient Arsenic Removal by Iron Electrocoagulation Enabled with in Situ Generation of Hydrogen Peroxide
journal, April 2020

  • Bandaru, Siva R. S.; van Genuchten, Case M.; Kumar, Arkadeep
  • Environmental Science & Technology, Vol. 54, Issue 10
  • DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.0c00012

Concrete stabilization of arsenic-bearing iron sludge generated from an electrochemical arsenic remediation plant
journal, March 2019


Arsenic removal from groundwater using iron electrocoagulation: Effect of charge dosage rate
journal, July 2013

  • Amrose, Susan; Gadgil, Ashok; Srinivasan, Venkat
  • Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part A, Vol. 48, Issue 9
  • DOI: 10.1080/10934529.2013.773215

Decontamination of wastewaters containing synthetic organic dyes by electrochemical methods. An updated review
journal, May 2015


Strategies for successful field deployment in a resource-poor region: Arsenic remediation technology for drinking water
journal, January 2019


Modeling As(III) Oxidation and Removal with Iron Electrocoagulation in Groundwater
journal, October 2012

  • Li, Lei; van Genuchten, Case M.; Addy, Susan E. A.
  • Environmental Science & Technology, Vol. 46, Issue 21
  • DOI: 10.1021/es302456b

Sustaining efficient production of aqueous iron during repeated operation of Fe(0)-electrocoagulation
journal, May 2019


Structure of Fe(III) precipitates generated by the electrolytic dissolution of Fe(0) in the presence of groundwater ions
journal, February 2014

  • van Genuchten, Case M.; Peña, Jasquelin; Amrose, Susan E.
  • Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, Vol. 127
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.gca.2013.11.044

How do operating conditions affect As(III) removal by iron electrocoagulation?
journal, April 2017


Oxidizing Capacity of Iron Electrocoagulation Systems for Refractory Organic Contaminant Transformation
journal, October 2019

  • Qian, Ao; Yuan, Songhu; Xie, Shiwei
  • Environmental Science & Technology, Vol. 53, Issue 21
  • DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.9b03754

Fe(III) Nucleation in the Presence of Bivalent Cations and Oxyanions Leads to Subnanoscale 7 Å Polymers
journal, October 2014

  • van Genuchten, Case M.; Gadgil, Ashok J.; Peña, Jasquelin
  • Environmental Science & Technology, Vol. 48, Issue 20
  • DOI: 10.1021/es503281a

Production and Transformation of Mixed-Valent Nanoparticles Generated by Fe(0) Electrocoagulation
journal, February 2015

  • Dubrawski, Kristian L.; van Genuchten, Case M.; Delaire, Caroline
  • Environmental Science & Technology, Vol. 49, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1021/es505059d

Role of carbonate speciation on the oxidation of Fe(II) by H2O2
journal, May 2000


Improvement of textile dye removal by electrocoagulation with low-cost steel wool cathode reactor
journal, June 2012


Formation of macroscopic surface layers on Fe(0) electrocoagulation electrodes during an extended field trial of arsenic treatment
journal, June 2016


Removal of arsenic from water by electrocoagulation
journal, June 2004


Electro-chemical arsenic remediation: Field trials in West Bengal
journal, August 2014