DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Statistically bias-corrected and downscaled climate models underestimate the adverse effects of extreme heat on U.S. maize yields

Abstract

Abstract Efforts to understand and quantify how a changing climate can impact agriculture often rely on bias-corrected and downscaled climate information, making it important to quantify potential biases of this approach. Here, we use a multi-model ensemble of statistically bias-corrected and downscaled climate models, as well as the corresponding parent models from the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 (CMIP5), to drive a statistical panel model of U.S. maize yields that incorporates season-wide measures of temperature and precipitation. We analyze uncertainty in annual yield hindcasts, finding that the CMIP5 models considerably overestimate historical yield variability while the bias-corrected and downscaled versions underestimate the largest weather-induced yield declines. We also find large differences in projected yields and other decision-relevant metrics throughout this century, leaving stakeholders with modeling choices that require navigating trade-offs in resolution, historical accuracy, and projection confidence.

Authors:
ORCiD logo; ORCiD logo; ORCiD logo; ; ; ORCiD logo
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Univ. of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, IL (United States); Purdue Univ., West Lafayette, IN (United States); Pennsylvania State Univ., University Park, PA (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE Office of Science (SC)
OSTI Identifier:
1821031
Alternate Identifier(s):
OSTI ID: 1820980
Grant/Contract Number:  
SC0016162
Resource Type:
Published Article
Journal Name:
Communications Earth & Environment
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Name: Communications Earth & Environment Journal Volume: 2 Journal Issue: 1; Journal ID: ISSN 2662-4435
Publisher:
Nature Publishing Group
Country of Publication:
United Kingdom
Language:
English
Subject:
54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES; Agriculture; Climate and Earth system modelling

Citation Formats

Lafferty, David C., Sriver, Ryan L., Haqiqi, Iman, Hertel, Thomas W., Keller, Klaus, and Nicholas, Robert E. Statistically bias-corrected and downscaled climate models underestimate the adverse effects of extreme heat on U.S. maize yields. United Kingdom: N. p., 2021. Web. doi:10.1038/s43247-021-00266-9.
Lafferty, David C., Sriver, Ryan L., Haqiqi, Iman, Hertel, Thomas W., Keller, Klaus, & Nicholas, Robert E. Statistically bias-corrected and downscaled climate models underestimate the adverse effects of extreme heat on U.S. maize yields. United Kingdom. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-021-00266-9
Lafferty, David C., Sriver, Ryan L., Haqiqi, Iman, Hertel, Thomas W., Keller, Klaus, and Nicholas, Robert E. Mon . "Statistically bias-corrected and downscaled climate models underestimate the adverse effects of extreme heat on U.S. maize yields". United Kingdom. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-021-00266-9.
@article{osti_1821031,
title = {Statistically bias-corrected and downscaled climate models underestimate the adverse effects of extreme heat on U.S. maize yields},
author = {Lafferty, David C. and Sriver, Ryan L. and Haqiqi, Iman and Hertel, Thomas W. and Keller, Klaus and Nicholas, Robert E.},
abstractNote = {Abstract Efforts to understand and quantify how a changing climate can impact agriculture often rely on bias-corrected and downscaled climate information, making it important to quantify potential biases of this approach. Here, we use a multi-model ensemble of statistically bias-corrected and downscaled climate models, as well as the corresponding parent models from the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 (CMIP5), to drive a statistical panel model of U.S. maize yields that incorporates season-wide measures of temperature and precipitation. We analyze uncertainty in annual yield hindcasts, finding that the CMIP5 models considerably overestimate historical yield variability while the bias-corrected and downscaled versions underestimate the largest weather-induced yield declines. We also find large differences in projected yields and other decision-relevant metrics throughout this century, leaving stakeholders with modeling choices that require navigating trade-offs in resolution, historical accuracy, and projection confidence.},
doi = {10.1038/s43247-021-00266-9},
journal = {Communications Earth & Environment},
number = 1,
volume = 2,
place = {United Kingdom},
year = {Mon Sep 20 00:00:00 EDT 2021},
month = {Mon Sep 20 00:00:00 EDT 2021}
}

Works referenced in this record:

Ensemble optimisation, multiple constraints and overconfidence: a case study with future Australian precipitation change
journal, April 2019


Is bias correction of regional climate model (RCM) simulations possible for non-stationary conditions?
journal, January 2013


Intercomparison of multiple statistical downscaling methods: multi-criteria model selection for South Korea
journal, September 2016

  • Eum, Hyung-Il; Cannon, Alex J.; Murdock, Trevor Q.
  • Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, Vol. 31, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1007/s00477-016-1312-9

Combined influence of soil moisture and atmospheric evaporative demand is important for accurately predicting US maize yields
journal, February 2020


Nonlinear temperature effects indicate severe damages to U.S. crop yields under climate change
journal, August 2009

  • Schlenker, Wolfram; Roberts, Michael J.
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 106, Issue 37
  • DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0906865106

Response of corn markets to climate volatility under alternative energy futures
journal, April 2012

  • Diffenbaugh, Noah S.; Hertel, Thomas W.; Scherer, Martin
  • Nature Climate Change, Vol. 2, Issue 7
  • DOI: 10.1038/nclimate1491

An intercomparison of statistical downscaling methods used for water resource assessments in the United States
journal, September 2014

  • Gutmann, Ethan; Pruitt, Tom; Clark, Martyn P.
  • Water Resources Research, Vol. 50, Issue 9
  • DOI: 10.1002/2014WR015559

A comparison of statistical downscaling methods suited for wildfire applications
journal, March 2011

  • Abatzoglou, John T.; Brown, Timothy J.
  • International Journal of Climatology, Vol. 32, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.1002/joc.2312

Propagation of climate model biases to biophysical modelling can complicate assessments of climate change impact in agricultural systems
journal, August 2018

  • Liu, De Li; Wang, Bin; Evans, Jason
  • International Journal of Climatology, Vol. 39, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1002/joc.5820

Utility of daily vs. monthly large-scale climate data: an intercomparison of two statistical downscaling methods
journal, January 2008


An Overview of CMIP5 and the Experiment Design
journal, April 2012

  • Taylor, Karl E.; Stouffer, Ronald J.; Meehl, Gerald A.
  • Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, Vol. 93, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1175/BAMS-D-11-00094.1

What is the importance of climate model bias when projecting the impacts of climate change on land surface processes?
journal, January 2014


Centennial drought outlook over the CONUS using NASA-NEX downscaled climate ensemble: DROUGHT PROJECTION USING NASA-NEX ENSEMBLE OVER THE CONUS
journal, August 2016

  • Ahmadalipour, Ali; Moradkhani, Hamid; Svoboda, Mark
  • International Journal of Climatology, Vol. 37, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.1002/joc.4859

Quantifying the impacts of compound extremes on agriculture
journal, January 2021

  • Haqiqi, Iman; Grogan, Danielle S.; Hertel, Thomas W.
  • Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, Vol. 25, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.5194/hess-25-551-2021

Economic impacts of climate change on agriculture: a comparison of process-based and statistical yield models
journal, May 2017

  • Moore, Frances C.; Baldos, Uris Lantz C.; Hertel, Thomas
  • Environmental Research Letters, Vol. 12, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/aa6eb2

Comparing estimates of climate change impacts from process-based and statistical crop models
journal, January 2017


Nonlinear heat effects on African maize as evidenced by historical yield trials
journal, March 2011

  • Lobell, David B.; Bänziger, Marianne; Magorokosho, Cosmos
  • Nature Climate Change, Vol. 1, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1038/nclimate1043

Development of a 50-Year High-Resolution Global Dataset of Meteorological Forcings for Land Surface Modeling
journal, July 2006

  • Sheffield, Justin; Goteti, Gopi; Wood, Eric F.
  • Journal of Climate, Vol. 19, Issue 13
  • DOI: 10.1175/JCLI3790.1

Climate change is projected to have severe impacts on the frequency and intensity of peak electricity demand across the United States
journal, February 2017

  • Auffhammer, Maximilian; Baylis, Patrick; Hausman, Catherine H.
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 114, Issue 8
  • DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1613193114

A novel bias correction methodology for climate impact simulations
journal, January 2016

  • Sippel, S.; Otto, F. E. L.; Forkel, M.
  • Earth System Dynamics, Vol. 7, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.5194/esd-7-71-2016

Amplification of future energy demand growth due to climate change
journal, June 2019


Recent weather fluctuations and agricultural yields: implications for climate change: A.L. D'Agostino, W. Schlenker
journal, November 2016

  • D'Agostino, Anthony Louis; Schlenker, Wolfram
  • Agricultural Economics, Vol. 47, Issue S1
  • DOI: 10.1111/agec.12315

Crop switching reduces agricultural losses from climate change in the United States by half under RCP 8.5
journal, October 2020


Effect of warming temperatures on US wheat yields
journal, May 2015

  • Tack, Jesse; Barkley, Andrew; Nalley, Lawton Lanier
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 112, Issue 22
  • DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1415181112

Characterizing uncertain sea-level rise projections to support investment decisions
journal, February 2018


Towards process-informed bias correction of climate change simulations
journal, November 2017

  • Maraun, Douglas; Shepherd, Theodore G.; Widmann, Martin
  • Nature Climate Change, Vol. 7, Issue 11
  • DOI: 10.1038/nclimate3418

The critical role of extreme heat for maize production in the United States
journal, March 2013

  • Lobell, David B.; Hammer, Graeme L.; McLean, Greg
  • Nature Climate Change, Vol. 3, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.1038/nclimate1832

Bias Correction, Quantile Mapping, and Downscaling: Revisiting the Inflation Issue
journal, March 2013


Global non-linear effect of temperature on economic production
journal, October 2015

  • Burke, Marshall; Hsiang, Solomon M.; Miguel, Edward
  • Nature, Vol. 527, Issue 7577
  • DOI: 10.1038/nature15725

Climate impact research: beyond patchwork
journal, January 2014

  • Huber, V.; Schellnhuber, H. J.; Arnell, N. W.
  • Earth System Dynamics, Vol. 5, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.5194/esd-5-399-2014

Regional Climate Models Add Value to Global Model Data: A Review and Selected Examples
journal, September 2011

  • Feser, Frauke; Rockel, Burkhardt; von Storch, Hans
  • Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, Vol. 92, Issue 9
  • DOI: 10.1175/2011BAMS3061.1

Statistical Downscaling Using Localized Constructed Analogs (LOCA)
journal, December 2014

  • Pierce, David W.; Cayan, Daniel R.; Thrasher, Bridget L.
  • Journal of Hydrometeorology, Vol. 15, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.1175/JHM-D-14-0082.1

Evaluation and improvement of tail behaviour in the cumulative distribution function transform downscaling method
journal, January 2019

  • Lanzante, John R.; Nath, Mary Jo; Whitlock, Carolyn E.
  • International Journal of Climatology, Vol. 39, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1002/joc.5964

Comparing and combining process-based crop models and statistical models with some implications for climate change
journal, September 2017

  • Roberts, Michael J.; Braun, Noah O.; Sinclair, Thomas R.
  • Environmental Research Letters, Vol. 12, Issue 9
  • DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/aa7f33

Progress on incorporating climate change into management of California’s water resources
journal, December 2007


Uncertainties in Future U.S. Extreme Precipitation From Downscaled Climate Projections
journal, April 2020

  • Lopez‐Cantu, Tania; Prein, Andreas F.; Samaras, Constantine
  • Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 47, Issue 9
  • DOI: 10.1029/2019GL086797

Evaluations of NASA NEX-GDDP data over Southeast Asia: present and future climates
journal, May 2018


Net benefits to US soy and maize yields from intensifying hourly rainfall
journal, August 2020


Bias Correction of GCM Precipitation by Quantile Mapping: How Well Do Methods Preserve Changes in Quantiles and Extremes?
journal, September 2015

  • Cannon, Alex J.; Sobie, Stephen R.; Murdock, Trevor Q.
  • Journal of Climate, Vol. 28, Issue 17
  • DOI: 10.1175/JCLI-D-14-00754.1

Technical Note: Bias correcting climate model simulated daily temperature extremes with quantile mapping
journal, January 2012

  • Thrasher, B.; Maurer, E. P.; McKellar, C.
  • Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, Vol. 16, Issue 9
  • DOI: 10.5194/hess-16-3309-2012

Cleaner air has contributed one-fifth of US maize and soybean yield gains since 1999
journal, July 2021


Characterization of future drought conditions in the Lower Mekong River Basin
journal, September 2017


Effects of environmental stressors on daily governance
journal, August 2018

  • Obradovich, Nick; Tingley, Dustin; Rahwan, Iyad
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 115, Issue 35
  • DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1803765115

Unpacking the climatic drivers of US agricultural yields
journal, May 2019

  • Ortiz-Bobea, Ariel; Wang, Haoying; Carrillo, Carlos M.
  • Environmental Research Letters, Vol. 14, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/ab1e75

Evaluating the stationarity assumption in statistically downscaled climate projections: is past performance an indicator of future results?
journal, January 2016


Asylum applications respond to temperature fluctuations
journal, December 2017


Evaluating adaptation options for urban flooding based on new high-end emission scenario regional climate model simulations
journal, June 2015

  • Arnbjerg-Nielsen, K.; Leonardsen, L.; Madsen, H.
  • Climate Research, Vol. 64, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.3354/cr01299

The representative concentration pathways: an overview
journal, August 2011


Comparison of Monthly Temperature Extremes Simulated by CMIP3 and CMIP5 Models
journal, October 2013


Adaptation of US maize to temperature variations
journal, November 2012


Future of the human climate niche
journal, May 2020

  • Xu, Chi; Kohler, Timothy A.; Lenton, Timothy M.
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 117, Issue 21
  • DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1910114117

Estimating economic damage from climate change in the United States
journal, June 2017


To bias correct or not to bias correct? An agricultural impact modelers’ perspective on regional climate model data
journal, July 2021


Precipitation downscaling under climate change: Recent developments to bridge the gap between dynamical models and the end user
journal, January 2010

  • Maraun, D.; Wetterhall, F.; Ireson, A. M.
  • Reviews of Geophysics, Vol. 48, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1029/2009RG000314

Framework for Incorporating Downscaled Climate Output into Existing Engineering Methods: Application to Precipitation Frequency Curves
journal, December 2017


Consistent negative response of US crops to high temperatures in observations and crop models
journal, January 2017

  • Schauberger, Bernhard; Archontoulis, Sotirios; Arneth, Almut
  • Nature Communications, Vol. 8, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1038/ncomms13931

Extreme climate indices in Brazil: evaluation of downscaled earth system models at high horizontal resolution
journal, April 2020


Evaluating the utility of dynamical downscaling in agricultural impacts projections
journal, May 2014

  • Glotter, M.; Elliott, J.; McInerney, D.
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 111, Issue 24
  • DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1314787111

Effects of initial conditions uncertainty on regional climate variability: An analysis using a low-resolution CESM ensemble: LOW-RESOLUTION CESM ENSEMBLE
journal, July 2015

  • Sriver, Ryan L.; Forest, Chris E.; Keller, Klaus
  • Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 42, Issue 13
  • DOI: 10.1002/2015GL064546

Climate extremes indices in the CMIP5 multimodel ensemble: Part 1. Model evaluation in the present climate: CLIMATE EXTREMES INDICES IN CMIP5
journal, February 2013

  • Sillmann, J.; Kharin, V. V.; Zhang, X.
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, Vol. 118, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1002/jgrd.50203

Climate damages and adaptation potential across diverse sectors of the United States
journal, April 2019


Representation of U.S. Warm Temperature Extremes in Global Climate Model Ensembles
journal, April 2019


A Hybrid Dynamical–Statistical Downscaling Technique. Part I: Development and Validation of the Technique
journal, June 2015


Anthropogenic climate change has slowed global agricultural productivity growth
journal, April 2021


Downscaling Extremes—An Intercomparison of Multiple Statistical Methods for Present Climate
journal, June 2012