DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Global Biodiversity Implications of Alternative Electrification Strategies Under the Shared Socioeconomic Pathways

Abstract

Meeting global electrification goals while simultaneously addressing climate mitigation will require transformative changes to the energy sector, primarily large-scale renewable energy deployment. However, renewable energy infrastructure expansion requires significant land-assets and could come at high costs to ecosystem integrity, creating potential mismatches in global climate and biodiversity conservation priorities. Here, we explore the potential land requirements and biodiversity implications of alternative future global electrification pathways as depicted under the Shared Socioeconomic Scenarios (SSPs). High-resolution estimates of global energy densities for ten renewable and conventional technologies were overlain with global richness data to estimate biodiversity footprints (species per GWh) for each technology. Regionally explicit electricity generation scenarios (2020 to 2100) were downscaled to 50-km depictions of future technology deployment and were additionally constrained by scenarios of protected land exclusion and variant local energy development policies. Biodiversity footprints were used to explore land and biodiversity impacts through a heuristic cumulative biodiversity impact (CBI) score. CBI variation among SSPs was not a clear tradeoff in global climate mitigation and biodiversity conservation, but an outcome of total electricity demand, energy efficiency, and the total magnitude of renewable energy development and storage technologies. Despite comprising <= 7% of total generation, biomass energy contributed the mostmore » to biodiversity impacts. However, our results suggest that land conservation practices and local strategies aimed to promote energy diversification could have greater implications for future biodiversity conflicts than alternative SSPs. Hence, there is great uncertainty in how future global electrification pathways will influence biodiversity depending on local land use and conservation policies.« less

Authors:
 [1]; ORCiD logo [2]; ORCiD logo [3]
  1. Baylor Univ., Waco, TX (United States). Dept. of Environmental Science
  2. Pacific Northwest National Lab. (PNNL), Richland, WA (United States)
  3. Oak Ridge National Lab. (ORNL), Oak Ridge, TN (United States). Environmental Sciences Division
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Oak Ridge National Lab. (ORNL), Oak Ridge, TN (United States); Pacific Northwest National Lab. (PNNL), Richland, WA (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE
OSTI Identifier:
1819594
Alternate Identifier(s):
OSTI ID: 1820045
Report Number(s):
PNNL-SA-161542
Journal ID: ISSN 0006-3207
Grant/Contract Number:  
AC05-00OR22725; AC05-76RL01830
Resource Type:
Accepted Manuscript
Journal Name:
Biological Conservation
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Volume: 260; Journal Issue: NA; Journal ID: ISSN 0006-3207
Publisher:
Elsevier
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES; 29 ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY, AND ECONOMY; Renewable energy; Land sharing; Land sparing; Biodiversity; Conservation; Climate change; biodiversity, SSP, GCAM

Citation Formats

McManamay, Ryan A., Vernon, Chris R., and Jager, Henriette I. Global Biodiversity Implications of Alternative Electrification Strategies Under the Shared Socioeconomic Pathways. United States: N. p., 2021. Web. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2021.109234.
McManamay, Ryan A., Vernon, Chris R., & Jager, Henriette I. Global Biodiversity Implications of Alternative Electrification Strategies Under the Shared Socioeconomic Pathways. United States. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2021.109234
McManamay, Ryan A., Vernon, Chris R., and Jager, Henriette I. Tue . "Global Biodiversity Implications of Alternative Electrification Strategies Under the Shared Socioeconomic Pathways". United States. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2021.109234. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1819594.
@article{osti_1819594,
title = {Global Biodiversity Implications of Alternative Electrification Strategies Under the Shared Socioeconomic Pathways},
author = {McManamay, Ryan A. and Vernon, Chris R. and Jager, Henriette I.},
abstractNote = {Meeting global electrification goals while simultaneously addressing climate mitigation will require transformative changes to the energy sector, primarily large-scale renewable energy deployment. However, renewable energy infrastructure expansion requires significant land-assets and could come at high costs to ecosystem integrity, creating potential mismatches in global climate and biodiversity conservation priorities. Here, we explore the potential land requirements and biodiversity implications of alternative future global electrification pathways as depicted under the Shared Socioeconomic Scenarios (SSPs). High-resolution estimates of global energy densities for ten renewable and conventional technologies were overlain with global richness data to estimate biodiversity footprints (species per GWh) for each technology. Regionally explicit electricity generation scenarios (2020 to 2100) were downscaled to 50-km depictions of future technology deployment and were additionally constrained by scenarios of protected land exclusion and variant local energy development policies. Biodiversity footprints were used to explore land and biodiversity impacts through a heuristic cumulative biodiversity impact (CBI) score. CBI variation among SSPs was not a clear tradeoff in global climate mitigation and biodiversity conservation, but an outcome of total electricity demand, energy efficiency, and the total magnitude of renewable energy development and storage technologies. Despite comprising <= 7% of total generation, biomass energy contributed the most to biodiversity impacts. However, our results suggest that land conservation practices and local strategies aimed to promote energy diversification could have greater implications for future biodiversity conflicts than alternative SSPs. Hence, there is great uncertainty in how future global electrification pathways will influence biodiversity depending on local land use and conservation policies.},
doi = {10.1016/j.biocon.2021.109234},
journal = {Biological Conservation},
number = NA,
volume = 260,
place = {United States},
year = {Tue Jul 13 00:00:00 EDT 2021},
month = {Tue Jul 13 00:00:00 EDT 2021}
}

Works referenced in this record:

Toward Meaningful End Points of Biodiversity in Life Cycle Assessment
journal, November 2010

  • Curran, Michael; de Baan, Laura; De Schryver, An M.
  • Environmental Science & Technology, Vol. 45, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1021/es101444k

Land use and electricity generation: A life-cycle analysis
journal, August 2009

  • Fthenakis, Vasilis; Kim, Hyung Chul
  • Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Vol. 13, Issue 6-7
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2008.09.017

Renewable energy and biodiversity: Implications for transitioning to a Green Economy
journal, April 2017

  • Gasparatos, Alexandros; Doll, Christopher N. H.; Esteban, Miguel
  • Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Vol. 70
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2016.08.030

Solar energy development impacts on land cover change and protected areas
journal, October 2015

  • Hernandez, Rebecca R.; Hoffacker, Madison K.; Murphy-Mariscal, Michelle L.
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 112, Issue 44
  • DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1517656112

Integrated life-cycle assessment of electricity-supply scenarios confirms global environmental benefit of low-carbon technologies
journal, October 2014

  • Hertwich, Edgar G.; Gibon, Thomas; Bouman, Evert A.
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 112, Issue 20
  • DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1312753111

US protected lands mismatch biodiversity priorities
journal, April 2015

  • Jenkins, Clinton N.; Van Houtan, Kyle S.; Pimm, Stuart L.
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 112, Issue 16
  • DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1418034112

Housing growth in and near United States protected areas limits their conservation value
journal, December 2009

  • Radeloff, V. C.; Stewart, S. I.; Hawbaker, T. J.
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 107, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0911131107

The influence of the global electric power system on terrestrial biodiversity
journal, December 2019

  • Holland, Robert A.; Scott, Kate; Agnolucci, Paolo
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 116, Issue 51
  • DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1909269116

A global-level assessment of the effectiveness of protected areas at resisting anthropogenic pressures
journal, October 2019

  • Geldmann, Jonas; Manica, Andrea; Burgess, Neil D.
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 116, Issue 46
  • DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1908221116

Bias in protected-area location and its effects on long-term aspirations of biodiversity conventions: Protected Areas Missing Biodiversity
journal, November 2017

  • Venter, Oscar; Magrach, Ainhoa; Outram, Nick
  • Conservation Biology, Vol. 32, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1111/cobi.12970

The Overlooked Terrestrial Impacts of Mountaintop Mining
journal, May 2013

  • Wickham, James; Wood, Petra Bohall; Nicholson, Matthew C.
  • BioScience, Vol. 63, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.1525/bio.2013.63.5.7

Characterising the impacts of emerging energy development on wildlife, with an eye towards mitigation
journal, September 2012

  • Northrup, Joseph M.; Wittemyer, George
  • Ecology Letters, Vol. 16, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1111/ele.12009

The Energy Footprint: How Oil, Natural Gas, and Wind Energy Affect Land for Biodiversity and the Flow of Ecosystem Services
journal, January 2015

  • Jones, Nathan F.; Pejchar, Liba; Kiesecker, Joseph M.
  • BioScience, Vol. 65, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1093/biosci/biu224

Impact of globalization on the resilience and sustainability of natural resources
journal, April 2019


Consumption‐Based Conservation Targeting: Linking Biodiversity Loss to Upstream Demand through a Global Wildlife Footprint
journal, November 2016

  • Kitzes, Justin; Berlow, Eric; Conlisk, Erin
  • Conservation Letters, Vol. 10, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.1111/con4.12321

Quantifying biodiversity trade-offs in the face of widespread renewable and unconventional energy development
journal, May 2020


The contribution of Utility-Scale Solar Energy to the global climate regulation and its effects on local ecosystem services
journal, December 2014


Impacts of climate change on the future of biodiversity: Biodiversity and climate change
journal, January 2012


Renewable energies and ecosystem service impacts
journal, August 2015

  • Hastik, Richard; Basso, Stefano; Geitner, Clemens
  • Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Vol. 48
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2015.04.004

Renewable energy development threatens many globally important biodiversity areas
journal, March 2020

  • Rehbein, Jose A.; Watson, James E. M.; Lane, Joe L.
  • Global Change Biology, Vol. 26, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.1111/gcb.15067

Clean and secure energy for the twenty-first century
journal, June 2002

  • Fells, I.
  • Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part A: Journal of Power and Energy, Vol. 216, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1243/09576500260251138

Humans drive future water scarcity changes across all Shared Socioeconomic Pathways
journal, January 2020

  • Graham, Neal T.; Hejazi, Mohamad I.; Chen, Min
  • Environmental Research Letters, Vol. 15, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/ab639b

Land-Use Efficiency of Big Solar
journal, January 2014

  • Hernandez, Rebecca R.; Hoffacker, Madison K.; Field, Christopher B.
  • Environmental Science & Technology, Vol. 48, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1021/es4043726

GCAM v5.1: representing the linkages between energy, water, land, climate, and economic systems
journal, January 2019

  • Calvin, Katherine; Patel, Pralit; Clarke, Leon
  • Geoscientific Model Development, Vol. 12, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.5194/gmd-12-677-2019

Assessing biodiversity loss due to land use with Life Cycle Assessment: are we there yet?
journal, September 2014

  • Souza, Danielle M.; Teixeira, Ricardo F. M.; Ostermann, Ole P.
  • Global Change Biology, Vol. 21, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1111/gcb.12709

Current and Future Land Use around a Nationwide Protected Area Network
journal, January 2013


Mapping global development potential for renewable energy, fossil fuels, mining and agriculture sectors
journal, June 2019

  • Oakleaf, James R.; Kennedy, Christina M.; Baruch-Mordo, Sharon
  • Scientific Data, Vol. 6, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1038/s41597-019-0084-8

Recent ecological responses to climate change support predictions of high extinction risk
journal, July 2011

  • Maclean, I. M. D.; Wilson, R. J.
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 108, Issue 30
  • DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1017352108

Understanding the life cycle surface land requirements of natural gas-fired electricity
journal, October 2017


Projecting terrestrial biodiversity intactness with GLOBIO 4
journal, November 2019

  • Schipper, Aafke M.; Hilbers, Jelle P.; Meijer, Johan R.
  • Global Change Biology, Vol. 26, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1111/gcb.14848

Biodiversity can benefit from climate stabilization despite adverse side effects of land-based mitigation
journal, November 2019


The performance and potential of protected areas
journal, November 2014

  • Watson, James E. M.; Dudley, Nigel; Segan, Daniel B.
  • Nature, Vol. 515, Issue 7525
  • DOI: 10.1038/nature13947

Sustainable hydropower in the 21st century
journal, November 2018

  • Moran, Emilio F.; Lopez, Maria Claudia; Moore, Nathan
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 115, Issue 47
  • DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1809426115

Assessment of the environmental impacts associated with hydropower
journal, April 2017

  • Botelho, Anabela; Ferreira, Paula; Lima, Fátima
  • Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Vol. 70
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.271

Global patterns of terrestrial vertebrate diversity and conservation
journal, June 2013

  • Jenkins, C. N.; Pimm, S. L.; Joppa, L. N.
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 110, Issue 28
  • DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1302251110

Ecological Mechanisms Linking Protected Areas to Surrounding Lands
journal, June 2007

  • Hansen, Andrew J.; DeFries, Ruth
  • Ecological Applications, Vol. 17, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1890/05-1098

Shared Socio-Economic Pathways of the Energy Sector – Quantifying the Narratives
journal, January 2017


Towards a 3D National Ecological Footprint Geography
journal, August 2011


Protecting Important Sites for Biodiversity Contributes to Meeting Global Conservation Targets
journal, March 2012


A database of freshwater fish species of the Amazon Basin
journal, March 2020


Environmental impacts of utility-scale solar energy
journal, January 2014

  • Hernandez, R. R.; Easter, S. B.; Murphy-Mariscal, M. L.
  • Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Vol. 29
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2013.08.041

Climate change and ecosystems: threats, opportunities and solutions
journal, January 2020

  • Malhi, Yadvinder; Franklin, Janet; Seddon, Nathalie
  • Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, Vol. 375, Issue 1794
  • DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2019.0104

The threat of energy diversification to a bioregion: a landscape-level analysis of current and future impacts on the US Chihuahuan Desert
journal, June 2019

  • McClung, Maureen R.; Taylor, Nathan T.; Zamzow, Benjamin K.
  • Regional Environmental Change, Vol. 19, Issue 7
  • DOI: 10.1007/s10113-019-01525-4

Energy Density and Spatial Footprints of Various Electrical Power Systems
journal, January 2014


Environmental co-benefits and adverse side-effects of alternative power sector decarbonization strategies
journal, November 2019


Dams have varying impacts on fish communities across latitudes: a quantitative synthesis
journal, May 2019

  • Turgeon, Katrine; Turpin, Christian; Gregory‐Eaves, Irene
  • Ecology Letters, Vol. 22, Issue 9
  • DOI: 10.1111/ele.13283

The roads ahead: Narratives for shared socioeconomic pathways describing world futures in the 21st century
journal, January 2017


Solar-power replacement as a solution for hydropower foregone in US dam removals
journal, August 2019


Efficient use of land to meet sustainable energy needs
journal, March 2015

  • Hernandez, Rebecca R.; Hoffacker, Madison K.; Field, Christopher B.
  • Nature Climate Change, Vol. 5, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1038/nclimate2556

Environmental impacts from the installation and operation of large-scale solar power plants
journal, August 2011


Reconciling Food Production and Biodiversity Conservation: Land Sharing and Land Sparing Compared
journal, September 2011


Global change synergies and trade‐offs between renewable energy and biodiversity
journal, October 2015

  • Santangeli, Andrea; Toivonen, Tuuli; Pouzols, Federico Montesino
  • GCB Bioenergy, Vol. 8, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.1111/gcbb.12299

Infrastructure for sustainable development
journal, April 2019


On the protection of "protected areas"
journal, May 2008

  • Joppa, L. N.; Loarie, S. R.; Pimm, S. L.
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 105, Issue 18
  • DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0802471105

A new scenario framework for climate change research: the concept of shared socioeconomic pathways
journal, October 2013


The Shared Socioeconomic Pathways and their energy, land use, and greenhouse gas emissions implications: An overview
journal, January 2017


Renewable energy production will exacerbate mining threats to biodiversity
journal, September 2020


Solar and wind energy enhances drought resilience and groundwater sustainability
journal, November 2019


Global land use for 2015–2100 at 0.05° resolution under diverse socioeconomic and climate scenarios
journal, October 2020


Managing the middle: A shift in conservation priorities based on the global human modification gradient
journal, January 2019

  • Kennedy, Christina M.; Oakleaf, James R.; Theobald, David M.
  • Global Change Biology, Vol. 25, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1111/gcb.14549

Occurrence Download
dataset, January 2020

  • Gbif. Org, Occdownload
  • The Global Biodiversity Information Facility
  • DOI: 10.15468/dl.7hgv7c

Occurrence Download
dataset, January 2020

  • Gbif. Org, Occdownload
  • The Global Biodiversity Information Facility
  • DOI: 10.15468/dl.7xc697

Occurrence Download
dataset, January 2020

  • Gbif. Org, Occdownload
  • The Global Biodiversity Information Facility
  • DOI: 10.15468/dl.gftpn9

Occurrence Download
dataset, January 2020

  • Gbif. Org, Occdownload
  • The Global Biodiversity Information Facility
  • DOI: 10.15468/dl.tj8rya

Occurrence Download
dataset, January 2020

  • Gbif. Org, Occdownload
  • The Global Biodiversity Information Facility
  • DOI: 10.15468/dl.tj8x5d

Occurrence Download
dataset, January 2020

  • Gbif. Org, Occdownload
  • The Global Biodiversity Information Facility
  • DOI: 10.15468/dl.udddpf

Occurrence Download
dataset, January 2020

  • Gbif. Org, Occdownload
  • The Global Biodiversity Information Facility
  • DOI: 10.15468/dl.xmgn4q

Occurrence Download
dataset, January 2020

  • Gbif. Org, Occdownload
  • The Global Biodiversity Information Facility
  • DOI: 10.15468/dl.zkx2rn

Occurrence Download
dataset, January 2020

  • Gbif. Org, Occdownload
  • The Global Biodiversity Information Facility
  • DOI: 10.15468/dl.7hgv7c

Occurrence Download
dataset, January 2020

  • Gbif. Org, Occdownload
  • The Global Biodiversity Information Facility
  • DOI: 10.15468/dl.7xc697

Occurrence Download
dataset, January 2020

  • Gbif. Org, Occdownload
  • The Global Biodiversity Information Facility
  • DOI: 10.15468/dl.gftpn9

Occurrence Download
dataset, January 2020

  • Gbif. Org, Occdownload
  • The Global Biodiversity Information Facility
  • DOI: 10.15468/dl.tj8rya

Occurrence Download
dataset, January 2020

  • Gbif. Org, Occdownload
  • The Global Biodiversity Information Facility
  • DOI: 10.15468/dl.tj8x5d

Occurrence Download
dataset, January 2020

  • Gbif. Org, Occdownload
  • The Global Biodiversity Information Facility
  • DOI: 10.15468/dl.udddpf

Occurrence Download
dataset, January 2020

  • Gbif. Org, Occdownload
  • The Global Biodiversity Information Facility
  • DOI: 10.15468/dl.xmgn4q

Occurrence Download
dataset, January 2020

  • Gbif. Org, Occdownload
  • The Global Biodiversity Information Facility
  • DOI: 10.15468/dl.zkx2rn