Significant impact of forcing uncertainty in a large ensemble of climate model simulations
Abstract
Forcing due to solar and volcanic variability, on the natural side, and greenhouse gas and aerosol emissions, on the anthropogenic side, are the main inputs to climate models. Reliable climate model simulations of past and future climate change depend crucially upon them. Here we analyze large ensembles of simulations using a comprehensive Earth System Model to quantify uncertainties in global climate change attributable to differences in prescribed forcings. The different forcings considered here are those used in the two most recent phases of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP), namely CMIP5 and CMIP6. We show significant differences in simulated global surface air temperature due to volcanic aerosol forcing in the second half of the 19th century and in the early 21st century. The latter arise from small-to-moderate eruptions incorporated in CMIP6 simulations but not in CMIP5 simulations. We also find significant differences in global surface air temperature and Arctic sea ice area due to anthropogenic aerosol forcing in the second half of the 20th century and early 21st century. These differences are as large as those obtained in different versions of an Earth System Model employing identical forcings. In simulations from 2015 to 2100, we find significant differences in themore »
- Authors:
-
- Environment and Climate Change Canada, Victoria, BC (Canada). Canadian Centre for Climate Modelling and Analysis
- Lawrence Livermore National Lab. (LLNL), Livermore, CA (United States). Program for Climate Model Diagnosis and Intercomparison
- Publication Date:
- Research Org.:
- Lawrence Livermore National Lab. (LLNL), Livermore, CA (United States)
- Sponsoring Org.:
- USDOE Office of Science (SC)
- OSTI Identifier:
- 1815637
- Grant/Contract Number:
- AC52-07NA27344
- Resource Type:
- Accepted Manuscript
- Journal Name:
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
- Additional Journal Information:
- Journal Volume: 118; Journal Issue: 23; Journal ID: ISSN 0027-8424
- Publisher:
- National Academy of Sciences
- Country of Publication:
- United States
- Language:
- English
- Subject:
- 54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES; climate change; climate model; external forcing; large ensemble
Citation Formats
Fyfe, John C., Kharin, Viatcheslav V., Santer, Benjamin D., Cole, Jason N. S., and Gillett, Nathan P. Significant impact of forcing uncertainty in a large ensemble of climate model simulations. United States: N. p., 2021.
Web. doi:10.1073/pnas.2016549118.
Fyfe, John C., Kharin, Viatcheslav V., Santer, Benjamin D., Cole, Jason N. S., & Gillett, Nathan P. Significant impact of forcing uncertainty in a large ensemble of climate model simulations. United States. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2016549118
Fyfe, John C., Kharin, Viatcheslav V., Santer, Benjamin D., Cole, Jason N. S., and Gillett, Nathan P. Tue .
"Significant impact of forcing uncertainty in a large ensemble of climate model simulations". United States. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2016549118. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1815637.
@article{osti_1815637,
title = {Significant impact of forcing uncertainty in a large ensemble of climate model simulations},
author = {Fyfe, John C. and Kharin, Viatcheslav V. and Santer, Benjamin D. and Cole, Jason N. S. and Gillett, Nathan P.},
abstractNote = {Forcing due to solar and volcanic variability, on the natural side, and greenhouse gas and aerosol emissions, on the anthropogenic side, are the main inputs to climate models. Reliable climate model simulations of past and future climate change depend crucially upon them. Here we analyze large ensembles of simulations using a comprehensive Earth System Model to quantify uncertainties in global climate change attributable to differences in prescribed forcings. The different forcings considered here are those used in the two most recent phases of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP), namely CMIP5 and CMIP6. We show significant differences in simulated global surface air temperature due to volcanic aerosol forcing in the second half of the 19th century and in the early 21st century. The latter arise from small-to-moderate eruptions incorporated in CMIP6 simulations but not in CMIP5 simulations. We also find significant differences in global surface air temperature and Arctic sea ice area due to anthropogenic aerosol forcing in the second half of the 20th century and early 21st century. These differences are as large as those obtained in different versions of an Earth System Model employing identical forcings. In simulations from 2015 to 2100, we find significant differences in the rates of projected global warming arising from CMIP5 and CMIP6 concentration pathways that differ slightly but are equivalent in terms of their nominal radiative forcing levels in 2100. Our results highlight the influence of assumptions about natural and anthropogenic aerosol loadings on carbon budgets, the likelihood of meeting Paris targets, and the equivalence of future forcing scenarios.},
doi = {10.1073/pnas.2016549118},
journal = {Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America},
number = 23,
volume = 118,
place = {United States},
year = {Tue Jun 01 00:00:00 EDT 2021},
month = {Tue Jun 01 00:00:00 EDT 2021}
}
Works referenced in this record:
The Model Intercomparison Project on the climatic response to
Volcanic forcing (VolMIP): experimental design and forcing input data for CMIP6
journal, January 2016
- Zanchettin, Davide; Khodri, Myriam; Timmreck, Claudia
- Geoscientific Model Development, Vol. 9, Issue 8
Volcanic Radiative Forcing From 1979 to 2015
journal, November 2018
- Schmidt, Anja; Mills, Michael J.; Ghan, Steven
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, Vol. 123, Issue 22
Partitioning climate projection uncertainty with multiple large ensembles and CMIP5/6
journal, January 2020
- Lehner, Flavio; Deser, Clara; Maher, Nicola
- Earth System Dynamics, Vol. 11, Issue 2
Overview of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) experimental design and organization
journal, January 2016
- Eyring, Veronika; Bony, Sandrine; Meehl, Gerald A.
- Geoscientific Model Development, Vol. 9, Issue 5
Surface response to stratospheric aerosol changes in a coupled atmosphere-ocean model: SURFACE RESPONSE TO AEROSOL CHANGE
journal, February 2013
- Fyfe, J. C.; von Salzen, K.; Cole, J. N. S.
- Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 40, Issue 3
The PMIP4 contribution to CMIP6 – Part 3: The last millennium, scientific objective, and experimental design for the PMIP4 past1000 simulations
journal, January 2017
- Jungclaus, Johann H.; Bard, Edouard; Baroni, Mélanie
- Geoscientific Model Development, Vol. 10, Issue 11
The Canadian Fourth Generation Atmospheric Global Climate Model (CanAM4). Part I: Representation of Physical Processes
journal, February 2013
- von Salzen, Knut; Scinocca, John F.; McFarlane, Norman A.
- Atmosphere-Ocean, Vol. 51, Issue 1
Quantifying stochastic uncertainty in detection time of human-caused climate signals
journal, September 2019
- Santer, Benjamin D.; Fyfe, John C.; Solomon, Susan
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 116, Issue 40
Coupled Model Intercomparison Project 5 (CMIP5) simulations of climate following volcanic eruptions: VOLCANIC IMPACTS IN THE CMIP5 MODELS
journal, September 2012
- Driscoll, Simon; Bozzo, Alessio; Gray, Lesley J.
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, Vol. 117, Issue D17
Warmer climate projections in EC-Earth3-Veg: the role of changes in the greenhouse gas concentrations from CMIP5 to CMIP6
journal, May 2020
- Wyser, Klaus; Kjellström, Erik; Koenigk, Torben
- Environmental Research Letters, Vol. 15, Issue 5
The Scenario Model Intercomparison Project (ScenarioMIP) for CMIP6
journal, January 2016
- O'Neill, Brian C.; Tebaldi, Claudia; van Vuuren, Detlef P.
- Geoscientific Model Development, Vol. 9, Issue 9
Making climate projections conditional on historical observations
journal, January 2021
- Ribes, Aurélien; Qasmi, Saïd; Gillett, Nathan P.
- Science Advances, Vol. 7, Issue 4
Constraining the Ratio of Global Warming to Cumulative CO 2 Emissions Using CMIP5 Simulations
journal, September 2013
- Gillett, Nathan P.; Arora, Vivek K.; Matthews, Damon
- Journal of Climate, Vol. 26, Issue 18
Sensitivity of Historical Climate Simulations to Uncertain Aerosol Forcing
journal, June 2020
- Dittus, Andrea J.; Hawkins, Ed; Wilcox, Laura J.
- Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 47, Issue 13
Carbon emission limits required to satisfy future representative concentration pathways of greenhouse gases: ALLOWABLE FUTURE CARBON EMISSIONS
journal, March 2011
- Arora, V. K.; Scinocca, J. F.; Boer, G. J.
- Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 38, Issue 5
Volcanic contribution to decadal changes in tropospheric temperature
journal, February 2014
- Santer, Benjamin D.; Bonfils, Céline; Painter, Jeffrey F.
- Nature Geoscience, Vol. 7, Issue 3
The representative concentration pathways: an overview
journal, August 2011
- van Vuuren, Detlef P.; Edmonds, Jae; Kainuma, Mikiko
- Climatic Change, Vol. 109, Issue 1-2
Volcanic stratospheric sulfur injections and aerosol optical depth from 500 BCE to 1900 CE
journal, January 2017
- Toohey, Matthew; Sigl, Michael
- Earth System Science Data, Vol. 9, Issue 2
Constraining human contributions to observed warming since the pre-industrial period
journal, January 2021
- Gillett, Nathan P.; Kirchmeier-Young, Megan; Ribes, Aurélien
- Nature Climate Change, Vol. 11, Issue 3
Stratospheric aerosol optical depths, 1850–1990
journal, January 1993
- Sato, Makiko; Hansen, James E.; McCormick, M. Patrick
- Journal of Geophysical Research, Vol. 98, Issue D12
Importance of the pre-industrial baseline for likelihood of exceeding Paris goals
journal, July 2017
- Schurer, Andrew P.; Mann, Michael E.; Hawkins, Ed
- Nature Climate Change, Vol. 7, Issue 8
The Chemistry Mechanism in the Community Earth System Model Version 2 (CESM2)
journal, April 2020
- Emmons, Louisa K.; Schwantes, Rebecca H.; Orlando, John J.
- Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, Vol. 12, Issue 4
The Persistently Variable "Background" Stratospheric Aerosol Layer and Global Climate Change
journal, July 2011
- Solomon, S.; Daniel, J. S.; Neely, R. R.
- Science, Vol. 333, Issue 6044
The Canadian Earth System Model version 5 (CanESM5.0.3)
journal, January 2019
- Swart, Neil C.; Cole, Jason N. S.; Kharin, Viatcheslav V.
- Geoscientific Model Development, Vol. 12, Issue 11
Solar forcing for CMIP6 (v3.2)
journal, January 2017
- Matthes, Katja; Funke, Bernd; Andersson, Monika E.
- Geoscientific Model Development, Vol. 10, Issue 6
The Detection and Attribution Model Intercomparison Project (DAMIP v1.0)
contribution to CMIP6
journal, January 2016
- Gillett, Nathan P.; Shiogama, Hideo; Funke, Bernd
- Geoscientific Model Development, Vol. 9, Issue 10
Climate models without preindustrial volcanic forcing underestimate historical ocean thermal expansion: OCEAN THERMAL EXPANSION UNDERESTIMATED
journal, April 2013
- Gregory, J. M.; Bi, D.; Collier, M. A.
- Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 40, Issue 8
Context for interpreting equilibrium climate sensitivity and transient climate response from the CMIP6 Earth system models
journal, June 2020
- Meehl, Gerald A.; Senior, Catherine A.; Eyring, Veronika
- Science Advances, Vol. 6, Issue 26
An Updated Assessment of Near‐Surface Temperature Change From 1850: The HadCRUT5 Data Set
journal, February 2021
- Morice, C. P.; Kennedy, J. J.; Rayner, N. A.
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, Vol. 126, Issue 3
Making sense of the early-2000s warming slowdown
journal, February 2016
- Fyfe, John C.; Meehl, Gerald A.; England, Matthew H.
- Nature Climate Change, Vol. 6, Issue 3
Effective radiative forcing and adjustments in CMIP6 models
journal, January 2020
- Smith, Christopher J.; Kramer, Ryan J.; Myhre, Gunnar
- Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Vol. 20, Issue 16