DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: A Robust and Efficient Deep Learning Method for Dynamical Mass Measurements of Galaxy Clusters

Journal Article · · The Astrophysical Journal (Online)
ORCiD logo [1]; ORCiD logo [2]; ORCiD logo [3]; ORCiD logo [2]; ORCiD logo [2];  [4]
  1. Carnegie Mellon Univ., Pittsburgh, PA (United States). McWilliams Center for Cosmology, Dept. of Physics; Carnegie Mellon University
  2. Carnegie Mellon Univ., Pittsburgh, PA (United States). McWilliams Center for Cosmology, Dept. of Physics
  3. Harvard Univ., Cambridge, MA (United States). Harvard Data Science Initiative; Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, Cambridge, MA (United States)
  4. Carnegie Mellon Univ., Pittsburgh, PA (United States). School of Computer Science

We demonstrate the ability of convolutional neural networks (CNNs) to mitigate systematics in the virial scaling relation and produce dynamical mass estimates of galaxy clusters with remarkably low bias and scatter. We present two models, CNN1D and CNN2D, which leverage this deep learning tool to infer cluster masses from distributions of member galaxy dynamics. Our first model, CNN1D, infers cluster mass directly from the distribution of member galaxy line-of-sight velocities. Our second model, CNN2D, extends the input space ofCNN1D to learn on the joint distribution of galaxy line-of-sight velocities and projected radial distances. We train each model as a regression over cluster mass using a labeled catalog of realistic mock cluster observations generated from the MultiDark simulation and UniverseMachine catalog. We then evaluate the performance of each model on an independent set of mock observations selected from the same simulated catalog. The CNN models produce cluster mass predictions with lognormal residuals of scatter as low as 0.132 dex, greater than a factor of 2 improvement over the classical M–σ power-law estimator. Furthermore, the CNN model reduces prediction scatter relative to similar machinelearning approaches by up to 17% while executing in drastically shorter training and evaluation times (by a factor of 30) and producing considerably more robust mass predictions (improving prediction stability under variations in galaxy sampling rate by 30%).

Research Organization:
Carnegie Mellon Univ., Pittsburgh, PA (United States)
Sponsoring Organization:
USDOE Office of Science (SC)
Grant/Contract Number:
SC0011114
OSTI ID:
1802212
Journal Information:
The Astrophysical Journal (Online), Journal Name: The Astrophysical Journal (Online) Journal Issue: 1 Vol. 887; ISSN 1538-4357
Publisher:
IOP PublishingCopyright Statement
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English

References (83)

Multivariate Density Estimation: Theory, Practice, and Visualization book March 2015
Measurement of Areas on a Sphere Using Fibonacci and Latitude–Longitude Lattices journal November 2009
Measuring photometric redshifts using galaxy images and Deep Neural Networks journal July 2016
Observational probes of cosmic acceleration journal September 2013
Deep learning journal May 2015
Mass estimation in the outer regions of galaxy clusters journal November 1999
Planck 2013 results. XVI. Cosmological parameters journal October 2014
Phase-space shapes of clusters and rich groups of galaxies journal November 2013
Planck 2015 results : VI. LFI mapmaking journal September 2016
Planck 2015 results : XXIV. Cosmology from Sunyaev-Zeldovich cluster counts journal September 2016
Planck 2015 results : XVI. Isotropy and statistics of the CMB journal September 2016
Planck 2015 results : XXVI. The Second journal September 2016
The XXL Survey: XXIII. The mass scale of XXL clusters from ensemble spectroscopy★ journal November 2018
Interloper treatment in dynamical modelling of galaxy clusters journal February 2007
Infall Regions of Galaxy Clusters journal June 1997
Correlations of Richness and Global Properties in Galaxy Clusters journal March 2003
The DEEP2 Galaxy Redshift Survey: First Results on Galaxy Groups journal May 2005
Virial Scaling of Massive Dark Matter Halos: Why Clusters Prefer a High Normalization Cosmology journal January 2008
Non-Gaussian Scatter in Cluster Scaling Relations journal May 2010
The Rockstar Phase-Space Temporal halo Finder and the Velocity Offsets of Cluster Cores journal December 2012
Toward Unbiased Galaxy Cluster Masses from Line-Of-Sight Velocity Dispersions journal July 2013
A Machine Learning Approach for Dynamical mass Measurements of Galaxy Clusters journal April 2015
Spatial Anisotropy of Galaxy Kinematics in Sloan Digital sky Survey Galaxy Clusters journal September 2012
Velocity Anisotropy and Shape bias in the Caustic Technique journal April 2013
MAMPOSSt: Modelling Anisotropy and Mass Profiles of Observed Spherical Systems – I. Gaussian 3D velocities journal January 2013
Weighing the Giants – III. Methods and measurements of accurate galaxy cluster weak-lensing masses journal February 2014
Weighing the giants – IV. Cosmology and neutrino mass journal November 2014
Effect of asphericity in caustic mass estimates of galaxy clusters journal February 2015
Galaxy cluster mass reconstruction project – I. Methods and first results on galaxy-based techniques journal May 2014
Galaxy Cluster Mass Reconstruction Project – II. Quantifying scatter and bias using contrasting mock catalogues journal March 2015
Rotation-invariant convolutional neural networks for galaxy morphology prediction journal April 2015
Galaxy cluster mass estimation from stacked spectroscopic analysis journal May 2016
Constraining the mass–richness relationship of redMaPPer clusters with angular clustering journal August 2016
Weighing the giants– V. Galaxy cluster scaling relations journal September 2016
MultiDark simulations: the story of dark matter halo concentrations and density profiles journal February 2016
Chandra measurements of a complete sample of X-ray luminous galaxy clusters: the luminosity–mass relation journal October 2016
CMU DeepLens: deep learning for automatic image-based galaxy–galaxy strong lens finding journal July 2017
Galaxy Cluster Mass Reconstruction Project – III. The impact of dynamical substructure on cluster mass estimates journal December 2017
Galaxy Cluster Mass Reconstruction Project – IV. Understanding the effects of imperfect membership on cluster mass estimation journal August 2018
Dark Energy Survey Year 1 results: weak lensing mass calibration of redMaPPer galaxy clusters journal October 2018
The Cluster-EAGLE project: a comparison of dynamical mass estimators using simulated clusters journal October 2018
An application of machine learning techniques to galaxy cluster mass estimation using the MACSIS simulations journal January 2019
UniverseMachine: The correlation between galaxy growth and dark matter halo assembly from z = 0−10 journal May 2019
Prediction of galaxy halo masses in SDSS DR7 via a machine learning approach journal October 2019
Influence of projection in cluster cosmology studies journal November 2011
Tracing cosmic evolution with clusters of galaxies journal April 2005
Gradient-based learning applied to document recognition journal January 1998
The cosmological simulation code gadget-2 journal December 2005
Cluster galaxy dynamics and the effects of large-scale environment: Galaxy cluster dynamics journal August 2010
Non-Gaussian velocity distributions - the effect on virial mass estimates of galaxy groups: Non-Gaussian velocity distributions journal March 2011
Cosmological Parameters from Observations of Galaxy Clusters journal September 2011
A Machine Learning Approach for Dynamical Mass Measurements of Galaxy Clusters text January 2018
A Machine Learning Approach for Dynamical Mass Measurements of Galaxy Clusters text January 2018
A Stochastic Approximation Method journal September 1951
Dynamical mass Measurements of Contaminated Galaxy Clusters Using Machine Learning journal November 2016
GalWeight: A New and Effective Weighting Technique for Determining Galaxy Cluster and Group Membership journal June 2018
A Deep Learning Approach to Galaxy Cluster X-Ray Masses journal May 2019
Measurement of areas on a sphere using Fibonacci and latitude-longitude lattices text January 2009
Influence of Projection in Cluster Cosmology Studies text January 2011
The Rockstar Phase-Space Temporal Halo Finder and the Velocity Offsets of Cluster Cores text January 2011
Toward Unbiased Galaxy Cluster Masses from Line of Sight Velocity Dispersions text January 2012
Weighing the Giants - III. Methods and Measurements of Accurate Galaxy Cluster Weak-Lensing Masses text January 2012
Spatial Anisotropy of Galaxy Kinematics in Sloan Digital Sky Survey Galaxy Clusters text January 2012
MAMPOSSt: Modelling Anisotropy and Mass Profiles of Observed Spherical Systems. I. Gaussian 3D velocities text January 2012
Planck 2013 results. XVI. Cosmological parameters text January 2013
Velocity Anisotropy and Shape Bias in the Caustic Technique text January 2013
Phase-space shapes of clusters and rich groups of galaxies text January 2013
Galaxy Cluster Mass Reconstruction Project: I. Methods and first results on galaxy-based techniques text January 2014
Weighing the Giants IV: Cosmology and Neutrino Mass text January 2014
A Machine Learning Approach for Dynamical Mass Measurements of Galaxy Clusters text January 2014
Measuring photometric redshifts using galaxy images and Deep Neural Networks preprint January 2015
Dynamical Mass Measurements of Contaminated Galaxy Clusters Using Machine Learning text January 2015
Chandra Measurements of a Complete Sample of X-ray Luminous Galaxy Clusters: The Luminosity-Mass Relation text January 2015
Galaxy Cluster Mass Reconstruction Project: III. The impact of dynamical substructure on cluster mass estimates text January 2017
Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Weak Lensing Mass Calibration of redMaPPer Galaxy Clusters text January 2018
GalWeight: A New and Effective Weighting Technique for Determining Galaxy Cluster and Group Membership text January 2018
The Cluster-EAGLE project: a comparison of dynamical mass estimators using simulated clusters text January 2018
An application of machine learning techniques to galaxy cluster mass estimation using the MACSIS simulations text January 2018
Prediction of galaxy halo masses in SDSS DR7 via a machine learning approach text January 2019
The DEEP2 Galaxy Redshift Survey: First results on galaxy groups text January 2004
Infall Regions of Galaxy Clusters text January 1997
Mass estimation in the outer regions of galaxy clusters text January 1999
Deep Learning text January 2018

Cited By (3)

A Hybrid Deep Learning Approach to Cosmological Constraints from Galaxy Redshift Surveys journal February 2020
Galaxy Cluster Mass Estimates in the Presence of Substructure journal January 2020
A Hybrid Deep Learning Approach to Cosmological Constraints From Galaxy Redshift Surveys text January 2019