DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Linear systematics mitigation in galaxy clustering in the Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Data

Abstract

ABSTRACT We implement a linear model for mitigating the effect of observing conditions and other sources of contamination in galaxy clustering analyses. Our treatment improves upon the fiducial systematics treatment of the Dark Energy Survey (DES) Year 1 (Y1) cosmology analysis in four crucial ways. Specifically, our treatment (1) does not require decisions as to which observable systematics are significant and which are not, allowing for the possibility of multiple maps adding coherently to give rise to significant bias even if no single map leads to a significant bias by itself, (2) characterizes both the statistical and systematic uncertainty in our mitigation procedure, allowing us to propagate said uncertainties into the reported cosmological constraints, (3) explicitly exploits the full spatial structure of the galaxy density field to differentiate between cosmology-sourced and systematics-sourced fluctuations within the galaxy density field, and (4) is fully automated, and can therefore be trivially applied to any data set. The updated correlation function for the DES Y1 redMaGiC catalogue minimally impacts the cosmological posteriors from that analysis. Encouragingly, our analysis does improve the goodness-of-fit statistic of the DES Y1 3 × 2pt data set (Δχ2 = −6.5 with no additional parameters). This improvement is due in nearly equal partsmore » to both the change in the correlation function and the added statistical and systematic uncertainties associated with our method. We expect the difference in mitigation techniques to become more important in future work as the size of cosmological data sets grows.« less

Authors:
ORCiD logo [1];  [1]; ORCiD logo [2]; ORCiD logo [3];  [4]; ORCiD logo [5];  [6]
  1. Department of Physics, University of Arizona, 1118 E. Fourth Street, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA
  2. Department of Astronomy and Steward Observatory, University of Arizona, 933 N Cherry Ave, Tucson, AZ 85719, USA
  3. Institut de Ciénces de l’Espai, IEEC-CSIC, Campus UAB, Carrer de Can Magrans, s/n, E-08193 Bellaterra, Barcelona, Spain
  4. Center for Cosmology and Astro-Particle Physics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA, Department of Physics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
  5. Department of Physics, University of Michigan, 450 Church St, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1040, USA, Leinweber Center for Theoretical Physics, University of Michigan, 450 Church St, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1040, USA
  6. (
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory (FNAL), Batavia, IL (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE Office of Science (SC), High Energy Physics (HEP)
Contributing Org.:
DES Collaboration
OSTI Identifier:
1774983
Alternate Identifier(s):
OSTI ID: 1693448
Report Number(s):
FERMILAB-PUB-20-480-AE; DES-2020-0563; arXiv:2009.10854
Journal ID: ISSN 0035-8711
Grant/Contract Number:  
SC0015975; AC02-07CH11359
Resource Type:
Published Article
Journal Name:
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Name: Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society Journal Volume: 503 Journal Issue: 3; Journal ID: ISSN 0035-8711
Publisher:
Oxford University Press
Country of Publication:
United Kingdom
Language:
English
Subject:
79 ASTRONOMY AND ASTROPHYSICS; methods: data analysis; cosmology: observations; galaxies: photometry; dark energy; methods: statistical

Citation Formats

Wagoner, Erika L., Rozo, Eduardo, Fang, Xiao, Crocce, Martín, Elvin-Poole, Jack, Weaverdyck, Noah, and DES Collaboration). Linear systematics mitigation in galaxy clustering in the Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Data. United Kingdom: N. p., 2021. Web. doi:10.1093/mnras/stab717.
Wagoner, Erika L., Rozo, Eduardo, Fang, Xiao, Crocce, Martín, Elvin-Poole, Jack, Weaverdyck, Noah, & DES Collaboration). Linear systematics mitigation in galaxy clustering in the Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Data. United Kingdom. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stab717
Wagoner, Erika L., Rozo, Eduardo, Fang, Xiao, Crocce, Martín, Elvin-Poole, Jack, Weaverdyck, Noah, and DES Collaboration). Wed . "Linear systematics mitigation in galaxy clustering in the Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Data". United Kingdom. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stab717.
@article{osti_1774983,
title = {Linear systematics mitigation in galaxy clustering in the Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Data},
author = {Wagoner, Erika L. and Rozo, Eduardo and Fang, Xiao and Crocce, Martín and Elvin-Poole, Jack and Weaverdyck, Noah and DES Collaboration)},
abstractNote = {ABSTRACT We implement a linear model for mitigating the effect of observing conditions and other sources of contamination in galaxy clustering analyses. Our treatment improves upon the fiducial systematics treatment of the Dark Energy Survey (DES) Year 1 (Y1) cosmology analysis in four crucial ways. Specifically, our treatment (1) does not require decisions as to which observable systematics are significant and which are not, allowing for the possibility of multiple maps adding coherently to give rise to significant bias even if no single map leads to a significant bias by itself, (2) characterizes both the statistical and systematic uncertainty in our mitigation procedure, allowing us to propagate said uncertainties into the reported cosmological constraints, (3) explicitly exploits the full spatial structure of the galaxy density field to differentiate between cosmology-sourced and systematics-sourced fluctuations within the galaxy density field, and (4) is fully automated, and can therefore be trivially applied to any data set. The updated correlation function for the DES Y1 redMaGiC catalogue minimally impacts the cosmological posteriors from that analysis. Encouragingly, our analysis does improve the goodness-of-fit statistic of the DES Y1 3 × 2pt data set (Δχ2 = −6.5 with no additional parameters). This improvement is due in nearly equal parts to both the change in the correlation function and the added statistical and systematic uncertainties associated with our method. We expect the difference in mitigation techniques to become more important in future work as the size of cosmological data sets grows.},
doi = {10.1093/mnras/stab717},
journal = {Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society},
number = 3,
volume = 503,
place = {United Kingdom},
year = {Wed Mar 10 00:00:00 EST 2021},
month = {Wed Mar 10 00:00:00 EST 2021}
}

Journal Article:
Free Publicly Available Full Text
Publisher's Version of Record
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stab717

Save / Share:

Works referenced in this record:

Astropy: A community Python package for astronomy
journal, September 2013


The Dark Energy Survey: more than dark energy – an overview
journal, March 2016

  • Abbott, T.; Abdalla, F. B.; Aleksic, J.
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 460, Issue 2, p. 1270-1299
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stw641

The Hyper Suprime-Cam SSP Survey: Overview and survey design
journal, September 2017

  • Aihara, Hiroaki; Arimoto, Nobuo; Armstrong, Robert
  • Publications of the Astronomical Society of Japan, Vol. 70, Issue SP1
  • DOI: 10.1093/pasj/psx066

Galaxy halo masses and satellite fractions from galaxy-galaxy lensing in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey: stellar mass, luminosity, morphology and environment dependencies
journal, May 2006


The Sloan Digital Sky Survey: Technical Summary
journal, September 2000

  • York, Donald G.; Adelman, J.; Anderson, Jr., John E.
  • The Astronomical Journal, Vol. 120, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1086/301513

KiDS-450 + 2dFLenS: Cosmological parameter constraints from weak gravitational lensing tomography and overlapping redshift-space galaxy clustering
journal, October 2017

  • Joudaki, Shahab; Blake, Chris; Johnson, Andrew
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 474, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stx2820

Cosmological parameter constraints from galaxy–galaxy lensing and galaxy clustering with the SDSS DR7
journal, April 2013

  • Mandelbaum, Rachel; Slosar, Anže; Baldauf, Tobias
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 432, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stt572

The Astropy Project: Building an Open-science Project and Status of the v2.0 Core Package
journal, August 2018

  • Price-Whelan, A. M.; Sipőcz, B. M.; Günther, H. M.
  • The Astronomical Journal, Vol. 156, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.3847/1538-3881/aabc4f

Introduction to the CFHT Legacy Survey final release (CFHTLS T0007)
conference, September 2012

  • Cuillandre, Jean-Charles J.; Withington, Kanoa; Hudelot, Patrick
  • SPIE Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation, SPIE Proceedings
  • DOI: 10.1117/12.925584

Unbiased methods for removing systematics from galaxy clustering measurements
journal, December 2015

  • Elsner, Franz; Leistedt, Boris; Peiris, Hiranya V.
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 456, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stv2777

No galaxy left behind: accurate measurements with the faintest objects in the Dark Energy Survey
journal, January 2016

  • Suchyta, E.; Huff, E. M.; Aleksić, J.
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 457, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stv2953

The WiggleZ Dark Energy Survey: survey design and first data release
journal, January 2010

  • Drinkwater, Michael J.; Jurek, Russell J.; Blake, Chris
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 401, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15754.x

Clustering of Sloan Digital sky Survey iii Photometric Luminous Galaxies: the Measurement, Systematics, and Cosmological Implications
journal, November 2012


Efficient Computation of Cosmic Microwave Background Anisotropies in Closed Friedmann‐Robertson‐Walker Models
journal, August 2000

  • Lewis, Antony; Challinor, Anthony; Lasenby, Anthony
  • The Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 538, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1086/309179

Probing the Universe with Weak Lensing
journal, September 1999


Dark Energy Survey year 1 results: Cosmological constraints from galaxy clustering and weak lensing
journal, August 2018


The SDSS-IV eBOSS: emission line galaxy catalogues at z ≈ 0.8 and study of systematic errors in the angular clustering
journal, October 2016

  • Delubac, T.; Raichoor, A.; Comparat, J.
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 465, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stw2741

Improving galaxy clustering measurements with deep learning: analysis of the DECaLS DR7 data
journal, May 2020

  • Rezaie, Mehdi; Seo, Hee-Jong; Ross, Ashley J.
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 495, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/staa1231

Interpolation, realization, and reconstruction of noisy, irregularly sampled data
journal, October 1992

  • Rybicki, George B.; Press, William H.
  • The Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 398
  • DOI: 10.1086/171845

Stable clustering, the halo model and non-linear cosmological power spectra
journal, June 2003


The weak Lensing Signal and the Clustering of boss Galaxies. ii. Astrophysical and Cosmological Constraints
journal, June 2015

  • More, Surhud; Miyatake, Hironao; Mandelbaum, Rachel
  • The Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 806, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/806/1/2

HEALPix: A Framework for High‐Resolution Discretization and Fast Analysis of Data Distributed on the Sphere
journal, April 2005

  • Gorski, K. M.; Hivon, E.; Banday, A. J.
  • The Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 622, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1086/427976

Revising the Halofit Model for the Nonlinear Matter Power Spectrum
journal, December 2012

  • Takahashi, Ryuichi; Sato, Masanori; Nishimichi, Takahiro
  • The Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 761, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/761/2/152

Tomographic galaxy clustering with the Subaru Hyper Suprime-Cam first year public data release
journal, March 2020

  • Nicola, Andrina; Alonso, David; Sánchez, Javier
  • Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, Vol. 2020, Issue 03
  • DOI: 10.1088/1475-7516/2020/03/044

KiDS+GAMA: cosmology constraints from a joint analysis of cosmic shear, galaxy–galaxy lensing, and angular clustering
journal, March 2018

  • van Uitert, Edo; Joachimi, Benjamin; Joudaki, Shahab
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 476, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/sty551

Ameliorating systematic uncertainties in the angular clustering of galaxies: a study using the SDSS-III: Ameliorating systematic uncertainties in w(θ)
journal, September 2011


The Galaxy-Mass Correlation Function Measured from Weak Lensing in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey
journal, May 2004

  • Sheldon, Erin S.; Johnston, David E.; Frieman, Joshua A.
  • The Astronomical Journal, Vol. 127, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.1086/383293

Increasing N eff with particles in thermal equilibrium with neutrinos
journal, December 2012

  • hm, Céline Bœ; Dolan, Matthew J.; McCabe, Christopher
  • Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, Vol. 2012, Issue 12
  • DOI: 10.1088/1475-7516/2012/12/027

LSST: From Science Drivers to Reference Design and Anticipated Data Products
journal, March 2019

  • Ivezić, Željko; Kahn, Steven M.; Tyson, J. Anthony
  • The Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 873, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab042c

Planck 2013 results. XI. All-sky model of thermal dust emission
journal, October 2014


Weak Gravitational Lensing by Large-Scale Structure
journal, September 2003


The Sdss-Iv Extended Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: Luminous red Galaxy Target Selection
journal, June 2016

  • Prakash, Abhishek; Licquia, Timothy C.; Newman, Jeffrey A.
  • The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, Vol. 224, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.3847/0067-0049/224/2/34

emcee : The MCMC Hammer
journal, March 2013

  • Foreman-Mackey, Daniel; Hogg, David W.; Lang, Dustin
  • Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, Vol. 125, Issue 925
  • DOI: 10.1086/670067

healpy: equal area pixelization and spherical harmonics transforms for data on the sphere in Python
journal, March 2019

  • Zonca, Andrea; Singer, Leo; Lenz, Daniel
  • Journal of Open Source Software, Vol. 4, Issue 35
  • DOI: 10.21105/joss.01298

2D-FFTLog: efficient computation of real-space covariance matrices for galaxy clustering and weak lensing
journal, June 2020

  • Fang (方啸), Xiao; Eifler, Tim; Krause, Elisabeth
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 497, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/staa1726

Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: The Photometric Data Set for Cosmology
journal, April 2018

  • Drlica-Wagner, A.; Sevilla-Noarbe, I.; Rykoff, E. S.
  • The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, Vol. 235, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.3847/1538-4365/aab4f5

CosmoSIS: Modular cosmological parameter estimation
journal, September 2015


KiDS-450: cosmological parameter constraints from tomographic weak gravitational lensing
journal, November 2016

  • Hildebrandt, H.; Viola, M.; Heymans, C.
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 465, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stw2805

cosmolike – cosmological likelihood analyses for photometric galaxy surveys
journal, May 2017

  • Krause, Elisabeth; Eifler, Tim
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 470, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stx1261

Extragalactic Imprints in Galactic Dust Maps
journal, January 2019


Dark Energy Survey year 1 results: Galaxy clustering for combined probes
journal, August 2018


The skewness of the aperture mass statistic
journal, July 2004


Bias and variance of angular correlation functions
journal, July 1993

  • Landy, Stephen D.; Szalay, Alexander S.
  • The Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 412
  • DOI: 10.1086/172900

Why your model parameter confidences might be too optimistic. Unbiased estimation of the inverse covariance matrix
journal, December 2006


Mitigating contamination in LSS surveys: a comparison of methods
journal, March 2021

  • Weaverdyck, Noah; Huterer, Dragan
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stab709

An Ultra Fast Image Generator (UFig) for wide-field astronomy
journal, February 2013


Blinded challenge for precision cosmology with large-scale structure: Results from effective field theory for the redshift-space galaxy power spectrum
journal, December 2020