DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Process design tools and techno-economic analysis for capacitive deionization

Abstract

Capacitive deionization (CDI) devices use cyclical electrosorption on porous electrode surfaces to achieve water desalination. Process modeling and design of CDI systems requires accurate treatment of the coupling among input electrical forcing, input flow rates, and system responses including salt removal dynamics, water recovery, energy storage, and dissipation. Techno-economic analyses of CDI further require a method to calculate and compare between a produced commodity (e.g. desalted water) versus capital and operational costs of the system. In this work, we demonstrate a new modeling and analysis tool for CDI developed as an installable Matlab program that allows direct numerical simulation of CDI dynamics and calculation of key performance and cost parameters. The program is provided for free and is used to run open-source Simulink models. The Simulink environment sends information to the program and allows for a drag and drop design space where users can connect CDI cells to relevant periphery blocks such as grid energy, battery, solar panel, waste disposal, and maintenance/labor cost streams. The program allows for simulation of arbitrary current forcing and arbitrary flow rate forcing of one or more CDI cells. We employ validated well-mixed reactor formulations together with a non-linear circuit model formulation that can accommodatemore » a variety of electric double layer sub-models (e.g. for charge efficiency). The program includes a graphical user interface (GUI) to specify CDI plant parameters, specify operating conditions, run individual tests or parameter batch-mode simulations, and plot relevant results. The techno-economic models convert among dimensional streams of species (e.g. feed, desalted water, and brine), energy, and cost and enable a variety of economic estimates including levelized water costs.« less

Authors:
 [1];  [1];  [1];  [2];  [1]
  1. Stanford Univ., CA (United States)
  2. Lawrence Livermore National Lab. (LLNL), Livermore, CA (United States)
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Lawrence Livermore National Lab. (LLNL), Livermore, CA (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)
OSTI Identifier:
1772305
Alternate Identifier(s):
OSTI ID: 1809461
Report Number(s):
LLNL-JRNL-820659
Journal ID: ISSN 0043-1354; 1031980
Grant/Contract Number:  
AC52-07NA27344
Resource Type:
Accepted Manuscript
Journal Name:
Water Research
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Volume: 183; Journal ID: ISSN 0043-1354
Publisher:
Elsevier
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
42 ENGINEERING; water desalination; capacitive deionization; process design tool; variable flow; electrode aging; techno-economic analysis

Citation Formats

Hasseler, Tristan D., Ramachandran, Ashwin, Tarpeh, William A., Stadermann, Michael, and Santiago, Juan G. Process design tools and techno-economic analysis for capacitive deionization. United States: N. p., 2020. Web. doi:10.1016/j.watres.2020.116034.
Hasseler, Tristan D., Ramachandran, Ashwin, Tarpeh, William A., Stadermann, Michael, & Santiago, Juan G. Process design tools and techno-economic analysis for capacitive deionization. United States. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2020.116034
Hasseler, Tristan D., Ramachandran, Ashwin, Tarpeh, William A., Stadermann, Michael, and Santiago, Juan G. Sat . "Process design tools and techno-economic analysis for capacitive deionization". United States. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2020.116034. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1772305.
@article{osti_1772305,
title = {Process design tools and techno-economic analysis for capacitive deionization},
author = {Hasseler, Tristan D. and Ramachandran, Ashwin and Tarpeh, William A. and Stadermann, Michael and Santiago, Juan G.},
abstractNote = {Capacitive deionization (CDI) devices use cyclical electrosorption on porous electrode surfaces to achieve water desalination. Process modeling and design of CDI systems requires accurate treatment of the coupling among input electrical forcing, input flow rates, and system responses including salt removal dynamics, water recovery, energy storage, and dissipation. Techno-economic analyses of CDI further require a method to calculate and compare between a produced commodity (e.g. desalted water) versus capital and operational costs of the system. In this work, we demonstrate a new modeling and analysis tool for CDI developed as an installable Matlab program that allows direct numerical simulation of CDI dynamics and calculation of key performance and cost parameters. The program is provided for free and is used to run open-source Simulink models. The Simulink environment sends information to the program and allows for a drag and drop design space where users can connect CDI cells to relevant periphery blocks such as grid energy, battery, solar panel, waste disposal, and maintenance/labor cost streams. The program allows for simulation of arbitrary current forcing and arbitrary flow rate forcing of one or more CDI cells. We employ validated well-mixed reactor formulations together with a non-linear circuit model formulation that can accommodate a variety of electric double layer sub-models (e.g. for charge efficiency). The program includes a graphical user interface (GUI) to specify CDI plant parameters, specify operating conditions, run individual tests or parameter batch-mode simulations, and plot relevant results. The techno-economic models convert among dimensional streams of species (e.g. feed, desalted water, and brine), energy, and cost and enable a variety of economic estimates including levelized water costs.},
doi = {10.1016/j.watres.2020.116034},
journal = {Water Research},
number = ,
volume = 183,
place = {United States},
year = {Sat Jun 20 00:00:00 EDT 2020},
month = {Sat Jun 20 00:00:00 EDT 2020}
}

Works referenced in this record:

Cost effective electrodialytic seawater desalination
journal, February 2003


Pathways to low-cost electrochemical energy storage: a comparison of aqueous and nonaqueous flow batteries
journal, January 2014

  • Darling, Robert M.; Gallagher, Kevin G.; Kowalski, Jeffrey A.
  • Energy & Environmental Science, Vol. 7, Issue 11, p. 3459-3477
  • DOI: 10.1039/C4EE02158D

A review of reverse osmosis membrane materials for desalination—Development to date and future potential
journal, March 2011


Optimization of the voltage window for long-term capacitive deionization stability
journal, December 2017


Global Sensitivity Analysis To Characterize Operational Limits and Prioritize Performance Goals of Capacitive Deionization Technologies
journal, March 2019

  • Hand, Steven; Shang, Xia; Guest, Jeremy S.
  • Environmental Science & Technology, Vol. 53, Issue 7
  • DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.8b06709

Energy transfer for storage or recovery in capacitive deionization using a DC-DC converter
journal, February 2020


Life cycle assessment of environmental impacts and energy demand for capacitive deionization technology
journal, December 2016


Water desalination via capacitive deionization: what is it and what can we expect from it?
journal, January 2015

  • Suss, M. E.; Porada, S.; Sun, X.
  • Energy & Environmental Science, Vol. 8, Issue 8
  • DOI: 10.1039/C5EE00519A

Theory of membrane capacitive deionization including the effect of the electrode pore space
journal, August 2011

  • Biesheuvel, P. M.; Zhao, R.; Porada, S.
  • Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, Vol. 360, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2011.04.049

Adsorption and capacitive regeneration of nitrate using inverted capacitive deionization with surfactant functionalized carbon electrodes
journal, April 2018


Understanding and mitigating performance decline in electrochemical deionization
journal, September 2019


The Economics of Desalination: Economics
journal, December 2005


Energy consumption analysis of constant voltage and constant current operations in capacitive deionization
journal, December 2016


Cost Optimization of Osmotically Assisted Reverse Osmosis
journal, October 2018

  • Bartholomew, Timothy V.; Siefert, Nicholas S.; Mauter, Meagan S.
  • Environmental Science & Technology
  • DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.8b02771

Comments on “Comparison of energy consumption in desalination by capacitive deionization and reverse osmosis”
journal, July 2019


Frequency analysis and resonant operation for efficient capacitive deionization
journal, November 2018


Technoeconomic Analysis of Brackish Water Capacitive Deionization: Navigating Tradeoffs between Performance, Lifetime, and Material Costs
journal, October 2019

  • Hand, Steven; Guest, Jeremy S.; Cusick, Roland D.
  • Environmental Science & Technology, Vol. 53, Issue 22
  • DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.9b04347

Quantifying the flow efficiency in constant-current capacitive deionization
journal, February 2018


Self similarities in desalination dynamics and performance using capacitive deionization
journal, September 2018


Dynamic Adsorption/Desorption Process Model for Capacitive Deionization
journal, March 2009

  • Biesheuvel, P. M.; van Limpt, B.; van der Wal, A.
  • The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, Vol. 113, Issue 14
  • DOI: 10.1021/jp809644s

Performance metrics for the objective assessment of capacitive deionization systems
journal, April 2019


Design and economics of RO seawater desalination
journal, July 1996


Performance Loss of Activated Carbon Electrodes in Capacitive Deionization: Mechanisms and Material Property Predictors
journal, November 2020

  • Liu, Xitong; Shanbhag, Sneha; Natesakhawat, Sittichai
  • Environmental Science & Technology, Vol. 54, Issue 23
  • DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.0c06549

Multi-objective optimization of RO desalination plants
journal, March 2008


Techno-economic assessment and environmental impacts of desalination technologies
journal, January 2011


Energy consumption in capacitive deionization – Constant current versus constant voltage operation
journal, October 2018


Energy breakdown in capacitive deionization
journal, November 2016