DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Comparing light-front quantization with instant-time quantization

Abstract

Here in this paper we compare light-front quantization and instant-time quantization both at the level of operators and at the level of their Feynman diagram matrix elements. At the level of operators light-front quantization and instant-time quantization lead to equal light-front time commutation (or anticommutation) relations that appear to be quite different from equal instant-time commutation (or anticommutation) relations. Despite this we show that at unequal times instant-time and light-front commutation (or anticommutation) relations actually can be transformed into each other, with it only being the restriction to equal times that makes the commutation (or anticommutation) relations appear to be so different. While our results are valid for both bosons and fermions, for fermions there are subtleties associated with tip of the light cone contributions that need to be taken care of. At the level of Feynman diagrams we show for non-vacuum Feynman diagrams that the pole terms in four-dimensional light-front Feynman diagrams reproduce the widely used three-dimensional light-front on-shell Hamiltonian Fock space formulation in which the light-front energy and light-front momentum are on shell. Moreover, we show that the contributions of pole terms in non-vacuum instant-time and non-vacuum light-front Feynman diagrams are equal. However, because of circle at infinitymore » contributions we show that this equivalence of pole terms fails for four-dimensional light-front vacuum tadpole diagrams. Then, and precisely because of these circle at infinity contributions, we show that light-front vacuum tadpole diagrams are not only nonzero, they quite remarkably are actually equal to the pure pole term instant-time vacuum tadpole diagrams. Light-front vacuum diagrams are not correctly describable by the on-shell Hamiltonian formalism, and thus not by the closely related infinite momentum frame prescription either. Thus for the light-front vacuum sector we must use the off-shell Feynman formalism as it contains information that is not accessible in the on-shell Hamiltonian Fock space approach. We show that light-front quantization is intrinsically nonlocal, and that for fermions this nonlocality is present in Ward identities. One can project fermion spinors into so-called good and bad components, and both of these components contribute in Ward identities. Central to our analysis is that the transformation from instant-time coordinates and fields to light-front coordinates and fields is a unitary, spacetime-dependent translation. Consequently, not only are instant-time quantization and light-front quantization equivalent, because of general coordinate invariance they are unitarily equivalent.« less

Authors:
 [1]; ORCiD logo [2];  [3]
  1. Univ. of Connecticut, Storrs, CT (United States)
  2. Ecole Polytechnique, Palaiseau (France). Inst. Polytechnique de Paris
  3. SLAC National Accelerator Lab., Menlo Park, CA (United States); Stanford Univ., CA (United States)
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory (SLAC), Menlo Park, CA (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE Office of Science (SC), Basic Energy Sciences (BES); French National Research Agency (ANR)
OSTI Identifier:
1768218
Alternate Identifier(s):
OSTI ID: 1874408
Grant/Contract Number:  
AC02-76SF00515
Resource Type:
Accepted Manuscript
Journal Name:
Physics Reports
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Volume: 891; Journal ID: ISSN 0370-1573
Publisher:
Elsevier
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
71 CLASSICAL AND QUANTUM MECHANICS, GENERAL PHYSICS; Light-front quantization; Light-front vacuum diagrams

Citation Formats

Mannheim, Philip D., Lowdon, Peter, and Brodsky, Stanley J. Comparing light-front quantization with instant-time quantization. United States: N. p., 2020. Web. doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2020.09.001.
Mannheim, Philip D., Lowdon, Peter, & Brodsky, Stanley J. Comparing light-front quantization with instant-time quantization. United States. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2020.09.001
Mannheim, Philip D., Lowdon, Peter, and Brodsky, Stanley J. Thu . "Comparing light-front quantization with instant-time quantization". United States. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2020.09.001. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1768218.
@article{osti_1768218,
title = {Comparing light-front quantization with instant-time quantization},
author = {Mannheim, Philip D. and Lowdon, Peter and Brodsky, Stanley J.},
abstractNote = {Here in this paper we compare light-front quantization and instant-time quantization both at the level of operators and at the level of their Feynman diagram matrix elements. At the level of operators light-front quantization and instant-time quantization lead to equal light-front time commutation (or anticommutation) relations that appear to be quite different from equal instant-time commutation (or anticommutation) relations. Despite this we show that at unequal times instant-time and light-front commutation (or anticommutation) relations actually can be transformed into each other, with it only being the restriction to equal times that makes the commutation (or anticommutation) relations appear to be so different. While our results are valid for both bosons and fermions, for fermions there are subtleties associated with tip of the light cone contributions that need to be taken care of. At the level of Feynman diagrams we show for non-vacuum Feynman diagrams that the pole terms in four-dimensional light-front Feynman diagrams reproduce the widely used three-dimensional light-front on-shell Hamiltonian Fock space formulation in which the light-front energy and light-front momentum are on shell. Moreover, we show that the contributions of pole terms in non-vacuum instant-time and non-vacuum light-front Feynman diagrams are equal. However, because of circle at infinity contributions we show that this equivalence of pole terms fails for four-dimensional light-front vacuum tadpole diagrams. Then, and precisely because of these circle at infinity contributions, we show that light-front vacuum tadpole diagrams are not only nonzero, they quite remarkably are actually equal to the pure pole term instant-time vacuum tadpole diagrams. Light-front vacuum diagrams are not correctly describable by the on-shell Hamiltonian formalism, and thus not by the closely related infinite momentum frame prescription either. Thus for the light-front vacuum sector we must use the off-shell Feynman formalism as it contains information that is not accessible in the on-shell Hamiltonian Fock space approach. We show that light-front quantization is intrinsically nonlocal, and that for fermions this nonlocality is present in Ward identities. One can project fermion spinors into so-called good and bad components, and both of these components contribute in Ward identities. Central to our analysis is that the transformation from instant-time coordinates and fields to light-front coordinates and fields is a unitary, spacetime-dependent translation. Consequently, not only are instant-time quantization and light-front quantization equivalent, because of general coordinate invariance they are unitarily equivalent.},
doi = {10.1016/j.physrep.2020.09.001},
journal = {Physics Reports},
number = ,
volume = 891,
place = {United States},
year = {Thu Sep 17 00:00:00 EDT 2020},
month = {Thu Sep 17 00:00:00 EDT 2020}
}

Works referenced in this record:

Exclusive processes in perturbative quantum chromodynamics
journal, November 1980


Quantum chromodynamics and other field theories on the light cone
journal, August 1998


Mass generation, the cosmological constant problem, conformal symmetry, and the Higgs boson
journal, May 2017


Mathematical Formulation of the Quantum Theory of Electromagnetic Interaction
journal, November 1950


Light-front quantum chromodynamics
journal, June 2014


Quantum field theory off null planes
journal, February 1971

  • Neville, R. A.; Rohrlich, F.
  • Il Nuovo Cimento A, Vol. 1, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1007/BF02734389

Introduction to noncovariant gauges
journal, October 1987


Relativistic dynamics on a null plane
journal, May 1978


Structure of light-front vacuum sector diagrams
journal, October 2019


Quantum Electrodynamics. II. Vacuum Polarization and Self-Energy
journal, February 1949


Forms of Relativistic Dynamics
journal, July 1949


Feynman Rules and Quantum Electrodynamics at Infinite Momentum
journal, April 1969


Some Remarks on Null-Plane Quantization
journal, March 1976

  • Suzuki, T.; Tameike, S.; Yamada, E.
  • Progress of Theoretical Physics, Vol. 55, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1143/PTP.55.922

Light-Cone Quantization: Foundations and Applications
book, January 2001


The Use of the Proper Time in Quantum Electrodynamics I
journal, February 1950


Localisation in worldline pair production and lightfront zero-modes
journal, September 2014


Quantum Electrodynamics and Renormalization Theory in the Infinite-Momentum Frame
journal, December 1973

  • Brodsky, Stanley J.; Roskies, Ralph; Suaya, Roberto
  • Physical Review D, Vol. 8, Issue 12
  • DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.8.4574

Light-cone quantization for massless fields
journal, June 1988

  • McCartor, G.
  • Zeitschrift für Physik C Particles and Fields, Vol. 41, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1007/BF01566926

Light-front formulation of the standard model
journal, August 2002


Pair creation and axial anomaly in light-cone QED 2
journal, November 2001

  • Tomaras, Theodore N.; Tsamis, Nick C.; Woodard, Richard. P.
  • Journal of High Energy Physics, Vol. 2001, Issue 11
  • DOI: 10.1088/1126-6708/2001/11/008

Light-front view of the axial anomaly
journal, May 1996


Some remarks on the “null plane development” of a relativistic quantum field theory
journal, March 1972

  • Schlieder, S.; Seiler, E.
  • Communications in Mathematical Physics, Vol. 25, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1007/BF01877587

Introduction to Majorana masses
journal, July 1984

  • Mannheim, Philip D.
  • International Journal of Theoretical Physics, Vol. 23, Issue 7
  • DOI: 10.1007/BF02214135

Classical spin and its quantization
journal, August 1985


Exclusive processes in quantum chromodynamics: Evolution equations for hadronic wavefunctions and the form factors of mesons
journal, November 1979


Antilinearity rather than Hermiticity as a guiding principle for quantum theory
journal, June 2018

  • Mannheim, Philip D.
  • Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical, Vol. 51, Issue 31
  • DOI: 10.1088/1751-8121/aac035

Alternatives to dark matter and dark energy
journal, April 2006


Light-cone gauge in Yang-Mills theory
journal, April 1984


Quantum Field Theories in the Infinite-Momentum Frame. I. Quantization of Scalar and Dirac Fields
journal, February 1973


Light-cone superspace and the ultraviolet finiteness of the N=4 model
journal, March 1983


Dynamics at Infinite Momentum
journal, October 1966


Works referencing / citing this record:

Distribution amplitudes of light diquarks
journal, April 2021