Comparing light-front quantization with instant-time quantization
Abstract
Here in this paper we compare light-front quantization and instant-time quantization both at the level of operators and at the level of their Feynman diagram matrix elements. At the level of operators light-front quantization and instant-time quantization lead to equal light-front time commutation (or anticommutation) relations that appear to be quite different from equal instant-time commutation (or anticommutation) relations. Despite this we show that at unequal times instant-time and light-front commutation (or anticommutation) relations actually can be transformed into each other, with it only being the restriction to equal times that makes the commutation (or anticommutation) relations appear to be so different. While our results are valid for both bosons and fermions, for fermions there are subtleties associated with tip of the light cone contributions that need to be taken care of. At the level of Feynman diagrams we show for non-vacuum Feynman diagrams that the pole terms in four-dimensional light-front Feynman diagrams reproduce the widely used three-dimensional light-front on-shell Hamiltonian Fock space formulation in which the light-front energy and light-front momentum are on shell. Moreover, we show that the contributions of pole terms in non-vacuum instant-time and non-vacuum light-front Feynman diagrams are equal. However, because of circle at infinitymore »
- Authors:
-
- Univ. of Connecticut, Storrs, CT (United States)
- Ecole Polytechnique, Palaiseau (France). Inst. Polytechnique de Paris
- SLAC National Accelerator Lab., Menlo Park, CA (United States); Stanford Univ., CA (United States)
- Publication Date:
- Research Org.:
- SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory (SLAC), Menlo Park, CA (United States)
- Sponsoring Org.:
- USDOE Office of Science (SC), Basic Energy Sciences (BES); French National Research Agency (ANR)
- OSTI Identifier:
- 1768218
- Alternate Identifier(s):
- OSTI ID: 1874408
- Grant/Contract Number:
- AC02-76SF00515
- Resource Type:
- Accepted Manuscript
- Journal Name:
- Physics Reports
- Additional Journal Information:
- Journal Volume: 891; Journal ID: ISSN 0370-1573
- Publisher:
- Elsevier
- Country of Publication:
- United States
- Language:
- English
- Subject:
- 71 CLASSICAL AND QUANTUM MECHANICS, GENERAL PHYSICS; Light-front quantization; Light-front vacuum diagrams
Citation Formats
Mannheim, Philip D., Lowdon, Peter, and Brodsky, Stanley J. Comparing light-front quantization with instant-time quantization. United States: N. p., 2020.
Web. doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2020.09.001.
Mannheim, Philip D., Lowdon, Peter, & Brodsky, Stanley J. Comparing light-front quantization with instant-time quantization. United States. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2020.09.001
Mannheim, Philip D., Lowdon, Peter, and Brodsky, Stanley J. Thu .
"Comparing light-front quantization with instant-time quantization". United States. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2020.09.001. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1768218.
@article{osti_1768218,
title = {Comparing light-front quantization with instant-time quantization},
author = {Mannheim, Philip D. and Lowdon, Peter and Brodsky, Stanley J.},
abstractNote = {Here in this paper we compare light-front quantization and instant-time quantization both at the level of operators and at the level of their Feynman diagram matrix elements. At the level of operators light-front quantization and instant-time quantization lead to equal light-front time commutation (or anticommutation) relations that appear to be quite different from equal instant-time commutation (or anticommutation) relations. Despite this we show that at unequal times instant-time and light-front commutation (or anticommutation) relations actually can be transformed into each other, with it only being the restriction to equal times that makes the commutation (or anticommutation) relations appear to be so different. While our results are valid for both bosons and fermions, for fermions there are subtleties associated with tip of the light cone contributions that need to be taken care of. At the level of Feynman diagrams we show for non-vacuum Feynman diagrams that the pole terms in four-dimensional light-front Feynman diagrams reproduce the widely used three-dimensional light-front on-shell Hamiltonian Fock space formulation in which the light-front energy and light-front momentum are on shell. Moreover, we show that the contributions of pole terms in non-vacuum instant-time and non-vacuum light-front Feynman diagrams are equal. However, because of circle at infinity contributions we show that this equivalence of pole terms fails for four-dimensional light-front vacuum tadpole diagrams. Then, and precisely because of these circle at infinity contributions, we show that light-front vacuum tadpole diagrams are not only nonzero, they quite remarkably are actually equal to the pure pole term instant-time vacuum tadpole diagrams. Light-front vacuum diagrams are not correctly describable by the on-shell Hamiltonian formalism, and thus not by the closely related infinite momentum frame prescription either. Thus for the light-front vacuum sector we must use the off-shell Feynman formalism as it contains information that is not accessible in the on-shell Hamiltonian Fock space approach. We show that light-front quantization is intrinsically nonlocal, and that for fermions this nonlocality is present in Ward identities. One can project fermion spinors into so-called good and bad components, and both of these components contribute in Ward identities. Central to our analysis is that the transformation from instant-time coordinates and fields to light-front coordinates and fields is a unitary, spacetime-dependent translation. Consequently, not only are instant-time quantization and light-front quantization equivalent, because of general coordinate invariance they are unitarily equivalent.},
doi = {10.1016/j.physrep.2020.09.001},
journal = {Physics Reports},
number = ,
volume = 891,
place = {United States},
year = {Thu Sep 17 00:00:00 EDT 2020},
month = {Thu Sep 17 00:00:00 EDT 2020}
}
Works referenced in this record:
Exclusive processes in perturbative quantum chromodynamics
journal, November 1980
- Lepage, G. Peter; Brodsky, Stanley J.
- Physical Review D, Vol. 22, Issue 9
Quantum chromodynamics and other field theories on the light cone
journal, August 1998
- Brodsky, S.
- Physics Reports, Vol. 301, Issue 4-6
Mass generation, the cosmological constant problem, conformal symmetry, and the Higgs boson
journal, May 2017
- Mannheim, Philip D.
- Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics, Vol. 94
Mathematical Formulation of the Quantum Theory of Electromagnetic Interaction
journal, November 1950
- Feynman, R. P.
- Physical Review, Vol. 80, Issue 3
Light-front quantum chromodynamics
journal, June 2014
- Bakker, B. L. G.; Bassetto, A.; Brodsky, S. J.
- Nuclear Physics B - Proceedings Supplements, Vol. 251-252
Quantum field theory off null planes
journal, February 1971
- Neville, R. A.; Rohrlich, F.
- Il Nuovo Cimento A, Vol. 1, Issue 4
Introduction to noncovariant gauges
journal, October 1987
- Leibbrandt, George
- Reviews of Modern Physics, Vol. 59, Issue 4
Relativistic dynamics on a null plane
journal, May 1978
- Leutwyler, H.; Stern, J.
- Annals of Physics, Vol. 112, Issue 1
Structure of light-front vacuum sector diagrams
journal, October 2019
- Mannheim, Philip D.; Lowdon, Peter; Brodsky, Stanley J.
- Physics Letters B, Vol. 797
Quantum Electrodynamics. II. Vacuum Polarization and Self-Energy
journal, February 1949
- Schwinger, Julian
- Physical Review, Vol. 75, Issue 4
Quantum Field Theories in the Infinite-Momentum Frame. IV. Scattering Matrix of Vector and Dirac Fields and Perturbation Theory
journal, March 1973
- Yan, Tung-Mow
- Physical Review D, Vol. 7, Issue 6
Forms of Relativistic Dynamics
journal, July 1949
- Dirac, P. A. M.
- Reviews of Modern Physics, Vol. 21, Issue 3
Feynman Rules and Quantum Electrodynamics at Infinite Momentum
journal, April 1969
- Chang, Shau-Jin; Ma, Shang-Keng
- Physical Review, Vol. 180, Issue 5
Some Remarks on Null-Plane Quantization
journal, March 1976
- Suzuki, T.; Tameike, S.; Yamada, E.
- Progress of Theoretical Physics, Vol. 55, Issue 3
Light-Cone Quantization: Foundations and Applications
book, January 2001
- Heinzl, Thomas; Beig, R.; Ehlers, J.
- Methods of Quantization, p. 55-142
The Use of the Proper Time in Quantum Electrodynamics I
journal, February 1950
- Nambu, Y.
- Progress of Theoretical Physics, Vol. 5, Issue 1
Localisation in worldline pair production and lightfront zero-modes
journal, September 2014
- Ilderton, Anton
- Journal of High Energy Physics, Vol. 2014, Issue 9
Quantum Electrodynamics and Renormalization Theory in the Infinite-Momentum Frame
journal, December 1973
- Brodsky, Stanley J.; Roskies, Ralph; Suaya, Roberto
- Physical Review D, Vol. 8, Issue 12
Light-cone quantization for massless fields
journal, June 1988
- McCartor, G.
- Zeitschrift für Physik C Particles and Fields, Vol. 41, Issue 2
Light-front formulation of the standard model
journal, August 2002
- Srivastava, Prem P.; Brodsky, Stanley J.
- Physical Review D, Vol. 66, Issue 4
Pair creation and axial anomaly in light-cone QED 2
journal, November 2001
- Tomaras, Theodore N.; Tsamis, Nick C.; Woodard, Richard. P.
- Journal of High Energy Physics, Vol. 2001, Issue 11
Light-front view of the axial anomaly
journal, May 1996
- Ji, Chueng-Ryong; Rey, Soo-Jong
- Physical Review D, Vol. 53, Issue 10
Some remarks on the “null plane development” of a relativistic quantum field theory
journal, March 1972
- Schlieder, S.; Seiler, E.
- Communications in Mathematical Physics, Vol. 25, Issue 1
Introduction to Majorana masses
journal, July 1984
- Mannheim, Philip D.
- International Journal of Theoretical Physics, Vol. 23, Issue 7
Classical spin and its quantization
journal, August 1985
- Mannheim, Philip D.
- Physical Review D, Vol. 32, Issue 4
Exclusive processes in quantum chromodynamics: Evolution equations for hadronic wavefunctions and the form factors of mesons
journal, November 1979
- Peter Lepage, G.; Brodsky, Stanley J.
- Physics Letters B, Vol. 87, Issue 4
Antilinearity rather than Hermiticity as a guiding principle for quantum theory
journal, June 2018
- Mannheim, Philip D.
- Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical, Vol. 51, Issue 31
Alternatives to dark matter and dark energy
journal, April 2006
- Mannheim, P.
- Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics, Vol. 56, Issue 2
Light-cone gauge in Yang-Mills theory
journal, April 1984
- Leibbrandt, George
- Physical Review D, Vol. 29, Issue 8
Quantum Field Theories in the Infinite-Momentum Frame. I. Quantization of Scalar and Dirac Fields
journal, February 1973
- Chang, Shau-Jin; Root, Robert G.; Yan, Tung-Mow
- Physical Review D, Vol. 7, Issue 4
Light-cone superspace and the ultraviolet finiteness of the N=4 model
journal, March 1983
- Mandelstam, Stanley
- Nuclear Physics B, Vol. 213, Issue 1
Dynamics at Infinite Momentum
journal, October 1966
- Weinberg, Steven
- Physical Review, Vol. 150, Issue 4
Works referencing / citing this record:
Distribution amplitudes of light diquarks
journal, April 2021
- Lu, Ya; Binosi, Daniele; Ding, Minghui
- The European Physical Journal A, Vol. 57, Issue 4