DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Rational design and testing of abiotic stress‐inducible synthetic promoters from poplar cis ‐regulatory elements

Abstract

Abiotic stress resistance traits may be especially crucial for sustainable production of bioenergy tree crops. Here, we show the performance of a set of rationally designed osmotic-related and salt stress-inducible synthetic promoters for use in hybrid poplar. De novo motif-detecting algorithms yielded 30 water-deficit (SD) and 34 salt stress (SS) candidate DNA motifs from relevant poplar transcriptomes. We selected three conserved water-deficit stress motifs (SD18, SD13 and SD9) found in 16 co-expressed gene promoters, and we discovered a well-conserved motif for salt response (SS16). We characterized several native poplar stress-inducible promoters to enable comparisons with our synthetic promoters. Fifteen synthetic promoters were designed using various SD and SS subdomains, in which heptameric repeats of five-to-eight subdomain bases were fused to a common core promoter downstream, which, in turn, drove a green fluorescent protein (GFP) gene for reporter assays. These 15 synthetic promoters were screened by transient expression assays in poplar leaf mesophyll protoplasts and agroinfiltrated Nicotiana benthamiana leaves under osmotic stress conditions. Twelve synthetic promoters were induced in transient expression assays with a GFP readout. Of these, five promoters (SD18-1, SD9-2, SS16-1, SS16-2 and SS16-3) endowed higher inducibility under osmotic stress conditions than native promoters. These five synthetic promoters weremore » stably transformed into Arabidopsis thaliana to study inducibility in whole plants. Herein, SD18-1 and SD9-2 were induced by water-deficit stress, whereas SS16-1, SS16-2 and SS16-3 were induced by salt stress. The synthetic biology design pipeline resulted in five synthetic promoters that outperformed endogenous promoters in transgenic plants.« less

Authors:
ORCiD logo [1]; ORCiD logo [2];  [1];  [1]; ORCiD logo [3];  [4];  [5];  [6]; ORCiD logo [1]
  1. Center for Agricultural Synthetic Biology University of Tennessee Institute of Agriculture Knoxville TN USA, Department of Plant Sciences University of Tennessee Knoxville TN USA
  2. Center for Agricultural Synthetic Biology University of Tennessee Institute of Agriculture Knoxville TN USA, Department of Plant Sciences University of Tennessee Knoxville TN USA, Biosciences Division Oak Ridge National Laboratory Oak Ridge TN USA
  3. Department of Plant Sciences University of Tennessee Knoxville TN USA, Department of Horticultural Science North Carolina State University Raleigh NC USA
  4. Center for Agricultural Synthetic Biology University of Tennessee Institute of Agriculture Knoxville TN USA, Department of Food Science University of Tennessee Knoxville TN USA
  5. Environmental Molecular Sciences Laboratory (EMSL) Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) Richland WA USA
  6. Department of Plant Sciences University of California Davis CA USA
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL), Oak Ridge, TN (United States); Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL), Richland, WA (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE; USDOE Office of Science (SC), Biological and Environmental Research (BER). Earth and Environmental Systems Science Division
OSTI Identifier:
1765044
Alternate Identifier(s):
OSTI ID: 1787091; OSTI ID: 1787965; OSTI ID: 1814270; OSTI ID: 1842822
Report Number(s):
PNNL-SA-160913
Journal ID: ISSN 1467-7644
Grant/Contract Number:  
DE‐SC0018347; AC05-00OR22725; SC0018347; AC05-76RL01830
Resource Type:
Published Article
Journal Name:
Plant Biotechnology Journal
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Name: Plant Biotechnology Journal Journal Volume: 19 Journal Issue: 7; Journal ID: ISSN 1467-7644
Publisher:
Wiley-Blackwell
Country of Publication:
United Kingdom
Language:
English
Subject:
59 BASIC BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES; 09 BIOMASS FUELS; synthetic biology; synthetic promoters; de novo motif analysis; computational design; abiotic stress; cis-regulatory elements; poplar; bioenergy

Citation Formats

Yang, Yongil, Lee, Jun Hyung, Poindexter, Magen R., Shao, Yuanhua, Liu, Wusheng, Lenaghan, Scott C., Ahkami, Amir H., Blumwald, Eduardo, and Stewart, Jr, Charles Neal. Rational design and testing of abiotic stress‐inducible synthetic promoters from poplar cis ‐regulatory elements. United Kingdom: N. p., 2021. Web. doi:10.1111/pbi.13550.
Yang, Yongil, Lee, Jun Hyung, Poindexter, Magen R., Shao, Yuanhua, Liu, Wusheng, Lenaghan, Scott C., Ahkami, Amir H., Blumwald, Eduardo, & Stewart, Jr, Charles Neal. Rational design and testing of abiotic stress‐inducible synthetic promoters from poplar cis ‐regulatory elements. United Kingdom. https://doi.org/10.1111/pbi.13550
Yang, Yongil, Lee, Jun Hyung, Poindexter, Magen R., Shao, Yuanhua, Liu, Wusheng, Lenaghan, Scott C., Ahkami, Amir H., Blumwald, Eduardo, and Stewart, Jr, Charles Neal. Mon . "Rational design and testing of abiotic stress‐inducible synthetic promoters from poplar cis ‐regulatory elements". United Kingdom. https://doi.org/10.1111/pbi.13550.
@article{osti_1765044,
title = {Rational design and testing of abiotic stress‐inducible synthetic promoters from poplar cis ‐regulatory elements},
author = {Yang, Yongil and Lee, Jun Hyung and Poindexter, Magen R. and Shao, Yuanhua and Liu, Wusheng and Lenaghan, Scott C. and Ahkami, Amir H. and Blumwald, Eduardo and Stewart, Jr, Charles Neal},
abstractNote = {Abiotic stress resistance traits may be especially crucial for sustainable production of bioenergy tree crops. Here, we show the performance of a set of rationally designed osmotic-related and salt stress-inducible synthetic promoters for use in hybrid poplar. De novo motif-detecting algorithms yielded 30 water-deficit (SD) and 34 salt stress (SS) candidate DNA motifs from relevant poplar transcriptomes. We selected three conserved water-deficit stress motifs (SD18, SD13 and SD9) found in 16 co-expressed gene promoters, and we discovered a well-conserved motif for salt response (SS16). We characterized several native poplar stress-inducible promoters to enable comparisons with our synthetic promoters. Fifteen synthetic promoters were designed using various SD and SS subdomains, in which heptameric repeats of five-to-eight subdomain bases were fused to a common core promoter downstream, which, in turn, drove a green fluorescent protein (GFP) gene for reporter assays. These 15 synthetic promoters were screened by transient expression assays in poplar leaf mesophyll protoplasts and agroinfiltrated Nicotiana benthamiana leaves under osmotic stress conditions. Twelve synthetic promoters were induced in transient expression assays with a GFP readout. Of these, five promoters (SD18-1, SD9-2, SS16-1, SS16-2 and SS16-3) endowed higher inducibility under osmotic stress conditions than native promoters. These five synthetic promoters were stably transformed into Arabidopsis thaliana to study inducibility in whole plants. Herein, SD18-1 and SD9-2 were induced by water-deficit stress, whereas SS16-1, SS16-2 and SS16-3 were induced by salt stress. The synthetic biology design pipeline resulted in five synthetic promoters that outperformed endogenous promoters in transgenic plants.},
doi = {10.1111/pbi.13550},
journal = {Plant Biotechnology Journal},
number = 7,
volume = 19,
place = {United Kingdom},
year = {Mon Feb 08 00:00:00 EST 2021},
month = {Mon Feb 08 00:00:00 EST 2021}
}

Journal Article:
Free Publicly Available Full Text
Publisher's Version of Record
https://doi.org/10.1111/pbi.13550

Save / Share:

Works referenced in this record:

Whole-genome draft assembly of Populus tremula x P. alba clone INRA 717-1B4
journal, December 2016

  • Mader, Malte; Le Paslier, Marie-Christine; Bounon, Rémi
  • Silvae Genetica, Vol. 65, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1515/sg-2016-0019

A Golden Gate Modular Cloning Toolbox for Plants
journal, February 2014

  • Engler, Carola; Youles, Mark; Gruetzner, Ramona
  • ACS Synthetic Biology, Vol. 3, Issue 11
  • DOI: 10.1021/sb4001504

Comparative analysis of synthetic DNA promoters for high-level gene expression in plants
journal, August 2014


Integration of Bioinformatics and Synthetic Promoters Leads to the Discovery of Novel Elicitor-Responsive cis-Regulatory Sequences in Arabidopsis
journal, June 2012

  • Koschmann, Jeannette; Machens, Fabian; Becker, Marlies
  • Plant Physiology, Vol. 160, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1104/pp.112.198259

CaMV-35S promoter sequence-specific DNA methylation in lettuce
journal, September 2015


Identification and validation of promoters and cis-acting regulatory elements
journal, March 2014


A review of ensemble methods for de novo motif discovery in ChIP-Seq data
journal, April 2015

  • Lihu, A.; Holban,  tefan
  • Briefings in Bioinformatics, Vol. 16, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.1093/bib/bbv022

Engineering synthetic regulatory circuits in plants
journal, August 2018


A Gibbs Sampling Method to Detect Overrepresented Motifs in the Upstream Regions of Coexpressed Genes
journal, April 2002

  • Thijs, Gert; Marchal, Kathleen; Lescot, Magali
  • Journal of Computational Biology, Vol. 9, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1089/10665270252935566

EMD: an ensemble algorithm for discovering regulatory motifs in DNA sequences
journal, July 2006

  • Hu, Jianjun; Yang, Yifeng D.; Kihara, Daisuke
  • BMC Bioinformatics, Vol. 7, Issue 1, 342
  • DOI: 10.1186/1471-2105-7-342

Functional dissection of a strong and specific microbe-associated molecular pattern-responsive synthetic promoter
journal, March 2015

  • Lehmeyer, Mona; Kanofsky, Konstantin; Hanko, Erik K. R.
  • Plant Biotechnology Journal, Vol. 14, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1111/pbi.12357

Modulating AtDREB1C Expression Improves Drought Tolerance in Salvia miltiorrhiza
journal, January 2017


Phenotyping transgenic wheat for drought resistance
journal, January 2012

  • Saint Pierre, Carolina; Crossa, José L.; Bonnett, David
  • Journal of Experimental Botany, Vol. 63, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.1093/jxb/err385

Abiotic Stresses Modulate Landscape of Poplar Transcriptome via Alternative Splicing, Differential Intron Retention, and Isoform Ratio Switching
journal, February 2018

  • Filichkin, Sergei A.; Hamilton, Michael; Dharmawardhana, Palitha D.
  • Frontiers in Plant Science, Vol. 9
  • DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2018.00005

Transcriptional regulatory code of a eukaryotic genome
journal, September 2004

  • Harbison, Christopher T.; Gordon, D. Benjamin; Lee, Tong Ihn
  • Nature, Vol. 431, Issue 7004
  • DOI: 10.1038/nature02800

Storage of competent cells for Agrobacterium transformation
journal, January 1988


The MEME Suite
journal, May 2015

  • Bailey, Timothy L.; Johnson, James; Grant, Charles E.
  • Nucleic Acids Research, Vol. 43, Issue W1
  • DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkv416

Practical Strategies for Discovering Regulatory DNA Sequence Motifs
journal, January 2006


Poplar as a feedstock for biofuels: A review of compositional characteristics
journal, March 2010

  • Sannigrahi, Poulomi; Ragauskas, Arthur J.; Tuskan, Gerald A.
  • Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining, Vol. 4, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1002/bbb.206

Inferring gene regulatory logic from high-throughput measurements of thousands of systematically designed promoters
journal, May 2012

  • Sharon, Eilon; Kalma, Yael; Sharp, Ayala
  • Nature Biotechnology, Vol. 30, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.1038/nbt.2205

Optimization of Agrobacterium-mediated genetic transformation of Fraxinus nigra and development of black ash for possible emerald ash borer resistance
journal, April 2018

  • Lee, Jun Hyung; Pijut, Paula M.
  • Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture (PCTOC), Vol. 134, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1007/s11240-018-1414-9

Transcriptomic analysis reveals importance of ROS and phytohormones in response to short-term salinity stress in Populus tomentosa
journal, September 2015


Analysis of Relative Gene Expression Data Using Real-Time Quantitative PCR and the 2−ΔΔCT Method
journal, December 2001


NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis
journal, June 2012

  • Schneider, Caroline A.; Rasband, Wayne S.; Eliceiri, Kevin W.
  • Nature Methods, Vol. 9, Issue 7
  • DOI: 10.1038/nmeth.2089

An Agrobacterium tumefaciens transformation protocol effective on a variety of cottonwood hybrids (genus Populus)
journal, January 2000

  • Han, K.-H.; Meilan, R.; Ma, C.
  • Plant Cell Reports, Vol. 19, Issue 3, p. 315-320
  • DOI: 10.1007/s002990050019

High-throughput analysis of transcriptome variation during water deficit in a poplar hybrid: a general overview
journal, September 2013

  • Cossu, Rosa Maria; Giordani, Tommaso; Cavallini, Andrea
  • Tree Genetics & Genomes, Vol. 10, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1007/s11295-013-0661-5

A Fruitful Decade Using Synthetic Promoters in the Improvement of Transgenic Plants
journal, November 2019


Computational discovery of soybean promoter cis -regulatory elements for the construction of soybean cyst nematode-inducible synthetic promoters
journal, June 2014

  • Liu, Wusheng; Mazarei, Mitra; Peng, Yanhui
  • Plant Biotechnology Journal, Vol. 12, Issue 8
  • DOI: 10.1111/pbi.12206

Promoter activation by ACGT in response to salicylic and abscisic acids is differentially regulated by the spacing between two copies of the motif
journal, September 2010


Quantitative characterization of genetic parts and circuits for plant synthetic biology
journal, November 2015

  • Schaumberg, Katherine A.; Antunes, Mauricio S.; Kassaw, Tessema K.
  • Nature Methods, Vol. 13, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1038/nmeth.3659

Signal Transduction in Maize and Arabidopsis Mesophyll Protoplasts
journal, December 2001


Rational design of minimal synthetic promoters for plants
journal, August 2020

  • Cai, Yao-Min; Kallam, Kalyani; Tidd, Henry
  • Nucleic Acids Research, Vol. 48, Issue 21
  • DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkaa682

Highly Efficient Isolation of Populus Mesophyll Protoplasts and Its Application in Transient Expression Assays
journal, September 2012


The Genome of Black Cottonwood, Populus trichocarpa (Torr. & Gray)
journal, September 2006


Emerging Opportunities for Synthetic Biology in Agriculture
journal, July 2018


Assessing computational tools for the discovery of transcription factor binding sites
journal, January 2005

  • Tompa, Martin; Li, Nan; Bailey, Timothy L.
  • Nature Biotechnology, Vol. 23, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1038/nbt1053

Evaluation of synthetic promoters in Physcomitrella patens
journal, June 2018

  • Peramuna, Anantha; Bae, Hansol; Rasmussen, Erling Koch
  • Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, Vol. 500, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2018.04.092

MYC-type transcription factors, MYC67 and MYC70, interact with ICE1 and negatively regulate cold tolerance in Arabidopsis
journal, August 2018


PLANT COLD ACCLIMATION: Freezing Tolerance Genes and Regulatory Mechanisms
journal, June 1999


Tomato SlDREB gene restricts leaf expansion and internode elongation by downregulating key genes for gibberellin biosynthesis
journal, October 2012

  • Li, Jinhua; Sima, Wei; Ouyang, Bo
  • Journal of Experimental Botany, Vol. 63, Issue 18
  • DOI: 10.1093/jxb/ers295

The Q-System as a Synthetic Transcriptional Regulator in Plants
journal, March 2020

  • Persad, Ramona; Reuter, D. Nikki; Dice, Lezlee T.
  • Frontiers in Plant Science, Vol. 11
  • DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2020.00245

Plant cis-acting regulatory DNA elements (PLACE) database: 1999
journal, January 1999

  • Higo, K.; Ugawa, Y.; Iwamoto, M.
  • Nucleic Acids Research, Vol. 27, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1093/nar/27.1.297

Designer promoter: an artwork of cis engineering
journal, February 2011


Floral dip: a simplified method for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of Arabidopsis thaliana
journal, December 1998


Plant synthetic biology
journal, May 2015


Weeder Web: discovery of transcription factor binding sites in a set of sequences from co-regulated genes
journal, July 2004

  • Pavesi, G.; Mereghetti, P.; Mauri, G.
  • Nucleic Acids Research, Vol. 32, Issue Web Server
  • DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkh465

Populus euphratica: the transcriptomic response to drought stress
journal, July 2013


Identification of functional cis-regulatory elements by sequential enrichment from a randomized synthetic DNA library
journal, January 2013


The BioMart community portal: an innovative alternative to large, centralized data repositories
journal, April 2015

  • Smedley, Damian; Haider, Syed; Durinck, Steffen
  • Nucleic Acids Research, Vol. 43, Issue W1
  • DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkv350

Design of orthogonal regulatory systems for modulating gene expression in plants
journal, May 2020


Revolutionizing agriculture with synthetic biology
journal, November 2019

  • Wurtzel, Eleanore T.; Vickers, Claudia E.; Hanson, Andrew D.
  • Nature Plants, Vol. 5, Issue 12
  • DOI: 10.1038/s41477-019-0539-0

Limitations and potentials of current motif discovery algorithms
journal, September 2005

  • Hu, J.; Li, B.; Kihara, D.
  • Nucleic Acids Research, Vol. 33, Issue 15
  • DOI: 10.1093/nar/gki791

Synthetic promoters in planta
journal, August 2015


The 6xABRE Synthetic Promoter Enables the Spatiotemporal Analysis of ABA-Mediated Transcriptional Regulation
journal, June 2018

  • Wu, Rui; Duan, Lina; Pruneda-Paz, José L.
  • Plant Physiology, Vol. 177, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1104/pp.18.00401

Rapid and reliable extraction of genomic DNA from various wild-type and transgenic plants
journal, September 2004


Plant synthetic promoters and transcription factors
journal, February 2016


Construction of Stress Responsive Synthetic Promoters and Analysis of Their Activity in Transgenic Arabidopsis thaliana
journal, May 2012

  • Hou, Lei; Chen, Longjun; Wang, Junyi
  • Plant Molecular Biology Reporter, Vol. 30, Issue 6, p. 1496-1506
  • DOI: 10.1007/s11105-012-0464-0

Functionality of soybean CBF/DREB1 transcription factors
journal, May 2016


Advanced genetic tools for plant biotechnology
journal, October 2013

  • Liu, Wusheng; Yuan, Joshua S.; Stewart Jr, C. Neal
  • Nature Reviews Genetics, Vol. 14, Issue 11
  • DOI: 10.1038/nrg3583