DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Driving toward sustainable algal fuels: A harmonization of techno-economic and life cycle assessments

Abstract

Research efforts have investigated a range of system designs for algae growth and conversion into biofuels. The economic feasibility and environmental impact of these systems are frequently evaluated through techno-economic analyses (TEA) and life-cycle assessment (LCA), which typically determine the levelized cost of fuel production in gallons of gasoline equivalent (MFSP, in $-gge-1), global warming potential (GWP, in g CO2-eq-MJfuel-1), and net energy ratio (NER, unitless). While the outputs from these models seem comparable, the results often conceal the impact of a large number of assumptions inherent to the modeling, limiting direct comparisons. As such, a direct comparison of the modeling results as published can be misleading due to differences in critical assumptions and/or foundational methodology. This work applies harmonization methodology to several sustainability assessment studies found in the literature with the goal of enhancing comparability through implementation of a standard set of assumptions. For the economic evaluation, two harmonization efforts were performed: the first focused on harmonizing productivity, economic assumptions, and cost year for the entire growth to product process; the second compared only downstream fuel conversion technologies by fixing the biomass cost, thereby removing the uncertainty of upstream-growth assumptions. For LCA, harmonization focused on productivity and system boundary.more » The results of these efforts show a decrease of 43% in the range of reported fuel prices and minimal redcution in the range of LCA results. Both TEA and LCA harmonization efforts then investigated the impact of productivity by simulating a range of biomass productivity values (12.5, 25, and 50 g-m-2 day-1). The work reveals limitations to both the economic and environmental benefits of productivity improvements past approximately 35 g-m-2 day-1. Results highlight the need to redirect research efforts not only to increase productivities, but also to other areas where investments can make a greater impact in terms of economic viability and environmental impact.« less

Authors:
; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Arizona State Univ., Tempe, AZ (United States); Colorado School of Mines, Golden, CO (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)
OSTI Identifier:
1761556
Alternate Identifier(s):
OSTI ID: 1785346; OSTI ID: 1873418
Grant/Contract Number:  
EE0007562; EE0008515; FE0029623; EE0008245
Resource Type:
Published Article
Journal Name:
Algal Research
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Name: Algal Research Journal Volume: 54 Journal Issue: C; Journal ID: ISSN 2211-9264
Publisher:
Elsevier
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
09 BIOMASS FUELS; TEA, LCA, Harmonization; AlgaeGrowth rate; Greenhouse gas emissions; Minimum fuel selling price; Net energy ratio; algae; growth rate; greenhouse gas; minimum fuel selling price; net energy ratio

Citation Formats

Cruce, Jesse R., Beattie, Audrey, Chen, Peter, Quiroz, David, Somers, Michael, Compton, Samuel, DeRose, Katherine, Beckstrom, Braden, and Quinn, Jason C. Driving toward sustainable algal fuels: A harmonization of techno-economic and life cycle assessments. United States: N. p., 2021. Web. doi:10.1016/j.algal.2020.102169.
Cruce, Jesse R., Beattie, Audrey, Chen, Peter, Quiroz, David, Somers, Michael, Compton, Samuel, DeRose, Katherine, Beckstrom, Braden, & Quinn, Jason C. Driving toward sustainable algal fuels: A harmonization of techno-economic and life cycle assessments. United States. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.algal.2020.102169
Cruce, Jesse R., Beattie, Audrey, Chen, Peter, Quiroz, David, Somers, Michael, Compton, Samuel, DeRose, Katherine, Beckstrom, Braden, and Quinn, Jason C. Thu . "Driving toward sustainable algal fuels: A harmonization of techno-economic and life cycle assessments". United States. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.algal.2020.102169.
@article{osti_1761556,
title = {Driving toward sustainable algal fuels: A harmonization of techno-economic and life cycle assessments},
author = {Cruce, Jesse R. and Beattie, Audrey and Chen, Peter and Quiroz, David and Somers, Michael and Compton, Samuel and DeRose, Katherine and Beckstrom, Braden and Quinn, Jason C.},
abstractNote = {Research efforts have investigated a range of system designs for algae growth and conversion into biofuels. The economic feasibility and environmental impact of these systems are frequently evaluated through techno-economic analyses (TEA) and life-cycle assessment (LCA), which typically determine the levelized cost of fuel production in gallons of gasoline equivalent (MFSP, in $-gge-1), global warming potential (GWP, in g CO2-eq-MJfuel-1), and net energy ratio (NER, unitless). While the outputs from these models seem comparable, the results often conceal the impact of a large number of assumptions inherent to the modeling, limiting direct comparisons. As such, a direct comparison of the modeling results as published can be misleading due to differences in critical assumptions and/or foundational methodology. This work applies harmonization methodology to several sustainability assessment studies found in the literature with the goal of enhancing comparability through implementation of a standard set of assumptions. For the economic evaluation, two harmonization efforts were performed: the first focused on harmonizing productivity, economic assumptions, and cost year for the entire growth to product process; the second compared only downstream fuel conversion technologies by fixing the biomass cost, thereby removing the uncertainty of upstream-growth assumptions. For LCA, harmonization focused on productivity and system boundary. The results of these efforts show a decrease of 43% in the range of reported fuel prices and minimal redcution in the range of LCA results. Both TEA and LCA harmonization efforts then investigated the impact of productivity by simulating a range of biomass productivity values (12.5, 25, and 50 g-m-2 day-1). The work reveals limitations to both the economic and environmental benefits of productivity improvements past approximately 35 g-m-2 day-1. Results highlight the need to redirect research efforts not only to increase productivities, but also to other areas where investments can make a greater impact in terms of economic viability and environmental impact.},
doi = {10.1016/j.algal.2020.102169},
journal = {Algal Research},
number = C,
volume = 54,
place = {United States},
year = {Thu Apr 01 00:00:00 EDT 2021},
month = {Thu Apr 01 00:00:00 EDT 2021}
}

Works referenced in this record:

Life-cycle assessment of biohythane production via two-stage anaerobic fermentation from microalgae and food waste
journal, September 2019


Life cycle assessment on microalgal biodiesel production using a hybrid cultivation system
journal, July 2014


Life cycle assessment of algae biodiesel and its co-products
journal, January 2016


Economic viability of multiple algal biorefining pathways and the impact of public policies
journal, January 2019


Lifecycle assessment of microalgae to biofuel: Comparison of thermochemical processing pathways
journal, September 2015


Life cycle assessment of bio-jet fuel from hydrothermal liquefaction of microalgae
journal, June 2014


Combined algal processing: A novel integrated biorefinery process to produce algal biofuels and bioproducts
journal, November 2016


Towards industrial products from microalgae
journal, January 2016

  • Ruiz, Jesús; Olivieri, Giuseppe; de Vree, Jeroen
  • Energy & Environmental Science, Vol. 9, Issue 10
  • DOI: 10.1039/C6EE01493C

The potential of microalgae biorefineries in Belgium and India: An environmental techno-economic assessment
journal, November 2018


Meta-analysis and Harmonization of Life Cycle Assessment Studies for Algae Biofuels
journal, August 2017

  • Tu, Qingshi; Eckelman, Matthew; Zimmerman, Julie
  • Environmental Science & Technology, Vol. 51, Issue 17
  • DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.7b01049

Integrating uncertainties to the combined environmental and economic assessment of algal biorefineries: A Monte Carlo approach
journal, June 2018


Techno-economic analysis of ash removal in biomass harvested from algal turf scrubbers
journal, April 2019


Economic comparison of open pond raceways to photo bio-reactors for profitable production of algae for transportation fuels in the Southwest
journal, May 2012


Life cycle evaluation of microalgae biofuels production: Effect of cultivation system on energy, carbon emission and cost balance analysis
journal, October 2019


Geographical Assessment of Microalgae Biofuels Potential Incorporating Resource Availability
journal, November 2012


Techno-economic analysis of autotrophic microalgae for fuel production
journal, October 2011


Microalgae to biofuels: Life cycle impacts of methane production of anaerobically digested lipid extracted algae
journal, November 2014


Life Cycle GHG Emissions from Microalgal Biodiesel – A CA-GREET Model
journal, May 2014

  • Woertz, Ian C.; Benemann, John R.; Du, Niu
  • Environmental Science & Technology, Vol. 48, Issue 11
  • DOI: 10.1021/es403768q

Harvesting and extraction technology contributions to algae biofuels economic viability
journal, July 2014


Life cycle assessment of microalgae production in a raceway pond with alternative culture media
journal, June 2018

  • Schneider, Rosana de Cassia de Souza; de Moura Lima, Marcelo; Hoeltz, Michele
  • Algal Research, Vol. 32
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.algal.2018.04.012

Biodiesel from microalgae – Life cycle assessment and recommendations for potential improvements
journal, November 2014


Environmental Performance of Algal Biofuel Technology Options
journal, February 2012

  • Vasudevan, Venkatesh; Stratton, Russell W.; Pearlson, Matthew N.
  • Environmental Science & Technology, Vol. 46, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1021/es2026399

An Outlook on Microalgal Biofuels
journal, August 2010


Microalgae biodiesel production in China: A preliminary economic analysis
journal, April 2019


Techno-economic assessment of carbon-negative algal biodiesel for transport solutions
journal, June 2013


Net Energy and Greenhouse Gas Emission Evaluation of Biodiesel Derived from Microalgae
journal, October 2010

  • Batan, Liaw; Quinn, Jason; Willson, Bryan
  • Environmental Science & Technology, Vol. 44, Issue 20
  • DOI: 10.1021/es102052y

Algae biodiesel life cycle assessment using current commercial data
journal, November 2013


Environmental and Sustainability Factors Associated With Next-Generation Biofuels in the U.S.: What Do We Really Know?
journal, July 2009

  • Williams, Pamela R. D.; Inman, Daniel; Aden, Andy
  • Environmental Science & Technology, Vol. 43, Issue 13
  • DOI: 10.1021/es900250d

Techno-economic assessment of open microalgae production systems
journal, April 2017


Algae biodiesel has potential despite inconclusive results to date
journal, January 2012


CO 2 Life-Cycle Assessment of the Production of Algae-Based Liquid Fuel Compared to Crude Oil to Diesel
journal, March 2016


An economic, sustainability, and energetic model of biodiesel production from microalgae
journal, May 2012


The potential of microalgae in biodiesel production
journal, July 2018


Hydrothermal liquefaction of biomass: Developments from batch to continuous process
journal, February 2015


An updated comprehensive techno-economic analysis of algae biodiesel
journal, October 2013


Sustainability of carbon delivery to an algal biorefinery: A techno-economic and life-cycle assessment
journal, March 2019


Life-cycle analysis of energy use, greenhouse gas emissions, and water consumption in the 2016 MYPP algal biofuel scenarios
report, June 2016

  • Frank, Edward; Pegallapati, Ambica K.; Davis, Ryan
  • ANL/ESD--16/11
  • DOI: 10.2172/1281137

Techno-economic evaluation of microalgae harvesting and dewatering systems
journal, April 2018


Comparative cost analysis of algal oil production for biofuels
journal, August 2011


Resource demand implications for US algae biofuels production scale-up
journal, October 2011


Early-Stage Capital Cost Estimation of Biorefinery Processes: A Comparative Study of Heuristic Techniques
journal, August 2016

  • Tsagkari, Mirela; Couturier, Jean-Luc; Kokossis, Antonis
  • ChemSusChem, Vol. 9, Issue 17
  • DOI: 10.1002/cssc.201600309

Microalgae for biodiesel production and other applications: A review
journal, January 2010

  • Mata, Teresa M.; Martins, António A.; Caetano, Nidia. S.
  • Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Vol. 14, Issue 1, p. 217-232
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2009.07.020

Microalgae biofuels: A comparative study on techno-economic analysis & life-cycle assessment
journal, December 2016


Life cycle assessment of algal biofuels: Influence of feedstock cultivation systems and conversion platforms
journal, April 2014


The future viability of algae-derived biodiesel under economic and technical uncertainties
journal, January 2014


Techno-economic and life-cycle assessment of an attached growth algal biorefinery
journal, November 2016


Life Cycle Assessment of Biofuels from Algae Hydrothermal Liquefaction: The Upstream and Downstream Factors Affecting Regulatory Compliance
journal, February 2015

  • Connelly, Elizabeth B.; Colosi, Lisa M.; Clarens, Andres F.
  • Energy & Fuels, Vol. 29, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1021/ef502100f

Effects of system design and Co-product treatment strategies on the life cycle performance of biofuels from microalgae
journal, September 2019


Energy use and greenhouse gas emissions from an algae fractionation process for producing renewable diesel
journal, September 2016


Second Generation Biofuels: High-Efficiency Microalgae for Biodiesel Production
journal, March 2008


Greenhouse gas emissions and energy balance of biodiesel production from microalgae cultivated in photobioreactors in Denmark: a life-cycle modeling
journal, January 2016


Life cycle assessment of biodiesel production from algal bio-crude oils extracted under subcritical water conditions
journal, October 2014


Microalgae to biofuels lifecycle assessment — Multiple pathway evaluation
journal, April 2014


Life cycle assessment and nutrient analysis of various processing pathways in algal biofuel production
journal, April 2017


Life Cycle Impacts and Techno-economic Implications of Flash Hydrolysis in Algae Processing
journal, February 2018

  • Bessette, Andrew P.; Teymouri, Ali; Martin, Mason J.
  • ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering, Vol. 6, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b03912

Economic evaluation of algae biodiesel based on meta-analyses
journal, August 2015


Techno-economic analysis of microalgal biomass production in a 1-ha Green Wall Panel (GWP®) plant
journal, November 2016


Quantitative Uncertainty Analysis of Life Cycle Assessment for Algal Biofuel Production
journal, December 2012

  • Sills, Deborah L.; Paramita, Vidia; Franke, Michael J.
  • Environmental Science & Technology, Vol. 47, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1021/es3029236