Reply to Comment by Mandel et al. on “Numerically Bounded Linguistic Probability Schemes Are Unlikely to Communicate Uncertainty Effectively”

Journal Article · 07 October 2020 · Earth's Future

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1029/2020ef001757 · OSTI ID:1760027

King, Andrew D.  ^[1]; Perkins‐Kirkpatrick, Sarah E.  ^[2]; Wehner, Michael F.  ^[3]; Lewis, Sophie C.  ^[4]

---

1. Univ. of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC (Australia). ARC Centre of Excellence for Climate Extremes and School of Earth Science
2. Univ. of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW (Australia). ARC Centre of Excellence for Climate Extremes and Climate Change Research Centre
3. Lawrence Berkeley National Lab. (LBNL), Berkeley, CA (United States)
4. ACT Commissioner for Sustainability and the Environment, Canberra, ACT (Australia)

We thank the Comment's authors for their considered critique of our paper. We respond to their main criticisms and hope that this discussion motivates further consideration of communication strategies for event attribution analyses.

• Research Organization: Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL), Berkeley, CA (United States)
• Sponsoring Organization: USDOE Office of Science (SC), Biological and Environmental Research (BER); USDOE
• Grant/Contract Number: AC02-05CH11231; DE‐AC02‐05CH11231
• OSTI ID: 1760027
• Alternate ID(s): OSTI ID: 1786850; OSTI ID: 1827915
• Journal Information: Earth's Future, Vol. 9, Issue 1; ISSN 2328-4277
• Publisher: American Geophysical Union (AGU)Copyright Statement
• Country of Publication: United States
• Language: English